Deseret News archives: ‘Ping-pong diplomacy' took center stage in 1971
On April 10, 1971, the U.S. table tennis team arrived in China at the invitation of the communist government for a goodwill visit that came to be known as 'ping-pong diplomacy.'
That year, nine players from the U.S. Table Tennis team took a historic trip to China, becoming the first delegation of Americans to visit the country in decades. Following the 1949 Chinese revolution, there had been no diplomatic ties, limited trade and few contacts between the United States and China.
Their trip was the start of what became known as 'ping-pong diplomacy' and helped lay the groundwork for establishing official diplomatic relations between the United States and China. Ping-pong diplomacy also led to improved people-to-people understanding and cultural exchange.
According to historical accounts, the U.S. team was at the 1971 World Table Tennis Championship in Nagoya, Japan, when an encounter between Glenn Cowan of the U.S. team and Zhuang Zedong of the Chinese team became an international sensation. Cowan had missed his bus following practice and boarded the Chinese team's bus. Zhuang approached the American, shaking his hand and offering him a depiction of the Huangshan Mountains on a piece of silk cloth.
When they exited the bus, journalists snapped photos of the two together. Two days later, the U.S. team received an official invitation to travel to China and play exhibition matches against the Chinese team. The United States accepted the invitation and everyone rushed to make arrangements.
U.S. Department of State consular officials in Japan, in advance of the team's onward journey to China, made a simple but profound change to their passports. On the page warning travelers of legal penalties 'for travel to or in Communist-controlled portions' of the listed countries, the officials simply took a black marker and carefully crossed-out 'China.'
The headlines in the Deseret News in in mid-April followed the daily interactions with the American athletes.
'Tennis players in Red China'
'Small hope opens in Red China Wall'
'Table tennis team will talk with China'
In 1972, U.S. President Richard Nixon made a trip to China. Here are some stories from Deseret News archives about the trip and diplomacy with China:
'Was Mao monster or Chinese hero?'
'Mao mementos a click away'
'Nixon's visit to China 20 years ago changed history'
'Soccer may help smooth ties between U.S., China'
'Qatar outreach widens with ping pong 'diplomacy''
'Deseret News archives: Nixon's trip to China concluded with a promise and a couple of pandas'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Vox
22 minutes ago
- Vox
The spin master in charge of feeding Gaza
The desperate plight of starving Gazans has captured the world's attention. Children are dying of malnutrition. Over 1,000 Palestinians have been killed while attempting to receive aid. The United Nations World Food Program has found that one-third of Gaza's roughly 2.1 million residents are not eating for multiple days in a row. More than 100 international aid organizations — including Doctors Without Borders, Save the Children, and Oxfam — signed a letter last week saying that 'restrictions, delays, and fragmentation under [Israel's] total siege have created chaos, starvation, and death.' And more than 30 countries, including Israel's allies, issued a joint statement earlier this month condemning 'the drip feeding of aid and the inhumane killing of civilians, including children, seeking to meet their most basic needs of water and food.' So who is overseeing this disaster? A public relations professional, the Rev. Johnnie Moore, with little experience in humanitarian aid. Moore is the executive chair of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, a private group backed by Israel and the US. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation has been controversial since it took over aid distribution in Gaza in May. Its first executive director, Jake Wood, resigned after a few weeks and complained of Israeli interference in their operations. The UN had set up 400 distribution sites in Gaza, but the GHF reduced that to four. The shortage of distribution sites has meant that Gazans walk long distances for food, and often leave empty-handed. Violence has also been prevalent at the aid distribution sites. American contractors armed with live ammunition and stun grenades guard the food alongside Israeli forces, who have opened fire on crowds awaiting aid. Israel denies responsibility and blames Hamas for the violence. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has claimed that there is 'no starvation' in Gaza. Today, Explained co-host Sean Ramewaram spoke with Arno Rosenfeld, enterprise reporter at The Forward, the largest Jewish news outlet in the United States, about Moore's background and how he's navigating the crisis. Below is an excerpt of their conversation, edited for length and clarity. There's much more in the full podcast, so listen to Today, Explained wherever you get podcasts, including Apple Podcasts, Pandora, and Spotify. Tell us more about the guy who's in charge of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), Johnnie Moore. Johnnie Moore is an evangelical leader with a long history in Republican politics. He graduated from Liberty University and then worked in communications for them for a number of years. That's the university founded by Jerry Falwell, a big evangelical mecca in the country. And then he went from that into PR. He was running a boutique PR firm that got acquired recently by a larger firm, and they do work for both Marriott Hotels and also Focus on the Family. It's not exclusively conservative religious causes, but it includes that. And then he's had various roles in the government. So he was an evangelical adviser to President Trump during his first campaign. He prayed with Trump in the White House… Prayed with Trump! Didn't know Trump was a big prayer. Well, he's surrounded himself with these leaders. And Liberty was