
A Spoken Calendar: Independent India Through the Eyes of its People
Excerpts from the conversation:
Q: What was the genesis of the book?
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
La Union: Un segundo ingreso para ecuatorianos: prueba Amazon CFD (Inicia hoy).
Empezar ahora
Registrarse
Undo
A:
The genesis was the publisher,
David Davidar
, who had chanced upon a book called 'A Personal History of Ireland Since 1958' written by Fintan O'Toole. He sent it to me saying, Gopal, would you like to take a look at it? And if you think you like the book, would you like to attempt a similar book on independent India? So I said, gosh, that's a tall one. But then I saw around me at home a lot of photographs from old times, archives, letters. And I said, maybe these old papers deserve to be dusted up and put into a narrative. And maybe Fintan O'Toole has just given me the chance to do so. And I told David, I am on board. That's how it started.
Q: What was it that appealed to you in that book that made you feel that there was a possibility in your attempting this as well?
A:
See, Fintan O'Toole, unlike me, is a very lively person. With a lot of things that have happened in his life which make his life interesting. So that was a big difference. Mine has been a very boring and humdrum life, but Fintan's has not been. But it was the structure of his book that held out some hope and promise for me. The structure was like this year by year, giving the name of what happened in that year as the title for that year. He has traversed the history of the Republic of Ireland with some of his own personal stuff put into it. And it seemed to me like a spoken calendar, a verbal diary. And I said, I think this interests me. And the structure and the form of Fintan O'Toole's gripped me as much as the content.
Q: When you were writing the 'Undying Light', albeit it's a memoir, you're looking at the personal documentation. How many layers of writing did it require before you reached this point of being able to publish it?
A:
That's an important question, both from the standpoint of writing as such and from the viewpoint of writing this particular book. As a columnist of
Monthly Columns
, I have had a working principle, you may call it working procedure, perhaps, by which I write to the fullest scope of what I want to say and then trim it down to the word count that has been given to me. That's how I wrote this. I put in all that I thought was necessary and then trimmed it down chapter by chapter, to the word count that my publisher had prescribed for me. And so layers is a very good expression. It is a layering, layering by my own sense of what needs to be said, and then a paring of that layering to what the publisher thinks is the right shape and size.
Q: How long did it take you to write this manuscript?
A:
It took me two and a half years. But those two and a half years were not devoted solely to the writing of this book. They were full of my life, my life with my grandchildren, with my children, with my family and with my teaching and writing of columns. So in shared time shared with family, friends and commitments, it took two and a half years. If I was doing only this and nothing else, I might have finished it in a year.
Q: When recounting for the sake of putting it down in writing and telling a story to a larger audience, many of whom you don't know, how do you find your voice in that space?
A:
There were two, three criteria which I had given to myself. One was difficult. I am writing about what I have seen, heard, experienced and because I've seen, heard and experienced. But I should not put myself at the centre of what I am writing. I should say what I know egolessly and as far as possible without using the letter, single letter word. It is difficult. But I did try to do so. I tried to mute my voice while I found my words.
Q: If anyone needs a good start of understanding how and what our democracy is and how it can work, it is to read this amazing document, this visionary document.
A:
You know, you're right. And here, if I may narrate a small incident. When I was working in West Bengal, I went to a village in Murshidabad which is at the moment the scene of a great deal of violence. I went to a village where they make bidis, handmade cigarettes. Smoking is an unhealthy thing and it is very rightly under great control now. But I went to see how the bidi is being made and what the life of the bidi makers is like. There were almost no men in the village. They had all gone out to work or to seek work. Women, mothers and their daughters were rolling these bidis from material that had been given to them by middlemen. And I went to one hut with a young girl, small girl, she was about 12 or so. And I said, are you not in school today? And she was so frank, she said, no, sir, I am not in school because you were coming. Our school has been shut today. And I felt so bad about it. But then I asked her, okay, can I see your books which you read? She went and opened a small box in her hut and brought out a book in a brown paper cover. And I saw it was the
Constitution of India
in English. I asked her if she had read it. And she said she had. So I said, can you recite any one line? And she stepped back, stood straight, hands down, chin up, and recited for me the
Preamble of India
or the Constitution of India. 'We, the people of India'. My heart trembled, my lips went dry, my hands shook in amazement. And I said to her in my mind, one day you will be the President of India.
