logo
Sobering Figures: Alcohol's Link to GI Cancer

Sobering Figures: Alcohol's Link to GI Cancer

Medscape06-06-2025

This transcript has been edited for clarity.
In January 2025, the US Surgeon General released an important advisory that 'highlights alcohol use as a leading preventable cause of cancer in the United States, contributing to nearly 100,000 cancer cases and about 20,000 cancer deaths each year.' This is in line with epidemiologic evidence for the carcinogenicity of alcohol.
However, the advisory also noted that approximately 72% of American adults drink alcohol at least once a week, and fewer than half realize that alcohol use contributes to an increase in cancer risk.
In this video, we will explore the research linking alcohol to gastrointestinal (GI) cancers and suggest ways that physicians and public health experts can help individuals dramatically reduce their alcohol consumption. Through careful discussions in the clinic and public health initiatives, we can hopefully prevent many cancer deaths related to alcohol use.
The Toll of Alcohol-Associated GI Cancer
The association between alcohol consumption and cancer risk was first appreciated during the late 1980s. Over time, a growing body of research has demonstrated 'a causal relationship between alcohol use and increased risk for at least seven different types of cancer, including breast (in women), colorectum, esophagus, liver, mouth (oral cavity), throat (pharynx), and voice box (larynx).'
The advisory publication noted that in 2020, approximately 741,300 patients developed cancer in part due to alcohol. In the United States, there are approximately 20,000 cancer deaths annually related to alcohol consumption, more than the number of alcohol-related motor vehicle collisions each year, which totals 13,500.
Breast cancer makes up 60% of cancer-related deaths for women, while liver cancer (approximately 33%) and colorectal cancer (approximately 21%) make up the most cancer-related deaths for men. These figures should be sobering.
Although the risk of developing cancer in people who consume fewer than two drinks per day is lower compared with higher levels of alcohol ingestion, there are a greater number of people who consume one to two drinks per day. Therefore, the total number of cancer cases is similar. In 2020, 185,100 patients who drank one to two drinks daily developed cancer attributed to alcohol usage, compared with 153,400 patients who consumed four to six drinks per day and 192,900 patients who consumed more than six drinks per day.
A standard drink of alcohol amounts to 5 fluid ounces of wine, 12 fluid ounces of beer, or 1.5 fluid ounces of hard liquor.
Knowledge Gap
The International Agency for Research on Cancer — a specialty arm of the World Health Organization — now classifies alcohol as a Group 1 carcinogen along with tobacco, asbestos, and formaldehyde. In fact, 25 years ago, the US National Toxicology Program announced that alcoholic beverage consumption is carcinogenic.
Yet, there remains a knowledge gap among the American public about the fact that alcohol is a strong cancer risk factor. A 2019 survey indicated that only 45% of Americans realized alcohol is a cancer risk factor, while those surveyed had higher awareness of the cancer risks posed by other factors, such as radiation exposure (91%), tobacco (89%), and asbestos (81%).
Scientists have been studying alcohol as a potential risk factor for cancer over 20 years, using the same template of observational studies that researchers previously applied to studying smoking as a cancer risk factor.
A large global meta-analysis comprising 572 research studies and 486,538 cancer deaths concluded that alcohol is indeed a cancer risk factor. A pooled analysis of 26 studies found the odds of developing oral cancer increased by 40% for those who drank one alcoholic beverage daily compared with those who did not. Furthermore, another meta-analysis showed the relative risk of cancer development compared with people who don't drink was 1.0 for light drinkers, 1.21 for moderate drinkers, and 1.52 for heavy drinkers (ie, more than four drinks per day).
How Alcohol Causes Cancer
Acetaldehyde is a breakdown byproduct of alcohol that can cause cancer by binding to DNA and damaging it. As a result, a cell can begin to grow uncontrollably and produce a cancerous tumor. In addition, alcohol can produce reactive oxygen species, which has the potential to create inflammation through oxidation, also damaging DNA, proteins, and lipids.
Studies have shown that providing ethanol or acetaldehyde, which is the metabolic breakdown product of ethanol, led rats to develop more tumors in the body compared with controls. Alcohol can even increase estrogen levels, which can potentially predispose to breast cancer development.
