logo
Budget 2026 must be 'sensible and prudent'

Budget 2026 must be 'sensible and prudent'

RTÉ News​3 days ago
Business group Ibec has said Budget 2026 must be "sensible and prudent" given the fragile global environment.
Launching its pre-budget submission, it urged the Government to take a "measured and strategic approach".
The group has also called for targeted investment in areas that enhance productivity and competitiveness.
It said sound economic policy must focus on restoring a balance between income and expenditure over the coming years and reduce the over-reliance on volatile tax receipts, such as corporation tax.
Ibec also warned that "persistent or emerging tariffs pose a serious threat to Irish business" and it said the economic model Ireland has relied on for the past 50 years is under serious strain.
It said while the broader economy may remain resilient, "some sectors will suffer significant and lasting damage to competitiveness".
As part of its submission, Ibec said such impacted businesses and their employees must receive targeted support, such as measures on PRSI and trade supports.
Ireland needs to 'make right choices'
Ibec's Chief Economist and Head of National Policy Gerard Brady said the budget must be framed in the context of ongoing trade tensions and recent US tax reforms
Mr Brady said Ireland needs to "make the right choices to safeguard our competitiveness and ability to attract and retain business".
"That means investing in productivity focused areas like infrastructure and committing to continue that investment regardless of the economic climate," he added.
Ibec also said the high cost of doing business here needs to be addressed and it said more needs to be done on skills and innovation.
Mr Brady urged the Government to use funding from the National Training Fund "to make sure that we're investing in skills, particularly at a time where there's significant change in the labuor force due to AI and other new technologies."
Mr Brady said: "Ireland still falls short of where it needs to be as an innovation leader and R&D performer."
In order to assist in attracting investment, he called on the Government to enhance and widen the scope of the R&D tax credit, which he believes would make Ireland "more attractive investment, both for Irish companies and for multinationals".
"Other measures take time to see the benefits for business on things like infrastructure and skills. R&D tax credit would work 1 January," he added.
He said the scheme should be expanded to include process innovation, AI, and green technologies.
"Allow application to offshore related-party research (with safeguards), provided IP and value remain in Ireland."
€3bn budget package proposed
Among the other measures in its submission, Ibec has proposed a budget package of €3bn, including €1.3bn in additional infrastructure spending under the National Development Plan.
And the business group has called on the Government to "maintain a strong, predictable capital investment pipeline".
It said public investment should be "prioritised above all other fiscal commitments."
In relation to tariffs, Ibec's Executive Director of Lobbying and Influence Fergal O'Brien said the group is hoping for a framework agreement.
Mr O'Brien said Budget 2026 is going to be "predominantly about the stress and pressure in our traded economy, and the uncertainty that the potential global trade war continues to have on the economy".
He said the 10% rate, which is currently in effect, is "materially hurting" low margin businesses particularly in the food and drink sectors.
"That 10% hurts, especially when you layer it on top of the dollar weakness of pretty much the same scale that we've seen since the start of the year."
Mr O'Brien said if the threatened 30% tariff did become a reality, "it will be extremely damaging".
He said Ibec members also have "a lot of concerns" about what countermeasures will be introduced by the EU.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

British special forces and MI6 spies among more than 100 Britons included in Afghan data leak
British special forces and MI6 spies among more than 100 Britons included in Afghan data leak

The Journal

time25 minutes ago

  • The Journal

British special forces and MI6 spies among more than 100 Britons included in Afghan data leak

