Mahindra XUV 3XO RevX: 5 key things you should know about the new variants
Mahindra & Mahindra has introduced a new RevX Series to the XUV 3XO lineup, aimed at offering more affordable and practical options within the subcompact SUV segment. Available in two trims, RevX M and RevX A. This new range adds more choice for buyers without straying far from the existing feature set. Here are five important things to know about it:
2 Cosmetic changes and interior updates
Both RevX trims come with small design updates, such as a body-coloured front grille, dual-tone roof, and RevX badges. The RevX M features black wheel covers, while the RevX A gets piano black alloy wheels.
Inside, the cabin keeps the existing layout but adds black leatherette upholstery for the seats, a first for the lower-spec models. The RevX A also includes a panoramic sunroof, which is not available on the M variant.
3 Features
The RevX M is based on the MX2 trim and brings in features such as projector headlamps, 10.25-inch touchscreen infotainment, engine start/stop button, steering-mounted controls, and rear AC vents. The M (O) variant adds an electric sunroof.
The RevX A, built on the AX5 trim, includes a digital driver display, dual-zone climate control, Alexa voice assistant, wireless Android Auto and Apple CarPlay, and roof rails. However, it doesn't include some features from the higher-end variants, such as ADAS, electronic parking brake, or a 360-degree camera.
Check out Upcoming Cars in India 2025, Best SUVs in India.
First Published Date: 09 Jul 2025, 17:30 PM IST
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
18 hours ago
- The Hindu
Mahindra expands XUV 3XO range with REVX variants
Mahindra has reinforced its presence in the competitive C-segment SUV space with the introduction of three new petrol variants under the 'REVX' nomenclature — the REVX M, REVX M(O), and the REVX A. These additions to the XUV 3XO range aim to bridge the gap between entry-level and higher-spec variants by offering a more feature-rich proposition at accessible price points. Positioning is key here. The REVX M and M(O) have been slotted between the MX2 and MX2 Pro trims, while the REVX A finds itself just below the AX5 L, effectively expanding the product band with minimal overlap. The strategy is clear: create finely-segmented options that respond to diverse buyer expectations — from value-driven essentials to performance-oriented sophistication. Powertrain options remain consistent with Mahindra's modular approach. The REVX M and M(O) are equipped with the 1.2-litre mStallion TCMPFi engine, producing 82 kW (110 bhp) and 200 Nm of torque. Tuned for smooth, linear delivery, it is well-suited for urban commutes and occasional intercity travel. The REVX A, however, makes a notable leap with the more advanced 1.2-litre mStallion TGDi powerplant, delivering 96 kW (130 bhp) and 230 Nm of torque. This engine, offered with both manual and automatic transmissions, transforms the 3XO into a far more responsive and refined vehicle — a distinction that will not go unnoticed by discerning drivers. Design and visual identity also receive meaningful upgrades. The REVX A stands apart with a distinctive body-coloured gunmetal grille, gloss-black R16 alloy wheels, a contrasting dual-tone roof, and subtle 'REVX' branding on the C-pillar — touches that lend it a premium, more individualistic character. ORVM-integrated turn indicators and Bi-LED projector headlamps further elevate both its safety credentials and road presence. Meanwhile, the REVX M and M(O) maintain visual consistency across the range. While they ride on steel wheels with black covers, both variants receive LED DRLs running across the fascia, a dual-tone roof, and the same body-coloured grille — a thoughtful approach that avoids a stripped-down aesthetic even in the lower trims. Inside, Mahindra has ensured that material quality and in-cabin technology remain competitive. The REVX A offers black leatherette upholstery, a dual-tone cabin theme, and twin 26.03 cm HD screens — one serving infotainment duties and the other as a digital driver's display. The Adrenox Connect system is standard on this trim, bringing with it a suite of connected features, including built-in Alexa, online navigation, and wireless Android Auto and Apple CarPlay — aligning the 3XO with modern user's expectations in the segment. Despite their more accessible positioning, the REVX M and M(O) are not spartan. The REVX M features leatherette seating, a touchscreen infotainment system, steering-mounted controls, and a 4-speaker audio setup. A single-pane sunroof is offered on the M(O), while the A variant receives a panoramic sunroof as standard — further enhancing the sense of space and premium appeal. The base REVX M omits a sunroof entirely, but remains reasonably well-equipped. Safety continues to be a strong point across the range. All three REVX variants are fitted with six airbags, Electronic Stability Control (ESC) with Hill Hold, and disc brakes on all four wheels — all as standard. Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS), however, remain the preserve of the higher AX trims, ensuring clear differentiation at the top of the hierarchy. The XUV 3XO has already demonstrated its market potential with over 1,00,000 units sold within 11 months of launch. With the introduction of the REVX variants, Mahindra is sharpening the product's appeal by introducing a more nuanced value proposition — one that caters to varied customer priorities without undermining the brand's premium aspirations. Ex-showroom pricing for the new REVX variants is — REVX M: ₹8.94 lakh, REVX M(O): ₹9.44 lakh and REVX A: Starting at ₹11.79 lakh. Motorscribes, in association with The Hindu, brings you the latest in cars and bikes. Follow them on Instagram on @motorscribes
Economic Times
19 hours ago
- Economic Times
AI device startup that sued OpenAI and Jony Ive is now suing its own ex-employee over trade secrets
ETtech A secretive competition to pioneer a new way of communicating with artificial intelligence chatbots is getting a messy public airing as OpenAI fights a trademark dispute over its stealth hardware collaboration with legendary iPhone designer Jony Ive. In the latest twist, tech startup iyO Inc., which already sued Ive and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman for trademark infringement, is now suing one of its own former employees for allegedly leaking a confidential drawing of iyO's unreleased product. At the heart of this bitter legal wrangling is a big idea: we shouldn't need to stare at computer or phone screens or talk to a box like Amazon's Alexa to interact with our future AI assistants in a natural way. And whoever comes up with this new AI interface could profit immensely from it. OpenAI, maker of ChatGPT, started to outline its own vision in May by buying io Products, a product and engineering company co-founded by Ive, in a deal valued at nearly $6.5 billion. Soon after, iyO sued for trademark infringement for the similar sounding name and because of the firms' past interactions. US District Judge Trina Thompson ruled last month that iyO has a strong enough case to proceed to a hearing this fall. Until then, she ordered Altman, Ive and OpenAI to refrain from using the io brand, leading them to take down the web page and all mentions of the venture. A second lawsuit from iyO filed this week in San Francisco Superior Court accuses a former iyO executive, Dan Sargent, of breach of contract and misappropriation of trade secrets over his meetings with another io co-founder, Tang Yew Tan, a close Ive ally who led design of the Apple Watch. Sargent left iyO in December and now works for Apple. He and Apple didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. "This is not an action we take lightly," said iyO CEO Jason Rugolo in a statement Thursday. "Our primary goal here is not to target a former employee, whom we considered a friend, but to hold accountable those whom we believe preyed on him from a position of power." Rugolo told The Associated Press last month that he thought he was on the right path in 2022 when he pitched his ideas and showed off his prototypes to firms tied to Altman and Ive. Rugolo later publicly expanded on his earbud-like "audio computer" product in a TED Talk last year. What he didn't know was that, by 2023, Ive and Altman had begun quietly collaborating on their own AI hardware initiative. "I'm happy to compete on product, but calling it the same name, that part is just amazing to me. And it was shocking," Rugolo said in an interview. The new venture was revealed publicly in a May video announcement, and to Rugolo about two months earlier after he had emailed Altman with an investment pitch. "thanks but im working on something competitive so will (respectfully) pass!" Altman wrote to Rugolo in March, adding in parentheses that it was called io. Altman has dismissed iyO's lawsuit on social media as a "silly, disappointing and wrong" move from a "quite persistent" Rugolo. Other executives in court documents characterized the product Rugolo was pitching as a failed one that didn't work properly in a demo. Altman said in a written declaration that he and Ive chose the name two years ago in reference to the concept of "input/output" that describes how a computer receives and transmits information. Neither io nor iyO was first to play with the phrasing - Google's flagship annual technology showcase is called I/O - but Altman said