
This July 4th, here's how my family earned the right to be called ‘Americans'
My father gave up everything — not to receive assistance or special treatment, but to pursue a future based on freedom and merit. He scrubbed toilets, worked night shifts and shared a home with my grandparents and relatives. My father never complained or requested handouts. He simply sought the opportunity to build a future through hard work and dignity.
My family followed the legal process. We filed paperwork, paid the required fees, attended government interviews, passed the citizenship exam and, ultimately, swore an oath of loyalty to the United States of America. That's the American way: not cutting the line or breaking the law but earning your place through sacrifice and assimilation.
Today, however, the American Dream is being redefined and undermined by those who treat it as an entitlement rather than an achievement.
The modern Democratic Party has turned legal immigration into a punchline, offering citizenship to those who circumvent the law. By blurring the line between legal and illegal, they betray the ideals they claim to uphold.
Not all immigrants are the same. Consider Albert Einstein, who fled Nazi persecution and changed the course of science. Elon Musk, who left South Africa, worked his way through school and helped revolutionize technology and space. Madeleine Albright, who escaped communist tyranny and became the first female United States Secretary of State. Each of these individuals earned their place in America through allegiance, contribution and sacrifice.
Contrast their legacy with that of Victor Martínez Hernández, who murdered Rachel Morin after multiple illegal entries into the country. Or Sebastian Zapeta Calil, who was accused of setting a woman on fire in a New York subway. Or Lina Maria Orovio Hernandez, who was accused of stealing more than $400,000 in taxpayer-funded benefits and illegally voting in the 2024 election. These are not the same stories, and the law must reflect that reality.
Millions of legal immigrants, like my family, followed the rules. We waited, worked and learned English. We assimilated. In contrast, under Democrats' broken border policies, millions entered the United States unlawfully — without documentation, vetting or any intention of becoming Americans in the fullest sense.
The threat is greater than most admit. We're facing an invasion of unvetted individuals — many of them fighting-aged men from China, Iran and violent regions of the Middle East. Human traffickers and cartels are ransoming, enslaving and assaulting women and children who trusted them to reach the U.S.
Democrats' open-border policies have fueled this black market of terror. This isn't just a failure — it's a national security crisis and a humanitarian disaster. And to those who say, "They're just here to work" — motives don't excuse breaking the law.
Desiring a better life is no excuse to break the law. Every illegal entry disregards those who pursued citizenship the right way. Rewarding such behavior — through sanctuary status, government benefits or expedited citizenship — sends a dangerous and deeply unjust message: that laws are optional, and that effort is irrelevant.
The consequences are real. Working-class Americans bear the cost — overcrowded hospitals and schools, higher housing prices and declining safety. This isn't compassion; it's injustice. The rhetoric of "equity" has been weaponized to build a new caste system — where legal immigrants and law-abiding citizens are pushed aside, while lawbreakers are elevated and subsidized. This isn't fairness. It's a grab for power.
I take pride in my Indian heritage — but I'm even prouder to be an American. Citizenship isn't just a status; it's a sacred commitment to defend the Constitution, uphold the law, and give more than you take. It means standing in line, abiding by the rules, and embracing both the duties and blessings of this country.
Because I embraced America, it embraced me. I became a lawyer, media commentator, served in national security and the Ohio Governor's Office, and became Ohio's first female sports agent — all thanks to a legal, merit-based system now under siege.
Democrats' open-border policies have fueled this black market of terror. This isn't just a failure — it's a national security crisis and a humanitarian disaster. And to those who say, "They're just here to work" — motives don't excuse breaking the law.
Legal immigrants across America are rejecting the left's false promises. In 2016, President Donald Trump won 36% of the legal immigrant vote. By 2024, it rose to 47%. Even CNN can't spin it. Why? Because we're tired of being ignored, disrespected, and erased. We won't stay silent as our story is co-opted.
This Independence Day, remember freedom isn't free and neither is citizenship. Both must be earned.
