Celestial slow dance over Kentucky skies to precede July's triple meteor shower
A post on Space.com highlighted how the moon will pass close to Saturn and Neptune on July 16, causing the two planets to be seen together in a pair of binoculars. The trifecta will linger together until the rising sun causes them to vanish from view.
Read more of the latest Kentucky news
While ordinarily impossible to see with the naked eye, Neptune's bluish hue can be seen just to the upper left of Saturn.
In a social media post, Sky Core noted that the best viewing conditions are expected just after 9 p.m. local time.
LATEST KENTUCKY NEWS:
Kentucky inmate alleged tried to escape, assaulted employees
Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear tells South Carolina Democrats his record is a red state success story
Joseph Lawson asks judge to throw out guilty verdict in Crystal Rogers trial
Starting July 17, a roughly 2,000-year-old interstellar light show will kick off, with an expected 20 meteors an hour being possible.
The Perseids are expected to run through Aug. 23, peaking around Aug. 12, joining the already active Alpha Capricornids.
The following day, the Southern Delta Aquariids will complete the cosmic trifecta, according to the American Meteor Society.
The Capricornids and Aquariids are expected to both peak between July 29 and July 30. According to Forbes, bright fireballs are common with the Capricornids, but only five or so shooting stars can be seen per hour.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
You Can't Outrun a Bad Diet and This Study Proves It
For years, people have blamed their expanding waistlines on not spending enough time at the gym. But a new study suggests the real problem may be what's on your plate, not how often you hit the treadmill. Scientists analyzed the daily calorie burn, body fat percentage, and BMI of more than 4,000 adults from diverse backgrounds, ranging from hunter-gatherers to office workers. Their conclusion? The amount of energy people expend each day is surprisingly similar, regardless of their lifestyle. So if we're all burning roughly the same amount of calories, why is obesity still climbing? Researchers say the answer is simple, and it's sitting in your pantry. 'We're not gaining weight because we stopped moving. We're gaining because we're overfed,' Florida neurosurgeon and longevity expert Dr. Brett Osborn, who wasn't part of the study but backs its findings, told Fox News Digital. Published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the study revealed that overeating is about 10 times more important than a lack of exercise in fueling the global obesity crisis. And while exercise is critical for heart health, mental well-being, and longevity, experts warn that counting on it to control weight isn't realistic. 'Exercise burns far fewer calories than people want to believe,' Osborn said. Adding to the problem is our growing addiction to ultraprocessed foods—calorie-packed, shelf-stable snacks engineered to override the body's natural signals of fullness. These foods make it dangerously easy to overeat, experts say, and they're driving obesity in places that never struggled with it before. Lindsay Allen, a registered dietitian, pointed out that building muscle and managing stress are also key factors in maintaining a healthy metabolism, but nothing replaces getting your diet in check. 'If you're worried about excess body fat, focus on calories in,' study authors Amanda McGrosky and Amy Luke advised. In other words, it's time to stop blaming the gym and start looking in the Can't Outrun a Bad Diet and This Study Proves It first appeared on Men's Journal on Jul 20, 2025
Fox News
2 hours ago
- Fox News
Buzz Aldrin commemorates Apollo 11 moon landing milestone on 55th anniversary with heartfelt message
Legendary astronaut Edwin Eugene "Buzz" Aldrin Jr. shared a heartfelt message on the 55th anniversary of the Apollo 11 mission, recalling the historic moment when the lunar module Eagle landed at Tranquility Base. The 95-year-old, who in 1969 walked on the Moon behind mission commander Neil Armstrong, reminisced about the iconic moment they shared while Michael Collins orbited above in the command module. "July 20, 1969. "Contact light, engine stop." The Apollo 11 lunar module Eagle touched down at Tranquility Base on the Moon. A few hours later, Neil Armstrong and I stepped foot on the Moon, with Michael Collins orbiting close-by," Aldrin wrote in a post on X. Aldrin emphasized that this monumental achievement stemmed from years of relentless effort, unwavering dedication, and the teamwork of hundreds of thousands. "An achievement resulting from years of incalculable effort, commitment, and team work." Aldrin invoked President John F. Kennedy's powerful challenge to reach the Moon and see Kennedy's "words become reality." "We choose to go to the Moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard; because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one we intend to win, and the others too," Aldrin wrote, sharing Kennedy's speech he had given at Rice University in September 1962. The speech, delivered to inspire national unity and ambition, set the stage for achieving the decade's most audacious goal. "Well, space is there, and we're going to climb it, and the Moon and the planets are there, and new hopes for knowledge and peace are there. And, therefore, as we set sail we ask God's blessing on the most hazardous and dangerous and greatest adventure on which man has ever embarked," Kennedy's speech concluded, according to the JFK Library. Aldrin closed with a message of pride and gratitude, honoring all who made the mission possible and extending his blessings to the United States and all of humanity. "I couldn't be prouder to have completed this mission with the hundreds of thousands of people that helped get us to the moon and back home. God bless the USA and all of humankind," Aldrin wrote. The Apollo 11 mission was the first in human history to land men on earth's satellite, fulfilling a dream as old as humanity itself. Armstrong was the first astronaut to step on the lunar surface at 9:56 p.m. ET on July 20, 1969. He was followed 19 minutes later by Aldrin. Aldrin is the only one of the three astronauts on the Apollo 11 mission still alive today. Stepheny Price is a writer for Fox News Digital and Fox Business. She covers topics including missing persons, homicides, national crime cases, illegal immigration, and more. Story tips and ideas can be sent to
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Is IonQ a Millionaire-Maker Stock?
