Clean energy, environment unity ticket on nature laws
The unprecedented alliance between the Clean Energy Council, Australian Conservation Foundation, Australian Marine Conservation Society and others is bound by the shared belief that existing environmental protections are failing both biodiversity and the energy transition.
"We have a once-in-a-generation opportunity to re-shape the law to tackle Australia's climate and nature crises," Australian Conservation Foundation chief executive Kelly O'Shanassy said.
The federal laws designed to kick in when renewable energy, mines and development threaten vulnerable species and other "matters of national environmental significance" are widely considered ineffective and in need of overhaul.
The federal government has promised reform but failed to complete the task in its first three-year term.
In the meantime, existing regulations have failed to stop projects destroying critical habitat at the same time as cumbersome environmental assessments have delayed the clean energy rollout.
Clean Energy Investor Group chief executive Richie Merzian said the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act was the number one concern for renewable energy investors and developers.
Projects were taking nearly twice as long to secure approval and the assessment backlog was growing, Mr Merzian told AAP.
"We want to see faster yeses and faster nos," he said.
The alliance, which also includes the Electrical Trades Union, Re-Alliance, WWF Australia and Biodiversity Council, agree on key pieces of environmental reform including legally-enforceable standards to prevent subjective ministerial decision-making.
Setting up an independent "cop on the beat" Environmental Protection Agency was also backed by the coalition, as well as more resources for departments to keep projects moving through the process.
Better planning should further help solar and wind developers identify "regions we should and shouldn't be working in".
Mr Merzian said the "nature versus climate" narrative was false.
"We can and should be doing both," he said.
Electrical Trades Union national secretary Michael Wright said delayed environmental assessments were making it hard to train workers for future jobs.
"The uncertainty of the assessment process means there is no reliable pipeline of work for communities or to train apprentices on anywhere close to the scale we need," he said.
New environment minister Murray Watt has already indicated that legislating a federal environment watchdog will be one of the top priorities for the returned government.
It's not been the only pressing matter competing for his attention, with the minister opting to greenlight Woodside's proposal to extend its North West Shelf project in Western Australia after years of delays.
The expansion has been granted commonwealth go-ahead despite concerns about its emissions burden and impact on sacred rock art.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
11 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Ex-Labor climate advisor Ross Garnaut makes incredible net zero admission as renewables push falters yet again
Ross Garnaut was once Labor's go-to expert on climate change. His landmark reviews under the Rudd and Gillard governments framed emissions reduction as a moral imperative. Now he's warning that the Albanese government's plans are not just off track but wildly detached from reality. Speaking to the Clean Energy Council this week, Mr Garnaut declared that Australia will miss its target of 82 per cent carbon-free electricity by 2030 'not by a little, but by a big margin'. It was a sober, data-driven indictment that few in the energy sector would seriously contest. The scale of the shortfall is hard to ignore. The rapid deployment of wind and solar the target demands has simply not materialised. Hundreds of renewable projects remain 'in the pipeline,' as Energy Minister Chris Bowen likes to point out. But very few are crossing the line into financial commitment. Most of those that do are now propped up by taxpayers via the Capacity Investment Scheme or other forms of implicit subsidy. It's a long way from the rosy optimism of December 2021, when Mr Bowen and Anthony Albanese unveiled their plan to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 43 per cent by the end of the decade. Mr Bowen described it as 'ambitious but achievable,', insisting it wasn't a vague aspiration but 'a target with teeth.' Yet the numbers tell another story. According to the National Greenhouse Gas Inventory, Australia's emissions were 24.7 per cent below 2005 levels in December 2022. By December last year, they'd improved only marginally, sitting at 27 per cent. To hit the 2030 target, emissions would need to fall by another 16 percentage points, more than three points per year. That would require a pace of change Australia has never achieved, particularly given the backlog of delays in generation, transmission, and storage. Flagship projects like Snowy Hydro are years behind schedule and blowing out budgets. Transmission infrastructure is not keeping up. Mr Bowen's hopes were pinned partly on green hydrogen, which almost no serious analyst considers technologically or economically viable at scale in this decade. He could have done without the reminder this week from the UN's climate tsar, Simon Stiell, that Australia's 2035 targets are due by September under the Paris timetable. In a rational policy environment, such headwinds would prompt a reassessment. Realistically, that would mean recalibrating the 2030 target and attaching heavy caveats to any post-2030 pledges. But climate politics rarely allows for realism. For a party of the progressive left, targets are not tools, they are moral declarations. Practical obstacles are downplayed, achieving them is merely a matter of political will. Those who dominate the climate debate rarely come from sectors responsible for delivering emissions cuts - energy, agriculture, transport, industry. Instead, they are diplomats, bureaucrats, or climate advocates like Mr Stiell, whose job is to rally nations around the IPCC's global ambitions. He called on Australia this week to 'demonstrate what ambition looks like' and to accelerate its departure from fossil fuels. 