Hamas taunted Israeli hostages with images of antisemitic Columbia University protests: ‘We have our own people everywhere'
Freed hostage Shlomi Ziv claimed he was shown disturbing images and stories of the protests that engulfed the Upper Manhattan campus last year while he was in captivity in the Gaza Strip.
5 A new filing in a federal lawsuit claims anti-Israeli Columbia University protesters are 'foot soldiers' for Hamas.
AP
Advertisement
5 Columbia University's Upper Manhattan campus has been a hotbed of anti-Israeli sentiment since the Oct. 7 attack.
AFP via Getty Images
'With the news report on, his captors told him, 'You see, we have our own people everywhere,' a court filing from Thursday said. 'They then told him that Hamas has an 'army' operating out of Gaza that focuses specifically on media and sending Hamas propaganda and messaging throughout America.'
The shocking allegation was revealed in an amended lawsuit filed against a slew of anti-Israel groups in Manhattan federal court for 'aiding and abetting Hamas' continuing acts of international terrorism and violations of the law of nations' following the terror groups Oct. 7, 2023 attack on Israel that left 1,200 dead and hundreds kidnapped.
Advertisement
Ziv, who is a plaintiff in the suit, was held in captivity for 246 days before he and four others were rescued in an Israel raid in June 2024. He claimed he was shown Al-Jazeera stories and pictures of the Columbia protests and that his captors 'bragged about having Hamas operatives on American university campuses.'
Filed on behalf of former hostages, the families of slain hostages, and former Israeli military personnel drawn into the Jewish State's counter-offensive against Hamas in Gaza, the suit claims the Ivy League school's protest organizers are essentially an arm of the terror group that impacted their lives.
5 Shlomi Ziv was taken hostage by Hamas and held for over 240 days in the Gaza Strip before being freed.
GoFundMe
5 Anti-Israeli organizers at Columbia University are essentially part of the Hamas terror network, a new lawsuit claims.
REUTERS
Advertisement
'The associated defendants acted as Hamas' foot soldiers in New York City and on Columbia's campus and enacted [protest organizer's] plan to disrupt Columbia's operations to assist Hamas,' the suit said.
The lawsuit, originally filed March 24, names several campus groups, including Within Our Lives, United for Palestine, Columbia Students for Justice In Palestine, Columbia University Apartheid Divest, Columbia-Barnard Jewish Voice For Peace, and individual group founders or leaders.
Ziv, an Israeli citizen, was working security at the Nova Music Festival on Oct. 7 when he was kidnapped. He and other hostages were starved and beaten 'almost every day,' their doctor said.
The Manhattan campus has been a hotbed for anti-Israeli demonstrations that have terrorized Jewish students — including some of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit who were enrolled at the school.
Advertisement
The school is among dozens of colleges and universities in the US that have seen pro-Palestinian protests, and anti-Israeli encampments following the Oct. 7 attack.
5 Shlomi Zi after his rescue by Israeli military forces in Gaza, where he was held for more than 240 days.
AFP via Getty Images
Last week, students burned their diplomas in protest on the Columbia campus, two weeks after masked student protesters stormed into the Butler Library at the school.
Last year, a mob of students took over Hamilton Hall on the campus and had to be forced out in a wild NYPD raid, leading to several arrests.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
16 minutes ago
- New York Post
Widow of Hamas chief smuggled out of Gaza with large sum of cash – and is already remarried
The widow of slain Hamas chief Yahya Sinwar was reportedly smuggled out Gaza and into Turkey in what's reported to be an operation involving 'high-level coordination, logistical support and large sums of money that regular Gazans don't have.' And just months after her husband's October death, Samar Muhammad Abu Zamar has reportedly remarried.
