U.S. took convicted murderer as part of Venezuela-El Salvador prisoner exchange
Dahud Hanid Ortiz, a U.S. veteran who served in Iraq, was convicted in absentia in Spain of killing two Cuban women and an Ecuadorian man in 2016.
Ortiz, who is a Venezuelan-born U.S. citizen, fled to the South American country after committing the crime. Venezuela's government rejected Spain's extradition request because its constitution does not allow the extradition of its citizens. Instead, Ortiz was tried in Venezuela.
A State Department spokesperson wrote in an emailed statement to NBC News that 'the United States had the opportunity to secure the release of all Americans detained in Venezuela, many of whom reported being subjected to torture and other harsh conditions. For privacy reasons, I won't get into the details of any specific case.'
The Venezuelan government last week released the 10 Americans, along with Venezuelan political prisoners, in exchange for more than 250 Venezuelan migrants the Trump administration had sent to a notorious megaprison in El Salvador in March. The three-country deal involved the governments of Nicolas Maduro in Venezuela, Nayib Bukele in El Salvador and President Donald Trump.
'Every wrongfully detained American in Venezuela is now free and back in our homeland,' Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a statement last week.
Two photos released by the State Department on Friday show the 10 freed Americans, including Ortiz, holding an American flag.
Ortiz was awarded a Purple Heart and was dishonorably discharged after making a false official statement and larceny, among other charges.
Ortiz was married to a German woman he met while stationed at the U.S. base in Schweinfurt, according to Spanish newspaper El País. They later separated and she developed a relationship with a lawyer in Madrid. Ortiz is accused of showing up at the law office and kill three of its employees. The lawyer with whom Ortiz's wife was reportedly having a relationship with was not at the office at the time.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
18 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Love & Other Poisons by Lesley McDowell review: 'enthralling'
Sign up to our Arts and Culture newsletter, get the latest news and reviews from our specialist arts writers Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... It was the most scandalous case in Victorian Scotland. Madeleine Smith, daughter of a successful Glasgow merchant – one with a country house too – was charged with murdering her lover, Emile L'Angelier, a French exile, ten years older than her and working as a clerk in a Glasgow office. There was no doubt that they were or had been lovers. Madeline, however, had been engaged to a young man approved of by her father. Emile had threatened to send Madeleine's love letters to her father, so there was clear evidence of motive. Lesley McDowell Moreover, Madeline had bought arsenic for medicinal purposes and her lover was killed by arsenic poisoning. But there was no evidence of how Madeline could have fed Emile the poison. The inability to prove this saved her. The Jury found the case 'not proven', that distinctive verdict open to Scots juries which in effect often means 'we're pretty sure you did it, but it hasn't been proved' or simply 'go away and don't do it again.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Lesley McDowell, in this fine novel, comes up with a plausible explanation of how the arsenic might have been introduced into Emile's body. She has no doubt that Madeline was guilty, yet feels for her. Madeleine is indeed the heroine here. In fact, the Glasgow scenes are only part of the story, and McDowell even denies herself the dramatic opportunities offered by the trial, restricting this to a few things said by the lawyers. She is at least as interested in what happened next, and indeed much later, for the novel opens with a brash young American forcing himself onto a nonagenarian Mrs Sheehy, claiming to be a friend of her granddaughter. The American, Harry, has come from Hollywood, where the silent movies are about to become talkies. He has identified the old woman as the infamous Madeleine – which she denies, not wishing her granddaughter and other younger members of her family to know her dark secret. Indeed, Madeleine has come a long way from Glasgow. For some years she moved successfully in London society, but in America her life has been more modest. Her past is to be forgotten, and she is now a respectable old lady. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The American bullies her nastily, however, and she is also disturbed by a murder trial in New York in which she sees an accused woman as a victim. It is part of McDowell's skill and understanding of human nature to make the very old Madeleine seem a sympathetic heroine, even though there is little doubt that a lifetime ago she murdered her French lover. It's an enthralling novel, a beautifully organised tale in which McDowell shifts the perspective with great skill. She has been living with this story for a long time, revealing that ten years ago she was planning to collaborate with that finely imaginative novelist Emma Tennant in a version of Madeleine's story. Tennant's death made this impossible, but the finished article is a book that Tennant would surely have admired. It is certainly thoroughly enjoyable – a remarkably intelligent and at times very moving fictionalisation of an extraordinary life.
