HMRC 'doesn't know how many billionaires actually pay tax in the UK', MPs reveal
HMRC doesn't know how many billionaires pay tax in the UK - or what they cough-up, MPs have revealed.
This worrying lack of know-how is despite there being relatively few billionaires to keep tabs on, and the huge amounts of money involved, they say. Critics claimed it showed HMRC had 'one set of rules for the wealthiest, and another for everyone else.' The Commons Public Accounts Committee, in a report, also flagged a wider problem that could hamper efforts to impose a wealth tax. Former Labour leader Lord Kinnock recently suggested imposing a 2% tax on assets valued above £10million would bring in up to £11billion a year.
Downing Street and senior ministers have refused to rule out the idea as Chancellor Rachel Reeves faces a battle to plug a massive hole in the public finances. Yet efforts could be complicated by the crucially important information HMRC gathers. According to the report: 'HMRC has no overview of an individual's total wealth and faces challenges in getting all the data it needs to risk assess and target wealthy people.'
The committee says the taxman has had some success in cracking down on the rich, including those trying to dodge tax. Through better enforcement of the rules, it collected £5.2billion from the wealthy in the 2023/24 financial year, more than double the £2.2billion in 2019/20. They are defined as individuals with incomes of £200,000 or more, or assets equal to or above £2million, in any of the past three years.
HMRC - whose work collecting tax is vital for funding public services - has around 1,000 in a team dedicated to getting tax from the rich, and has secured funding to take on another 400. But the report says the authority 'can and must' do more.
It found HMRC 'does not know how many billionaires pay tax in the UK or how much they contribute overall.' Yet the Sunday Times Rich List includes figures in its annual update, recently finding there were 155 billionaires in the UK. The Public Accounts Committee suggests HMRC 'immediately start work' comparing available data on known billionaires, including the Rich List, with its own records. It notes they do something similar already in the US, where the Inland Revenue Service worked with researchers to link its data to the Forbes 400 list of the super-rich.
There were also just 25 criminal prosecutions of wealthy people for their tax affairs in 2023/24. Meanwhile, the number of penalties slumped from 1,747 to 456 penalties. Another area of concerns was the so-called tax gap - the difference between what HMRC thinks the wealthy may owe and what it collected. The report questioned whether the estimate of £1.9billion is "over optimistic". It points to estimates of £300million due from offshore sources, when UK residents held £849billion in offshore accounts in 2019.
The committee recommends HMRC use artificial intelligence to speed up the data gathering process. Lloyd Hatton, a Labour MP member of the committee, said it was crucial for taxpayers to have trust in the system and for the rich to be paying their fair share.
"This report is not concerned with political debate around the redistribution of wealth," he said. "Our committee's role is to help HMRC do its job properly ensuring wealthy people pay the correct tax. While HMRC does deserve some great credit for securing billions more in the tax take from the wealthiest in recent years, there is still a very long way to go before we can reach a true accounting of what is owed.'
Fariya Mohiuddin, interim deputy director at the group Tax Justice UK, said: 'If HMRC isn't able to tax the super-rich fairly, how can anyone have faith in a system that seemingly has one set of rules for the wealthiest, and another for everyone else. At the heart of this story is the urgent need for HMRC to have the resources and political backing for it to be an effective and efficient tax authority that can administer a tax system that is fair and fit for the 21st century.
'With millions waiting for healthcare treatment to essentials being unaffordable for many, HMRC needs to be able to collect the right tax from the super-rich. Failing to do so lets money be squirrelled away into tax havens like some of the British Overseas Territories which deprives our communities, hospitals and schools of the cash they need. he government must give HMRC backing by investing in it for the long-term, to make the system fair, and ensure British tax havens implement transparency measures to prevent offshore hoarding of wealth.'
An HMRC spokesperson said: "The government is determined to make sure everyone pays the tax they owe. Extra resources were announced in the recent spending review which allows us to significantly step up our work on closing the tax gap amongst the wealthiest. This includes recruiting an extra 400 officials specialising in the wealthy and offshore tax gap, and increasing prosecutions of those who evade tax."
