logo
NEPRA likely to cut power tariff by Rs0.65/unit for June

NEPRA likely to cut power tariff by Rs0.65/unit for June

Listen to article
Consumers are likely to receive relief in their electricity bills through a fuel charges adjustment for June 2025. This is due to a drop in energy prices used for power generation. NEPRA may reduce the power tariff by Rs0.6541 per kWh under the monthly FCA. It has scheduled a public hearing on July 30, 2025, regarding the proposed FCA for XWDISCOs.
According to the CPPA-G, NEPRA has been requested to approve a reduction of Rs0.6541/kWh in fuel charges. The reference fuel cost was Rs8.3341/kWh, but actual costs came in lower due to cheaper fuel inputs.
In June 2025, 13,744 GWh of electricity was generated. Hydropower led the mix with a 39.36% share, followed by RLNG (16.12%), local coal (10.99%), imported coal (10.16%), and nuclear (10.06%). The highest-cost power source remained imports from Iran at Rs22.5155/kWh. After transmission losses of 2.97% and adjustments, 13,310 GWh were delivered to DISCOs at an average cost of Rs7.6800/kWh.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NEPRA likely to cut power tariff by Rs0.65/unit for June
NEPRA likely to cut power tariff by Rs0.65/unit for June

Express Tribune

timea day ago

  • Express Tribune

NEPRA likely to cut power tariff by Rs0.65/unit for June

Listen to article Consumers are likely to receive relief in their electricity bills through a fuel charges adjustment for June 2025. This is due to a drop in energy prices used for power generation. NEPRA may reduce the power tariff by Rs0.6541 per kWh under the monthly FCA. It has scheduled a public hearing on July 30, 2025, regarding the proposed FCA for XWDISCOs. According to the CPPA-G, NEPRA has been requested to approve a reduction of Rs0.6541/kWh in fuel charges. The reference fuel cost was Rs8.3341/kWh, but actual costs came in lower due to cheaper fuel inputs. In June 2025, 13,744 GWh of electricity was generated. Hydropower led the mix with a 39.36% share, followed by RLNG (16.12%), local coal (10.99%), imported coal (10.16%), and nuclear (10.06%). The highest-cost power source remained imports from Iran at Rs22.5155/kWh. After transmission losses of 2.97% and adjustments, 13,310 GWh were delivered to DISCOs at an average cost of Rs7.6800/kWh.

Discontinuation of ED collection opposed: KP govt urges Power Division to reconsider decision
Discontinuation of ED collection opposed: KP govt urges Power Division to reconsider decision

Business Recorder

timea day ago

  • Business Recorder

Discontinuation of ED collection opposed: KP govt urges Power Division to reconsider decision

ISLAMABAD: The federal government's plan to discontinue the collection of Electricity Duty (ED) has hit another roadblock as the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) government has formally opposed the move, following the earlier objection by the Sindh government. The KP government has urged the Power Division to reconsider the decision in the interest of constitutional propriety, cooperative federalism, and fiscal stability. In response to a letter dated June 30, 2025, from Federal Minister for Power Sardar Awais Khan Leghari, KP Chief Minister Ali Amin Gandapur conveyed strong reservations regarding the unilateral discontinuation of ED collection by the Power Division through Distribution Companies (Discos), without prior notice or consultation. Leghari urges chief ministers to scrap electricity duty from bills starting July Gandapur highlighted the constitutional and legal basis for the imposition of Electricity Duty: (i) under Article 157(2)(b) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), provincial governments are empowered to levy taxes on electricity consumption within their jurisdictions ;(ii) according to Section 13(2) of the KP Finance Act, 1964, every distribution licensee is obligated to collect and remit Electricity Duty to the provincial government. This duty constitutes a first charge on the amount recoverable for energy supplied, thereby making it a debt owed to the KP government; and (iii) Rule 5(1) of the West Pakistan Electricity Duty Rules, 1964 requires Discos to list Electricity Duty as a separate item on electricity bills and recover it alongside energy charges. He further argued that under Section 38 of the NEPRA Act (1997), provinces are authorized to monitor Discos' compliance regarding billing, metering, and theft cases. The Act also affirms the provincial government's jurisdiction over electricity consumption charges based on the principle of subsidiarity. Gandapur pointed out that under Section 36(2) of the State-Owned Enterprises (SoE) Act, 2023, all previous orders, regulations, and instruments remain in force unless repealed. Thus, the KP Finance Act, 1964 and the Electricity Duty Rules, 1964 continue to hold legal standing. He also referenced Articles 268 and 279 of the Constitution, which provide continuity to existing laws, including taxation statutes, until altered by the appropriate legislature. These protections, he argued, reinforce the provinces' legal right to collect ED. The chief minister emphasized that under Article 154(1) of the Constitution, the Council of Common Interests (CCI) is the designated body to formulate and regulate policies related to electricity and oversee related institutions. Therefore, any decision affecting the power sector must be considered and approved by the CCI, with mandatory consultation from the provinces—a process that was not followed in this case. He noted that three distribution companies—PESCO, HAZECO, and TESCO—operate within KP's jurisdiction and are legally bound to comply with provincial laws, under the principle of lex situs (the law of the place where the property is situated). The ED, he added, must be collected through the billing system as mandated by law, and there exists no alternate mechanism for its recovery. 'The Power Division's unilateral administrative decision, without CCI's approval or consultation with the KP government, is unconstitutional and legally void,' Gandapur asserted. 'This measure may unnecessarily fuel federal-provincial tensions.' The KP government maintains that ED is not a general tax that can be collected through alternative channels, but rather a sector-specific charge that, by law, must be recovered via electricity bills issued by Discos. The provincial government has sought immediate reconsideration of the decision of Power Division, expressing readiness for constructive dialogue, provided the constitutional and legal frameworks are upheld. Earlier, Sindh Chief Minister Murad Ali Shah also criticized the federal government, accusing Islamabad of imposing a unilateral decision and advising it to 'put its own house in order' before dictating terms to the provinces. Currently, Discos collect an estimated Rs 60 billion annually as Electricity Duty on behalf of the provinces. While the federal government claims the move is intended to provide relief to consumers, provincial governments argue it undermines their constitutional right. Power Minister Sardar Awais Leghari has stated that he will present the collective responses of all provinces to the prime minister before deciding on a future course of action. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Nepra issues pending notifications for KE tariffs
Nepra issues pending notifications for KE tariffs

