Missing 15-year-old girl who had disturbing chats with men is found safe over 500 miles from home
Alisa Petrov, 15, from South Jordan, walked into the Colorado Springs Police Department on Sunday evening, six weeks after she disappeared, police said, according to KUTV.
She was in good health, but cops have not yet determined how she got to the police station or if she was held against her will, the outlet reported.
Advertisement
3 15-year-old Alisa Petrov, who had been missing for six weeks, appeared healthy when she walked into a Colorado police precinct Sunday.
Facebook / Nikolai Petrov
Petrov was reported missing on April 21, two days after her final message to a 41-year-old man with whom she had been having a series of sexual conversations, according to an affidavit obtained by KSL TV.
'I'M RUNNING AWAY. Please don't contact me,' Petrov wrote on April 19 at 12:34 a.m. in a message to an unnamed man from Herriman, Utah, whom she met on Discord, the report said.
The man was later identified as Samuel Teancum Mitchell, after police conducted a reverse search of the phone number he provided to Petrov, KUTV reported.
Advertisement
Their chats had become increasingly sexual, including discussions about condoms and sex games, as well as planning to meet in person, according to the affidavit.
Messages were discovered on Petrov's iPad, which she left behind in her bedroom.
She had shared her Snapchat username with him, and some messages may have been deleted, according to the warrant.
Advertisement
3 Sexually explicit messages were discovered on Petrov's iPad, which she left behind in her bedroom.
Facebook / Nikolai Petrov
Mitchell, 41, was arrested Wednesday and charged with five counts of sexual exploitation of a minor, a second-degree felony, and enticement of a minor.
Two other men were also charged for communicating with Petrov before her disappearance, KSL reported.
William Taylor Glines, 37, is in custody in Texas, and a second suspect, Matthew Nicholas Menard, 35, of Florida, turned himself in on Wednesday night, the outlet said.
Advertisement
3 William Taylor Glines was charged with aggravated sexual exploitation of a minor, among other charges. He is one of three men arrested following Petrov's disappearance.
Galveson County Jail
Glines has been charged with aggravated sexual exploitation of a minor, attempted aggravated sexual exploitation of a minor, first-degree felonies, and criminal solicitation, records indicate.
Menard was also charged with aggravated sexual exploitation of a minor, enticing a minor, and three counts of criminal solicitation.
Petrov was last seen on security video leaving a train platform in Provo, KUTV reported.
Her family had previously offered a $20,000 reward for any information leading to her safe return.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Business News
2 hours ago
- Time Business News
Digital Footprints as Evidence: How Online Activity Can Shape Court Cases
The intersection of digital technology and courtroom proceedings has reached a critical juncture, with legal experts warning that Americans' online behaviors are increasingly becoming their own worst enemies in litigation. Recent comprehensive analysis by The Texas Law Dog reveals a startling reality: your digital presence may be silently sabotaging your legal rights, regardless of how secure you believe your privacy settings to be. Legal professionals are witnessing an unprecedented shift in how evidence is gathered and presented in courtrooms across America. What many citizens fail to recognize is that every click, post, and digital interaction creates a permanent record that can be legally accessed and weaponized against them during litigation proceedings. The scope of this phenomenon extends far beyond what most individuals anticipate. Research tracking digital evidence usage across major social media platforms including Facebook, LinkedIn, X (formerly Twitter), Instagram, YouTube, and TikTok has uncovered compelling statistics that should concern every internet user. Data analysis spanning from fall 2022 through fall 2023 demonstrates that digital evidence played a decisive role in approximately half a million legal cases, fundamentally altering trial outcomes and settlement negotiations. A dangerous misconception pervades public understanding of digital privacy. Many users operate under the false assumption that privacy controls on social media platforms provide legal protection against evidence discovery. This belief has proven catastrophically wrong in countless courtrooms nationwide. Federal courts have established clear precedent regarding digital evidence admissibility. Under established Federal Rules of Evidence, judges consistently rule that relevant social media content qualifies as legitimate evidence, regardless of privacy settings or user intentions when posting. The American Bar Association has documented the systematic approach courts use to authenticate digital evidence, noting that social media posts present unique verification challenges compared to traditional electronic communications like emails or text messages. The authentication process requires courts to examine multiple factors, including potential account access by third parties, the possibility of planted evidence, and the overall reliability of the digital platform. However, once authenticated, this evidence carries substantial weight in judicial proceedings. The practical implications of digital evidence have been demonstrated through numerous high-profile legal cases that serve as cautionary tales for social media users. In the landmark case Romano v. Steelcase Inc. , a plaintiff's claims of permanent, home-confining injuries were completely undermined when defense attorneys successfully obtained access to her supposedly private Facebook and MySpace accounts. The content revealed activities and lifestyle patterns that directly contradicted her sworn testimony about physical limitations. Similarly, the Nucci v. Target Corp. case illustrates how seemingly innocent social media activity can destroy a legal claim. The plaintiff, who sued for significant injuries and emotional trauma following a slip-and-fall incident, was compelled by the court to provide recent Facebook photographs. These images revealed a lifestyle inconsistent with her claimed injuries and emotional distress, ultimately weakening her case and reducing potential compensation. Insurance companies have rapidly adapted to this new evidentiary landscape, deploying sophisticated digital investigation techniques to challenge claims. Adjusters now routinely scour social media platforms for content that contradicts injury claims, seeking evidence of physical activities that appear inconsistent with alleged limitations or emotional states that don't align with claimed psychological distress. This