THE DETAILS OF more than 100 Britons, including spies and special forces, were included in a massive data leak that resulted in thousands of Afghans being secretly relocated to the UK. Defence sources have said that details of MI6 spies, SAS and special forces personnel were included in the spreadsheet, after they had endorsed Afghans who had applied to be brought to the UK. The dataset, containing the personal information of nearly 19,000 people who applied for the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (Arap), was released 'in error' in February 2022 by a defence official. The Ministry of Defence (MoD) became aware of the breach more than a year later, when excerpts of the spreadsheet were anonymously posted in a Facebook group in August 2023. Other details leaked included the names and contact details of the Arap applicants and names of their family members. In a statement on Tuesday, after an unprecedented superinjunction was lifted by a UK High Court judge, British Defence Secretary John Healey offered a 'sincere apology' on behalf of the Government for the data breach. He later told the Commons the spreadsheet contained 'names and contact details of applicants and, in some instances, information relating to applicants' family members, and in a small number of cases the names of members of Parliament, senior military officers and Government officials were noted as supporting the application'. 'This was a serious departmental error,' he added. Shadow defence secretary James Cartlidge also apologised on behalf of the former Conservative government, which was in power when the leak happened and when it was discovered more than a year later. Cartlidge later asked Healey about reports that someone other than the original person who leaked the data had been engaged in blackmail. Arap was responsible for relocating Afghan nationals who had worked for or with the UK Government and were therefore at risk of reprisals once the Taliban returned to power in Kabul in 2021. Between 80,000 and 100,000 people, including the estimated number of family members of the Arap applicants, were affected by the breach and could be at risk of harassment, torture or death if the Taliban obtained their data, judges said in June 2024. However, an independent review, commissioned by the UK Government in January 2025, concluded last month that the dataset is 'unlikely to significantly shift Taliban understanding of individuals who may be of interest to them'. Advertisement The breach resulted in the creation of a secret Afghan relocation scheme – the Afghanistan Response Route – by the previous government in April 2024. The scheme is understood to have cost around £400 million (€463m) so far, with a projected cost once completed of around £850 million (€983m). Millions more are expected to be paid in legal costs and compensation. Around 4,500 people, made up of 900 Arap applicants and approximately 3,600 family members, have been brought to the UK or are in transit so far through the Afghanistan Response Route. A further estimated 600 people and their relatives are expected to be relocated before the scheme closes, with a total of around 6,900 people expected to be relocated by the end of the scheme. Projected costs of the scheme may include relocation costs, transitional accommodation, legal costs and local authority tariffs. The case returned to the High Court in London today, sitting in a closed session in the morning where journalists and their lawyers were excluded. While private hearings exclude the public and press but allow the parties in the case to remain, closed hearings require specific lawyers who can deal with sensitive issues, including national security. During the public part of the hearing, Mr Justice Chamberlain said that while he needed to give lawyers for the Ministry of Defence an 'opportunity' to argue why a closed hearing was needed, 'I will be scrutinising very carefully any justification for holding any part of this hearing in private, let alone in closed'. The judge later said he would not be 'kicking the ball down the road'. He added: 'The superinjunction has now been lifted and if there are other matters that are capable of being reported in public, that needs to be able to happen straight away.' Also on Thursday, Parliament's Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) requested a number of documents used in the superinjunction proceedings be provided to it 'immediately'. This includes intelligence assessments from the MoD and the Joint Intelligence Organisation, as well as the unredacted report of retired civil servant Paul Rimmer. The ISC has also asked for the reasons why barristers for the UK Government previously told the Court of Appeal that information about the breach could not be shared with it.

Simon Harris was having the time of his life today with Pearse Doherty's Supervalu mistake
Simon Harris was having the time of his life today with Pearse Doherty's Supervalu mistake

The Journal

timean hour ago

  • The Journal

Simon Harris was having the time of his life today with Pearse Doherty's Supervalu mistake

