Tories allowed almost £50billion of tax to go unpaid in their final year
Labour has slammed the Tory government for allowing almost £50billion of tax to go unpaid in its final year in charge.
Figures from HM Revenue & Customs revealed the colossal amount of tax it is estimated was due, but missed. The biggest chunk relates to small firms and a widespread cash-in-hand economy.
The data shows the 'tax gap' stood at 5.3% in the year to March 2024 - meaning around £1 in every £20 was lost. The total stood at £46.8billion. Campaigners warn the true scale of the lost tax bill could be considerably higher.
The vast sum comes as the government makes tough decisions on higher taxes and spending cuts. Sources say the tax gap fell less than had been anticipated last year.
Labour has vowed to finally get a grip of the issue by ploughing more resources into tackling tax evaders, with the money used to boost public services.
Treasury Minister James Murray said the scale of lost tax was 'not good enough'. He said: ' Mirror readers will know that every pound of tax that some people do not pay puts a financial burden on everyone else who plays by the rules.
'The higher this 'tax gap', the less money the government has to invest in rebuilding the public services we all rely on. That is why this government is laser-focused on closing that tax gap, to fund our public services, invest in our infrastructure and grow the economy to put more money in people's pockets.'
The data showed corporation tax accounts for nearly half of the £46.8billion total, The corporation tax gap jumped to 15.8% - its highest for more than a decade.
Rachael Griffin, tax and financial planning expert at Quilter, said the rise in the corporation tax gap is the 'standout concern' in the data. 'That's a red flag for policymakers, especially as economic uncertainty and global tax competition continue to put pressure on business revenues,' she said.
She added the rise is 'likely driven by a mix of economic strain, increased complexity in the global tax system, and perhaps a lag in HMRC enforcement capacity'.
The figures show progress in personal tax collection, with the VAT gap falling to 5% from 13.8% in 2005/06, and the income tax, national insurance and capital gains tax gap dropping to 3% from a high of 5.3% in 2013/14. HMRC said the combined share of the tax gap attributed to individuals and the wealthiest now accounts for just 10% of the overall.
Mike Lewis, executive director at investigative think tank TaxWatch, said: 'It's also important to know what's not in those figures. Recent reporting by the National Audit Office suggests that there may be serious under-estimation of tax going unpaid by wealthy individuals, through offshore tax evasion, and in areas like online retail.'
Caitlin Boswell, head of advocacy and policy at Tax Justice UK, said: 'The real story here is that the UK's tax authority doesn't have the resources or backing it needs to tackle the tax gap which is likely far larger than what is published.
'Evidence suggests that the level of tax non-compliance among the super-rich is far higher than estimated, with eye-watering sums of hoarded wealth being held offshore and out of sight of HMRC.
'Collecting the right tax, to invest in better healthcare, education and social security requires reliable investment and political backing in HMRC. Instead, the department has to battle fluctuations in staffing resources, has disbanded its unit dedicated to collecting tax from ultra wealthy individuals and is expected to weather real-terms cuts to budgets in the coming years.'
James Murray, Exchequer Secretary to the Treasury
Labour was elected to fix the Tories' mess and to change our country for the better. When we came into office last summer, our public services – our schools, NHS, police force – were crumbling around us.
We promised to change that, and at the Spending Review last week we set out how we're investing in the things British people care about: our security, our health, and our economy.
We're seeing the progress of the choices we've made. More investment in defence and energy security. NHS waiting lists down. Wages up more in the first 10 months of this Labour government than in the first 10 years of Tory rule. But we know there's more to do.
New statistics show that, in the last year of the Conservatives' time in office, £46.8billion of tax in Britain went unpaid. This is not good enough. Mirror readers will know that every pound of tax that some people do not pay puts a financial burden on everyone else who plays by the rules.
The higher this 'tax gap', the less money the government has to invest in rebuilding the public services we all rely on. That is why this government is laser-focused on closing that tax gap, to fund our public services, invest in our infrastructure and grow the economy to put more money in people's pockets.
In my role as the Minister for HMRC, I have made it this government's priority to make sure everyone pays what they owe. In our first year in office, we have set out the most ambitious package ever to close the tax gap. This will bring in an extra £7.5billion of uncollected tax – money that goes straight back into our essential public services.
Let me be clear, this isn't about raising taxes. It's about making sure everyone plays by the rules and pays what they owe. HMRC are recruiting new compliance and debt officers, including those focusing on some of the wealthiest individuals who do not pay what they owe, and this new will generate far more than they cost.
We are also taking on those people who promote dodgy tax avoidance schemes, making sure ordinary people don't get sucked into them where they could risk thousands in penalties and fines. And we're making it easier to prosecute the fraudsters who want to cheat the system, whilst offering rewards to 'whistleblowers' for major tax fraud.
At the same time as going after those who don't pay what they owe, we are making it easier and less stressful for everyone else to interact with HMRC.