To every legal immigrant who followed the law: this country sees you, values you, and needs you. You're not a footnote in America's story. You're its backbone. We won't let that legacy be stolen.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Unilever cuts off funding for Ben & Jerry's foundation amid tensions over Gaza, audit
Unilever is cutting off millions in funding for Ben & Jerry's charitable foundation after it refused to provide audit documents, escalating what has become a microcosm for corporate 'woke' wars. Peter ter Kulve, who runs Unilever's ice cream business, told Ben & Jerry's executives in an email that the foundation's trustees 'have continued to resist basic oversight' and are not cooperating with requests from corporate auditors ahead of the ice cream business' spinoff from Unilever. The probe into the foundation began in part because of its giving to pro-Palestinian organizations, Semafor reported earlier this year. 'It represents a marked departure from the norms of charitable organizations, for whom transparency is typically a bedrock operating principle,' ter Kulve wrote in the email, which was seen by Semafor. The Ben & Jerry's foundation distributed more than $5 million of Unilever's money in 2022, to mostly progressive organizations, and has done so ever since the quirky, left-leaning Vermont creamery was acquired by the corporate giant in 2000. Since then, Ben & Jerry's politics have been a headache for its parent, and the tensions between the two have grown more acute as the business community got swept into the culture wars — first pulled to the left in the mid-2010s, then retreating rightward under the second Trump administration. Ter Kulve wrote that management of the soon-to-be standalone ice cream company had met with foundation trustees and 'consistently sought to accommodate concerns' they raised, including switching audit firms and promising to keep certain information about grantees private. 'The Foundation is a powerful force for good and has played a meaningful role in advancing the Ben & Jerry's social mission,' ter Kulve told executives. 'We remain committed to that mission.' Representatives for Unilever and Ben & Jerry's did not respond to a request for comment. A lawyer for the foundation's trustees didn't immediately comment. Unilever decided to spin off its ice cream business last year. The audit of Ben and Jerry's foundation was part of that process. But it has devolved into a turf war between Unilever and the foundation, whose trustees claim their parent company is using the transaction as a pretense to attack its charitable giving. The troubles date back to at least 2021, when Ben & Jerry's said it would stop selling its products in Israeli-occupied Palestinian territories. Unilever sold the regional Ben & Jerry's license in response. Ben & Jerry's independent directors sued Unilever in November, accusing their parent company of silencing the ice cream maker's statements in support of Palestinian refugees. Other court documents allege that Unilever muzzled Ben & Jerry's social media posts that mentioned President Donald Trump, Elon Musk, and Nelson Peltz, the billionaire investor and Unilever director who introduced the president to Musk. Activist Robbie Starbuck told Semafor earlier this year he was planning a lobbying group to pressure corporate America to drop DEI targets, to prevent 'a situation where we have totally parallel economies,' with blue brands and red brands, because it's 'going to hurt our economy.'
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
S&P 500 futures and dollar dip as Trump revives tariff tension
Equity-index futures fell and the dollar dipped after President Trump said his administration may start sending out letters imposing unilateral tariffs on trading partners as early as Friday. Ahead of his July 9 deadline for trade negotiations, the U.S. President told reporters on Thursday: 'We're probably going to be sending some letters out, starting probably tomorrow, maybe 10 a day to various countries saying what they're going to pay to do business with the U.S.' Now that the megabill has passed, expect a ton of short-term debt to be sold to finance the government's deficit 'I'm single': At 70, I have $500,000 in stocks and $220,000 in savings. How do I invest my $130,000 windfall? 'Today is my 61st birthday': I have my ex-spouse's Social Security benefits. Should I retire at 65 and travel? 'I do all the yard work, cooking and cleaning': I live with my daughter and her lazy boyfriend. She wants me to buy her house. Do I say yes? My wife and I are in our late 60s. Do I sell stocks to pay our $30,000 credit-card debt — or do it gradually over 3 years? U.S. stocks closed at record highs following a holiday-shortened session on Thursday. The S&P 500 SPX has surged 26% from its April low as investors welcomed Trump's retreat from his original draconian tariff strategy announced on April 2 that pushed import levies to 131-year highs. However, the President's latest comments suggest few trade deals are likely to be struck before the April 9 deadline and now markets face increased tariff uncertainty once again. Jim Reid, strategist at Deutsche Bank, noted that Trump later also said that the imposed tariffs, which may come into effect on August 1, could range in value from 10% to maybe 60 or 70%. 'So definitely one to keep an eye on, as the difference in that range would have significant economic implications for the various countries,' said Reid. U.S. equity and bond markets are closed for the Independence Day break, but stock-index futures are active, and the E-mini S&P 500 contract ES00 was 0.6% lower in early Friday action, with traders shrugging off news that the Republican's big tax-cutting bill had been passed. The U.S. dollar fell, down 0.4% versus the Japanese yen USDJPY, and losing 0.2% against the euro EURUSD. Global stock markets were mostly on the back foot, despite Wall Street's overnight record, with those countries arguably more vulnerable to a higher unilateral Trump tariff under most pressure. South Korea's KOSPI Composite Index KR:180721 fell 2%, while Germany's DAX DX:DAX was down 0.7% and the CAC 40 FR:PX1 in France lost 0.9% by mid afternoon in Europe. '[R]isk sentiment is draining from markets,' said Kathleen Brooks, research director at XTB. 