'The science is calling for a collective effort for all countries to cut emissions by 60 per cent by 2035,' he said. Mr Bowen's response carried a hint of irritation: 'Targets are easier set than met,' he noted. 'We will set a target informed by expert advice in the national interest.' Mr Stiell's authority as a scientific voice is undermined by the apocalyptic tone of his rhetoric. In London last year, he warned that humanity had just two years left to 'save the world.' This week in Sydney, he predicted 'mega-droughts' that would make 'fresh fruit and veg a once-a-year treat.' Such claims are not supported by the IPCC's own findings, which express 'low confidence' in any global trend in drought since the mid-20th century. The evidence for widespread climate-driven crop failures is similarly thin. Agricultural yields have surged globally despite warming. In 2022, the UN Food and Agriculture Organization reported record global grain output. The uncertainty is no surprise. As physicist and former Obama science adviser Steven Koonin notes in ' Unsettled' , precipitation data is highly variable and difficult to synthesise. 'There is no easy way to combine precipitation data from scattered weather stations to get at the bigger picture,' he writes. Mr Koonin's verdict? Predictions of climate-induced food collapse are 'yet another apocalypse that ain't.' Mr Stiell also warned that Australia could suffer an $8 trillion GDP loss by 2050 - another figure divorced from mainstream analysis. The IPCC's own modelling projects average global economic growth of two per cent annually through the century, with climate impacts reducing this to 1.96 per cent - a barely perceptible change. In a functional policy process, those numbers would matter. They would be weighed soberly, and targets set accordingly - with engineering, economics, and institutional capacity in mind. Instead, they are shouting from the sidelines - while the government clings to a plan that increasingly looks like a triumph of political symbolism over practical delivery. Nick Cater is senior fellow at Menzies Research Centre and a regular contributor to Sky News Australia Originally published as Ex-Labor climate advisor Ross Garnaut makes incredible net zero admission as renewables push falters yet again
ABC News
5 days ago
- ABC News
Climate debate has been "self-serving" by some politicians, says outgoing clean energy CEO
Outgoing Clean Energy Council chief executive, Kane Thornton joined The Business from the sidelines of the Clean Energy Summit to discuss Australia's progress on reaching 82 percent of renewables by 2030.
The Age
5 days ago
- The Age
‘Perverse outcomes': NSW a deforestation hotspot on par with Indonesia
Land-clearing in NSW surged by 40 per cent in 2023, making NSW a deforestation hotspot on par with Indonesia, as environmentalists slam the Minns government for failing to ditch rules driven by former Nationals leader John Barilaro after more than two years in government. The figures from the annual NSW Statewide Landcover and Tree Study (SLATS) released on Monday reveal 66,498 hectares of the state's native vegetation were destroyed in 2023 – the equivalent of 237 Sydney CBDs or four times the size of Royal National Park – and more than half was unallocated to any law. The figure is a 40 per cent rise from the revised figure of 47,388 hectares cleared in 2022. The clearing of woody vegetation (trees and shrubs) jumped from 21,137 hectares in 2022 to 32,847 hectares in 2023. Australian Conservation Foundation campaigner Nathaniel Pelle said this was 'on par with the amount of forest that is cleared every year for palm oil in Indonesia' – about 30,000 hectares in 2023. 'It's a lot ... for a rich country to be still clearing [more than] 30,000 hectares of forest and woodland in a year, and for that clearing rate to be going up,' said Pelle. The SLATS data also revealed 33,651 hectares of non-woody vegetation (grasslands, ferns and ground cover) was cleared, up from 26,251 hectares the previous year. Pelle said the surge in 2023 was probably 'panic clearing' ahead of anticipated legal reforms, since Labor came to power promising to fix land-clearing laws that had been loosened by the former Coalition government in 2016. 'If you telegraph that you're going to do something, and then don't, it can have perverse outcomes,' Pelle said. 'We need more than just words from the Minns government on reforming these rules and their enforcement or compliance.' In late 2024, the government overhauled the 2016 Biodiversity Offset Scheme, which allows developers to pay to destroy biodiversity, acting on a scathing review by former Treasury Secretary Ken Henry. The government also promised to reform the Local Land Services Act, which governs clearing on private land, but its proposed legislation remains in consultation stage.
