Teetotal Trump hits brewers with surprise beer can tax
Under sweeping global tariffs announced on Wednesday by Donald Trump, most food and drink imported into the US from Europe incurs a tariff of 20pc. A lower rate of 10pc applies to the UK.
However, the small print of the new US tariff system shows that cans of beer will in fact be subject to the higher rate of 25pc that Mr Trump has applied to aluminium.
Brewers have warned that the decision to extend the 25pc tariff to canned beers could cost thousands of jobs and hammer beer businesses across the UK and Europe.
Emma McClarkin, the chief executive of the British Beer & Pub Association, said: 'A 25pc tariff on beer imported into the US is a direct hit to the brewers of the UK, who contribute so much to this country's economy and heritage.
'We urge the Government to defend the great British brewing industry and strike a deal which removes these harmful tariffs.
'With the enormous cost of doing business, many British brewers won't be able to sustain a hit such as this from one of our biggest trading partners.'
European brewers are also lobbying Brussels to defend their interests amid warnings 100,000 jobs could be lost on the Continent – 5pc of all brewing jobs in Europe.
Julia Leferman, the secretary-general of Brewers of Europe, told the Financial Times: 'We are calling on the [European] Commission to use all diplomatic channels and whether through negotiation or retaliation, find a way to de-escalate this tariff in which we have become a collateral victim.'
Dutch brewer Heineken, Denmark's Carlsberg and Dublin-based Guinness are all significant exporters to the US and will be affected by the new tariffs.
Brewers are not yet clear on some crucial details, such as whether the 25pc tariff will be charged on the value of the entire product or just on the value of the can. A BBPA spokesman said it looked from the US government's wording as if the former would be the case.
Mr Trump is a self-proclaimed teetotaller. He has said in interviews that this is because his older brother, Freddie, was an alcoholic – a factor that contributed to his premature death.
The president has said: 'It was a very tough period of time. If you don't start you're never going have a problem. If you do start you might have a problem. And it's a tough problem to stop.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Solar Firms Surge as Senate Drops Excise Tax From Trump Bill
(Bloomberg) -- Shares for solar companies rose on Tuesday on the Senate's decision to remove an excise tax on wind and solar projects from President Donald Trump's tax and spending bill. Struggling Downtowns Are Looking to Lure New Crowds Philadelphia Transit System Votes to Cut Service by 45%, Hike Fares Sprawl Is Still Not the Answer Shares in Sunrun Inc. were up about 11%, Enphase Energy Inc. was up about 4% and Solaredge Technologies Inc. were up 9% at around 12:49 p.m. in New York after news reports on the change. The Senate passed the $3.3 trillion bill on Tuesday after making the last-minute change and other modifications meant to mollify some Republicans. The measure spiked a previously proposed excise tax on wind and solar projects that contained a certain threshold of components made in China, Senator James Lankford, a Republican from Oklahoma, told reporters Tuesday. That proposed tax, which had been tucked into the Senate bill unveiled days ago, was supported by some US manufacturers who said the country needs to urgently wean clean energy supply chains off China. But it had sparked alarm from renewable developers who said it could hike costs for wind farms and solar arrays that still rely on some foreign components and supply chains dominated by Beijing. Senator Ed Markey, a Democrat from Massachusetts, hailed the removal of the excise tax in a post on X ahead of passage. The bill would still phase out subsidies for wind and solar projects placed in service after December 31, 2027; some Republicans had made a last-ditch push to ease the credit cutoff. The various iterations of Trump's tax and spending package have whipsawed much of the renewable energy industry — and, with it, shares of developers, installers and manufacturers. The proposed addition over the weekend of the tax on some wind and solar projects stunned the industry, prompting shares to slide Monday. But now, with the excise tax's removal, shares popped on a day that would otherwise have threatened the pace of the growth of renewable energy in the US. Clean energy trade groups had warned that without changes, Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' would have threatened some wind farms and solar arrays already under construction. The changes weren't enough to satisfy renewable developers who on Tuesday said the Senate-passed bill still poses a major threat to the industry. 'Despite limited improvements, this legislation undermines the very foundation of America's manufacturing comeback and global energy leadership. If this bill becomes law, families will face higher electric bills, factories will shut down, Americans will lose their jobs, and our electric grid will grow weaker,' Abigail Ross Hopper, president of the Solar Energy Industries Association, said in a statement. --With assistance from Erik Wasson. America's Top Consumer-Sentiment Economist Is Worried How to Steal a House SNAP Cuts in Big Tax Bill Will Hit a Lot of Trump Voters Too China's Homegrown Jewelry Superstar Pistachios Are Everywhere Right Now, Not Just in Dubai Chocolate ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Miami Herald
