This Much-Loved European Destination Is Restricting Alcohol Sales—Here's What to Know
However, from now on, those keen to purchase the famous drink may need to do so before 9 p.m. As of Wednesday, June 25, Porto has implemented a nighttime ban on alcohol sales from supermarkets, convenience stores, wine cellars, and souvenir shops. The ban will be effective between the hours of 9 p.m. and 8 a.m.
Though the restrictions are not city-wide, they will apply to the entirety of Porto's 'Containment Zone,' which encompasses the downtown area, including popular nightlife hubs like Rua da Galeria de Paris. During these hours, only licensed cafes, bars, restaurants, and nightclubs will be allowed to sell alcoholic beverages.
The restrictions, part of an amendment to regulations first put in place in 2023, come as Porto experiences a significant increase in visitor numbers, with people flocking to main areas to soak up the culture and the growing nightlife scene—in turn increasing disruptive drinking incidents. In particular, street gatherings, known locally as botellóns (a Spanish term for an informal, outdoor gathering of people, who meet in public spaces to socialize while drinking alcohol), have led to increased scrutiny of public behavior, and the city's mayor, Rui de Carvalho de Araújo Moreira, indicated that previous fines for non-compliance were insufficient deterrents. He explained: "What we noticed is that the successive application of fines did not dissuade [people] from continuing to violate the rules, because paying the fine was worth it, because the fines were low."
Inspection bodies will now have the authority to immediately and temporarily close establishments that violate the new regulations.
'What justifies this is our conviction that this phenomenon in several parts of the city is causing harm and having an impact on urban security,' said Filipa Correia Pinto, the Councillor for Economic Activities and Inspection, as reported by Portugal News.
For travelers with upcoming plans to visit Porto, know these new measures aim to improve the quality of life for residents and foster a more responsible nightlife culture—they will not detract from city's inherent charm and creative allure.
Porto is beloved for its enchanting labyrinth of narrow streets, colorful patchwork facades, and breathtaking views over the Douro River. Visitors will still be able to indulge in port wine tastings at the numerous cellars in Vila Nova de Gaia, explore the architectural marvels like the São Bento train station with its stunning azulejo panels, and savor exquisite Portuguese cuisine.
This article originally appeared on Condé Nast Traveller UK.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Adams trashes $14 M NYC Council-approved law to provide free garbage bins: 'Ax to grind'
NYC homeowners might not be getting the free garbage cans the City Council promised – as legislators and Mayor Eric Adams literally fight over trash. Adams revealed this week he won't sign off on $14.5 million in taxpayer dough to give away hundreds of thousands of specially secure bins to New Yorkers as part of his war on NYC rats. The bins are supposed to go to owners of one- and two-family homes with the city refunding those who already purchased them, provided they are enrolled in the state's School Tax Relief (STAR) program. The giveaway was supposed to begin Friday under legislation sponsored by Yusef Salaam (D-Manhattan) that the Council unanimously approved in February with a veto-proof majority. 3 Mayor Eric Adams is snubbing a new law that is supposed to provide owners of one- and two-family home with city-issued bins. Instead, Council members this week were told to come up with the $14.5 million on their own — enough to cover about 265,000 one-and two family households, by NYC Independent Budget Office estimates. The City Council has its own taxpayer-funded budget that it uses to pay staff, fund pet projects in their district and for other initiatives. It was the latest salvo fired in an ongoing feud between the city's executive and legislative branches, which also this week included Adams vetoing a City Council measure that would have blocked Bally's from opening a Bronx casino and another that would decriminalize illegal vending. 3 'The mayor has an ax to grind,' said Council Minority Leader Joann Ariola (R-Queens). Ron Sachs – CNP for NY Post A vast majority of NYC property owners will be required to use city-issued bins with secure lids by June 2026. They range in cost from $43.88 for 25-gallon containers to $53.01 to 45-gallon bins — a tab the Council believes should be picked up by the city for many New Yorkers. Reps for the mayor said the Council should have addressed the bill's funding before agreeing last month on a new $115.9 billion budget for this fiscal year – especially since Adams previously complained the trash-bin giveaway plan was fiscally irresponsible. But Adams has an obligation to abide by the new law, and the Council believed the money for the bins was covered by $32 million of permanent new funding he set aside for the Department of Sanitation to keep NYC clean, some members said. 'The mayor has an ax to grind … This was never supposed to be funded by the City Council,' said Council Minority Leader Joann Ariola (R-Queens). '[Adams] is putting up the middle-finger to middle-class taxpayers.' 3 The trash-bin giveaway was supposed to begin Friday under legislation sponsored by Yusef Salaam (D-Manhattan) Matthew McDermott 'Homeowners in the STAR program are predominantly seniors and one of the most vulnerable groups in the city. That's why the … legislation to provide free garbage bins to these residents was so important,' said Councilwoman Lynn Schulman (D-Queens). 'The city must take care of its most precious constituents.' Salaam did not return messages. Liz Garcia, an Adams spokeswoman, said 'it is unfortunate that the City Council irresponsibly passed an unfunded law and then did not prioritize funding for it during our recent budget negotiations.' 'We will continue to work to provide the most affordable options to New Yorkers and send the rats packing out of our city,' Garcia said.