Business Recorder

timea day ago

  • Business Recorder

Nepra issues pending notifications for KE tariffs

ISLAMABAD: The National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (NEPRA) has issued pending notifications for K-Electric's (KE) supply, distribution, and transmission tariffs for the period 2023–24 to 2029–30 under the Multi-Year Tariff (MYT) regime, stating that the federal government's pending review motion does not legally restrain the regulator from notifying its earlier determinations. Previously, the federal government was responsible for issuing tariff notifications. However, amid prolonged delays and under pressure from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank, the law was amended in 2021, granting NEPRA the authority to notify tariffs directly. 'It is now the duty of the Authority to issue the requisite notifications of its determinations if the government fails to do so or if any reconsideration request remains pending,' official sources said. Under Rule 31 of the NEPRA Act, the Authority can issue such notifications if the federal government does not act within the specified time. DISCOs and KE: Nepra approves revised average uniform SoT Although the government's review motion is still under consideration, NEPRA clarified that if it revises its previous determinations, the tariffs will be amended accordingly. In a related development, Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar recently chaired a high-level, confidential meeting to discuss KE's ownership issues involving Al-Jomaih, following a strongly worded letter from Pakistan's Ambassador to Saudi Arabia. KE's average power supply tariff has been fixed Rs 39.97 / kWh which includes power purchase excluding transmission cost of Rs 31.96 per unit, transmission cost of Rs 2.86 per unit, distribution cost Rs 3.31 per unit, supply margin Rs 2.28 per unit and Prior Year Adjustment negative Rs 0.44 per unit. The power utility company's total revenue requirement is estimated to be Rs 606.920 billion, for FY 2023-24, of which supply margin will be Rs 34.681 billion, O&M cost Rs 5.91 billion, working capital negative Rs 1.244 billion, recovery loss, Rs 36.253 billion, gross margin Rs 40.921 billion, other income negative Rs 6.240 billion, net margin Rs 34.681 billion and prior year adjustment negative Rs 6.690 billion. The Authority also considering the fact that FY 2023-24 has already lapsed and FY 2024-25 is almost 11 months gone, also obtained ICE's actual recovery ratios for the FY 2023-24 and FY 2024-25. As submitted by KE its actual recovery for the FY 2023-24 remained at 91.50%, whereas FY 2024-25 is expected to close at 90.50%. The financial impact of under recovery of 8.50% for FY 2023-24 and 9.50% for FY 2024-25, as reported by KE, is around Rs.40 billion and Rs.57 billion respectively. The Authority noted that return allowed to KE for its distribution function is around Rs.21.6 billion, meaning thereby that effectively KE would be incurring losses for the first 02 years of MYT, if no recovery loss is allowed to KE. This may compromise the financial viability of the company, which is neither in the interest of the consumers nor power system as whole. In another notification NEPRA has approved distribution tariff of Rs 3.31/ kWh and Rs 2.684 / kWh for investment of Rs 43.447 billion during the validity of MYT. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store