Ban on Palestine Action clears Parliament but faces legal challenge
A short time before, a so-called regret motion proposed by a Green Party peer criticising the measure was rejected by 144 votes to 16, majority 128.
The ministerial order, which has already been approved by MPs, will make it a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison to be a member of the direct action group or to support it.
However, it is unclear when the ban, which needs final sign-off by the Home Secretary, will come into force as the group is mounting a court challenge to try to temporarily block the move with a hearing scheduled on Friday, pending further proceedings.
The Government crackdown comes after two planes were vandalised at RAF Brize Norton on June 20 causing £7 million worth of damage, in an action claimed by Palestine Action.
Four people have been charged by counter-terrorism police in connection with the incident and were remanded in custody following a court appearance.
Home Office minister Lord Hanson of Flint said: 'I will always defend the right of British people to engage in legitimate and peaceful protest and to stand up for the causes in which they believe.
'But essential as these rights are, they do not provide a blank cheque for this particular group to seriously damage property or subject members of the public to fear and violence.'
He added: 'We would not tolerate this activity from organisations if they were motivated by Islamist or extreme right-wing ideology, and therefore I cannot tolerate it from Palestine Action.
'By implementing this measure, we will remove Palestine Action's veil of legitimacy, tackle its financial support, degrade its efforts to recruit and radicalise people into committing terrorist activity in its name.'
Supporters outside Westminster Magistrates' Court, London, where four people were charged with conspiracy to enter a prohibited place knowingly for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or interests of the United Kingdom, and conspiracy to commit criminal damage following an incident at RAF Brize Norton in which two Voyager aircraft were damaged (Jeff Moore/PA)
But ministers have faced criticism over the decision to outlaw Palestine Action, with opponents branding the move as 'draconian overreach' and comparing the group to the Suffragettes.
The United Nations has also warned against the ban, with experts concerned at the 'unjustified labelling of a political protest movement as 'terrorist''.
In the Lords, Green Party peer Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb opposed the proscription of Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation.
Her regret motion argued the ban undermined civil liberties, constituted a misuse of anti-terror legislation, suppressed dissent against the UK's policy on Israel, and criminalised support for a protest group, causing 'a chilling effect on freedom of expression'.
The legislation approved by the Lords also bans two white supremacist groups, Maniacs Murder Cult and Russian Imperial Movement, including its paramilitary arm Russian Imperial Legion.
The Home Office describes the Maniacs Murder Cult as a neo-Nazi transnational and online organisation which has claimed a number of violent attacks around the world.
The Russian Imperial Movement is an ethno-nationalist group which aims to create a new Russian imperial state.
Its paramilitary unit fought alongside Russian forces in the invasion of Ukraine to advance its ideological cause.
It also runs a paramilitary training programme to support attendees to carry out terror attacks, the Home Office added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economist
17 minutes ago
- Economist
Macron will beat Trump to London
When Sir Keir Starmer sat down with Donald Trump at the White House in February, the British prime minister handed over a letter from King Charles III inviting the American president for a state visit to Britain. On July 8th a foreign president will indeed arrive in Britain for the first state visit the king has hosted this year. Yet the guest will be not Mr Trump but President Emmanuel Macron of France.