Smoking while drinking poses additional risks. Carcinogens from tobacco smoke can dissolve in alcohol liquid and more easily enter the body, which is especially concerning for the potential contribution to throat and oral cancers. Acetaldehyde can sometimes be used as a food additive and aroma agent, and is a significant carcinogenic component found in cigarette smoke. The acetaldehyde concentration in cigarette smoke is 1000 times greater than that in other significant carcinogens such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons or nitrosamines from tobacco. Drinking alcohol in combination with smoking cigarettes can have a synergistic negative effect on the risk for colorectal cancer, and the combination can have a sevenfold effect on the upper digestive tract's exposure to carcinogenic acetaldehyde.
Additional research has focused on whether folate deficiency, sometimes caused by heavy alcohol use, might also place patients at risk through an alternative pathway.
Esophageal and Liver Cancer
According to the National Cancer Institute (NCI), heavy alcohol consumption can increase esophageal cancer risk fivefold. Even light drinking can increase the risk by 1.3-fold, highlighting the importance of limiting alcohol consumption.
The NCI also reports that heavy alcohol ingestion can multiply the risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma by two times compared with the regular population.
Although additional research needs to be conducted, it has been hypothesized that alcohol can cause liver cancer by altering the immune response, causing reactive oxygen species production, and producing changes in the immune response.
Unfortunately, alcohol can act synergistically with hepatitis B and C to cause liver cancer.
Also, consistently drinking two or more alcoholic beverages per day is associated with an increased risk for liver cancer.
Gastric Cancer
Recent studies have shown that alcohol consumption could increase gastric cancer risk. Acetaldehydes may act as a possible mechanism by creating a local toxic effect, and ethanol may also disturb gastric mucosal protection.
A meta-analysis that reviewed 10 case-control studies investigating alcohol and gastric cancer risks validated it as a risk factor even at low levels of alcohol consumption. A Korean population-based retrospective cohort study found that 'the risk of GI cancer increased linearly with the frequency of drinking in a dose-dependent manner.'
Pancreatic Cancer
The same Korean study found that the risk for pancreatic cancer increased with weekly alcohol drinking.
A meta-analysis published in the British Journal of Cancer also showed a 20% increase in pancreatic cancer risk with alcohol consumption.
In a study of over 450,000 Americans living in California, Florida, Louisiana, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey, the risk of developing pancreatic cancer in heavy alcohol users (at least three drinks per day) was 1.35 compared with light users (less than one drink per day) in never smokers.
Another study, of over 33,000 patients in Sweden, found the relative risk of pancreatic cancer for intermediate and heavy alcohol use was 2.13 in former smokers.
Colorectal Cancer
In 2025, the NCI published a guide indicating that moderate to heavy alcohol consumption is associated with a 1.2- to 1.5-fold increased risk for colorectal cancer compared with patients who were abstinent.
In an earlier review, from 2015, researchers showed that alcohol consumption of more than 30 grams per day was associated with an increased risk of developing colorectal cancer. Estimates from the World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research indicate that there was a 9% risk of developing colorectal cancer for every 10 grams of alcohol consumed daily.
In addition, folate deficiency has been shown to worsen the effects of drinking alcohol on colorectal cancer risks.
A 2022 meta-analysis published in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology found that consuming alcohol was associated with a 1.71 relative risk of developing early-onset colorectal cancer. Interestingly, cigarette smoking was not statistically significant for establishing such an association. Consumption of processed meat and fried foods, as well as lack of exercise, also contributed to the development of early-onset colorectal cancer. As physicians, we should encourage patients to make lifestyle modifications to avoid those other risk factors.
While additional research needs to be conducted, a cohort study in California and Hawaii, led by Dr Song-Yi Park, indicated that the relationship between alcohol and colorectal cancer might vary by ethnicity. In addition, it found that colorectal cancer risk was increased by wine and beer, but not liquor. The association with alcohol was greatest for rectal and left colon cancers.