Key Points IonQ is taking a distinct approach to quantum computing compared to its peers. A massive market is expected to open up within the next decade for quantum computing. 10 stocks we like better than IonQ › IonQ (NYSE: IONQ) is one of the top competitors in the quantum computing race. It's a pure-play option that's solely focused on quantum computing supremacy, so if its approach fails, the stock is likely to head to zero. On the other hand, if it succeeds, there is major upside from today's levels that could generate substantial returns for investors. But can it turn a meager investment into $1 million? Let's take a look. IonQ uses a trapped ion approach for quantum computing IonQ has emerged as a top competitor in this space primarily due to its short-term success and its partnerships. Quantum computing isn't yet commercially relevant, and most funding comes from partnerships with various research institutions in the U.S. One of the top ones is the Air Force Research Laboratory, with which IonQ has a deep partnership. Money from various contracts is what enables IonQ to operate, and the approach it is taking differentiates it from the competition. IonQ employs a trapped-ion approach to perform quantum computing, rather than a superconducting approach. The vast majority of quantum computing competitors are taking the superconducting approach, including Rigetti Computing (NASDAQ: RGTI), IBM (NYSE: IBM), and Alphabet's Google. However, there are key advantages that the trapped-ion approach provides. Perhaps the most important is the temperature at which quantum computing is conducted. Superconducting requires the particle to be cooled down to near absolute zero temperatures, which is an expensive process. For quantum computing to become relevant, it also needs to be cost-effective, and this cost may be a significant hurdle for those in this field to overcome. Another advantage the trapped-ion approach has is qubit connectivity. It's well accepted that allowing qubits to interact with each other provides more accurate calculations, but superconducting only allows qubits to interact with their neighbors. The trapped ion approach enables all the qubits within the system to interact with one another, allowing IonQ to achieve 99.9% fidelity or better. IonQ's differentiated approach is a key reason why I believe it's a worthy investment in quantum computing, as it takes a distinct approach compared to others in this field. While this may ultimately be the wrong move, it's impossible to tell right now, so having investments in quantum computing companies that are tackling this problem in different ways is a smart idea. If IonQ's approach prevails, could it transform an investment into $1 million? IonQ could be a successful investment, but likely won't be a millionaire-maker I'll use a $10,000 initial investment as the baseline, which would require IonQ to return 100 times its initial investment. With IonQ's current $10.5 billion market cap, that would mean it would have to turn into a $1 trillion company. That's a massive return, and considering that there are only 11 companies that have ever achieved a $1 trillion market capitalization, this may be a bit far-fetched. As a result, I doubt that IonQ can provide 100x returns from this level. But it could still be a successful investment. IonQ believes that quantum computing could have an $87 billion market opportunity by 2035. Even if it can capture only 20% of that, it would be a hugely successful investment that provides shareholders excellent returns. However, investors also need to understand that an IonQ investment is far from a sure thing. It could fail and go to $0, which is why investors need to keep their position sizing fairly small -- no more than 1% of their total portfolio. That way, if it succeeds, it still has a significant effect, but if it fails, then it's not as big a deal. If you can keep that in mind, then IonQ may be a smart longshot pick for a portfolio. Should you buy stock in IonQ right now? Before you buy stock in IonQ, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and IonQ wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $652,133!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,056,790!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,048% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 15, 2025 Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Keithen Drury has positions in Alphabet. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet and International Business Machines. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Is IonQ a Millionaire-Maker Stock? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