Times
23 minutes ago
- Times
Palestine Action claims ban is ‘authoritarian abuse' of power
Palestine Action has labelled the government 'authoritarian' and compared its activists to the Suffragettes as part of an 11th hour bid to avoid being banned as a terrorist organisation. The group's founder, Huda Ammori, has asked the High Court to temporarily block the government from proscribing it under the Terrorism Act. The ban is set to become law at midnight on Saturday after being approved by the House of Commons and the House of Lords. If it goes ahead, membership and support for Palestine Action would become a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. 'This is the first time in our history that a direct action civil disobedience group, which does not advocate for violence, has been sought to be proscribed as terrorists,' Raza Husain KC, representing Ammori, said. Husain said his client 'was inspired by the long tradition of direct action in this country', including the Suffragettes and movements against apartheid and the Iraq War, and wished to take action 'to prevent harm before it happens'. Quoting Ammori, the barrister continued that the group had 'never encouraged harm to any person at all' and that its goal 'is to put ourselves in the way of the military machine perpetrating genocide'. • Revealed: Palestine Action's map of UK targets Addressing Mr Justice Chamberlain, Husain said: 'We ask you, in the first instance, to suspend until July 21 what we say is an ill-considered, discriminatory and authoritarian abuse of statutory power which is alien to the basic tradition of the common law and is contrary to the Human Rights Act.' The Home Office is opposing both the bid to delay the ban from becoming law, and the potential attempt to launch a legal challenge against the decision. There was a heavy police presence with dozens of officers and several police vans in the street outside the Royal Courts of Justice as several hundred protesters gathered. The group's supporters waved Palestinian flags and held placards as organisers beat drums and chanted slogans. • Chants of 'death to the IDF' as Palestine Action members face court Protesters, ranging from children to the elderly, described the bans as 'erasing resistance' and an 'outrageous' attack on a democratic right to protest. Many protesters said they will still support the cause, even if the proscription comes into force. A minor scuffle unfolded mid-morning after a counterprotester from Our Fight UK, a pro-Israeli group, was removed. No arrests were made as the two protesters were moved away from the Palestine Action protest. Yvette Cooper, the home secretary, moved to proscribe the group after activists caused an alleged £7 million worth of damage to two Voyager planes at RAF Brize Norton on June 20. The group has also repeatedly targeted the Elbit Systems UK, which it says makes military hardware for the Israel Defence Forces. In the hearing, Palestine Action argued that the criminal damage it has meted out to its targets does not constitute terrorism, although it conceded its activists caused 'serious damage to property', as defined in the Terrorism Act 2000. Palestine Action said that the government's use of its statutory power needs to be balanced against the group's human rights, including freedom of expression and the right to peaceful association. Chamberlain suggested an assessment on whether to ban Palestine Action under terrorist laws had been made as early as March, and 'preceded' the incident at RAF Brize Norton. Husain replied: 'Yes they did, and that is very relevant to today because it is very relevant to timing.'
Telegraph
26 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Banning Palestine Action ‘considered months before RAF break-in'
Banning Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation was considered by the Government months before the break-in at RAF Brize Norton, the High Court has heard. Huda Ammori, the group's co-founder, has sought to bring a legal challenge against the Home Office because of Yvette Cooper's decision to proscribe the group under the Terrorism Act 2000. Justice Martin Chamberlain was asked at the Royal Courts of Justice on Friday to grant 'interim relief' to Ms Ammori, which would temporarily block the legislation from coming into effect at midnight on Saturday. During the hearing, he noted that an assessment on whether to ban the group had been made as early as March and 'preceded' the incident at the RAF base. He said: 'The process or assessment on the basis of which that proscription decision was made preceded that, in March.' Another hearing to decide whether Ms Ammori will be allowed to challenge the Home Secretary's decision is expected to be held later in July. If the law comes into effect as planned, it would make membership of or support for the action group a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. The move was announced after two RAF Voyager planes were damaged at Brize Norton in Oxfordshire on June 20. Palestine Action promptly claimed responsibility for the incident, which police said caused around £7 million worth of damage. Arguing on behalf of Palestine Action, Raza Husain KC, said: '[This is] the first time in our history that a direct action civil disobedience group, which does not advocate violence, has been sought to be proscribed as terrorists.' He described the decision to proscribe the group as an 'ill-considered, discriminatory authoritarian abuse of statutory power'. Speaking for Ms Ammori, he said she had been inspired to create the organisation by the 'long tradition of direct action' in the UK, 'from the suffragettes to Iraq War activists'. Mr Husain added that while people may disagree with Palestine Action's methods, which include criminal damage, trespass and burglary, but to say they are concerned in terrorism was 'an abuse of language'. 'The Secretary of State has still not sufficiently articulated or evidenced a national security reason that proscription should be brought into effect now,' he continued. Ms Cooper publicly announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action on June 23, calling the vandalism of the two planes 'disgraceful' and saying the group had a 'long history of unacceptable criminal damage'. MPs in the House of Commons voted 385 to 26 – a majority of 359 – in favour of proscribing the group on Wednesday before the House of Lords supported the move without a vote on Thursday. Four people – Amy Gardiner-Gibson, 29, Jony Cink, 24, Daniel Jeronymides-Norie, 36, and Lewis Chiaramello, 22 – have all been charged in connection with the incident. They appeared at Westminster magistrates' court on Thursday after being charged with conspiracy to enter a prohibited place knowingly for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or interests of the UK and conspiracy to commit criminal damage under the Criminal Law Act 1977. They were remanded in custody and will appear at the Old Bailey on July 18. Counter-Terrorism Policing South East said on Wednesday that a 41-year-old woman arrested on suspicion of assisting an offender had been released on bail until Sept 19 and a 23-year-old man who was arrested has been released without charge.
