logo
Labour MPs call for benefit cuts to be scrapped after winter fuel payment U-turn

Labour MPs call for benefit cuts to be scrapped after winter fuel payment U-turn

Independent09-06-2025
Labour backbenchers are urging the Government to reconsider planned disability benefit cuts following the restoration of winter fuel payments to the majority of pensioners by Rachel Reeves.
The chancellor's £1.25 billion initiative, revealed on Monday, will provide automatic payments of up to £300 to pensioners with an income below £35,000 annually.
This decision reverses last year's removal of the universal scheme for pensioners, which was reinstated for those claiming specific benefits like pension credit.
Nadia Whittome, Labour MP for Nottingham East, cautioned ministers against repeating a "similar mistake" by tightening eligibility criteria for Personal Independence Payments (PIP).
Richard Burgon, MP for Leeds East, implored pensions minister Torsten Bell to heed the concerns of backbenchers, offering their assistance to help the Government 'get it right.'
In her warning, Ms Whittome said she was not asking Mr Bell 'to keep the status quo or not to support people into work' and added: 'I'm simply asking him not to cut disabled people's benefits.'
The pensions minister, who works in both the Treasury and Department for Work and Pensions, replied that the numbers of people receiving PIP is set to 'continue to grow every single year in the years ahead, after the changes set out by this Government'.
In its Pathways to Work green paper, the Government proposed a new eligibility requirement, so PIP claimants must score a minimum of four points on one daily living activity, such as preparing food, washing and bathing, using the toilet or reading, to receive the daily living element of the benefit.
'This means that people who only score the lowest points on each of the PIP daily living activities will lose their entitlement in future,' the document noted.
Mr Burgon told the Commons: 'As a Labour MP who voted against the winter fuel payment cuts, I very much welcome this change in position, but can I urge the minister and the Government to learn the lessons of this and one of the lessons is, listen to backbenchers?
'If the minister and the Government listen to backbenchers, that can help the Government get it right, help the Government avoid getting it wrong, and so what we don't want is to be here in a year or two's time with a minister sent to the despatch box after not listening to backbenchers on disability benefit cuts, making another U-turn again.'
Mr Bell replied that it was 'important to listen to backbenchers, to frontbenchers'.
Opposition MPs cheered when the minister added: 'It's even important to listen to members opposite on occasion.'
Liberal Democrat MP Mike Martin warned that 'judging by the questions from his own backbenchers, it seems that we're going to have further U-turns on PIP and on the two-child benefit cap'.
The Tunbridge Wells MP asked Mr Bell: 'To save his colleagues anguish, will he let us know now when those U-turns are coming?'
The minister replied: 'What Labour MPs want to see is a Labour Government bringing down child poverty, and that's what we're going to do
'What Labour MPs want to see is a Government that can take the responsible decisions, including difficult ones on tax and on means testing the winter fuel payment so that we can invest in public services and turn around the disgrace that has become Britain's public realm for far too long.'
Conservative former work and pensions secretary Esther McVey had earlier asked whether the Chancellor, 'now that she and the Government have got a taste for climbdowns', would 'reverse the equally ridiculous national insurance contribution (Nic) rises, which is destroying jobs, and the inheritance tax changes, which is destroying farms and family businesses'.
Mr Bell said: 'This is a party opposite that has learned no lessons whatsoever, that thinks it can come to this chamber, call for more spending, oppose every tax rise and expect to ever be taken seriously again – they will not.'
Labour MP Rebecca Long-Bailey pressed the Government to make changes to the two-child benefit cap, which means most parents cannot claim for more than two children.
'It's the right thing to do to lift pensioners out of poverty, and I'm sure that both he and the Chancellor also agree that it's right to lift children out of poverty,' the Salford MP told the Commons.
'So can he reassure this House that he and the Chancellor are doing all they can to outline plans to lift the two-child cap on universal credit as soon as possible?'
Mr Bell replied: 'All levers to reduce child poverty are on the table.
'The child poverty strategy will be published in the autumn.'
He added: 'If we look at who is struggling most, having to turn off their heating, it is actually younger families with children that are struggling with that.
'So she's absolutely right to raise this issue, it is one of the core purposes of this Government, we cannot carry on with a situation where large families, huge percentages of them, are in poverty.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK's cheapest and priciest seaside towns to buy a home
UK's cheapest and priciest seaside towns to buy a home

