Convicted for murdering her father, Telangana HC asks petitioner to pursue LLB from prison
The division bench of Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya and Justice B R Madhusudhan Rao was hearing a prayer seeking direction to the authorities of Dr VRK college of Law in Mehdipatnam, Hyderabad, to receive examination fee and examination application form of the petitioner relating to second semester and also to write second semester examination of LLB course scheduled to be held this month.
P Prabhakar Rao, the senior counsel appearing for the petitioner, informed the court that the college was not willing to collect the examination fee as well as the examination application form, citing the requirements for physically attending the classes and a mandatory 60 percent attendance.
The senior counsel sought a directive from the court to the college, which was denied by the bench, stating that it could not interfere with the rules of the college.
The original application for bail for one month for the petitioner to appear for the exams was also denied by the court.
The senior counsel, thereafter, referred to a Kerala High Court judgment permitting an appellant to undergo online classes from prison.
Responding to this, the bench said, 'Needless to say, there can't be an embargo, in law or equity, from preventing the appellant to pursue her LLB course from inside the prison precincts, the appellant would certainly be entitled to pursue, in coordination with the college authorities.'
'The appellant still wants to appear for physical classes and our petition for bail is posted for July 28. For now, the court has directed us to find out if the necessary infrastructure for permitting online classes for the petitioner is available in the prison as well as the college,' the senior counsel said, when contacted.
The appellant, Priyanka Sula, and her siblings Medipalli Tharun, 28, and Anjali Sula, 29, have been lodged in Cherlapally Central Prison since August 2024 after the court convicted them of the murder of their father and sentenced them to life imprisonment.
Rahul V Pisharody is an Assistant Editor with the Indian Express Online and has been reporting from Telangana on various issues since 2019. Besides a focused approach to big news developments, Rahul has a keen interest in stories about Hyderabad and its inhabitants and looks out for interesting features on the city's heritage, environment, history culture etc. His articles are straightforward and simple reads in sync with the context.
Rahul started his career as a journalist in 2011 with The New Indian Express and worked in different roles at the Hyderabad bureau for over 8 years. As Deputy Metro Editor, he was in charge of the Hyderabad bureau of the newspaper and coordinated with the team of district correspondents, centres and internet desk for over three years.
A native of Palakkad in Kerala, Rahul has a Master's degree in Communication (Print and New Media) from the University of Hyderabad and a Bachelor's degree in Business Management from PSG College of Arts and Science, Coimbatore. Long motorcycle rides and travel photography are among his other interests. ... Read More
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
7 hours ago
- The Hindu
Rising concern over conduct of lawyers in virtual hearings
NEW DELHI Born out of necessity during the COVID-19 lockdown five years ago, virtual courtrooms are now grappling with a different challenge – growing indiscipline among lawyers and litigants who flout decorum during online hearings. A virtual court hearing functions like a regular court proceeding but is conducted via video conferencing platforms. Once a matter is listed, parties and lawyers receive a secure video link to join the hearing remotely. The system was introduced during the pandemic, when physical courtrooms were shut to curb the spread of the virus, but the judiciary needed to continue functioning. The facility has proven a boon for lawyers, who can now attend multiple hearings across different courts, and even cities, within a single day, without the burden of travel. For litigants too, it has eased the hassle of appearing in person for each hearing. Screen-time shenanigans However, the system's flexibility has also led to blatant misuse. One egregious example involved a man attending a Gujarat High Court hearing from his toilet. In another case, also in Gujarat, a video went viral showing a senior advocate appearing to sip beer during a virtual session. In Delhi, the High Court recently took strong exception to a female lawyer who joined a hearing via mobile phone while walking through a public park. Though she claimed to be at the Agra court complex, the judge was unconvinced. 'Despite repeated directions, certain sections of the Bar have failed to understand the decorum of the court,' observed Justice Girish Kathpalia. He urged Bar Associations across Delhi to sensitise their members regarding proper conduct during virtual appearances. Justice Kathpalia reminded that the videoconferencing facility was extended to enable counsel to appear from their offices, thereby sparing them the ordeal of rushing between multiple court complexes. Former Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, in February 2023, strongly supported the continued use of virtual hearings, saying, 'Technology is here to stay for the future, forever.' But recent developments underscore that its success depends not just on technical infrastructure, but equally on courtroom conduct. Senior advocate and Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) president Vikas Singh did not mince words: 'Online hearing, which started more like a necessity, is being misused by lawyers. It is trivialising a solemn court function. Court hearings cannot be argued from a car, a park, or while having a beer. Strict guidelines must be enforced,' he told The Hindu. Missing penalties While the Delhi High Court, a pioneer in institutionalising video conferencing, issued comprehensive rules in 2021, these mainly focus on behavioural expectations. They mandate that 'participants wear sober attire', with advocates in professional dress as per the Advocates Act, 1961. The rules also state that participants must look into the camera, remain attentive, and refrain from multitasking. 'All proceedings conducted by a court via video conferencing shall be judicial proceedings, and all the courtesies and protocols applicable to a physical court shall apply to these virtual proceedings,' the rules say. However, no specific penalties are prescribed. Courts may invoke the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, or exercise their inherent powers in egregious cases. Senior advocate Sanjoy Ghose, whose post about the toilet incident went viral, advocated for clear penalties and their strict enforcement. 'There should be penalties prescribed, and they should be strictly enforced,' he told The Hindu. He also called for better awareness: 'Dos and don'ts must be clearly listed on court websites. Litigants may lack familiarity, but lawyers have no excuse.' Sharanya Tripathi, associate advocate at Jotwani Associates, called the trend 'deeply disrespectful to the court's dignity'. 'Everyone attending a virtual hearing, whether lawyer or litigant, must understand that appearing through a screen does not reduce the formality of the courtroom,' she asserted. 'If someone joins from an unsuitable location or behaves disrespectfully, the court should act promptly by removing the participant, imposing costs, or initiating contempt proceedings in serious cases,' Ms. Tripathi said. Courts could also hold legal representatives accountable for ensuring that their clients maintain proper decorum during virtual hearings, she added.
