logo
‘Physical threat' from Iran has ‘increased significantly', watchdog finds

‘Physical threat' from Iran has ‘increased significantly', watchdog finds

Leader Live2 days ago
In a report published on Thursday, Parliament's Intelligence and Security Committee described the threat from Iran as 'persistent' and 'unpredictable'.
The committee found the 'physical threat' from Iran had 'significantly increased', focused on Iranian dissidents and Jewish and Israeli interests, and was now 'comparable with the threat posed by Russia'.
It also warned that the nuclear threat from Iran had increased since the US withdrew from a key international agreement in 2018, arguing that de-escalation 'must be a priority'.
The report from the nine-member committee, which scrutinises the work of Britain's intelligence agencies, only covers the period up to August 2023 and publication was delayed by last year's election.
Between the beginning of 2022 and the end of the committee's evidence-gathering in August 2023, the report found there had been at least 15 attempts at murder or kidnap against British nationals or UK residents.
The committee urged the Government to make clear to Tehran that such attempts would 'constitute an attack on the UK and would receive the appropriate response'.
Committee chairman Lord Beamish said: 'Iran poses a wide-ranging, persistent and unpredictable threat to the UK, UK nationals and UK interests'.
Describing Iran's 'high appetite for risk when conducting offensive activity', he added: 'As the committee was told, Iran is there across the full spectrum of all the kinds of threats we have to be concerned with.'
His committee also recommended that the Government consider whether it was 'legally possible and practicable' to proscribe Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as a terrorist organisation and make a full statement to Parliament on the issue.
Ministers have faced calls in recent years to ban the IRGC, but the committee recognised there were 'complexities inherent' in such a decision.
Since August 2023, the international picture has changed with the outbreak of war following Hamas's attack on Israel in October of that year.
The war has seen Iranian proxies such as Hamas and Hezbollah weakened, while last month the US and Israel carried out air strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities over concerns Tehran was close to developing a nuclear weapon.
But the committee insisted that, despite these changes, its recommendations remained 'relevant'.
The committee warned that, while Iran had neither developed a nuclear weapon nor decided to produce one by August 2023, it had taken steps towards that goal in recent years.
It found that Iran had been 'broadly compliant' with the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) that limited its nuclear ambitions.
But since the US under Donald Trump withdrew from the deal in 2018, the threat of a nuclear Iran had increased and Tehran 'had the capability to arm in a relatively short period'.
It also warned that the UK remained a target for Iranian espionage, which it found was 'narrower in scope and scale' and 'less sophisticated' than the threat from Russia and China.
And while Iran had engaged in political interference activity, it said this had had 'a negligible effect'.
But the report cautioned that Iran-backed cultural and educational centres such as the Islamic Centre of England could be being used to 'promote violent and extremist ideology'.
The committee said it was also 'essential' to 'raise the resilience bar' on cybersecurity across the UK in the face of Iran's willingness to carry out digital attacks.
Regarding the Government's response to the Iranian threat, the committee warned that policy had 'suffered from a focus on crisis management' over Iran's nuclear programme and lacked 'longer-term thinking'.
It also criticised a 'lack of Iran-specific expertise', saying there was 'seemingly no interest in building a future pipeline of specialists'.
One witness told the committee: 'If you have people running policy in the Foreign Office who don't speak a word of Persian, then that is a fat lot of good.'
The committee also noted that the UK had sanctioned 508 individuals and 1,189 individuals relating to Iran by August 2023, but urged the Government to reconsider whether sanctions 'will in practice deliver behavioural change or in fact unhelpfully push Iran towards China'.
But it welcomed the decision to place Iran in the 'enhanced tier' of the new Foreign Influence Registration Scheme, placing extra burdens on people acting on Tehran's behalf in the UK.
A UK Government spokesperson said: 'This independent report demonstrates the vital work our security and intelligence agencies do countering threats posed by states such as Iran.
'This Government will take action wherever necessary to protect national security, which is a foundation of our plan for change.
'We have already placed Iran on the enhanced tier of the foreign influence registration scheme and introduced further sanctions against individuals and entities linked to Iran, bringing the total number of sanctions to 450.
'We thank the committee for its diligent work and will respond fully in due course.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mhairi Black: UK is following a familiar script over Gaza
Mhairi Black: UK is following a familiar script over Gaza