17 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Miami-Dade's immigrant past: from the Mariel tent city to Alligator Alcatraz
With Alligator Alcatraz opening today — complete with a visit from President Donald Trump — some may not recall this isn't the first time undocumented immigrants in Miami-Dade have been housed in makeshift camps under Florida's blazing sun while the government decides what to do with them. We've been here before — but this time, it's about punishment, not trying to help immigrants fleeing oppression. It was 45 years ago this summer that Miami-Dade had another tent city. Dozens of military-style tents were pitched beneath the Interstate 95 overpass near Southwest Eighth Street by the Miami River. The city had allowed the encampment as a last resort for housing hundreds of undocumented Cuban men, women and children who had no relatives in Miami, no jobs, no work permits and nowhere to live after arriving during the chaos of the 1980 Mariel Boatlift. It wasn't ideal, but it reflected a community overwhelmed, not vindictive. A small number of Mariels were said to have been released from Fidel Castro's prisons, but deportation was never considered for the people in this original tent city. And there was no glee from leaders about housing human beings in rough conditions or about using 'natural security' — alligators and pythons — to keep them in line. The 1980s version — where José Martí Park's basketball courts are now — was a necessity. More than 125,000 Cubans had poured into South Florida in just a few months, escaping Castro's communist Cuba. Conditions were rough: tents, minimal sanitation, little privacy. The goal was resettlement and integration. Eventually, the Carter administration responded with the Cuban-Haitian Entrant Program (CHEP), which granted special immigration status to those who had arrived during that time. It allowed Mariel refugees to start a new life. Now compare that to today. The Florida Everglades — an ecologically fragile and nationally protected treasure — is the site of a sprawling pop-up detention center meant to house up to 5,000 undocumented immigrants. Gov. Ron DeSantis, who called for its construction in a matter of days using emergency authority, has proudly dubbed it Alligator Alcatraz, a name now printed on GOP merchandise. This new tent city isn't a response to a humanitarian crisis. It's a message from DeSantis and the Trump administration with one goal in mind: mass deportation. Back in 1980, local leaders worked to help refugees. Today, the city and county have signed agreements to help ICE — U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement — catch and deport immigrants already living here. This time, the optics are deliberate. A detention camp in a swamp sends a clear message: You are not welcome. Alligator Alcatraz evokes isolation and fear. It's political theater. In many ways, these two crises reflect their eras. The 1980s tent city was a Cold War scramble to help refugees fleeing communism. The public was wary but there was a sense of moral obligation. Miami was a city of refugees. Alligator Alcatraz, by contrast, treats undocumented immigrants not as people to help but as threats to contain and deport under an administration that demands it. It's a 'get out' mentality. One constant remains: Miami is still ground zero for America's unresolved immigration crisis. We now have the benefit of hindsight. Many of the Mariel refugees once warehoused under a highway overpass became American citizens, business owners and vital parts of our community. The same could be true for today's undocumented immigrants — if we gave them the chance. Granted, some of those being detained committed crimes. In general, those people should be deported. But the rush to push people out of the country includes lots of immigrants who have not committed offenses. Our response to the immigration crisis must be rooted in dignity: Alligator Alcatraz fails miserable at that goal. Sadly, Trump's visit is meant to turn Florida into an immigration detention poster state for the country. What a difference 45 years can make. Click here to send the letter.
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Today's Market: Tax Bill Uncertainty Ignites Dow Rally, Sends Nasdaq Tumbling
July 1 - U.S. equity benchmarks diverged Tuesday as lawmakers debated extending Trump?era tax cuts. The Dow Jones Industrial Average edged up about 1%, while the S&P 500 slipped less than 0.5%. The Nasdaq Composite slid about 0.5% from its record high. Investors are weighing the prospects of a fresh tax package that could roll back individual and corporate rates, which some see as a boon for consumer stocks and small?caps. Uncertainty over the bill's details, such as the duration of rate extensions and offsets for lost revenue, has prompted traders to pare back exposure to high?valuation technology names. Technology shares led declines, with semiconductors and software companies under pressure. Meanwhile, financials and industrials found modest support, buoyed by expectations of sustained consumer spending if tax relief is approved. Treasury yields held near recent peaks, reflecting growing confidence in near?term economic strength but also fears of higher deficits. Market participants will focus on upcoming congressional sessions for clues on the bill's final shape. With fiscal policy negotiations set to intensify, investors may see further volatility as new details emerge. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.