Daily Mail​

time22 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

UK's cheapest and priciest seaside towns to buy a home

By Buying a home in Dorset's exclusive Sandbanks is a dream for many downsizers looking to relocate to the coast. It's a stone's throw from a beautiful sandy beach, surrounded by luxurious yachts and is popular among celebrities. The catch? An average price tag of a cool £1.28million – which is the most expensive for a seaside town the UK, new research reveals. That's according to property portal Rightmove, which has crunched the numbers for the costliest and most affordable seaside spots in the country, based on their asking prices. Of course, buyers may well negotiate to shave tens of thousands of pounds off the listed price - or end up offering more than the asking price to secure their home in these in-demand hotspots. All of the top ten town Rightmove says are the most expensive are along the south coast – but the very top spots are not in the typical staycation destinations of Cornwall and Devon. Homes in the luxurious Sandbanks are listed for an average £1.28million– some three times the national average, Rightmove says. It's the only seaside town in the country where asking prices are more than £1million. And it's not hard to see why, with it's proximity to the beach and clear blue water. Plus, your neighbours would be former football manager Harry Redknapp and television chef Rick Stein. However, homes with the average price tag are unlikely to buy you a house as £1.25million typically only stretches as far as a three-bedroom, two-bathroom apartment or maisonette. Mary Lou Press, of estate agent industry body Propertymark, explains in the past decade prospective buyers have been hunting for different characteristics in their home – and picturesque areas such a seaside spots are now much more appealing, which has driven up their price tag. The pandemic sparked a major race for space in the property market as families flocked out of economic hubs such as London in favour of working from home in coastal destinations. While the trend has cooled slightly in recent years as workers return to the office, the seaside spots are clearly still in demand. Press says: 'Seaside locations are desirable for many people of all demographics, and with popularity comes heightened house prices, which can price many locals out of the housing market. 'Considering that the average house price of coastal homes has only slightly dipped, and buyer demand has increased, ongoing economic turbulence doesn't seem to have overly affected the market or dented the confidence of buyers of coastal locations.' But despite the high asking price, the price tags for homes in Sandbanks have fallen by 3 per cent year-on-year. And it's not alone. In fact, across the top 50 most expensive seaside spots, average asking prices fell by 1 per cent – and that's despite demand rising by a healthy 8 per cent. After Sandbanks, it's neighbouring area Canford Cliffs which is the second most costly coastal town. A home in the town will still set buyers back some £974,635, which typically buys a four-bedroom, three-bathroom home. The area is home to Canford Cliffs beach, which has been awarded the coveted Blue Flag status, the gold standard for beaches. Plus, it is also close to Shore Road beach and Branksome Chine beach. The area is just a 35-minute walk from Sandbanks, ideal for those who want to shave more than £300,000 from their hose purchase but still want to be close to the glamorous Sandbanks. However, Canford Cliffs has also seen a slight sip in house prices with the average price tag falling by some 9 per cent year-on-year. Taking the bronze spot is village Milford-on-Sea in Hampshire, where colourful beach huts line the shore. Homes here are listed for £728,460. Also in Hampshire, Lymington takes fourth place as property asking prices are £639,316. Classic coastal destinations in holiday hotspots Cornwall and Devon also make the top ten. Budleigh Salterton is the fifth most expensive town with a price tag of £535,761. Then it's popular second home area St. Ives (£507,139), Dartmouth (£500,006) and Sidmouth (£494,811). Rounding out the top ten is Whitstable in Kent – where asking prices average £469,586 – and Hythe, where homes are listed for £466,898. And if you want a cheaper spot? Head up north, according to Rightmove. Saltcoats – a town on the west coast of North Ayrshire in Scotland and around a 50 minute drive to Glasgow – has been crowned the most affordable seaside resort by Rightmove. Homeowners list their properties here for just £122,208 – some £256,032 lower than the average across the nation. Plus, prices have soared by some 13 per cent year on year, the highest growth on the list. But despite the low price tag, there's plenty to do in this small town with seaside classics such as bowling, a museum, cafes and a cinema to keep you busy. In the silver spot for the most affordable seaside town is Peterlee in County Durham. Properties here are listed for just £38 more, on average, than those in Saltcoats. At £122,246, asking prices have seen a 6 per cent growth in prices in the last year. Next is Ashington in Northumberland where asking prices are £135,050 and Bootle in Merseyside, with price tags of £135,208. In fact, not one town in the bottom ten is more than £160,000, making these locations good value for seaside seekers on a tight budget. Grimsby, Blackpool and Fleetwood also make the list of the most affordable seaside spots with listed prices of £142,072, £142,804 and £148,101, respectively. Birkenhead in Merseyside (£149,527), Blyth in Northumberland (£153,487) and Workington in Cumbria (£158,956) finish the top ten cheapest spots.