Public Health Approaches
Alcohol is the most consumed drug in the United States, a statistic that requires validated approaches for addressing.
In the future, Congress can vote to include alcohol warning labels on bottles and cans. There's evidence that health warning labels are effective in teaching the public about alcohol-induced health consequences. Interestingly, multiple studies have illustrated a decrease in alcohol consumption following viewership of alcohol warning labels. In addition, alcohol warning labels depicting liver cancer or negative alcohol consequences have been shown to reduce drinking and drunk driver situations.
A 2024 meta-analysis showed with 'moderate certainty' that alcohol warning labels might decrease selection of alcoholic drinks and drinking before driving. However, there was 'low evidence' demonstrating that warning labels might reduce alcohol drinking per occasion, or alcohol drinking speeds, which would be important considerations at parties and social gatherings.
A 2020 study showed that alcohol selection was lower for all kinds of alcohol warning labels compared with no warning labels. Specifically, alcoholic drink selection was 56% with warning labels that consisted of an image and text, 49% for image only, and 61% for text only.
During the 1990s and 2000s, physicians and public health experts learned a lot about how to motivate patients to quit smoking. One successful public health approach was the use of the transtheoretical model, where patients go through various stages, such as precontemplation, contemplation, preparation, action, and maintenance, when trying to decide when to quit smoking. This behavioral modification model could be used for alcohol prevention too.
Key public policy interventions also helped, including a tobacco taxation, advertising bans, and tobacco marketing restrictions in smoke-free zones. Similar interventions could work well for alcohol. Alcohol taxation can be used to deter heavy drinkers and young drinkers who don't have as much money to spend, given that tobacco taxation was successful for smoking reductions.
Furthermore, policies could be set to maintain minimum unit pricing to prevent the sale of ultracheap liquor. States could also limit the hours of alcohol purchasing or even the days, such as banning alcohol sales on Sunday. These public health strategies could work in tandem to help decrease alcohol drinking rates in the United States.
Alcohol and smoking are very similar social activities that for years were depicted as stylish and cool in movies and on TV. Then smoking ads were banned on TV through the Public Health Cigarette Smoking Act of 1970. During the 1970s, cigarette companies shifted their advertising from TV to print.
So, it would be important in the future to ban alcohol ads from all media and printed marketing.
As highlighted by the World Health Organization, advertising bans and restrictions were helpful in Nordic countries with decreasing the per-capita drinking amount.
Finally, physicians should screen patients for heavy alcohol consumption using the validated AUDIT- C questionnaire and biomarkers such as phosphatidyl ethanol. When needed, Alcoholics Anonymous or a similar 12-step program can be offered to patients who drink heavily to reduce alcohol consumption.
Tips to Reduce Alcohol Consumption
Here are some helpful tips to encourage patients and friends to reduce alcohol consumption.
Set a quit date and avoid triggers such as meeting friends at bars.
Drink mocktails at social gatherings and parties. Patients can also choose from a plethora of innovative and tasty alcohol-free beers when drinking with friends. Several beer companies, such as Heineken, Budweiser, Guinness, and Samuel Adams, have developed great alcohol-free beer alternatives, which are extremely helpful for patients trying to remain abstinent and also for those trying to prevent cancer.
Mass media initiatives such as the Ad Council and celebrity public service announcement television spots could be used to shift social norms around alcohol consumption. Public service announcements could also be shared at sporting events and concerts where alcohol consumption is common.
Public health campaigns could place posters in bars and liquor stores informing consumers about the link between alcohol and cancer.
Social media could teach target populations about alcohol reduction in fun and engaging ways.
By talking with patients in clinic and working on public health campaigns, gastroenterologists have a unique opportunity to inspire behavioral lifestyle changes in patients and to prevent many cancers.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