News24
9 hours ago
- News24
EFF councillor Banzi Dambuza details being strangled by law enforcement
Facebook A contentious incident unfolded during a councillor's meeting on Wednesday, July 30, 2025, at the Cape Town City Council chambers, involving EFF party council leader, Banzi Dambuza, and law enforcement officers, as seen in the widely circulating video online, where EFF council leader Banzi Dambuza is seen allegedly being choked by another man. The meeting, which included representatives from the DA, Good Party and many others, took a dramatic turn when EFF whip Ntsikelelo Tyandela was cut off by Speaker Felicity Purchase while posing a question to the City's mayor regarding the violent riots in Happy Valley, Blue Downs, related to service delivery. Read more | WATCH | EFF councillor 'choked' during ejection from Cape Town City Council chambers When Ntsikelelo was denied the opportunity to express himself fully, Banzi intervened, prompting the Speaker to call out his name multiple times, leading to her calling the 'Peace officers' to escort the EFF councillors out of the chambers. Speaking to Drum, Dambuza recalled the moments before the incident unfolded. 'I am the party leader, and Mr Tyandelo is the whip, so when the speaker was done speaking, she opened the floor to questions, and the five parties in attendance had to ask questions. My whip, Ntsikelelo, asked questions, and while he was doing so, there was a scuffle happening in the background from the DA councillors, and I asked why people are making a noise when the EFF is taking the floor,' he says. 'The speaker got upset and said she's kicking me out, and after that she said I must leave the council chambers, which I refused because she was not utilising the rules correctly as she was protecting DA councillors, and she called the peace officers who, in this case, were not peaceful at all,' he exclaimed. Read more | EFF celebrates 12th birthday in Cape Town with more than 10k supporters He added that while he was being escorted out, the EFF members built a protective layer around him, and that's when the violence from the officers started. 'They then started pushing, shouting, beating, and assaulting women and I was underneath a table grabbing onto the arms of it, and they came under to drag me out, but upon realising that I'm holding on, then this one officer who's a SWAT trainer strangled me and when I started grabbing his arm with my right arm to stop him his colleague reached out for my hand, and I passed out for a minute, and they were also beating me, I eventually gained consciousness but he choked me even more,' he said. 'The executive director, Vincent Botto, eventually stopped the situation after watching the situation unfold in front of him, doing nothing.' 'It has always been said that councillor Dambuza is problematic and there's an element of that was done to ensure that I don't challenge the Speaker again, I'm saying this because one of the DA councillors after the whole incident came to me directly and said; 'I hope you've learned your lesson and you'll never challenge the speaker again,' he mentioned. A case of attempted murder has been opened by the EFF party to the South African Police Services (SAPS), but Dambuza says he's not confident in them bringing him the justice he deserves. 'We've opened an attempted murder case with SAPS at the Cape Town police station, but we believe that there's an element of politics playing a role here as the detective handling the case told us they can't detain him unless they interview him, whereas we've been arrested before without being asked any questions and we'd be told we'll present our arguments in court in front of a judge, so why can't the same happen to him? And we've also been told that this is not attempted murder but just an assault, hence we say there's an element of politics involved,' he says. 'It's the DA making sure it protects the person they had sent to do their job,' he claimed. Dambuza also concluded by saying he has been to a doctor to tend to the injuries he suffered during the incident. 'My body is in total pain, and I'm struggling to move my neck around. I am at the doctors' as we speak.' A video of the incident, which includes disturbing footage of Banzi Dambuza being physically restrained and allegedly strangled by the law enforcement officer, can be viewed below. Trigger Warning: The footage may be distressing to some viewers, and we advise readers to proceed with caution. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Ntsikelelo Tyandela (@ntsido) Drum reached out to the Cape Town police station where the case was opened for a comment, and the media liaison officer, Captain F.C. Van Wyk, confirmed that indeed a case of assault has been opened. 'This office can confirm that an assault common case was registered at Cape Town Central SAPS for investigation following an altercation between security personnel and the victim, yesterday, Wednesday, 30 July 2025. Investigations continue, no arrest has been made,' he told Drum. Furthermore, Drum reached out to Speaker Felicity Purchase for a comment, but no response has been received at the time of publication.