We are investing to improve HMRC's digital operations, including using the latest AI. New tech tools will cut down the time you need to spend on the phone, and cut the number of letters HMRC sends by three-quarters, saving £50million a year. That's how we make the tax system fairer and deliver our Plan for Change: cutting out waste, making sure everyone plays by the same rules, and putting more money in working people's pockets.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
a minute ago
- The Guardian
Lord Desai obituary
An economist with a strong grasp of politics, Meghnad Desai, who has died aged 85, put telling the truth ahead of the pursuit of personal ambition. His work as professor at the London School of Economics had the wide perspective that came from his Indian heritage, and his interest in Labour politics led to him becoming an active member of the House of Lords. The first of his books, Marxian Economic Theory, was published in 1973. I was one of his many students who benefited from the use of his book Applied Econometrics (1976). Testing Monetarism (1981) predicted the demise of the money-supply targeting that was then being pursued by Margaret Thatcher's government. Marx's Revenge: The Resurgence of Capitalism and the Death of Statist Socialism (2002) contains perhaps his best-known contribution to the discipline. He asserted that Karl Marx had been misunderstood: he never said that capitalism was going to collapse anytime soon. On Meghnad's reading, Marx expected capitalism to continue until it had exhausted its productive potential, which given globalisation, could take a very long time. Appointed to the Lords by Neil Kinnock in 1991, he became a frontbench economics spokesman, but was sacked three years later by John Smith when a theoretical speculation of his ran counter to Labour's need for a presentable tax policy. Meghnad backed a proposal to widen the scope of the VAT net to include food and children's clothing. This view was subsequently supported in 2010 by Sir James Mirrlees' review for the Institute for Fiscal Studies as to how a more rational tax system could operate, but it was not a political headline that Labour was looking for in 1994. More presciently, he pointed out in early August 2022 that if Liz Truss were elected as Conservative leader and so the new prime minister, which she was a month later, then she would crash the pound. On the international stage, Meghnad championed a move away from a narrow focus on material progress in measuring development, and proposed instead a human development index. This found its way into the human development reports produced by the UN. With particular regard to India, Meghnad was an early proponent of, and an optimist about, the market-based reforms that were first introduced in 1991 and were to mark a turning point for Indian economic growth. In a tribute at the time of his deah, Prime Minister Narendra Modi called him a 'distinguished thinker and reformer'. His later writings included Nehru's Hero: Dilip Kumar in the Life of India (2004), on the film star who brought method acting to Indian cinema; Rethinking Islamism: The Ideology of the New Terror (2006), distinguishing between the religion and the militant mindset; and The Rediscovery of India (2011), covering the last 500 years of the region's history. He turned his hand to fiction too, with Dead on Time (2009), featuring a British prime minister, and an autobiography, Rebellious Lord (2020). He published more than 200 articles in academic journals and books, and was co-editor of the Journal of Applied Econometrics from 1984 to 1991. In British political life, he was chairman of the Islington South and Finsbury Labour party between 1986 and 1992; the constituency's MP was Chris Smith. When in 2020 Meghnad felt that the Labour party had not done enough to counter antisemitism, he became a non-affliated peer, and then, in 2023, a crossbencher. Born in what is now Varodara, in Gujarat state, Meghnad was the son of Mandakini and Jagdhishchandra Desai, a civil servant. He started secondary school at the age of seven and matriculated at 14. Then he was educated at the University of Bombay and subsequently won a scholarship to attend the University of Pennsylvania, where he obtained his PhD at the age of 23 under the supervision of the Nobel laureate Lawrence Klein. After a short spell at the University of California, Berkeley, he arrived as a lecturer at the LSE in 1965, becoming professor in 1983 and emeritus in 2003, and president of the Association of University Teachers in Economics (1987-90). At the LSE he was head of the Development Studies Institute (1990-95), and founded and headed the Centre for the Study of Global Governance (1992-2003). In 1970, he married Gail Wilson, a lecturer at the LSE. They had three children, Tanvi, Nuala and Sven. The editor of his book on Dilip Kumar was Kishwar Ahluwalia. After his first marriage ended in divorce, he married Kishwar in 2004, and his family then expanded to include her three children, Gaurav, Mallika and Priyanka. In 2008, he was awarded the Padma Bhushan, the third highest civilian honour awarded by India. Six years later, Meghnad founded the Gandhi Statue Memorial Trust, and as chair of the trustees, he raised money and worked with the UK government to help erect the statue in Parliament Square in 2015. He also supported Kishwar in her role as chair of the Arts and Cultural Heritage Trust, the NGO responsible for creating and running the Partition Museum, which opened in Amritsar in 2017. Meghnad's kindness and generosity were evident when the economics internship I had been offered at a government department in 1979 fell victim to spending cuts by the incoming Thatcher government. He quickly found money to offer me a research assistant post, and encouraged many people early in their careers. His open-mindedness showed in his insistence, when I was an undergraduate, that I read widely, including John Rawls, the advocate of 'justice as fairness'. He is survived by Kishwar, his children and four grandchildren, Om, Ira, Chloe and Kiko. Meghnad Jagdishchandra Desai, Lord Desai, economist, born 10 July 1940; died 29 July 2025
Daily Mail
a minute ago
- Daily Mail
Migrants will be allowed into UK from France for up to three months