Q: You have been a bureaucrat, and a diplomat, and upon your retirement, governor of West Bengal. You have seen the Constitution work in so many different ways. And that is what I have really enjoyed reading the subtext in your memoir.
A:
I am glad you are emphasising the importance of the Constitution as such and the place of the Constitution in this book. I can't help but say here, that the Preamble, which is a lyrical document, has been translated with the rest of the Constitution in all the languages of India. But the Sanskrit translation of Preamble starts with 'We the people of India' as 'Vayam Bharatasya jana' and the Urdu translation starts with 'Hum hind ki avam'. There is an extraordinary lyrical voltage to 'Vayam Bharatasya jana' and 'Hum Hind ki avam' which takes it even beyond the English. We the people of India. This book is about the people of India both as a collectivity and as so many individuals.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Donald Trump tariffs to dent India's GDP growth? Up to 30 basis points dip possible, say experts; expected trade deal could soften blow
AI-generated image The imposition of a 25 per cent US tariff on Indian goods from August 1, along with an unspecified penalty over India's continued trade with Russia, could weigh on India's GDP growth and export prospects, experts have warned. Sectors such as pharmaceuticals, gems and jewellery, textiles, and automobiles are likely to be most affected. While the tariff blow is expected to lower India's GDP by up to 30 basis points, analysts believe the impact could be mitigated through an eventual trade agreement between the two countries, helped by India's domestic demand-driven growth model, according to PTI. ICRA : Growth forecast may be downgraded if penalty is severe ICRA Chief Economist Aditi Nayar said the US move was harsher than previously anticipated. 'We had already factored in a lower growth projection of 6.2 per cent for FY26 due to earlier tariffs. Now, the new 25 per cent tariff plus the penalty could pose a sharper headwind,' she said, adding that the exact impact will depend on how steep the penalty turns out to be. EY: Active trade engagement still offers hope EY India's Trade Policy Leader Agneshwar Sen stressed the importance of the ongoing bilateral negotiations. 'Given the shared history and strategic partnership, both sides can resolve these contentious issues constructively and reach a mutually beneficial agreement,' he said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Mini House for 60 sqm for Seniors with Toilet and Bath (Price May Surprise You) Pre Fabricated Homes | Search Ads Search Now Undo Barclays: India's domestic demand limits gdp hit Barclays estimates that the new tariffs could shave off 30 basis points from GDP in FY26, but India's relatively closed economy will cushion the blow. 'We expect the final tariff to settle below 25 per cent as talks progress,' it said. It also highlighted that the Indian rupee is oversold, though pressure will persist in the short term. Elara Capital: India's disadvantage vs others Garima Kapoor, economist at Elara Capital, said the tariff makes India less competitive compared to peers like Vietnam and Indonesia, which face lower duties. The uncertainty around pharma inclusion is particularly worrying, she noted, since the US accounts for over 30 per cent of India's pharmaceutical exports. "If no deal is signed by September-October, we see a downside to full-year GDP growth estimate for India by 20 basis points," she said. Grant Thornton: Market will adapt despite geopolitical shocks Rishi Shah of Grant Thornton Bharat said the economic ecosystem is resilient. 'Markets adjust, and new equilibria emerge. The multi-alignment strategy followed by India will help it navigate such shocks,' he added. Moody's Analytics: Pharma, gems, and dairy access are key flashpoints Aditi Raman of Moody's Analytics said India's relative insulation from global trade shocks is a plus, but the tariffs will hurt key sectors. She pointed out that agriculture and dairy access remain sensitive issues in US-India negotiations. Artha Bharat Fund: Tariff high but not a surprise Nachiketa Sawrikar of Artha Bharat Global Multiplier Fund said the government likely expected such a move. 'China already faces a 30 per cent tariff. India's rate could have been worse, though it still puts us behind ASEAN peers,' he said. FED: India now worse off than competitors like China Rahul Ahluwalia of the Foundation for Economic Development said the 25 per cent tariff puts India at a disadvantage against countries like China and Vietnam. 'India must act fast to secure a favourable deal,' he warned. Choice broking: Temporary blow to investor confidence Utsav Verma, Head of Research at Choice Broking, said sectors such as pharma, auto components, and textiles may see a short-term dip in investor sentiment. However, he believes the tariff will likely settle closer to 15 per cent once negotiations progress. Medical Technology Association: Tariffs politically and strategically misguided Chairman Pavan Choudary called the move 'economically shortsighted and strategically inappropriate.' He said coercive trade measures in response to India's sovereign decisions on defence and energy partnerships with Russia are 'counterproductive.' Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . Discover stories of India's leading eco-innovators at Ecopreneur Honours 2025


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Pivot to Pakistan: Is Trump ditching Delhi for its enemy?