Time of India
9 hours ago
- Time of India
Supreme Court judge calls for more empathetic justice system for child survivors of sexual abuse
Hyderabad: Justice Vikram Nath of the Supreme Court on Sunday called for a more empathetic and effective justice system for child survivors of sexual abuse. 'We must also listen to children. Often, the voices of child survivors are drowned in the noise of administrative processes. If we are to design truly victim-centric systems, we must involve children in shaping the responses meant for them,' he added. Delivering the valedictory address at the national conference on 'Ensuring Justice, Rehabilitation and Reintegration for Child Victims: Strengthening POCSO and Child Protection Ecosystems' held here, Justice Nath emphasised that legal provisions must be backed by compassionate and coordinated systems to ensure real justice for children. Drawing from personal experience as former chairperson of the Juvenile Justice Committee of the Allahabad high court, Justice Nath said, 'This subject is not just a professional interest — it is deeply personal. I have seen first hand the immense challenges and responsibilities that surround child protection.' You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad He underscored that child victims often face not just the trauma of abuse but were also re-traumatised by the system meant to protect them. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Monster Hunter Wilds – Exclusive Discounts! Shop Now Undo 'Justice cannot merely mean punishment. It must encompass healing, restoration, and the hope of a future unmarred by the past,' he said at the conference, organised by the women safety wing of the Telangana police in collaboration with the women development and child welfare department, the Telangana State Legal Services Authority and UNICEF. He praised Telangana's Bharosa Centres as a model worth replicating nationwide, calling them 'spaces of safety, listening, and healing' due to their integration of police, legal, medical, and psychological support under one roof. 'Such convergence should not be the exception but the norm,' he said, urging similar models to be scaled across India. The apex court judge also acknowledged the challenges of delays in the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (Pocso) trials, gaps in trained personnel, and the lack of infrastructure. He questioned whether institutions truly had the will and capacity to implement child protection laws effectively and empathetically. Speaking about the judiciary's role, Justice Nath stressed that judges must go beyond the mechanical application of law. 'Technicalities must not eclipse justice. Justice is not a product — it is a process, and in that process, dignity must be non-negotiable.' He urged the judiciary, investigators, and legal aid lawyers to adopt a child-sensitive approach, insisting that legal aid must be timely and rehabilitation must be holistic—going beyond compensation to include education, counselling, family reintegration, and community care. Recognising the growing threat of online exploitation, he called for better digital safeguards, increased cybercrime investigation capacities, and active collaboration with tech platforms to combat abuse facilitated by technology. He also stressed the importance of digital literacy for children, parents, and teachers. Justice Nath called for sustained judicial training grounded in empathy, psychological insight, and field experience. 'Our goal must be to create a justice system where children are not mere witnesses, but participants whose well-being is our central concern,' he added. 'Their testimonies, their experiences, their suggestions must inform our laws and our institutions. We are accountable not just to the Constitution or to the statutes, but to every child who looks to us for safety and justice. Each case of child sexual abuse is not just a legal file; it is a broken world. And while we may not be able to undo the past, we have a duty to ensure that the future is filled with dignity and hope,' the apex court judge said. Quoting Nelson Mandela, he concluded: 'There can be no keener revelation of a society's soul than the way in which it treats its children.' Justice Nath added, 'Justice must have a human face. Let that face be visible to every child who walks into a courtroom, a police station, a hospital, or a shelter home.' Acting Chief Justice Sujoy Paul, Justice Sam Koshy and several judges from the Telangana high court, advocate general A Sudarshan Reddy, Unicef child protection specialist Sonykutyy George and others participated.
The Hindu
18 hours ago
- The Hindu
Cheque bounce case acquittals can be challenged before district courts from July 7: Madras High Court
Victims in cheque bounce cases can henceforth file appeals, against judicial magistrates' acquittal orders, directly before the jurisdictional district courts without having to approach the Madras High Court seeking its leave to file the appeals against the acquittal of the accused. The Madras High Court's Registrar (Judicial) has issued a notification intimating lawyers and litigants that the High Court would not entertain petitions to grant leave, to file appeals, from Monday (July 7, 2025) in accordance with a judicial order passed Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan. While hearing two such leave petitions on June 30, 2025, the judge pointed out the Supreme Court in Celestium Financial versus A. Gnanasekaran (2025) had ruled victims in cheque bounce cases were entitled to file appeals as a matter of right without having to seek the leave of the High Court. The top court had pointed out the procedure of filing appeals, against acquittal orders passed by judicial magistrates, in the High Court, that too after obtaining its leave, had to be followed only in cases where the private complainants were not the victims in a criminal case. 'A person convicted of a crime has the right to prefer an appeal under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as a matter of right and not being subjected to any conditions. Similarly, a victim of a crime, whatever be the nature of the crime, unconditionally must have a right to prefer an appeal,' the Supreme Court had said. However, since the top court had not mentioned whether its decision should be given effect retrospectively or prospectively, Justice Ilanthiraiyan decided to give effect to it from July 7, 2025. 'The district courts are directed to entertain the appeals... from July 7, 2025 onwards,' he ordered. The judge also directed the High Court Registry to circulate his order to all district courts in Tamil Nadu and Puducherry.