They added that large amounts of data was already used to collect the tax that is legally due, relying on multiple sources, including our own records, information that is already in the public domain and detail shared by other countries.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
22 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Britain facing pension poverty 'time bomb' as Rachel Reeves' tax grab helps crater retirement savings by 20 per cent in six months
Britain is facing a pension poverty 'time bomb' after Rachel Reeves ' punishing tax grab helped plunge retirement savings by 20 per cent in six months. Survey figures suggest Britons may have been reducing their pension contributions since Christmas as the economy reacted to Labour's new tax regime. The Chancellor's national insurance hike has been partly blamed for high inflation this year, raising the cost of goods and services. Critics said last night the increased cost of living is 'squeezing' households and preventing people from putting money away for their retirement. As a result, the average monthly pension contribution has slumped to £53.40 this month from £59.10 in April and £65.10 in December. This is the first time in two years contributions have dropped for six months in a row, according to data from the House Money Index compiled by price comparison website MoneySuperMarket. At the same time, average household spending on bills and other outgoings surged by 12 per cent to £1,564 per month. The data showed the average Brit is now shelling out £52.14 per day on essentials, up from £46.40 in December. Kara Gammell, personal finance expert at MoneySuperMarket, said: 'People are reducing their private and workplace pension contributions, perhaps to help offset rising costs and stretched household finances.' Last night, Helen Whately MP, shadow pensions secretary, said: 'Britain is facing a pension poverty time bomb of Labour's making. 'By squeezing the public with more taxes and higher bills, people are being forced to make terrible choices – choices we won't see the full consequence of for years. 'The Conservatives will always stand on the side of the makers – those who work hard, do the right thing, and want to get on in life. 'And so we will hold Labour to account for the economic mess they are making.' John O'Connell, chief executive at the TaxPayers' Alliance said: 'Sky-high taxes and soaring living costs mean hard-pressed households are dipping into their retirement savings just to stay afloat.' This month, the Office for National Statistics said UK inflation jumped higher than economists had expected to 3.6 per cent in June, up from 3.4 per cent in May. It marked the steepest increase since January 2024, with critics blaming Mrs Reeves' 'job tax'. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall said the Government was reviving New Labour's Pensions Commission to help people save more. She said: 'People deserve to know they will have a decent income in retirement – with all the security, dignity and freedom that brings. 'But the truth is, that is not the reality facing many people, especially if you're low paid, or self-employed.
The Guardian
10 hours ago
- The Guardian
‘We have to move': historic village of Tempsford reels from plan to swell its 600 residents to 350,000
This is – they tell you in Tempsford – where Boudicca rallied against the Romans. Where the early English kings fought off the Danes and where Churchill launched secret flights to aid resistance fighters keeping the Nazis at bay. But the historic earthworks, wheatfields and RAF base of Tempsford may yet prove no match for a chancellor bent on housebuilding and growth, armed with thinktank reports and a 10-year infrastructure strategy. Before Rachel Reeves announced plans to accelerate a 'growth arc' between Oxford and Cambridge, the name of this tiny Bedfordshire village was likely unknown to most. Then, last month, the government confirmed plans to make it the site of a new railway station, where the planned East West Rail linking the university cities will meet the East Coast mainline from London. Tempsford could be an appealing commuter base for workers in any of those cities, but some see more potential still. As Labour came to power pledging 1.5 million new homes, a report from UK Day One urged that they should be built as new towns. And there was one obvious location. It was, said David Sutton, the chair of the parish council and landlord of the village pub, quite a moment when the 600 residents of Tempsford learned of plans to swell their ranks to 350,000 people. A previous local Bedfordshire plan had identified possible development opportunities, and the county has seen plenty of fields give way to housing estates, solar farms and wind turbines. But, Sutton said: 'There had been talk of 10,000 or 20,000 houses, then out of nowhere came this 350,000 [people] figure.' He said local reaction ranged 'from apathy, saying, 'well, nothing's happened yet,' to 'we have to move away.'' The post-war new towns of Stevenage and Welwyn, and the success story of the 1960s wave, Milton Keynes, are all relatively nearby. But as they thrived, Tempsford saw its century-old station axed in the Beeching cuts, and the expanded A1 road cut the settlement in two. On the east side of this division is Station Road, ending in a level crossing where East Coast main line trains whizz between London and Edinburgh. To the west is the pub, various Tudor buildings and the church. Union jacks fly over centuries-old thatched cottages and – if you can ignore the sound of the A1, tucked out of sight behind strategically placed trees – the rural England vibes are strong. Sutton's pub, the Wheatsheaf, reopened last year, and claims a history dating back at least as far as a coaching house on the site in the early 16th century. 'There's an element of being the only traditional pub in a city of hundreds of thousands of people that isn't all bad,' Sutton said. 