a big part of burnishing his conservative evangelical bona fides during that first race. So he has a long history there. And Moore held various posts in the government. He was on the committee that the US has to promote religious freedom around the world. So he's traveled around the world to defend the religious liberty of Muslims in China and different groups in different countries in the Middle East. He was involved in some of the diplomatic work with Saudi Arabia with Trump. He met with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman a number of years ago. So Moore has had long ties to the Trump administration, and now he is in this new role as a humanitarian. Everything makes sense up until '... and now he's in this new role as a humanitarian.' Because, as you're saying here, he's basically a PR guy. How does he go from PR flack in the Trump administration to in charge of maybe one of the most consequential humanitarian missions on the planet? The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation is a very strange entity, but the most direct answer to your question is that Moore has a long history of supporting Israel, of traveling to Israel. He's deep into the world of Christian Zionism. Of course, a lot of Israel's strongest supporters in the United States are evangelical Christians. And so he comes out of that world and has these ties. And I think for a variety of reasons, when they were looking for someone to take over this organization after the executive director stepped down in May after only a few weeks on the job, they brought Moore in to burnish its reputation. He's been on a big media tour. So he's leaning into his PR expertise in this new role. What's he saying on his big media tour? His argument is basically that the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation is the victim of conspiracy theories promoted by the United Nations, which wants to hoard all of the aid and the glory for delivering food for themselves. He's also claiming that Hamas is on their own PR tour and has snookered all of these reporters around the world into repeating lies about the humanitarian situation in Gaza. So, basically, GHF is doing great work. They're doing the most Christian thing possible, in his words, feeding people. And unfortunately, the entire international aid community at the behest of the UN and perhaps also Hamas just has it in for them. It's very unfair, but they're not going to let that stop them from doing the Lord's work. What does he have to say about all the dead Palestinians? The dead Palestinians as a result of starvation or as a result of being shot while trying to get food from his organization? The second one. His argument is, again: It's very tragic. They never want anyone to lose their lives. He said that they complain often to the IDF when the IDF shoots at people queuing for aid. He said the IDF has taken responsibility for those incidents. He said Hamas has also attacked GHF employees and Palestinians trying to get aid from GHF, and that Hamas has not taken responsibility for that. He said that more people are being killed trying to get UN and World Food Programme aid than have been killed trying to get his organization's aid. It depends a little bit how you parse the statistics. I don't think that's true, but that's what he's been saying in these public appearances. Is he convincing anyone? One of the things that's important to understand about his role and what the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation is intended to do is that there is a segment of Israel supporters in the United States that live in a little bit of an alternate reality. And I think his job is to convince those people that Israel and the United States are not responsible for Palestinian civilians starving in Gaza. So, for example, the piece that I wrote was about him addressing the American Jewish Congress. And his argument to them was basically: Yes, there is a humanitarian crisis. We are doing everything in our power. The United States and Israel are doing the right thing. Unfortunately, all these other aid groups are just letting food rot. He's a charismatic guy. He's good at talking to these audiences. So I do think it's a convincing message for that audience. It's just a very specific audience. Does it tell us something, though, that this is the kind of person that was put at the top of this operation, that it wasn't someone with deep experience in aid, but instead someone who would fight the PR war around the effort? It's another good question because Cindy McCain, John McCain's widow, runs the World Food Programme. So it's not totally unprecedented to have people who have a public profile and political connections in these figurehead roles atop humanitarian organizations. But Cindy McCain, after a lot of pressure, has become increasingly critical of the Israeli government. That's what people thought might happen with GHF. It's not just that Moore has these political connections or that he doesn't have deep expertise in humanitarian aid, but his job is to defend the United States and Israel, which is incredibly unusual. It's not anything that I've seen an aid organization do in the past. Certainly sometimes they speak out politically here or there, but they're not typically primarily promoting what almost seems like a political agenda. And that's a lot of what we've seen Johnnie Moore do, even as he insists the politics are the worst possible thing for humanitarian aid and he doesn't want anything to do with them. A lot of Israel supporters in the United States are liberal. They do care about civilians in Gaza, and they're very alarmed by what they're seeing in the news about starvation in Gaza. And so I think those people desperately want to be reassured that Israel, the Jewish state that they support, is not responsible for mass starvation and civilian suffering in Gaza. And he's presented a very compelling narrative to them. That's a lot of the role that he's playing right now. And I think that he's playing it well.
