DV Investors Have the Opportunity to Lead the DoubleVerify Securities Fraud Lawsuit with Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP
If you suffered losses exceeding $75,000 in DoubleVerify between November 10, 2023 and February 27, 2025 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).
[You may also click here for additional information]
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - June 3, 2025) - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. ('DoubleVerify' or the 'Company') (NYSE: DV) and reminds investors of the July 21, 2025 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company.
[ This image cannot be displayed. Please visit the source: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/6455/254214_52ddf5edc4709b5c_001full.jpg ]
Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See www.faruqilaw.com.
As detailed below, the complaint alleges that the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and/or misleading statements and/or failing to disclose that: (a) DoubleVerify's customers were shifting their ad spending from open exchanges to closed platforms, where the Company's technological capabilities were limited and competed directly with native tools provided by platforms like Meta Platforms and Amazon; (b) DoubleVerify's ability to monetize on Activation Services, the Company's high-margin advertising optimization services segment, was limited because the development of its technology for closed platforms was significantly more expensive and time-consuming than disclosed to investors; (c) DoubleVerify's Activation Services in connection with certain closed platforms would take several years to monetize; (d) DoubleVerify's competitors were better positioned to incorporate AI into their offerings on closed platforms, which impaired DoubleVerify's ability to compete effectively and adversely impacted the Company's profits; (e) DoubleVerify systematically overbilled its customers for ad impressions served to declared bots operating out of known data center server farms; (f) DoubleVerify's risk disclosures were materially false and misleading because they characterized adverse facts that had already materialized as mere possibilities; and (g) as a result of the foregoing, Defendants' positive statements about the Company's business, operations, and prospects were materially false and/or misleading or lacked a reasonable basis.
The truth about this fraud was revealed through a series of disclosures culminating in February 2025 and March 2025. In February 2025, DoubleVerify reported disappointing earnings and disclosed a multiyear deceleration trend due to the suspension of DoubleVerify services by a large customer. On this news, the price of DoubleVerify stock fell 36 percent. Then, in March 2025, market research company Adalytics Research released a report claiming that DoubleVerify's web advertisement verification and fraud protection services are ineffective, and that DoubleVerify customers are regularly billed for ad impressions served to declared bots operating out of known data center server farms.
The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not.
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding DoubleVerify's conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others.
To learn more about the DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. class action, go to www.faruqilaw.com/DV or call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, on X, or on Facebook.
Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP ( www.faruqilaw.com ). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner.
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/254214
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
8 minutes ago
- New York Post
Troubling Malik Beasley debt details emerge with NBA star embroiled in gambling probe
Malik Beasley seems to be in some deep water. Amid a federal investigation into gambling allegations made earlier this week, it has now been revealed that the NBA free agent with nearly $60 million in contract earnings across his nine-year career is facing financial woes that include multiple debts and lawsuits against him. It was reported Tuesday that Beasley is being sued by his former marketing agency for failing to repay in full a $650,000 advance. Then, The Detroit News reported Tuesday evening the sharpshooter has incurred debts to a celebrity barber, a dentist, a landlord and a lender — all in addition to the New York-based marketing firm. Advertisement 4 Malik Beasley has had a troubled financial history in recent years. AP 'I have been with Malik for a long time, I have seen a lot of people around him come and go, but I have stayed away from any of his financial management or mismanagement or decisions he would make with money,' Steve Haney, Beasley's criminal defense lawyer, told The Detroit News. Haney, who said he doesn't 'get involved' in Beasley's finances, added: 'You hope to get them around the best business people and planners and management people. Sometimes they do and sometimes they don't.' Advertisement 4 Malik Beasley fumbled a pass with a chance to make a game-tying three against the Knicks in the playoffs. Rick Osentoski-Imagn Images The Detroit News reported that Beasley even pledged his current and future NBA contracts to a lending company, South River Capital LLC, which won a nearly $5.8 million judgment against Beasley — a copy of the judgment was filed in 2022 when Beasley was with the Timberwolves. Beasley's reasoning for borrowing money is unclear, though court records show that he paid back $1.3 million in early 2023. 