'Milton Keynes shows how it could be done. But it isn't pretty.' The neighbouring village, Roxton, is already seeing development and could be swallowed up by the new town. Behind the bar of the Wheatsheaf, Fiona Nicholl said she recently sold her home in Roxton to move to Tempsford. 'I used to look out of my windows and see fields,' she said. 'Then I watched the road and houses grow up ... All this rural land disappeared. 'It just doesn't make any sense – it's just taking away the beauty of a rural area. The amount of stress it puts on the whole community is mad.' Roxton residents have just lost a planning appeal to stop a development that was admitted to be environmentally damaging. 'But that didn't outweigh the benefits of new housing,' said Deborah Jackson, a Wheatsheaf regular. 'If a council hasn't met its housing need, then the planners can ride roughshod over the rest.' It is very much the direction of travel, as the new Labour government has signalled, to favour the builders over the blockers. And Tempsford, unlike many new developments, will at least be well connected. As well as the promised new train station, work is underway to reshape the nearby Black Cat roundabout. Part of a £1bn investment by National Highways, this will complete the dual carriageway between Milton Keynes and Cambridge. 'It seemed like the perfect location,' said Kane Emerson, one of the UK Day One report's two authors. 'We were motivated by our strong feeling that new homes should be well located for transport.' Emerson, who is also the head of housing at the Yimby Alliance ('Yes, in my back yard'), added: 'The government speaks a lot about economic growth – and if you look at where homes will deliver the most growth, it's near where the average earnings to house price ratio is at its highest – essentially those places with really good opportunities such as Oxford, Cambridge and London.' Developers had already spotted the potential. About 850 hectares (2,100 acres) of the land around Tempsford is optioned by Urban&Civic, a developer owned by the Wellcome Trust. The case for Tempsford improves further, the UK Day One report said, with a tax or other mechanism to claim some of the massive uplift in land value for the state. 'The agricultural price per hectare is about £35,000,' Emerson said. 'Once you get planning permission you are looking at £3m per hectare. The government should be capturing a significant chunk of that – it's kind of free money.' Emerson's co-author, Samuel Hughes, is an editor at Works in Progress magazine. He said this money could finance long-desired upgrades to the East Coast main line: expanding the King's Cross terminus and relieving the bottleneck at Welwyn – where four tracks become two, forcing high-speed and stopping services on to the same lines. 'The two big questions are over land value capture and scale,' Hughes said. 'Is it 10,000 or 100,000 dwellings?' After visiting the village, he still favours the latter. 'The residents were remarkably polite to me, all things considered,' he said. 'Unfortunately, there is an overwhelming case for building at Tempsford.' The future for Tempsford may well depend on the government-commissioned new towns taskforce, which is due to report in September. But others concur that going big beats small, scattered areas of new homes. Steve Chambers is the director of the charity Transport for New Homes. He has visited plenty of housing developments that don't work. 'We term them cowpat estates – plonked in the fields,' he said. 'Every single trip they generate is in the car, in the vast majority of cases. If it's remote, it needs to be big enough to support amenities – you're talking about tens of thousands of homes. 'What we like about the new towns plan is the scale. They really do have the potential because they can support having a high street, a bus service … And Tempsford on those two rail lines will effectively be a transport node. But it has to be built at scale if it is to be successful.' Massive urban development still feels a long way away in the Wheatsheaf, where a tank of racing snails takes pride of place. Looking across the road, over fields that lead to the river Ouse, and his own Tudor house, Sutton said: 'I remember as a lad going down the A1, through this village that was cut in two, thinking that's a weird place. 'Yes, it is a weird place. But I love it.' A neighbour pulled up, and wound down the window of his electric Porsche. He was sceptical that widespread housing could come to this side of the village, having previously put sandbags out to protect his own home from the flooding river. But across the A1, he reckoned, 20,000 homes were a given. How did that make him feel? 'It's progress,' he said, sombrely, before brightening: 'I'll be in there,' he added, pointing to the nearby graveyard, 'long before it happens'.
Daily Mail
10 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Equality street! The suburban road where identical homes on one side are 'worth £100k more' than the other
Homeowners have called on Royal Mail to adopt the postcode of a neighbouring suburb where average house prices are significantly higher. A cluster of locals in Thornbury, a Bradford suburb straddling the city's eastern edge, have launched a bold bid to trade in their postcode to increase their house prices by £100k. They say they are being 'penalised' by having the city's undesired BD3 postcode despite technically falling in the council jurisdiction of neighbouring Leeds. Instead, they want to adopt the LS28 postcode of Pudsey, which carries a more desirable reputation. But neighbours on Gain Lane, the vast majority of whom are covered by Bradford council, have branded the move 'snobbish' and a thinly veiled attempt to 'pretend they don't live where they do.' One resident, firmly living in the BD3 postcode plagued by high crime rates, said: 'They're desperate to keep up appearances. 'Just because you buy a few hanging baskets and call your house 'The Willows' doesn't mean you live in Pudsey or Leeds. 