USA Today
16 minutes ago
- USA Today
After $220 million Columbia deal, Trump promises more to come
After commending Columbia University for "agreeing to do what is right," President Trump indicates his pressure campaign to reshape prestigious colleges isn't stopping any time soon. WASHINGTON – After announcing a $220 million deal with Columbia University to restore its federal funding, President Donald Trump indicated his pressure campaign to reshape prestigious colleges isn't stopping anytime soon. Not long after the settlement was reached, he wrote on his social media platform that similar agreements with "Numerous other Higher Education Institutions that have hurt so many, and been so unfair and unjust, and have wrongly spent federal money, much of it from our government, are upcoming." Columbia, a selective and wealthy Ivy League school in New York City, on July 23 agreed to pay more than $220 million in fines over several years to the government for allegedly violating federal civil rights laws. Last year, the campus became the epicenter of student protests related to the Israel-Hamas war. At the time, the tense environment drew nationwide concern over a spike in antisemitic and anti-Muslim incidents. The heightened scrutiny also focused the ire of many conservative politicians, who have long accused higher education more broadly of being too left-leaning. Read more: How Columbia University became the epicenter of disagreement over the Israel-Hamas war Trump's criticisms of the campus, however, have extended far beyond its compliance with antidiscrimination protections. In March, he demanded that the school overhaul its hiring, admissions and teaching practices. Columbia's president, Claire Shipman, said the university would appoint an independent monitor to oversee the campus in conjunction with federal officials, and to ensure administrators are abiding by the terms of the deal. The 22-page agreement contains sweeping concessions from the college, including handing over admissions data to the independent monitor, new faculty appointments, conducting reviews of some academic departments and more greatly scrutinizing foreign student enrollment. In return, the Trump administration promised to reroute more than $400 million in paused federal funding, largely for research, back to the college. In an interview on CNN the morning after the arrangement was announced, Shipman indicated billions more dollars were at stake. "It's not just money for Columbia," she said. "This is about science. It's about curing cancer, cutting edge, boundary breaking science that actually benefits the country and humanity." The unprecedented agreement came weeks after the administration struck a separate accord with the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, another member of the Ivy League, to unfreeze $175 million in return for apologizing to swimmers who competed against a transgender athlete years ago. "I also want to thank and commend Columbia University for agreeing to do what is right," Trump wrote. "I look forward to watching them have a great future in our Country, maybe greater than ever before!" Zachary Schermele is an education reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach him by email at zschermele@ Follow him on X at @ZachSchermele and Bluesky at @
The Hill
16 minutes ago
- The Hill
Forget trade wars — the future isn't about physical goods, but data, ideas and services
Despite a U.S.-driven trade war with China, voters turning to populism across the globe and the risk of a recession, reports of globalization's demise are — at least for now — overblown. Washington's trade hawks would do well to read the signs. True, that may seem like pie in the sky. Messages from Washington are all about reshoring and decoupling of trade. As President Trump's reciprocal tariffs aims to reindustrialize the American economy, his vision is one of the manufacture of cars and smartphones moving away from Asia to assembly lines of obedient workers in America. But the chief engine of the U.S. economy is no longer found in physical factories. Instead, it lies in intangible investments, such as research and development, software, organizational structures and intellectual capital. These immaterial assets eclipse physical capital such as machinery and equipment, now accounting for over 60 percent of corporate capital investment and, by some estimates, 90 percent of the S&P 500's market value. This has led to new patterns of globalization, defined by invisible items — data, ideas, modern services and cross-border teams. As trade in physical goods began to sputter in the beginning of the 21st century, these invisible flows have soared over the past decade. They are largely immune to tariffs, decoupling and attacks of populist politicians. Even with chips nearshored, global U.S. companies like Qualcomm still earn a quarter of their profits by licensing ideas globally. Although the U.S. may start soon a full-blown trade war with the European Union, data flows between the two trade giants are set to soar in the next decade, according to the European Commission. And as U.S. multinationals exit China, they remain reliant on cross-border teams within these companies. Meanwhile, modern services trade has continued to grow by 10 percent well into 2024 without interruption. Contrary to common belief, intangible flows span both manufacturing and services. Take Coca-Cola. The multinational rarely produces any of its famous beverages anymore. Instead, it licenses its recipe to non-affiliated contract producers called bottlers, from whom it receives property income. Google runs on worldwide data flows to power its services globally. McKinsey predicts that by 2040, modern sectors such as cloud computing, shared autonomous vehicles, AI, space and biotechnology will account for 16 percent of global GDP, nearly double the share of today's leading sectors like industrial electronics and semiconductors, which currently make up 9 percent. These emerging sectors fuse manufacturing and services. These sectors are also rife with global intangible flows. Consider BioNTech's COVID-19 vaccine. The underlying mRNA technology was licensed from the biochemist Katalin Karikó. Cloud‑based trial data zipped across borders and Pfizer's partnership turbo‑charged the research and development and scale‑up. The same blueprint was later licensed to Moderna for its vaccine. Intangible flows like these are powering modern U.S. multinational production networks and their supply chains. Just as a quarter to half of the trade in U.S. goods in the 20th century occurred within multinationals, so too will U.S. intangible flows mostly take place within global firms this century. These new flows clash with Trump's trade narrative. For starters, the American economy is well positioned to benefit, as it holds strong comparative advantages in these emerging industries. Second, they don't fit with populist views on the evils of trade deficits. Data, for instance, transcends borders as a global commodity, contributing neither to a country's trade deficit nor surplus. U.S. cross-border research and development and global teams remain largely unnoticed as an international flow. But their output has surged by respectively 95 and 30 percent since 2009, boosting income at home. Meanwhile, the U.S. has held the world's largest trade surplus in modern services for years, backing both high- and low-skilled jobs at home. The overall U.S. trade deficit in goods is not the problem, but rather the byproduct of America's greatest modern globalization success. These new globalization flows are difficult to grasp, hard to monetize and challenging to rein in behind countries' borders. They do not rely on ships, airplanes and trucks, but instead on the internet, human minds and collaboration. The paradox is that they have continued to grow despite the ongoing global turmoil, and they could put the U.S. in the driver's seat this century. The outlook for globalization is more positive than the populist doomsayers in Washington are claiming. However, new intangible flows rely on attracting the world's top talent, without undermining universities; on maintaining a predictable environment for global business, without disregarding court rulings; and on avoiding questionable policy initiatives, without blindsiding allies. If the U.S. truly wants to capitalize on its strengths, policymakers should change their global engagement strategy and embrace the next wave of globalization before it's too late.