The National

time42 minutes ago

  • The National

Mhairi Black: UK is following a familiar script over Gaza

On Thursday, at least 15 Palestinians – of which eight were children – were killed in an Israeli strike while queuing for nutritional supplements in front of a clinic in central Gaza. For more than 20 months, Israel has decimated Gaza with unconditional and unrestrained bombardment, and has created a man-made famine. Israeli strikes have continually targeted schools, hospitals and aid centres – all of which constitute war crimes. Yet, if you watched the UK news over the last two weeks, you might think the biggest horror facing the world right now was two bands performing at Glastonbury. READ MORE: TRNSMT main stage act calls out politicians' attempts to cancel Kneecap A report from Al Jazeera said there are satellite images showing Israeli plans to create a concentration camp in southern Gaza. The images show large tracts of land being cleared of buildings in preparation for the forced transfer of Palestinians. We know to expect this since Israel's defence minister has said it is its intention to forcibly move the entire population of Gaza – more than two million people – out of their homes. Given the atrocities inflicted upon Jewish people during the Second World War, you would expect there to be a natural degree of horror at the thought of building new concentration camps, and forcibly seeking to move or destroy an entire group of people. Of course, there is a deep history and link between the experiences and historic persecution of Jews and the creation of the state of Israel. However, it is crucial to remember that Israel is exactly that – a state. It is not a religion. Yet, our leaders in Britain continually capitulate to the idea that to criticise the actions of the Israeli government in any way is antisemitic. For example, the BBC claims to be an impartial source of news and a beacon of free speech, yet was more than happy to de-platform the unapologetically pro-Palestine band Kneecap on the basis that they are pro-Palestine. The BBC also apologised for broadcasting punk rap duo Bob Vylan's performance after the singer's 'death to the IDF' chants. You may find this distasteful or even violent but it is not antisemitic. The IDF is a military organisation, not a religion. It is a war machine used by Israel to commit war crimes. Calling for an end to a military organisation that consistently murders innocent civilians fleeing violence perpetrated against them by that very military organisation should not be controversial. The very fact that Keir Starmer, Kemi Badenoch and Nigel Farage are all more outraged about bands playing Glastonbury than they are at the genocide of the people of Gaza is as barbaric as it is illogical. READ MORE: Protests against Palestine Action ban set to take place this weekend However, when you consider the history of Britain's actions in the world, maybe it is logical? Its history is littered with examples of invading foreign countries to force our will and propaganda onto them, while extracting and profiteering from their wealth and resources at their expense. Any domestic resistance to this exploitation has always been immediately labelled as terrorism. Even if we only consider events from living memory, there were the mass arrests, torture and murders of Mau Mau leaders in Kenya in the 1950s. Up until 1960, in Malaya (now Malaysia), British forces herded hundreds of thousands of people into fortified camps. They heavily bombed rural areas, tortured and murdered innocent civilians for no reason other than to preserve the colonial profits Britain enjoyed from Malaya's rubber and tin. Cocoa and oil were extracted from Nigeria through exploitation. In South Africa, black labour was responsible for British diamond profits under apartheid. In Canada and Australia, indigenous kids were forcibly removed from their families to learn how to live 'sophisticatedly'. The UK's military interventions in Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan just so happened to coincide with our oil and gas interests. Through the actions in both Ireland and India, we know that Britain is no stranger to creating a man-made famine. Britain has always been the portrait of privilege built by the pain of others. Modern-day Britain refuses to acknowledge or learn from the racist and imperialist mistakes of the past, mainly because those in power do not view them as mistakes. Our history is soaked with elitism, and the blood and tears of foreign generations whose toil sustained that elitism. The UK still thinks of itself as an imperial world power, able to divvy up land and resources to whoever it pleases, when the reality is that the world has moved on. Today – July 12 – Northern Ireland will see multiple Orange marches similar to the ones held in the west of Scotland last week. READ MORE: How TRNSMT's gender balance is shaping up in 2025 – see the graphs It is difficult to take Starmer and John Swinney seriously when they call for bands like Kneecap and Bob Vylan to be cancelled for an alleged, perceived religious intolerance when they criticise Israel when, simultaneously, local councils are granting marching licences for an organisation whose followers routinely sing chants about being 'up to their knees in Fenian blood', and have built a bonfire with a mock migrant boat filled with brown faces at the very top waiting to be set alight. The hypocrisy and double standards are bewildering. Maybe it is time to stop looking for logic and instead look for – and reward – honesty and bravery.