NBC News
22 minutes ago
- NBC News
Trump is ‘clearly afraid' of what's in the Epstein files, says Pennsylvania House Democrat
Rep. Chris Deluzio (D-Pa.) joins Meet the Press NOW to discuss the president's domestic agenda legislation as Republicans lawmakers head back to their districts to sell the bill. Rep. Deluzio slammed the law, accusing it of saddling the American people with debt. The congressman also called for the release of the Epstein files, claiming the President is 'clearly afraid' of what's in the 29, 2025
New York Post
23 minutes ago
- New York Post
EPA chief Lee Zeldin to repeal ‘holy grail' Obama-era emissions finding that hiked energy costs for years
WASHINGTON — Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin is moving to repeal an Obama-era emissions finding he once dubbed the 'holy grail of the climate change religion' that underpinned $1 trillion in regulations — leading to higher energy costs for more than a decade. Zeldin revealed plans to rescind the 2009 Endangerment Finding during a speech at an Indianapolis auto dealership on Tuesday, promising to 'end sixteen years of uncertainty for automakers and American consumers' with 'the largest deregulatory announcement in US history.' 'In our work so far, many stakeholders have told me that the Obama and Biden EPAs twisted the law, ignored precedent, and warped science to achieve their preferred ends and stick American families with hundreds of billions of dollars in hidden taxes every single year,' said the former Long Island congressman. Advertisement 5 'With this proposal, the Trump EPA is proposing to end sixteen years of uncertainty for automakers and American consumers,' EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin said. REUTERS 'We heard loud and clear the concern that EPA's GHG [greenhouse gas] emissions standards themselves, not carbon dioxide — which the Finding never assessed independently — was the real threat to Americans' livelihoods,' Zeldin went on. 'If finalized, rescinding the Endangerment Finding and resulting regulations would end $1 trillion or more in hidden taxes on American businesses and families.' The EPA has projected that rescinding the finding could save American consumers alone up to $54 billion in annual costs. Advertisement Under Obama, the EPA determined that carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons and sulfur hexafluoride emissions, primarily from cars, were threatening to the 'public health and welfare of current and future generations.' No immediate regulations were imposed but the finding allowed the 44th president's administration to put forward seven subsequent rules affecting the auto industry, as well as others touching on energy issues. Zeldin's proposal would scrap the finding that allowed both Obama's and former President Joe Biden's EPA to regulate emissions by vehicles that are light-, medium- and heavy-duty as well as those with heavy-duty engines under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act. 5 Zeldin revealed plans to rescind the 2009 Endangerment Finding by former President Barack Obama's EPA during a speech at an Indianapolis auto dealership on Tuesday. Getty Images Advertisement The rules began taking effect for light-duty vehicles — including cars, vans, SUVs and pickup trucks — in 2010 but later ramped up to cover all models. Biden used it to justify his push for mass production of electric vehicles during his administration. 'This electric-truck mandate put the trucking industry on a path to economic ruin and would have crippled our supply chain, disrupted deliveries, and raised prices for American families and businesses,' said American Trucking Association President Chris Spear, who joined Zeldin at the event alongside Energy Secretary Chris Wright and Indiana GOP Gov. Mike Braun. 'Moreover, it kicked innovation to the curb by discarding available technologies that can further drive down emissions at a fraction of the cost.' 5 Under Obama, the EPA determined carbon dioxide as well as methane, nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons and sulfur hexafluoride emissions, primarily from cars, were threatening to public health. Tricky Shark – Advertisement Democrats in Congress panned the move, with Rep. Frank Pallone (D-NJ), the ranking member on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, telling Politico it amounted to 'a despicable betrayal of the American people.' 'President Trump and his EPA administrator are now pretending that climate pollution does not endanger human health or the environment — not because there is any scientific justification, but because it helps line the pockets of their billionaire corporate polluter friends,' Pallone said. The reversal comes as Zeldin is seeking to cut red tape for other energy-related issues. 5 The reversal comes as Zeldin is seeking to cut red tape for other energy-related issues. Getty Images 5 US Supreme Court cases have aided Trump's EPA leader in limiting the agency's regulatory authority — including emissions standards that controlled coal and gas power plants generating electricity. AFP via Getty Images Several recent US Supreme Court cases have aided Trump's EPA leader in limiting the agency's regulatory authority — including scrapping emissions standards that controlled coal and gas power plants generating electricity. The White House Office of Management and Budget is also planning on addressing rescission of the Obama-era finding at other agencies. Advertisement 'Since the Obama EPA illegally issued its unconstitutional endangerment finding in 2009, more than half of the US coal industry has been destroyed, electricity prices have soared, and the average price of cars has almost doubled,' said Steve Milloy, senior fellow at the Energy and Environment Legal Institute and an adviser to Trump's EPA transition team. 'Where do wrongly terminated coal miners, wrecked coal industry-dependent communities and ripped-off consumers go for redress of the injuries inflicted by a climate-hoaxed crazed federal government?'