'President Trump seems to have called time on trade negotiations before next Wednesday's deadline…This suggests that at this late stage he is willing to play hardball rather than negotiate,' she added. Concerns that higher tariffs across a broad range of countries would stymie trade and weaken the global economy saw copper futures HG00 fall 1.6% and oil futures CL.1 drop 1.3%. 'Optimism is evaporating at the end of the week, as the U.S. tariff deadline looms and the signs are that many countries will face higher duties than expected,' said Susannah Streeter, head of money and markets at Hargreaves Lansdown. The mildly risk-off tone caused bitcoin BTCUSD to slip 0.8% but saw gold GC00 give up early gains to trade little changed at around $3,342 an ounce. My wife and I have $7,000 a month in pensions and Social Security, plus $140,000 cash. Can we afford to retire? 'Finance makes me break out in hives': I inherited $240K from my parents. Do I pay off my $258K mortgage and give up my job? The Dow and Russell 2000 are joining the stock market's party. Is it a game changer for the bulls? My job is offering me a payout. Should I take a $61,000 lump sum — or $355 a month for life? We're living in 'end times' when you can't retire on $1 million Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Forbes
23 minutes ago
- Forbes
General Stanley McChrystal: What It Takes To Live A Life Of Character
Retired four-star general Stanley McChrystal Another book on character? Yes, that's what I thought when I saw the title of Stanley McChrystal's newest book, titled On Character: Choices That Define a Life. When I heard General McChrystal speak about his new book and then read it, I realized it was different from many other books on the topic. Why? Because McChrystal, a retired four-star general, combat commander and West Point graduate, has lived it. He is also not afraid to call himself out when he has been deficient. Many will remember that McChrystal offered President Barack Obama his resignation when an article in Rolling Stone magazine about his unit featured some negative comments about then-Vice President Biden and frustration with the administration's handling of the war in Afghanistan. McCrystal, as he had been taught to do, took full responsibility. Obama accepted his resignation. After more than 30 years of service, McChrystal was out of a job, a career, and a life that began as an Army brat born while his father was serving in Germany. That abrupt change is character-building. What character means And so when McChrystal addresses what it takes to lead with character, he knows of what he speaks – as the subtitle says: 'choices that define a life.' Character is the spine that steels the spine in times of adversity and heals the soul in times of trial. The idea for the book came from Annie McChrystal, his wife, herself the daughter of an Army officer. She nudged him to put down the many thoughts he had expressed to her over many conversations. As a result, the book has a discursive feel but is also very personal. There are three sections to the book: Conviction – beliefs upon which character forms Discipline – the ability to follow through on what we believe Character – the structure of life, e.g., "what we are willing to tolerate and what we are not." This troika casts the notion of character as foundational, practical and resilient. Getting personal There is a touching part of the book, one he spoke about to Amna Nawaz on PBS NewsHour. He admits he was not a good father because he put his career first. As he said, his son started high school when he went to Afghanistan, and then he went to Iraq and Afghanistan, where his son was in college. "I wasn't a great father,' he writes in his book. 'In retrospect, I regret things I didn't do as a father, but, thankfully, avoided doing many things I would have regretted. If I could do it all again, I believe I would be a better father, but I don't believe Sam could be a better son." Fortunately, as McChrystal tells Nawaz, 'The beauty is, I get a second chance, because my son lives next door to me now, along with my granddaughters. So, I see him every day. We have a very close relationship. But you can't make up for things you didn't do.' That's a measure of character—facing the reality of the past while doing better in the present. Again, these are "choices that define a life" of self-awareness, integrity and truthfulness. One of the reasons McChrystal wrote about character—and something he has reiterated on media appearances related to this book—is his desire to promote a national discussion of the role of character in society. Character is fundamental to leadership; without it, leadership is a position without moral conviction. Character, or rather the lack of it, is on full display in our culture when we see people in positions of power advocate for themselves rather than for those they are supposed to lead. Living character In their book Character Is Destiny, John McCain and co-author Mark Salter write, 'Our character is a lifelong project, and perhaps the older we are, and the more fixed our shortcomings are, the more we can use inspiration to encourage our escape from the restraints of our deficiencies.' Character is not being 'holier than thou.' Character emerges from the frailty of the human psyche. It is a recognition rooted in self-awareness, knowing your strengths as well as your shortcomings. With that knowledge of imperfection, you live your life rooted in universal truths and lead your life in the practice of doing better for others.