'It is very common for professional athletes to go to third-party lenders and get advances on contracts. It's a part of the business of professional sports,' Haney said. 'Many of these lenders are predatory and charge extremely high interest rates and outrageous fees that border on usury.' Advertisement 4 Malik Beasley had a career year in Detroit and was primed for a contract extension. AP Beasley's other financial issues include being sued twice for failing to pay more than a combined $20,000 in rent at The Stott building in Detroit. In January, a celebrity barber serving many NBA players won a $26,827 judgment against Beasley. Elsewhere in January, a Minnesota dentist won a $34,390 default judgment against Beasley, and the dentist, Hassan Alshehabi of Delicate Smiles, started garnishing Beasley's paychecks from the Pistons the following month. Advertisement Beasley was likely going to sign a reported three-year, $42 million contract with Detroit before the gambling investigation put a wrench into those plans just a day before free agency opened. 4 Malik Beasley waving to the Madison Square Garden crowd after making a clutch three-pointer in a January game. Charles Wenzelberg / New York Post The 28-year-old made 319 3-pointers for the Pistons this past season, just one behind Anthony Edwards' league-leading 320. While the gambling investigation is fresh and ongoing, the evidence of Beasley's financial issues is growing.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
WPP (WPP) Slid on Weaker-Than-Expected Results
Hotchkis & Wiley, an investment management company, released its 'Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value Fund' first quarter 2025 investor letter. A copy of the letter can be downloaded here. In Q1 2025, the MSCI World Index decreased by 1.8%, driven by the decline of mega-cap growth stocks. The Magnificent Seven represented over 22% of the MSCI World Index in the quarter, collectively experiencing a decline of 14%. The Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value Fund returned 5.96% in the quarter, outperforming the MSCI World Value Index's 4.81% return. For more information on the fund's best picks in 2025, please check its top five holdings. In its first-quarter 2025 investor letter, Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value Fund highlighted stocks such as WPP plc (NYSE:WPP). WPP plc (NYSE:WPP) is a creative transformation company that offers communications, experience, commerce, and technology services. The one-month return of WPP plc (NYSE:WPP) was -8.28%, and its shares lost 23.15% of their value over the last 52 weeks. On July 1, 2025, WPP plc (NYSE:WPP) stock closed at $35.88 per share, with a market capitalization of $7.741 billion. Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value Fund stated the following regarding WPP plc (NYSE:WPP) in its Q1 2025 investor letter: "WPP plc (NYSE:WPP) is a large ad agency holding company. WPP's stock price came under pressure following weaker-than expected Q424 earnings results. The company trades at a low multiple of consensus earnings with a good balance sheet, we believe WPP can deliver near mid-teens returns from the combination of capital return and capital-free organic growth." A media buying executive looking out a window at a brand advertiser's billboard. WPP plc (NYSE:WPP) is not on our list of 30 Most Popular Stocks Among Hedge Funds. As per our database, 9 hedge fund portfolios held WPP plc (NYSE:WPP) at the end of the first quarter, which was 5 in the previous quarter. While we acknowledge the potential of WPP plc (NYSE:WPP) as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns, and doing so within a shorter timeframe. If you are looking for an AI stock that is as promising as NVIDIA but that trades at less than 5 times its earnings, check out our report about the undervalued AI stock set for massive gains. In another article, we covered WPP plc (NYSE:WPP) and shared the list of undervalued European stocks to invest in. Oakmark International Fund also attributed WPP plc's (NYSE:WPP) decline during the quarter to the same factor in its Q1 2025 investor letter. In addition, please check out our hedge fund investor letters Q1 2025 page for more investor letters from hedge funds and other leading investors. While we acknowledge the potential of WPP as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: The Best and Worst Dow Stocks for the Next 12 Months and 10 Unstoppable Stocks That Could Double Your Money. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.