In a surprising move that sent ripples through South Asia's already volatile geopolitical landscape, U.S. President Donald Trump announced an oil exploration deal with Pakistan, just hours after imposing steep 25% tariffs on Indian imports while threatening additional penalties for buying weapons and oil from Russia. While the Trump administration's transactional approach to foreign policy is well-documented, the timing and optics of this decision raise a deeper strategic question: Is the United States, under Trump, pivoting away from India in favour of Pakistan? Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Degree Project Management others Technology Data Analytics Design Thinking Data Science Management MBA Cybersecurity Healthcare MCA PGDM Public Policy Operations Management Finance CXO healthcare Leadership Product Management Digital Marketing Others Data Science Skills you'll gain: Data-Driven Decision-Making Strategic Leadership and Transformation Global Business Acumen Comprehensive Business Expertise Duration: 2 Years University of Western Australia UWA Global MBA Starts on Jun 28, 2024 Get Details A strategic recalibration or short-term opportunism? America's relationship with India had largely been characterized by warmth and strategic convergence, especially concerning China. From the Indo-Pacific vision to defense and technology cooperation, India had emerged as a natural partner in America's containment policy toward Beijing. However, this recent tilt toward Pakistan complicates that alignment. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Sleep Apnea Ruined My Life – Then I Found This Simple Trick Health Insight Undo Trump's Pakistan pivot — if it can be called that — appears to be driven by multiple overlapping interests. Reports suggest that Pakistan has dangled lucrative mineral deals and crypto opportunities before Trump and his inner circle, including Trump Jr. This is no small matter for an administration (and political family) often accused of blending personal business interests with state policy. By cozying up to Pakistan, Trump could be attempting to extract concessions from India, particularly on trade, defense procurement, and its growing ties with Russia and China. This 'carrot-and-stick' approach aligns with Trump's pattern of coercive diplomacy. Live Events The U.S. has long sought leverage in South Asia as it shifts focus away from direct military interventions. Pakistan, due to its proximity to Iran, Afghanistan, and Central Asia, offers a valuable launchpad for intelligence and counterterrorism operations. In this light, the pivot may reflect a broader recalibration, not just a one-off transactional deal. Trump may believe he can weaken China's influence in the region by luring Pakistan away from Beijing's orbit, especially if he can offer economic incentives or diplomatic backing. Yet this is an ambitious, if not unrealistic, bet given Pakistan's deep economic and military entanglement with China via CPEC and other strategic pacts. India's response: Strategic patience or policy rethink? India has been notably wary of America's renewed engagement with Pakistan. New Delhi has long viewed U.S.-Pakistan ties through the prism of duplicity: Washington arms Islamabad in the name of counterterrorism even as terror groups strike Indian soil. The situation is further aggravated by Trump's posturing around the India-Pakistan ceasefire of May 10. Trump claimed it was his intervention, and implied trade threats, that led to de-escalation, while India insists that it was a communication from a humbled Pakistan that led to the stand-down. This divergence in narrative reflects a deeper trust deficit. More significantly, Trump's reception of General Asim Munir and the recent award to US General Erik Kurilla by Pakistan, months after the Pahalgam terror attack, has only deepened Indian suspicion. These moves, coupled with Secretary of State Marco Rubio's gratitude to Pakistan for counterterrorism cooperation, signal to India that Washington may be willing to overlook Pakistan's links to terror in exchange for short-term regional utility. The bigger picture: A zero-sum fallacy? It would be a mistake, however, to see America's Pakistan outreach purely as an abandonment of India. The U.S.