logo
Partner of crossbow victim says Leeds attack shows urgent need for restrictions

Partner of crossbow victim says Leeds attack shows urgent need for restrictions

Yahoo30-04-2025
A woman whose partner was killed in a crossbow attack says the injuries inflicted on two women in the recent incident in Leeds is further proof that action is needed on the sale of these weapons.
Laura Sugden was commenting after counter-terror police announced that 38-year-old Owen Lawrence – the man suspected of carrying out a crossbow attack in the Headingley area of Leeds – had died.
Mr Lawrence, from Headingley, was taken to hospital on Saturday with a self-inflicted wound after two women were injured in Otley Road.
Ms Sugden was seriously injured in 2018 by a crossbow-wielding neighbour – coincidentally called Lawrence – who killed her partner Shane Gilmer.
Since that attack in the village of Southburn, East Yorkshire, Ms Sugden has campaigned to halt the unregulated ownership of crossbows.
She said she welcomed Government proposals outlined earlier this week designed to tighten the law around crossbow sales, but said on Wednesday that they need to go further.
Ms Sugden said: 'This recent attack in Headingley shows yet again how dangerous and accessible these weapons are.
'We've been campaigning for crossbows to be treated with the same seriousness as firearms, including licensing and police checks.
'Crossbows are devastating weapons – in some cases more dangerous than guns – and it's far too easy to get hold of one today.'
She said: 'While a total ban may not be feasible, we must have legislation in place that offers real protection and accountability.
'The latest proposals are a start, but we need real, meaningful action that stops tragedies like Shane's from ever happening again.'
Home Office minister Dame Diana Johnson said on Monday that amendments tabled to the Crime and Policing Bill aim to strengthen age verification controls on both the online sale and delivery of the weapon.
Dame Diana also expressed concerns about how people can go online and 'in a few clicks' buy a crossbow, as she signalled the Government intends to bring forward further measures.
Her remarks came during an urgent question about the incident in Leeds at the weekend in which two women, aged 19 and 31, were injured and a crossbow and firearm were recovered.
Ms Sugden's solicitor Gemma Vine, from Ison Harrison, said her client is encouraged by Dame Diana's comments but asked the Government to publish its response to the consultation on this issue which closed more than a year ago.
Ms Vine said: 'New, restrictive laws would mark a turning point after years of dedicated campaigning and offer some measure of closure for victims like Laura.
'More importantly, they would prevent further avoidable deaths and bring these dangerous weapons under proper control.
'With more lives now lost, we urge the Home Office to urgently publish its response and provide a clear plan and timetable for reform.'
Police believe Owen Lawrence was acting alone and say they are not looking for anyone else in connection with the Leeds attack.
His Facebook accounts are being examined as the investigation into what happened continues.
Posts on two accounts that appear to be linked to Lawrence include images of a gun and makeshift wooden knives, as well as a rambling entry setting out an apparent plan to kill people taking part in the Otley Road Run pub crawl.
Mr Gilmer, 30, died after his next-door neighbour, Anthony Lawrence, broke into his house in January 2018, and shot both him and Ms Sugden.
Lawrence was later found dead in a camper van in North Yorkshire.
Ms Sugden told a 2021 inquest that she went upstairs and found Lawrence in her daughter's bedroom, holding a crossbow.
She said Lawrence brought the already injured Mr Gilmer into the room and then shot her.
Ms Sugden, who was pregnant at the time, managed to pull the arrow out of her head but Lawrence took it from her and pushed it into her neck.
She told the jury that she pleaded with Lawrence and manged to escape as Mr Gilmer told her to get help, saying: 'Keep you and baby safe.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

India Clears $12.3 Billion of Defense Purchases After Clash
India Clears $12.3 Billion of Defense Purchases After Clash

Bloomberg

time34 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

India Clears $12.3 Billion of Defense Purchases After Clash

India approved $12.3 billion of defense purchases a month after its military confrontation with neighboring Pakistan. The Defence Acquisition Council cleared 10 proposals, according to a government statement. These include armored recovery vehicles, surface-to-air missiles, electronic warfare systems, and a tri-services inventory management system. The navy will also acquire moored mines, mine countermeasure vessels, submersible autonomous vessels, and super rapid gun mounts.