This Dirt Cheap Healthcare Stock Could Be a Hidden Artificial Intelligence (AI) Opportunity (Hint: It's Not Eli Lilly)
This Dirt Cheap Healthcare Stock Could Be a Hidden Artificial Intelligence (AI) Opportunity (Hint: It's Not Eli Lilly)

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

This Dirt Cheap Healthcare Stock Could Be a Hidden Artificial Intelligence (AI) Opportunity (Hint: It's Not Eli Lilly)

One major potential use case for AI in healthcare is drug discovery for pharmaceutical companies. Insurance is another healthcare-related industry likely to benefit from AI, which could aid scenario modeling, predictive analytics, and natural language processing. UnitedHealth Group experienced some operational challenges this year, but AI could wipe away these shortcomings in the long run. 10 stocks we like better than UnitedHealth Group › When it comes to popular healthcare stocks, investors have focused a lot of attention lately on Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk and the potential of their blockbuster weight management treatments, including Mounjaro, Zepbound, Ozempic, and Wegovy. While these drugs are likely to lead to billions in revenue, Lilly and Novo aren't relying solely on these drugs to grow their businesses. Both companies are also looking into the potential that artificial intelligence (AI) can bring to their operations -- and for good reason. Accounting and consulting firm PwC estimates that the total addressable market (TAM) for AI in healthcare could reach $868 billion by 2030. One of the obvious applications that AI has for healthcare is facilitating pharmaceutical companies in clinical trials and drug discovery. While such use cases are exciting, I see another pocket of the healthcare industry that could be positively disrupted by AI: insurance. Let's explore why UnitedHealth Group (NYSE: UNH) could be an under-the-radar growth opportunity because of the intersection between healthcare and AI. Back in April, UnitedHealth greatly disappointed investors after the company published revised financial guidance that indicated a lower-than-expected earnings outlook for the remainder of the year. Management blamed the lower profitability on two primary factors. First, utilization rates in the company's Medicare Advantage program exceeded internal forecasts, taking a toll on the company's cost structure. Second, reimbursements in the company's pharmacy benefits management (PBM) platform, Optum Health, were negatively impacted by reductions in Medicare funding as well as changes to some of the patient demographic profiles in this segment of the business. In short order, the stock price plunged and has shown no indications of recovery, so far. For 2025, share prices are down 40%, making UnitedHealth the poorest-performing stock in the Dow Jones Industrial Average this year. But before you go writing UnitedHealth off as a broken business, let's examine how AI has the potential to help the health insurance industry and how UnitedHealth specifically could implement this technology to improve the business over time. The underlying issue surrounding UnitedHealth's challenges right now has to do with forecasting. There isn't anything fundamentally broken with the business. Rather, unforeseen changes in the macroeconomic environment led to a different reality than what management had previously modeled -- ultimately leading to higher costs and compressed profit margins. By using machine learning, UnitedHealth could train AI models on claims data and subsequently integrate these feeds into electronic health records (EHR) to help predict more accurate utilization trends. More efficient data feeds could help UnitedHealth hone its pricing strategy and better plan for cost spikes. In addition, AI has the ability to build predictive models that can more accurately assess patient risk profiles. In theory, this has the potential to analyze more granular detail around various segments of patient data as it relates to engagement rates and risk profiles. This could help improve reimbursement forecasts for the Optum business. Lastly, natural language processing (NLP) can also be used to create scenario models by simulating how a business could be impacted based on changes in the regulatory landscape. An example of a company that specializes in this area of AI training is FiscalNote. This could help UnitedHealth plan more strategically as it pertains to budgeting decisions during periods of political uncertainty. While shares of UnitedHealth trade at a slight premium to other large health insurers based on forward earnings multiples, the bigger takeaway from the trends below is that the stock price is hovering near a five-year low. While UnitedHealth's operational challenges won't be fixed overnight, it is key to remember that management believes the company can course correct throughout the second half of this year and be better positioned by 2026. Whether UnitedHealth transitions into an AI-powered service remains to be seen. Investors with a long-run time horizon might want to consider holding on to their shares, though, as the ideas explored above showcase how AI has the potential to become a game-changing advancement for the health insurance industry over time. Looked at a different way, UnitedHealth could transform its business over the next several years by making cognizant investments in this technology. Nevertheless, the stock appears dirt cheap right now, and I think patient investors will be rewarded as the company turns things around over the next couple of quarters. Before you buy stock in UnitedHealth Group, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and UnitedHealth Group wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $713,547!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $966,931!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,062% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 177% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025 Fiscal Note is a transcription service used by The Motley Fool. Adam Spatacco has positions in Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk. The Motley Fool recommends Novo Nordisk and UnitedHealth Group. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This Dirt Cheap Healthcare Stock Could Be a Hidden Artificial Intelligence (AI) Opportunity (Hint: It's Not Eli Lilly) was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Freak accident at the beach sends teen to ICU as mom warns of waterfront danger
Freak accident at the beach sends teen to ICU as mom warns of waterfront danger