Pubs in Scotland continue to struggle despite heatwave boost for businesses
Pubs in Scotland continue to struggle despite heatwave boost for businesses

Daily Record

timean hour ago

  • Daily Record

Pubs in Scotland continue to struggle despite heatwave boost for businesses

EXCLUSIVE: Hospitality chiefs have called on the SNP Government to reform the business rates system which puts bars north of the Border at a "competitive disadvantage" to those in England. Pubs across Scotland are continuing to struggle due to rising costs despite enjoying a bumper weekend as a heatwave grips the country. Hospitality chiefs have today called on the SNP Government to reform the business rates system which puts bars north of the Border at a "competitive disadvantage" compared to those in England. ‌ UKHospitality Scotland, which represents members of the licensed trade, said the industry was being squeezed by sky-high energy bills and the impact of employer National Insurance contributions (NICs) being hiked by the UK Government. ‌ The trade body warned pubs and bars were now shedding jobs as a result of the NIC hike and is demanding a rethink ahead of the autumn Budget. Pubs are currently closing across Britain at a rate of one a day. The Record previously revealed how 56 bars closed for good in Scotland last year, compared to 42 that shut down in 2023. Around 1,000 pubs have closed north of the border over the last 20 years, with the total dropping from the more than 5,000 operating in 2004. In a letter to Keir Starmer, the trade body warned the 2024 Budget had directly contributed to a reversal in hospitality's ability to create jobs. Between October 2024 and May 2025, the sector lost 69,000 jobs across the UK. In the same period the previous year, hospitality created an additional 18,000 jobs. Leon Thompson, Executive Director of UKHospitality Scotland, said: "The damaging impact of increasing employer National Insurance contributions (NICs) is being felt by businesses and teams across Scotland, with thousands of Scottish hospitality jobs undoubtedly lost since the Budget. "While the damage caused by employer NICs was a decision made in Westminster, we still need Holyrood to step up and back our businesses with vital support. ‌ "The Scottish Government needs to speed up in delivering its promise to reform the broken business rates system, before it's too late and Scottish businesses are put at a further competitive disadvantage to those in England. "It's also critical that the Scottish Government maintains and extends business rates relief for the sector at the Scottish Budget later this year - this is the lifeline our venues need." Kate Nicholls, chair of UKHospitality, said: "In the years following the financial crisis we created one in five net new jobs and today employ 3.5 million people. The Government needs sectors like hospitality to create jobs and meet their ambition to get more people back into work. ‌ "We have a proven track record of being able to deliver those jobs in every part of the country and for people from all backgrounds. "The NICs change was socially regressive and had a disproportionate effect on entry level jobs." Shona Robison, the Finance Secretary, said: "Businesses are being hit by the impact of the UK Government's decision to raise employers' National Insurance contributions and rising energy costs continue to bite hard. "While many levers to grow Scotland's economy lie with the UK Government, we are providing a package of non-domestic rates reliefs worth an estimated £733 million in 2025-26, including 40% relief – capped at £110,000 per business – for hospitality premises liable for the Basic Property Rate. "Around half of properties in the retail, hospitality and leisure sectors also continue to be eligible for 100% Small Business Bonus Scheme relief – the most generous small business rates relief in the UK.'

Immigration officials can't detain people based on race, speaking Spanish in Los Angeles, judge rules
Immigration officials can't detain people based on race, speaking Spanish in Los Angeles, judge rules

NBC News

time2 hours ago

  • NBC News

Immigration officials can't detain people based on race, speaking Spanish in Los Angeles, judge rules

A federal judge on Friday ruled that immigration officers in southern California can't rely solely on someone's race or speaking Spanish to stop and detain people. Magistrate Judge Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong issued a temporary restraining order after a lawsuit was filed by three men who were arrested as they waited to be picked at a Pasadena bus stop for a job on June 18. Frimpong's order bars the detention of people unless the officer or agent "has reasonable suspicion that the person to be stopped is within the United States in violation of U.S. immigration law." It says they may not base that suspicion solely on apparent race or ethnicity; speaking Spanish or speaking English with an accent; presence at a particular location like a bus stop or day laborer pick-up site; or the type of work one does. The lawsuit, against Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and the head of Immigration and Customs and Enforcement, was filed as the federal government under President Donald Trump has aggressively made immigration arrests in Los Angeles and other parts of Southern California. The American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California called the restraining order a victory for rights guaranteed under the U.S. Constitution. 'No matter the color of their skin, what language they speak, or where they work, everyone is guaranteed constitutional rights to protect them from unlawful stops," Mohammad Tajsar, senior staff attorney with the ACLU Foundation of Southern California, said in a statement. "While it does not take a federal judge to recognize that marauding bands of masked, rifle-toting goons have been violating ordinary people's rights throughout Southern California, we are hopeful that today's ruling will be a step toward accountability for the federal government's flagrant lawlessness that we have all been witnessing," Tajsar said. California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, both Democrats, have objected to the federal immigration actions in Southern California. Bass has said they are they are motivated by a political agenda 'of provoking fear and terror.' The Trump administration has defended the crackdown on people in the country without authorization. President Donald Trump ran on a campaign that promised deportations.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store