How a tear or two spooked markets and dominated UK's political narrative
How a tear or two spooked markets and dominated UK's political narrative

Washington Post

time36 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

How a tear or two spooked markets and dominated UK's political narrative

LONDON — The weekly session in which the British prime minister is questioned by lawmakers in Parliament can be an ordeal for the government leader. For Cabinet members, it's usually simply a matter of backing their boss. But on Wednesday the spotlight ended up on Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves during the Prime Minister's Questions session because it became evident that she was crying as she sat beside Prime Minister Keir Starmer .

How a tear or two spooked markets and dominated UK's political narrative
How a tear or two spooked markets and dominated UK's political narrative

Associated Press

time44 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

How a tear or two spooked markets and dominated UK's political narrative

LONDON (AP) — The weekly session in which the British prime minister is questioned by lawmakers in Parliament can be an ordeal for the government leader. For Cabinet members, it's usually simply a matter of backing their boss. But on Wednesday the spotlight ended up on Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves during the Prime Minister's Questions session because it became evident that she was crying as she sat beside Prime Minister Keir Starmer. It's not known what triggered the tears, later said to have been personal. They came as Starmer sought to fend off attacks that his year-old government was losing its authority and that he was about to fire Reeves to regain the initiative. Markets spooked Traders got spooked, with the interest rate charged on the U.K.'s 10-year benchmark bond in the markets up sharply, and the pound down. The moves were a sign investors had lost confidence in U.K. financial assets. Reeves had become associated with fiscal discipline, in particular a rule of covering day-to-day government spending with tax revenue, said Andrew Wishart, an economist at Berenberg Bank. 'The markets are concerned that if the Chancellor goes, such fiscal discipline would follow her out of the door,' he added. With Starmer insisting Thursday that Reeves would remain in post, the markets calmed down. Prime minister's weekly ordeal Prime Minister's Questions, or PMQs, can come as close to a gladiatorial contest as is possible in a modern legislative chamber. Very little deference is given to the man or woman holding the highest office in the land. The prime minister is considered the first among equals. Like all other members of Parliament, the prime minister represents one of 650 constituencies. And nowhere is that shared connection more noticeable than at noon every Wednesday in the House of Commons. Starmer stands for half an hour every week to be quizzed by friends and foes. He may get soft balls, but there's always a potential zinger around the corner. The leader of the biggest opposition party, currently the Conservative Party's Kemi Badenoch, has the best chance to knock the prime minister off course. With six questions, she can lay traps and go for the jugular. Typically it's more theater than substance, and the weekly shouting match is consistently the most-watched parliamentary event, viewed around the world, including on C-Span in the United States. This week was fraught This week's session appeared to have more at stake than usual following a chaotic run-up to a welfare reform bill. With scores of Labour lawmakers opposed, Starmer was forced to scrap key planks of the bill — at a cost, politically and economically. For a prime minister, with one of the biggest majorities in history, it was a sign of weakness. Many Labour MPs blame Reeves, for her rigid adherence to her budget rules. As usual, Starmer was flanked to his left by Reeves, who didn't look her usual self, clearly bloated around the eyes. Badenoch showed little mercy, describing Reeves as 'absolutely miserable' and a 'human shield' for Starmer. She asked Starmer whether he could repeat a pledge that Reeves would stay in her post until the general election, which has to take place by the middle of 2029. While praising Reeves' handling of the economy, Starmer didn't give that assurance, and it was around this point that Reeves wiped away a tear. 'How awful for the Chancellor that he couldn't confirm that she would stay in place,' Badenoch responded. The immediate political aftermath Starmer's Downing Street operation faced questions over Reeves' teary appearance. Could it have been hay fever? Had Starmer told Reeves she would be fired for the government's recent woes, which has seen Labour's approval ratings slide? Starmer's press spokesman said it was a 'personal matter,' insisted Reeves was 'going nowhere' and had the prime minister's 'full backing.' Later, Starmer told the BBC that Reeves would be Chancellor for a 'very long time' and that it was 'absolutely wrong' to suggest her distress was related to the welfare U-turn. A day on Images of Reeves' agitated state were emblazoned across newspapers and remained a key item on the news agenda. Starmer repeated on Thursday that Reeves would remain Chancellor 'for years to come' and sought to explain why he hadn't comforted Reeves during PMQs. 'In PMQs, it is bang, bang, bang,' he said at an event where he and Reeves hugged. 'That's what it was yesterday and therefore I was probably the last to appreciate anything going on in the chamber.' Reeves appeared more like her usual self. 'People saw I was upset, but that was yesterday,' she told Sky News. 'I guess the thing that is different from my job and many of your viewers is that when I'm having a tough day, it's on the telly.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store