Fox News

timean hour ago

  • Fox News

Freak accident at the beach sends teen to ICU as mom warns of waterfront danger

A teenager remains in intensive care after suffering severe injuries in a freak diving accident at Hampton Beach. The incident happened on Monday afternoon in Hampton Beach, New Hampshire, where 19-year-old Aiden Sloan and his cousins were playing in the water to beat the heat. "He was diving into the water into the waves, I've done it a thousand times, and I think it was more shallow than he expected," Hampton Beach Fire Chief Michael McMahon told Fox News Digital. Sloan's mom, Melina Burton, echoed McMahon and described the ordeal to Fox News Digital and what life has been like since she got word of her son's injury. "They were diving into the waves like kids do," Burton described. "And there was a sandbar that nobody could have known was there, so he dove through a wave, and he hit the sandbar head-on." Burton shared that Sloan's cousins also saw something had gone terribly wrong and dragged him to the beach, where they realized he wasn't breathing. "He was just, like, not moving at all," one of Sloan's cousins told NBC10 Boston when the accident happened. "It was like we were carrying a dead body." Burton said her son had been completely knocked out and if it was not for his cousins, he might not be alive today. "They're actually really great kids, and they're handling it so well. I did check in with both of them. Michael, the one that actually pulled Aiden out of the water, was here yesterday. And I said, 'Can I give you a hug?'" Burton said. "I said, 'I am so, so grateful to you for rescuing my boy and pulling him out of the water,' because he probably would not even be here today if you had not done that. So I will forever be grateful." McMahon added that he had gone out on a similar call years ago, in nearly the exact same situation. "So it didn't shock me, but it's not a regular occurrence for us, certainly. And it is unfortunate," McMahon said. "Sometimes, we go to calls and people are doing dumb things and drugs and alcohol and this was not how we saw this. This was just a kid at the beach because it was hot, and he got hurt in a terribly unfortunate way." A GoFundMe page has been set up for Sloan, where he is described as having suffered from a broken neck. "He misjudged the depth of some water at Hampton and, as a result, broke his neck," the post read. "He is unable to move his legs and hands at this point but is able to move his arms. His mom, Melina, is a single mom and will need to be by her boy's side as he recovers." Burton said it is too soon to tell if there is any permanent damage and said Sloan is just trying to be strong and take each day as it comes. "The doctor met with him this morning just to kind of explain to him, one, the surgery that they did on him, and two, what exactly his injuries were. When they explained it to him the first time, he was so drowsy that he didn't really understand," Burton said. "So they came back in this morning, they said that he has two things going for him. One, the fact that he's 19, young and strong, and two, that they were able to operate on him within 12 hours of the injury. So the prognosis we don't know yet, there's a lot of different factors." Sloan, who is also a chef at a restaurant inside the Nash Casino, is receiving support from his employer, who is donating a portion of sales to his medical expenses. "A member of our Greenleaf family, Aiden Sloan, unfortunately suffered a serious neck injury while having a fun day at Hampton beach earlier this week," Greenleaf Milford wrote in a post on their Facebook page. "Aiden joined our Greenleaf family at a young age, and we watched him grow as a person and a cook over the years and he and his family have our full love and support during these difficult times." Sloan is expected to remain in the hospital for several weeks before going to a rehab facility, Burton said, and is hopeful things turn around. "They (doctors) ask him multiple times a day if he can move his hands and his fingers, if he could move his feet and toes, and if he can lift his knees. Or if he can feel anything in his midsection, and he gets very defeated and hopeless when he can't," Burton explained. "And he doesn't understand why they keep asking him to try these things. So he's very tearful. He's very emotional today, which for anybody who knows Aiden, it is not who he is at all. He is always smiling and joking and happy. And even when, you know, life isn't going so great for him, he is still always just trying to make people laugh. So to see him so defeated and hopeless right now is really heartbreaking." Stepheny Price is a writer for Fox News Digital and Fox Business. She covers topics including missing persons, homicides, national crime cases, illegal immigration, and more. Story tips and ideas can be sent to