The National
18 minutes ago
- The National
Expert debunks peers' bid to stop UK recognising Palestine as a state
On Thursday, around 40 members of the unelected second chamber wrote to Attorney General Richard Hermer, suggesting that the criteria for recognising Palestine had not been met under the Montevideo Convention – a Pan-American treaty signed in 1933. The Convention, signed by 17 signatories in the Americas, set out four key criteria for statehood. The UK was not a signatory. Richard McNeil-Willson, who lectures in the Islamic and Middle Eastern studies department at Edinburgh University, said that the interpretation was 'not only ludicrous' by a 'cynical' interpretation of the treaty. READ MORE: Ipso defends chair for publicly opposing recognition of Palestine And, Scottish Greens co-leader Patrick Harvie said it was 'deplorable' that peers were trying to use legal technicalities while a genocide is underway. The criteria under the Montevideo Convention sets out that a state must have a permanent population, a defined territory, a government and capacity to enter into relations with other states. But, McNeil-Willson explained there are several issues with that argument, adding that it was a 'spoiler attempt' to stop Palestinians from having 'basic rights'. 'It's very bizarre that this has been focused on by the 43 peers and signatories who essentially put forward these arguments that Palestine doesn't meet any of the four criteria," he said. 'You can look at this from a technical point of view, the letter of the law, and you can say, well clearly Palestine has a permanent population. 'It also has borders, and it has borders that are internationally recognised, and they are recognised under the International Court of Justice.' (Image: Supplied) McNeil-Willson noted the claims that this applies as there isn't a functioning government in Palestine, there have been no elections for decades, and Hamas is a terrorist organisation, falls short. 'The [Montevideo Convention] doesn't care what kind of government is in place, if it's a democratic organisation, they wouldn't care if it's non-democratic authoritarian – that doesn't stop it from being recognised as a state,' he added. 'Equally, the idea that it's a terrorist organisation – if you look at contemporary international relations, the recognition of the Taliban as a government in Afghanistan, despite it being previously seen by the US and lots of Europe as a terrorist organisation. 'Then there's the HTS [Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham] in Syria which is now being recognised as the legitimate government of Syria, that doesn't change Syria's righteousness as a state. None of these ideas make any sense.' McNeil-Willson added that under the interpretation put forward by the peers in the letter, the 147 states that have already recognised Palestine, including Mexico, Brazil, and Chile, who also signed the Montevideo Convention, are already in violation of international law. READ MORE: 'Keir' name goes extinct after Starmer comes to power 'The arguments they're putting forward – that the population isn't permanent, the borders aren't recognised – are a direct result of Israel's genocide, of its bombing and its invasion,' he added. 'It's not only ludicrous, it's a very cynical view of the conflict that in no way takes Israel's role into account.' He added: 'To Israel, the existence of Palestine is a threat. To Palestinians, it's simply a way of proclaiming basic human rights that should be granted to them.' Scottish Greens co-leader Harvie said that recognition of Palestine as a state is 'long overdue'. 'It must be just the first step of many toward achieving peace, security and justice for the Palestinian people,' he added. 'To seek legal technicalities to block progress is deplorable. We should completely reject the idea that Palestine should be denied statehood because of factors which are entirely the result of Israel's occupation and illegal settlements over many years. 'The current genocide must end, the occupation must end, and the international community must finally take action against the state of Israel for its dehumanisation of Palestinians and hold war criminals accountable.' We previously told how Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced the UK Government would follow France's lead and officially recognise Palestinian statehood in September if Israel and Hamas do not agree to a ceasefire.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
US imposes visa sanctions on Palestinian Authority officials, PLO members
WASHINGTON, July 31 (Reuters) - The U.S. imposed sanctions on Palestinian Authority officials and members of the Palestine Liberation Organization on Thursday, accusing them of undermining peace efforts with Israel even as other Western powers moved toward recognition of Palestinian statehood. The State Department said it would deny visas for travel to the U.S. by those it was targeting, although it did not name any specific individuals. "It is in our national security interests to impose consequences and hold the PLO and PA accountable for not complying with their commitments and undermining the prospects for peace," the State Department said in a statement. The State Department said the two Palestinian organizations had "taken actions to internationalize" their conflict with Israel, including through the International Criminal Court, and said both had continued "to support terrorism." The PA and PLO serve as representatives for the Palestinian people and have long pushed for recognition of a Palestinian state by international organizations and foreign nations. The two groups had no immediate comment on the U.S. move. The State Department made its announcement just a day after Canada said it planned to recognize the State of Palestine at a meeting of the United Nations in September, ratcheting up pressure on Israel as starvation spreads in the Palestinian enclave of Gaza. France said last week it would back Palestinian statehood and Britain said it would do the same at September's U.N. General Assembly meeting if the fighting in Gaza had not stopped by then. U.S. President Donald Trump has insisted that recognition of Palestinian statehood would wrongly reward Hamas, the militant group that is battling Israel in the Gaza Strip. Since returning to office in January, Trump has been vague on his position on a two-state solution to the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians. Israel has denounced the moves by France, Britain and Canada. Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar, in a post on X, thanked the U.S. for its "moral clarity" in sanctioning the Palestinian officials, saying the action "also exposes the moral distortion of certain countries that ran to recognise a virtual Palestinian state while turning a blind eye to its support for terror and incitement." It was not immediately clear how the U.S. visa ban would affect Palestinian diplomats. Under the 1947 U.N. "headquarters agreement," the U.S. is generally required to allow access for foreign diplomats to the U.N. in New York. But Washington has said it can deny visas for security, terrorism and foreign policy reasons. The U.S. sanctions follow an international conference this week at the U.N., hosted by France and Saudi Arabia, that aimed to work towards a two-state solution between Israel and the Palestinians. Israel and the U.S. boycotted the event. Also on Thursday, U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff met Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in a bid to salvage Gaza truce talks and tackle a humanitarian crisis in the enclave, where a global hunger monitor has warned that famine is unfolding. The Gaza war began on October 7, 2023, when Hamas-led fighters stormed southern Israel, killing 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and taking 251 hostages back to Gaza, according to Israeli tallies. Since then, Israel's offensive has killed more than 60,000 people in Gaza, mostly civilians, according to Gaza health officials, reduced much of the enclave to ruins and displaced nearly the entire population.