Quality of UK economic data concerning, quick fix unlikely, say economists: Reuters poll
Quality of UK economic data concerning, quick fix unlikely, say economists: Reuters poll

Reuters

time24 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Quality of UK economic data concerning, quick fix unlikely, say economists: Reuters poll

BENGALURU, July 3 (Reuters) - A clear majority of economists polled by Reuters are concerned about the quality of official British economic data, the backbone of monetary and fiscal policy decisions, and have doubts over how quickly they can be fixed. Facing criticism over unreliable economic data, Britain's Office for National Statistics announced measures last week to address the issue, including splitting its leadership structure and investing 10 million pounds ($14 million) over the next two years. But a Reuters poll published on Thursday showed reservations among analysts over how quickly the problems, primarily involving labour market data, can be fixed. The Labour Force Survey has seen a plunge in response rates since the COVID-19 pandemic, casting doubts over its results. The ONS also said last month that April consumer price inflation, which the Bank of England targets, was overstated by 0.1 percentage point. The British agency isn't alone. There are some concerns about the reliability of U.S. inflation data released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics as it faces a staffing crunch. The BoE, like other central banks, needs to be sure about inflationary pressures from the jobs market to set its policy. Governor Andrew Bailey recently described the data shortcomings as a "substantial" problem for policymakers. Inaccurate economic data also make it difficult for economists to produce forecasts, as historical data play a key role in that process. Nearly 85% of economists, 21 of 25, in a June 25-July 3 Reuters poll said they were concerned about the quality of official UK economic statistics, including 40%, or 10, who said they were very concerned. Only four said they were unconcerned. "Producing economic statistics is not an easy task, but the ONS has managed to let the quality slip of some fairly important statistics over the years," said James Rossiter, head of global macro strategy at TD Securities, one of the gilt-edged market makers (GEMMs) - primary dealers in UK government bonds. "The fact the agency was so slow to come to terms with the quality decline ... makes the institution's data less trustworthy than their peers in other developed economies." Rossiter said the big risk was that policymakers were left grappling with the true state of the economy against a volatile global backdrop. Worries about economic data could also hurt investor confidence, which is already low over erratic U.S. trade policies and ongoing geopolitical conflicts. Concerns have eased somewhat following the ONS's pledge to "restore quality and confidence" in its data, but a turnaround will take time. "There are clearly issues with UK labour market data which we are aware of and working with or around ... There isn't necessarily a quick fix here," said Cathal Kennedy, senior UK economist at RBC Capital Markets, also a GEMM. "The best way the ONS can rebuild confidence is to continue being transparent and open about the steps it is taking to improve its services. Some refocus on core/key areas is also likely to be beneficial." ($1 = 0.7320 pounds)

Ulster's home ground to be renamed Affidea Stadium
Ulster's home ground to be renamed Affidea Stadium

BBC News

time37 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Ulster's home ground to be renamed Affidea Stadium

Ulster Rugby's home ground has been renamed the Affidea Stadium after a "long-term" sponsorship agreement with the healthcare Belfast ground, originally known as Ravenhill, had been called Kingspan Stadium since Ulster statement said the new deal will provide "a strong platform to invest in the development of players, facilities and fan experience"."Together, we will continue to invest in elite and grassroots rugby, and we look forward to seeing the Affidea Stadium become a beacon for sport and community pride in Ulster," said the province's chief executive officer Hugh 11-year naming rights deal with construction firm Kingspan concluded at the end of last month, while the association went back to commercial relationship with the Cavan-based company had been questioned in the wake of the firm's links to the Grenfell Tower people died in the fire in London in 2017 and Kingspan's business practices were criticised during an company, however, said its products made up only 5% of the insulation at Grenfell and that they were used without its recommendation.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store