he and Ive acquired the domain name in August 2023. The idea was "to create products that go beyond traditional products and interfaces," Altman said. "We want to create new ways for people to input their requests and new ways for them to receive helpful outputs, powered by AI." A number of startups have already tried, and mostly failed, to build gadgetry for AI interactions. The startup Humane developed a wearable pin that you could talk to, but the product was poorly reviewed and the startup discontinued sales after HP acquired its assets earlier this year. Altman has suggested that io's version could be different. He said in a now-removed video that he's already trying a prototype at home that Ive gave him, calling it "the coolest piece of technology that the world will have ever seen." Altman and Ive still haven't said is what exactly it is. The court case, however, has forced their team to disclose what it's not. "Its design is not yet finalized, but it is not an in-ear device, nor a wearable device," said Tan in a court declaration that sought to distance the venture from iyO's product. It was that same declaration that led iyO to sue Sargent this week. Tan revealed in the filing that he had talked to a "now former" iyO engineer who was looking for a job because of his frustration with "iyO's slow pace, unscalable product plans, and continued acceptance of preorders without a sellable product." Those conversations with the unnamed employee led Tan to conclude "that iyO was basically offering 'vaporware' - advertising for a product that does not actually exist or function as advertised, and my instinct was to avoid meeting with iyO myself and to discourage others from doing so." IyO said its investigators recently reached out to Sargent and confirmed he was the one who met with Tan. Rugolo told the he feels duped after he first pitched his idea to Altman in 2022 through the Apollo Projects, a venture capital firm started by Altman and his brothers. Rugolo said he demonstrated his products and the firm politely declined, with the explanation that they don't do consumer hardware investments. That same year, Rugolo also pitched the same idea to Ive through LoveFrom, the San Francisco design firm started by Ive after his 27-year career at Apple. Ive's firm also declined. "I feel kind of stupid now," Rugolo added. "Because we talked for so long. I met with them so many times and demo'd all their people - at least seven people there. Met with them in person a bunch of times, talking about all our ideas." Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. Why this one from 'Dirty Dozen', now in Vedanta fold, is again in a mess Can Indian IT protect its high valuation as AI takes centre stage? Engine fuel switches or something else? One month on, still no word on what crashed AI 171 As GenAI puts traditional BPO on life support, survival demands a makeover Stock Radar: ITC Hotels hits fresh record high in July – time to buy or book profits? Weekly Top Picks: These stocks scored 10 on 10 on Stock Reports Plus These large- and mid-cap stocks can give more than 24% return in 1 year, according to analysts Suited for the long term, even with headwinds: 8 stocks from healthcare & pharma sectors with upside potential of up to 39%
Time of India
19 hours ago
- Time of India
AI device startup that sued OpenAI, Jony Ive, is now suing its own ex-employee over trade secrets
By Matt O'Brien A secretive competition to pioneer a new way of communicating with artificial intelligence chatbots is getting a messy public airing as OpenAI fights a trademark dispute over its stealth hardware collaboration with legendary iPhone designer Jony Ive. In the latest twist, tech startup iyO Inc., which already sued Ive and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman for trademark infringement, is now suing one of its own former employees for allegedly leaking a confidential drawing of iyO's unreleased product. At the heart of this bitter legal wrangling is a big idea: we shouldn't need to stare at computer or phone screens or talk to a box like Amazon's Alexa to interact with our future AI assistants in a natural way. And whoever comes up with this new AI interface could profit immensely from it. OpenAI, maker of ChatGPT, started to outline its own vision in May by buying io Products, a product and engineering company co-founded by Ive, in a deal valued at nearly $6.5 billion. Soon after, iyO sued for trademark infringement for the similar sounding name and because of the firms' past interactions. U.S. District Judge Trina Thompson ruled last month that iyO has a strong enough case to proceed to a hearing this fall. Until then, she ordered Altman, Ive and OpenAI to refrain from using the io