The Journal / YouTube TÁNAISTE SIMON HARRIS appeared to be enjoying himself in the Dáil today when he got the opportunity to slag Sinn Féin's finance spokesperson for his Supervalu faux pas. On Tuesday, Sinn Féin were forced to explain their embarrassing mistake after Pearse Doherty and a number of other Sinn Féin TDs repeatedly referred in the Dáil to SuperValu being owned by United Natural Foods Inc., a US-based firm rather than the Irish Musgrave Group. The party put the mistake down to 'human error' due to a search by Sinn Féin staff into Google Finance turning up a different 'Supervalu' company based in the US. During Leaders' Questions today, Harris made sure not to spare Doherty's blushes. During a discussion on the cost of living, the Fine Gael leader saw his opportunity to strike and took it. Advertisement 'You spend a lot of your political career standing up here saying: 'you don't get it over here. You don't understand, you're out of touch. 'You know what I know? I know who owns Supervalu. And it's not an American multinational,' the Tánaiste jeered across the Dáil at a glum-faced Sinn Féin, receiving whoops of approval from the Government benches. 'I know who owns Supervalu, they sponsor the GAA, they sponsor the Tidy Towns. They're in towns and villages across the country, they're a proud Irish company. And you thought, you thought they were owned by an American multinational! 'And you want Paschal Donohoe's job?,' the Tánaiste said with a smile, while pointing at the Finance Minister sitting beside him. 'You want Paschal Donohoe's job and you don't even know who owns SuperValu? Or can't even use Google? Give me a break,' he concluded. Unintelligible shouts continued from the Sinn Féin benches, as the Tánaiste repeated: 'Give me a break, Pearse, give me a break.' Rising to her feet for her speaking slot, Social Democrats TD Jennifer Whitmore was far from impressed with the scenes she had just witnessed. 'Anybody looking in on this debate today will have their head in their hands. They are worried about putting food on their table, they are worried about turning their lights on and we have this kind of behaviour going on? 'It's just — I actually don't think either of you get it,' the Wicklow TD said. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal

Disability groups challenge Government to 'show me the money' in budget
Disability groups challenge Government to 'show me the money' in budget

Irish Examiner

timean hour ago

  • Irish Examiner

Disability groups challenge Government to 'show me the money' in budget

Will this year's budget translate general election promises on disability services into cold hard cash? Disability groups have essentially said 'show me the money' to Government in a series of pre-budget submissions this week. Inclusion Ireland represents people with intellectual disabilities and their families. Its data shows social welfare supports do not match the needs of 66% of adults with an intellectual disability, so it wants core disability payments raised above the poverty threshold. One in four families said their child received no early intervention therapies. This needs investment in children's disability network teams (CDNTs), the submission recommended. CEO Derval McDonagh said: 'Our community is not looking for short-term fixes; we demand long-term thinking and ambition from our leaders.' Its survey of 1,000 people identified 'significant gaps' between people's lived experiences and what the State is obliged to provide under the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. The Disability Federation of Ireland referred back to the programme for government promise of 'a step change in the supports and services required by people with disabilities". The federation's campaign call is 'deliver the step change'. It also argued for an increase in core social protection rates to reflect the true cost of living with a disability. The Disability Federation of Ireland said councils should be funded to make sure 7.5% of all new housing is suitable for wheelchair users. The CDNTs need at least 75 extra full-time therapists and staff, it said. It also called for more assessment of need funding. Councils should be funded to make sure 7.5% of all new housing is suitable for wheelchair users. The federation pointed out the voluntary charity sector delivers over 70% of disability services here. This needs sustainable, multi-annual funding it said. As I Am, Ireland's autism charity, focused on strategies and policies already in existence but in need of funding to roll-out fully. It called for resourcing of the Autism Innovation Strategy. It echoed calls for a weekly cost of disability payment, and also recommended a 10% increase in disability, carers, and domiciliary care allowances. CEO Adam Harris, brother to Tánaiste Simon Harris, said: 'Budget 2026 must confront the uncomfortable reality that our systems are failing autistic people, from year-long waits for services to social exclusion and financial strain." Norma Foley, minister for children, disability and equality and Hildegarde Naughton, junior minister for disability will soon be sitting in on heated budget discussions. They now have a shopping list prepared by people directly impacted by the reality of disability. Can they deliver the money is the question. Read More Letters to the Editor: System fails people with disabilities

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store