Forbes
34 minutes ago
- Forbes
Texas Delivers On Housing Reforms, Connecticut Stumbles
Mexican American family having a party in backyard of sustainable home with solar panels on the ... More roof. Suburb area of Houston, Texas. The median sale price for a home in the United States was $440,913 in May, about $140,000 more than five years ago. The housing affordability problem that started in a few coastal cities has spread across the country, and the only way to solve it is to build a lot more housing. This year Texas passed several laws that will do just that, while in Connecticut a similar bundle of reforms was vetoed by the governor. In its legislative session that ended earlier this month, Texas passed a number of reforms to make it easier to build more housing. The first law, SB 840, requires municipalities to allow what is commonly called missing-middle housing. These are housing types that lie between large single-family homes and multi-story apartment buildings, such as duplexes, triplexes, and townhomes. Many local governments have rules that effectively ban these types of homes, but now they will be allowed in any area already zoned for commercial or mixed-use development. This will enable developers to build affordable housing near shops, restaurants, and jobs, a pattern of development that was common across the country but has largely taken a backseat to residential-only suburbs since the 1960s. Another law, SB 15, will make it easier for developers to build smaller homes in Texas. The law prohibits cities from requiring lot sizes of more than 1,400 square feet in new greenfield subdivisions of at least five acres. Land is a big contributor to the cost of housing, comprising between 20% and 40% of the cost of a new house. Allowing builders to use less land will make housing more affordable for lower- and middle-income families. The third pro-housing law, SB 2477, removes regulations that discourage office-to-residential conversions. This law prevents local governments from tying up conversion projects with unnecessary traffic studies, parking requirements, and zoning changes. Last year, the Pew Charitable Trusts released a report showing that converting office buildings to single-room occupancy units is a feasible and effective way to add more housing in dense city centers. This new law will pave the way for such projects in Texas's big cities. The next law, SB 2835, allows developers to build apartment buildings up to six stories with only one staircase. Single-stair apartment buildings are cheaper to build—reducing construction costs by 6% to 13%—and can fit on smaller lots than double-loaded corridor buildings. Their flexibility is especially important for infill development in cities, where lots are often small and irregularly shaped. Finally, HB 24 eliminates a loophole that enabled small groups of anti-housing protesters to block new housing projects. The old law made it too easy for a minority of residents to use petitions and other mechanisms to stifle development. The new law modernizes the community feedback process to create more predictability for builders and ensures that property owners are not unduly prevented from using their land to help communities meet the growing demand for more housing. Texas has grown rapidly since the pandemic, and these reforms will make it easier and cheaper to build the housing it needs. The reforms are timely, too. In a recent study, economists Edward Glaeser and Joseph Gyourko find that many Southern and Western metro areas are not adding as much housing as they used to, which is pushing prices up. By passing these pro-housing laws, Texas is doing its part to reverse this trend so families can afford to live and work in the Lonestar state. Shifting to the Northeast, like Texas Connecticut had a chance to make housing more affordable this year. But unlike Texas, it whiffed on the opportunity when Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont vetoed HB 5002. Connecticut's home price-to-median income ratio is 4.4, below the U.S. average but still a signal that housing is too expensive. Worse, the gap between housing prices and income has widened over the last five years. HB 5002 would make several changes to the state's housing policies designed to improve affordability. These include reducing and eliminating parking requirements, making it easier to convert commercial buildings to residential units, encouraging more development near public transportation routes, and making it easier to build missing-middle housing such as duplexes and townhomes. The bill would also increase funding to support and improve governments' planning processes. During his veto announcement, Governor Lamont expressed support for many of the provisions in the bill. But in the end, he sided with local officials worried about the state infringing on local control. During his press conference, he said 'I think the only way to really make it work is if you have buy-in from the local communities.' In a unique twist, Connecticut Republicans—long thought to be the party of economic growth and property rights—led the effort to veto a bill that would have boosted economic growth and expanded individual property rights. Responding to Lamont's veto, Pete Harrison, the Connecticut Director of the Regional Plan Association and the Director of pro-housing organization DesegregateCT told me, 'We wish Governor Lamont let alone Republicans in Connecticut would show half the foresight and common sense that Red State Republicans have shown when it comes to housing policy. The disconnect is costing Connecticut billions in economic activity and future growth.' He added 'We hope the governor keeps his promise to call a special session where both he and Republicans will have another chance at stepping up as both the Democratic-controlled House and Senate have done.' While Governor Lamont's and Republicans' concerns about local control are understandable, it is important to remember local governments only have the control states grant them. If local governments abuse their authority—perhaps by making it unnecessarily difficult to build housing—state officials should step in to rectify the situation and uphold their responsibility to help the state prosper. When it comes to zoning and land-use regulations, there are powerful local incentives to restrict new development. Current homeowners, well-connected developers, and local politicians chosen from these groups often worry about the impact new development will have on their neighborhoods, so they hinder it. State officials are better positioned to overcome these concerns since they have an incentive to consider the broader economic effects more housing will have on the state's economy and budget. It would be wise for Governor Lamont to remember these dynamics the next time a housing bill crosses his desk. The high cost of housing is one of the biggest problems facing America. Research shows that high housing prices limit access to jobs and high-quality schools, delay family formation, and even reduce fertility. Young people are the most affected. According to one recent survey, 67% of Americans believe homeownership is unrealistic for young people. If this belief persists, it will undermine how younger generations view America: Not as the land of opportunity, but as a place where opportunity is hoarded by established homeowners at the expense of everyone else. Texas's officials are trying to fix the problem. We will see if Connecticut's join them.