brand, leading them to take down the web page and all mentions of the venture. A second lawsuit from iyO filed this week in San Francisco Superior Court accuses a former iyO executive, Dan Sargent, of breach of contract and misappropriation of trade secrets over his meetings with another io co-founder, Tang Yew Tan, a close Ive ally who led design of the Apple Watch. Sargent left iyO in December and now works for Apple. He and Apple didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. "This is not an action we take lightly," said iyO CEO Jason Rugolo in a statement Thursday. "Our primary goal here is not to target a former employee, whom we considered a friend, but to hold accountable those whom we believe preyed on him from a position of power." Rugolo told The Associated Press last month that he thought he was on the right path in 2022 when he pitched his ideas and showed off his prototypes to firms tied to Altman and Ive. Rugolo later publicly expanded on his earbud-like "audio computer" product in a TED Talk last year. What he didn't know was that, by 2023, Ive and Altman had begun quietly collaborating on their own AI hardware initiative. "I'm happy to compete on product, but calling it the same name, that part is just amazing to me. And it was shocking," Rugolo said in an interview. The new venture was revealed publicly in a May video announcement, and to Rugolo about two months earlier after he had emailed Altman with an investment pitch. "thanks but im working on something competitive so will (respectfully) pass!" Altman wrote to Rugolo in March, adding in parentheses that it was called io. Altman has dismissed iyO's lawsuit on social media as a "silly, disappointing and wrong" move from a "quite persistent" Rugolo. Other executives in court documents characterized the product Rugolo was pitching as a failed one that didn't work properly in a demo. Altman said in a written declaration that he and Ive chose the name two years ago in reference to the concept of "input/output" that describes how a computer receives and transmits information. Neither io nor iyO was first to play with the phrasing - Google's flagship annual technology showcase is called I/O - but Altman said he and Ive acquired the domain name in August 2023. The idea was "to create products that go beyond traditional products and interfaces," Altman said. "We want to create new ways for people to input their requests and new ways for them to receive helpful outputs, powered by AI." A number of startups have already tried, and mostly failed, to build gadgetry for AI interactions. The startup Humane developed a wearable pin that you could talk to, but the product was poorly reviewed and the startup discontinued sales after HP acquired its assets earlier this year. Altman has suggested that io's version could be different. He said in a now-removed video that he's already trying a prototype at home that Ive gave him, calling it "the coolest piece of technology that the world will have ever seen." Altman and Ive still haven't said is what exactly it is. The court case, however, has forced their team to disclose what it's not. "Its design is not yet finalized, but it is not an in-ear device, nor a wearable device," said Tan in a court declaration that sought to distance the venture from iyO's product. It was that same declaration that led iyO to sue Sargent this week. Tan revealed in the filing that he had talked to a "now former" iyO engineer who was looking for a job because of his frustration with "iyO's slow pace, unscalable product plans, and continued acceptance of preorders without a sellable product." Those conversations with the unnamed employee led Tan to conclude "that iyO was basically offering 'vaporware' - advertising for a product that does not actually exist or function as advertised, and my instinct was to avoid meeting with iyO myself and to discourage others from doing so." IyO said its investigators recently reached out to Sargent and confirmed he was the one who met with Tan. Rugolo told the he feels duped after he first pitched his idea to Altman in 2022 through the Apollo Projects, a venture capital firm started by Altman and his brothers. Rugolo said he demonstrated his products and the firm politely declined, with the explanation that they don't do consumer hardware investments. That same year, Rugolo also pitched the same idea to Ive through LoveFrom, the San Francisco design firm started by Ive after his 27-year career at Apple. Ive's firm also declined. "I feel kind of stupid now," Rugolo added. "Because we talked for so long. I met with them so many times and demo'd all their people - at least seven people there. Met with them in person a bunch of times, talking about all our ideas."