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
Watertown's legal bills for Olney ethics case exceed $100,000
Aug. 1—WATERTOWN — The city has wracked up almost $118,000 in legal bills for the ethics investigation into City Councilman Cliff G. Olney. Since then-Mayor Jeffrey M. Smith filed his complaint in September 2023, the city has paid three law firms a total of $117,975 in the case, without coming to a conclusion whether Olney violated city ethics. With the cost exceeding six figures, the legal expenses could keep mounting — depending on whether the City Council proceeds with the complaint on Monday. Council members might decide Monday night whether to schedule a hearing date to determine Olney's fate. It's been estimated that the attorney fees could increase another $20,000 or more if they move forward with it. On Friday, council members expressed shock after hearing how much has been spent on lawyers. Councilman Benjamin P. Shoen was so shocked that he initially didn't know how to react. "That's a lot of money to get nowhere," Shoen said. "I hate it was a waste of money. To me, if we had gotten somewhere with it, that would be OK, but we got nowhere." After hearing about the cost, Lisa A. Ruggiero was equally shocked, blaming Smith for making the accusations against Olney solely for political reasons "to make him look bad." "It's outrageous," she said. "I just think it needs to stop. It's gotten us nowhere." Ruggiero and Shoen both said the money could have been used to decrease the property tax rate or for other purposes, such as hiring two public works employees — but it was wasted instead. Councilman Robert O. Kimball wants to move forward with holding a hearing on the ethics complaint, stressing that council has an obligation "to see it through to a conclusion." Despite spending more money, council needs to know whether one of its members violated the city's ethics and "how bad" they were violated, Kimball said. However, some members of the public will believe that it's a waste of taxpayers' money to proceed, he said. Some are going to say we're "throwing good money after bad," Kimball acknowledged. The Watertown Daily Times filed a Freedom of Information Law request with the city for the legal bills from three law firms that have been involved in the matter. The invoices from the three law firms were heavily redacted, but The Times has determined that the city paid $117,975 in legal bills for work on the ethics investigation. The Syracuse law firm that handles the city's legal matters accumulated the brunt of the legal bills. City attorney Bond, Schoeneck & King charged the city $80,166 for its handling of the ethics complaint. Those bills covered legal work until Nov. 6, 2024. Last year, however, the law firm recused itself from being involved in the complaint. With that law firm recusing itself, the city retained another Syracuse firm, Hancock Estabrook, to take over the work of the ethics complaint. They have submitted bills totaling $18,900 as of April 14. The city's former attorney, the Rochester law firm of Harris Beach PLLC, billed the city $18,949 for its part in starting the ethics investigation. Calling it "a stunning escalation of a politically motivated ethics complaint," Olney strongly criticized a proposed resolution on Monday night's agenda that would allow waiving attorney-client privilege to allow former city attorneys to testify against him in an ethics hearing — just months before the councilman is seeking reelection. It would mean paying yet another law firm to act as the prosecutor in the hearing, Olney said. The original ethics complaint, filed on Sept. 11, 2023, was drafted privately with the assistance of Harris Beach attorney H. Todd Bullard, using city legal resources without any formal authorization from the City Council. For nearly two years, the matter mostly sat dormant — until now, Olney said. "This is nothing short of election interference using public dollars," Olney said. "But now they want to selectively waive privilege — only where it might damage my reputation — to breathe life into a complaint that should never have existed in the first place." He repeated his criticism that the city has refused to provide him and the local press with unredacted legal bill records that would show the exact charges by the law firms. Just about all of the 46 pages of billing records were redacted. Some contained names of attorneys and clerks, how many hours that they worked on the city matters and the hourly rates that were charged to the city. Out of 36 pages that Bond, Schoeneck & King filed, 24 contained large black boxes that blacked out "descriptions" of what kind of legal work that they did for the city. Olney is calling for the release of all unredacted invoices from Harris Beach related to the ethics matter. He also wants a formal investigation into how the ethics complaint was prepared and funded. As for what happens at Monday night's meeting, Shoen doesn't know what council will decide, expecting Olney and Ruggiero to oppose moving forward with the complaint, while Kimball and Mayor Sarah V.C. Pierce will support proceeding with it. Agreeing with Kimball that the matter should proceed to its conclusion, Pierce said Friday that she hopes it can be determined that the ethics hearing could move forward without the involvement of an attorney. She wants to find out whether council members can hold the hearing themselves, so that the city won't "incur" additional legal expenses. Olney might be told that he must recuse himself from the vote, citing a conflict of interest since the matter involves him. If that happens, it could end up a 2-2 vote and it will be defeated. Thus putting an end to the legal bills, Olney said. Solve the daily Crossword