-India strategic relationship is anchored in shared long-term interests —economic, technological, and military — that are difficult to replicate with Pakistan. However, Trump's actions signal a desire to rebalance or at least re-leverage that relationship. For India, this means it must resist the urge to overreact but remain vigilant. Recent signs of New Delhi warming up to Beijing may be a signal to Washington that India has options too. The irony is that a US administration aiming to pull Pakistan out of China's embrace may inadvertently push India closer to it. Trump's pivot to Pakistan may be more tactical than strategic, but its implications are significant. By leaning into Pakistan for resources, regional leverage, and possibly to curb Chinese influence, Trump risks alienating India — a far more stable, democratic, and economically promising partner. If the U.S. under Trump (or a future administration) is perceived as rewarding Pakistan despite its checkered history with terrorism and military adventurism, India may begin recalibrating its trust in the U.S. partnership. That could have lasting consequences, not only for the Indo-Pacific strategy but also for America's standing as a reliable ally in Asia. In the end, Trump may view foreign policy as a high-stakes deal-making exercise but in a region as combustible and complex as South Asia, missteps born of transactionalism could carry strategic costs that outlast any oil deal or tariff measure.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Who is Mike from PA aka Central_Committee and why did Twitch ban him?
Image via: Mike from PA on YouTube With another storm brewing for the politically-oriented commentator, streamer, and broadcaster, Michael Beyer, once known online as Mike From PA or the Twitch username Central_Committee, found himself momentarily banned on July 30, 2025. This was actually his fifth recorded Twitch suspension. The temporary ban was flagged first by the automated account, which threw up once again the discourse around Beyer's increasingly polarizing presence in the online political realm. A Pattern of Controversy Mike From PA has long had a controversial presence on Twitch. Due to his weird style, the streamer had long occupied a sour spot in online discussions. The exact cause of the ban has never been publicly revealed, but at least a message on his Twitch account says that he was banned for breaching Community Guidelines or Terms of Service. Despite that, the ban is not permanent. Various fans speculate about a 30 days suspension, with many calling for even harsher penalties in light of recent history. Viral Clip Sparks Outrage Just hours before the ban, a 21-second video of one of Beyer's latest 'Just Chatting' streams went viral. In it, Mike From PA paused a speech given by the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the 2024 UN General Assembly and then proceeded with a controversial statement questioning the legitimacy of Jewish identity as an ethnicity: "Actually crazy. Jew is not a f**king ethnic. Jewish is not an ethnicity. This constructed ethnicity, this demonic ethnicity, wholly invented!" The statement spread quickly over platforms such as X and Reddit and was largely condemned as antisemitic. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Discover how to go from draft to done in a few clicks—not a few hours. Grammarly Install Now Undo Beyer was seen by his critics as promoting dangerous rhetoric and dehumanizing a legitimate religious and ethnic body. On the other hand, Beyer's supporters tried to refute the argument stating that these are political criticisms wrongly construed outside of their intended context. Community Backlash and Platform Pressure The reaction has been swift and vocal. There have been some going as far as calling for an advertiser boycott should Twitch fail to impose a longer suspension. "If this is shorter than 30 days I'm still targeting advertisers," one user posted. Meanwhile, there's yet to be an official comment from Twitch, which is nowadays owned by Amazon, about this incident or the length What's Next for Mike From PA? The channel, meanwhile, is still showing offline, but given what Beyer stood for, one can hardly imagine a quiet departure. With loyal fans and a knack for stirring up trouble, Mike From PA is bound to make yet another comeback perhaps even under more scrutiny than before. While the debate is raging on, one thing is crystal clear: the boundary between a political discourse and hate speech is being put under harsher scrutiny than ever on platforms like Twitch. Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!