France imposes smoking ban on beaches, parks
France imposes smoking ban on beaches, parks

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

France imposes smoking ban on beaches, parks

Anyone who lights up on a beach or in a public park in France will be breaking the law from Sunday under new rules aimed at protecting children from the dangers of passive smoking. Bus shelters and areas in the immediate vicinity of libraries, swimming pools and schools will also be affected by the ban, which is coming into force one day after its publication in the official government gazette on Saturday. The rule is being imposed one week before the beginning of the school holidays in France in a clear bid to immediately protect children from smoke on the beach. However, to the disappointment of some anti-tobacco activists, the ban does not cover the terraces of bars and restaurants where many French still happily light up. They are also unhappy that the ban does not apply to electronic cigarettes. The rules had initially been expected to come into force on Tuesday after a previous announcement by the health ministry but the publication in the official gazette means this has now been brought forward to Sunday. People should also not smoke within a 10 metres radius of schools, swimming pools, libraries and other places that hurt minors. The health ministry said it would announce the minimum distance for smoking in these areas in the coming days as well as reveal the sign used to designate such areas. Violators of the ban could face a fine of 135 euros ($160) up to a maximum of 700 euros. However the health ministry is expecting an initial grace period as the new rules are explained. "Tobacco must disappear from places where there are children. A park, a beach, a school -- these are places to play, learn, and breathe. Not for smoking," Health and Family Minister Catherine Vautrin said. This is another step "towards a tobacco-free generation", she added, which France is targeting from 2032. - 'It must be clear' - The ban "is a step in the right direction, but remains insufficient," said Yves Martinet, president of the National Committee Against Smoking (CNCT), criticising the continued permission to smoke on cafe terraces. "The minister points to the protection of children," but children "also go to the terraces," Martinet, a pulmonologist, said. He lamented the absence of e-cigarettes from the text, saying flavours are used to "hook young people". "For a measure to be effective, it must be clear -- no consumption of products containing tobacco or nicotine in public," Martinet said. But Frank Delvau, president of the Union of Hotel Trades and Industries (UMIH) for the Paris region, said a ban on smoking on cafe terraces "would only shift the problem because people on terraces would go smoke next to these establishments". "Smokers and non-smokers can coexist" on terraces, the "last places of conviviality and freedom," said Franck Trouet, of hospitality association Hotels and Restaurants of France (GHR). In France, passive exposure to tobacco smoke causes 3,000 to 5,000 deaths per year, according to official figures. Smoking is steadily declining in France with "the lowest prevalence ever recorded since 2000", according to France addiction agency the OFDT. Less than a quarter of adults aged 18 to 75 reported smoking daily in 2023, according to the agency. Smoking causes 75,000 deaths per year in France and, again according to the OFDT, costs society 156 billion euros annually, counting factors including lost lives, quality of life, productivity, prevention, law enforcement, and healthcare. According to a recent opinion survey, 62 percent of French people favour a smoking ban in public places. ch-ref-alu-sjw/gv/tc

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store