systematic approach to digital evidence gathering has fundamentally shifted the power dynamic in personal injury litigation. What previously required expensive private investigators and extensive surveillance can now be accomplished through comprehensive social media analysis, making it easier and more cost-effective for insurance companies to challenge legitimate claims. Given this evolving legal landscape, individuals must approach their online presence with the same caution they would exercise when giving sworn testimony. Every post, photograph, and interaction should be evaluated through the lens of potential legal scrutiny. Legal experts recommend implementing comprehensive digital hygiene practices, including regular privacy audits, careful consideration of all posted content, and understanding that deletion doesn't guarantee permanent removal. The key is recognizing that your digital footprint extends far beyond your immediate social circle and can be accessed by opposing legal teams with proper court authorization. As Matt Aulsbrook from The Texas Law Dog emphasizes, 'The digital age has fundamentally changed how legal cases are won and lost. Understanding the permanent nature of online activity and its potential legal implications isn't just advisable—it's essential for protecting your rights and ensuring fair legal outcomes.' The message is clear: in today's interconnected world, your smartphone screen might as well be a courtroom window, and every post could become evidence in ways you never imagined. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
New York Post
6 hours ago
- New York Post
Aussie running for Boston suburb mayor says there's ‘no chance' he'll change his name despite Jeffrey Epstein comparison
He's not name-dropping. An Australian man named Geoffrey Epstein is running for mayor in a Massachusetts town — and he rejects any comparisons to the convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, according to a report. Epstein, who goes by 'Geoff,' said he wasn't afraid of the overt homophonic resemblance his name bears to that of the notorious, dead sex trafficker. Advertisement 3 Geoffrey Epstein attends the Framingham Democrats summer barbecue on July 27, 2025. Geoff Epstein for Mayor/Facebook 'That other one is a dead American and I am a live Aussie,' Epstein, who is seeking office in Framingham, a Boston suburb, told HuffPost Tuesday. 'But, of course, there is all the horrifying criminality and darkness of the other guy,' the aspiring pol said, adding, 'I have lived my life trying to be straight up and improving things.' Advertisement Epstein said there was 'no way' he would change his name to avoid association with the degenerate criminal, who officials said committed suicide in a Manhattan lockup in 2019. 'I like my name and I am proud of my family,' he said, adding his family proudly fought in World War II. The Aussie, who noted he was born on September 11, further stands apart from his doppel-namer by way of holding a Ph.D. in theoretical physics, whereas Jeffrey Epstein dropped out of Cooper Union before attaining a degree. He is not the first politician to fight off associations with the infamous sex trafficker. Advertisement 3 Epstein, who goes by 'Geoff,' said he wasn't afraid of the overt homophonic resemblance his name bears to that of the notorious, dead sex trafficker. Geoff Epstein for Mayor/Facebook 3 Convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein in a mugshot after his arrest in 2019. Kypros New York State Assemblyman Harvey Epstein was mocked on Saturday Night Live last year for having a name that recalled not only Jeffrey Epstein, but convicted rapist Harvey Weinstein. Advertisement 'It was a total surprise,' Epstein told The Post the day after the show aired. 'Imagine if you were watching SNL and there was a parody about you.' 'Your name is your name. It is what it is. Both [Jeffrey Epstein and Harvey Weinstein] are horrific,' the pol added.
New York Post
16 hours ago
- New York Post
Maniac was ‘hell-bent' on getting to beloved NYC deli worker despite mom's screams: witness
A maniac who stabbed a beloved Brooklyn deli worker appeared 'hell-bent' after an earlier scuffle with the frightened father — despite his own mother's screams for him to stop, witnesses said Saturday. The fight at the NY Deli & Mini Market Corp. at the corner of Hegeman and Van Siclen avenues in East New York broke out just after 3 p.m. Friday, cops said. The worker, Diego Sandoval Nava, was rushed to Brookdale University Hospital Medical Center where the father of three, including a nerwborn, died, cops said. The unhinged knifeman fled the scene and has not been captured, an NYPD spokesman said. Ivor Dowridge saw some of the attack when he went into the store to use the ATM and said three workers were trying to hold the berserk attacker back. It is unclear what led to the fight. 'He was hell-bent on going after the guy,' Dowridge, 63, said. 'The victim looks scared. I saw his face, I saw it in his eyes.' The maniac put his hands down and walked out of the store, but returned a short time later with a knife, he said. 'When I was leaving the store, I saw him running back in,' Dowridge said. 'I saw him going in his pocket. 'His mom was outside shouting at him as he was going back, 'What the f–k are you doing? What the hell are you doing?' ' Dowridge, a union worker who lives in the area, knows the stabber, who was out of work, has two kids and gets help from his mother, he told The Post. 'He just had to walk away and nothing like this would've happened,' he said. 'You stabbed somebody, your life is over.' A 45-year-old woman who works nearby said Nava always made her breakfast. 'Once you became a regular, he knew what you wanted and you didn't have to tell him,' the woman, who asked to remain anonymous, said. 4 Diego Sandoval-Nava was the bodega worker stabbed at New York Deli and Mini Market at the corner of Hegeman and Van Siclen avenues in East New York just after 3 p.m. Friday. Diego Sandoval-Nava / Facebook 'He was very humble, did not speak much, just did his job – very nice guy,' she said. 'It's heartbreaking. I bought a candle to put outside the store in his memory.' Republican mayoral candidate Curtis Sliwa, who was at the deli, called working at a bodega 'the most dangerous job in the city.' 'It goes against the grain of what we've been told by both Mayor Adams and (Police Commissioner) Jessica Tisch: It's a perception of crime,' he said. 'Well, if you happen to be behind a bodega counter, you know it ain't no perception. It's reality every day.' 4 The stabbing was preceeded by a dispute inside the bodega, cops said. ABC 7 4 It wasn't clear what the fight was about but the irate man returned to the deli and appeared 'hell bent' to get Nava, a witness who knew both men said. Diego Sandoval-Nava / Facebook