'You're still in Bradford at the end of the day.' Bradford's BD3 postcode covers some of the city's most troubled and poverty-stricken communities. It ranks among the worst postcodes in the country related to car theft and dangerous driving offences. Whereas the neighbouring LS28 postcode covers the gentrified Leeds suburbs of Farsley, Calverley and Pudsey - represented in parliament by chancellor Rachel Reeves. House prices in the well-heeled commuter hubs are tens of thousands of pounds higher than in Bradford. Campaigners say they are being unfairly punished for having a BD3 suffix, despite technically falling under Leeds City Council's jurisdiction. They say that they are having to pay out for higher car and home insurance policies as a consequence, while also having to ensure deflated house prices. Lynda Berry, 59, admitted she wanted the LS28 postcode because it was 'posher'. She said: 'We're paying more in council tax and then getting hit again with higher car and home insurance. 'And we don't even get the benefits of being in Leeds, even though we technically are. 'It's frustrating. I understand there has to be a border somewhere, but we're getting penalised for being in BD3.' Russell Robinson, 69, who has lived in the area for over six decades, says the postcode saga has dragged on for years - despite multiple attempts to get it changed. He said: 'If you're in BD3, you're paying hundreds more for car insurance because it's one of the worst postcodes in the country for car crime and bad driving. 'When I used to go to an insurance broker, they'd look at my postcode and say, 'If you lived in LS28, it'd be £200 cheaper.' 'For my Freelander I have to pay £595, fully comprehensive. For my other Defender quite a few companies wouldn't insure it all. 'It's not like I'm going Trans-European or up mountains in it. It's just the Bradford postcode.' Mr Robinson, a retired council worker, revealed that when he sold his father's house - which also technically fell under Leeds but still carried a Bradford postcode - it sold for less than equivalent houses with an LS28 address. He said: 'We got £190,000 for it, something like that. It was a well-built stone house. 'They're paying £200,000 for much less in Pudsey - small gardens, one car on the drive. 'It's just the LS postcode.' According to Rightmove data, house prices in BD3 had an overall average of £120,323 over the last year. In leafier LS28, the average was £262,061 over the last year. Gurvinder Singh, 59, has lived in Gain Lane since 1989. He said he had pleaded with the council to swap his postcode to Leeds. He said: 'Our house prices are low. Our insurance is high. 'There a difference of around £100,000. If our house was in LS28 it would go for £260,000. Here there's a limit of about £160,000. 'Because of BD3, the prices are not high. We keep spending money on the house but we're not going to get the full benefit.' Asked if he tells people he is from Leeds or Bradford, Mr Singh, who works for Bradford-based baker Hovis, added: 'Leeds. Sorry to say, but Leeds. 'Bradford has a very bad reputation, especially BD3. 'I've caught drug dealers right outside the front of my house. I've had drugs thrown in my garden during a police chase. 'LS28 is like a different world. It's much better. The people are sensible, there are no idiot drivers on that side.' One resident further down Gain Lane, firmly within Bradford Council's boundaries, said the campaign was 'classist'. The woman, who would not be named for fear of riling neighbours, said: 'My house is in Bradford and I'm proud to be from Bradford. 'I think it's people trying to pretend they don't live where they do, to make them look and feel better. 'It's still Bradford, love.' Priyan Welikandu, 56, said his car insurance premiums had soared simply because of the BD3 postcode - despite paying all his bills to Leeds. He said: 'The car insurance is very high for no real reason. I've had this smaller car for 20 years, no claims, no accidents - and I'm still paying £700 a year. 'They told me it's because of the BD3 postcode. It should be around £300 or £400, but they said nothing counts for anything in BD3.' Mr Welikandu admitted he tells people he is from Pudsey, not Bradford. He added: 'If I say to my work colleagues, Bradford, they get the wrong idea - like it's dodgy. Pudsey is a bit more civilised.' The postcode lottery has also hit businesses landed with a BD3 postcode, despite administratively falling in Leeds. Mohammed Saqid, 20, who runs the Shandar takeawy on Gain Lane, said his business insurance premium had risen to £10,000. He said: 'If this was LS28 it would be £2,500. So having a Bradford postcode is four times more expensive for us. 'We pay our rates to Leeds council, we're right by the sign that says 'welcome to Pudsey'. It doesn't make any sense to us.' Conservative local councillors have backed the residents in their attempts to be reclassified by Royal Mail. Councillor Andrew Carter said: 'I am supporting local residents, and they are in contact with Royal Mail. Every possible obstacle has been put in the way of progress. Residents want to be in LS28 and they are right.' Cllr Craig Timmins said the postcode had also caused confusion for emergency services and council services. He added: 'These streets are an important part of our community and should be able to identify that way with their postcode, instead of constantly being frustrated by it.' Royal Mail said postcodes are designed to support deliveries, not to reflect geographies. A spokesperson said: 'Postcodes are designed to support the efficient sorting and delivery of mail, not to reflect geographic or administrative boundaries. Each one is based on the delivery route and the local delivery office, which means the postcode may not always match the actual geographic identity of the area. 'We have previously reviewed the arrangements and given the structure of the local network and the needs of the nearby delivery office, we do not believe a change is appropriate for our operations. 'It is important to note that postcodes typically cover groups of addresses delivered together.