Migrants in France will be handed a visa to live in Britain for up to three months if they apply through Labour's new 'one in, one out' deal. Details of the new Anglo-French scheme published by the Home Office today revealed applicants will be able to come to this country while their final application is considered. Documents said each successful applicant who meets a number of criteria would be 'granted entry clearance to come to the UK for a period of up to three months' after completing an online application. They will not be allowed access to public funds and will also be barred from working or studying during the initial three month period, while the Home Office considers whether it will grant a longer visa. It is unclear where the migrants will be housed, however, opening the prospect of them being placed in taxpayer-funded hotels. Furthermore, it is not known what would happen to migrants allowed into Britain under the scheme if their applications were later refused. The Home Office also confirmed applicants could be penalised of they fail to 'present for travel to the UK, without reasonable excuse, when directed by the Home Office'. The number of people accepted from France will have a 'cap' equal to the number of small boat migrants who are sent back under the deal, the documents showed. But the Home Office was unable to confirm the level of the cap. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said: 'There are scant details as yet but this risks turning into yet another wide open door into the UK. 'It is not clear what will happen if the Home Office accepts people whose applications are rejected later on, and whether they can be removed. 'And what if the Home Office accepts people without being able to remove the same number to France due to legal challenges? 'There are a lot of unanswered questions and this risks descending into yet another Labour borders farce.' It came after Home Secretary Yvette Cooper refused to say how many migrants will be returned under the deal because it 'could help the smuggling gangs'. Migrants who arrive by small boat from tomorrow could face being selected for the scheme and placed in detention. Ms Cooper told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: 'We will provide regular updates, people will be able to see how many people are being detained, how many people are being returned, and it is right that we should be transparent around that. 'But we're not setting the numbers in advance, firstly because there is no fixed number in terms of the overall number of people to come through this system, and secondly because we're not going to provide (gangs) with that operational information.' The agreement with Emmanuel Macron's government will lapse at the end of June next year – just 47 weeks away – unless it is renewed. Last month it was suggested the scheme would see 50 migrants a week sent back to France. At that rate, just 2,350 would be returned before the agreement expires. By comparison, a record 25,436 migrants have reached Britain by small boat since the start of the year, up 49 per cent on the same period last year. Meanwhile, pro-migrant groups have already indicated they are poised to bring legal challenges – just as they did against the previous Conservative government's Rwanda asylum deal. Steve Valdez-Symonds of Amnesty International UK said: 'We anticipate that this deal is likely to face legal challenges from people who quite reasonably will resist being swapped around like mere fodder rather than addressing the claim for asylum they have made. 'Once again, refugees are treated like parcels, not people, while the public is left to pay the price for yet another cruel, costly failure dressed up as policy. 'If and when there is some real detail on how this deal is intended to work, Amnesty will of course consider what further steps we ought to take.' Natasha Tsangarides, of the charity Freedom from Torture, said: 'While this pilot offers a pathway to sanctuary for a small number of refugees, it will rely on the mass detention of survivors of torture and persecution. 'We know from our therapy rooms how profoundly harmful any time in detention is for people who've been through the unimaginable horrors of torture. 'Many survivors were tortured in detention, so locking them up again reopens deep psychological scars and can set them back significantly on their road to recovery. 'A more secure world for everyone depends on international cooperation not only to ensure safety for survivors but also to stop repression.' From tomorrow, any new Channel arrivals will be taken to the Home Office's processing centre at Manston, near Ramsgate, Kent, and assessed by Border Force officials. Any selected for the returns scheme will be transferred to short-term immigration holding facilities operated by the Home Office, such as those at Heathrow and Gatwick airports. After further assessment, they could be sent to an immigration removal centre to await return to France. The first migrants will be returned by the end of August and detention space has already been set aside for the launch of the scheme. The deal was agreed by PM Sir Keir Starmer and French president Emmanuel Macron last month after a summit at Downing Street.
Telegraph
12 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Labour is ruining one of Britain's great success stories
More than 50 independent schools have closed or announced they are set to close following Labour imposing VAT on private education. The prevailing narrative from the Left frames this as a necessary tax on the ultra-rich; a way to make society more equal. But that story misses a more complex reality. As someone whose parents made sacrifices to send me to a private school, I've seen first-hand how deeply this aspiration runs within many ethnic minority families. For us, education wasn't a luxury; it was a strategy for survival, stability and success. It is no surprise that, according to the Independent Schools Council, ethnic minority representation in independent schools is higher than that in the state sector. In many urban centres across the UK, where state education can at times struggle with quality and consistency, private schools appeal to some immigrant families. These families often come from cultures that place a high value on moral and intellectual formation. They prioritise academic achievement and upward mobility – values they believe independent schools are better equipped to deliver. There is a common presumption that independent schools are largely populated by the upper-middle class or, at minimum, comfortably placed professionals. But my experience at a private school in inner-city London didn't fully reflect that. While some pupils did come from affluent backgrounds, a noticeable number, particularly from ethnic minority families like my own, were there because their parents had made real sacrifices: working multiple jobs, living frugally, and prioritising education above all else. I worry about how these families will absorb the substantial fee increases that has followed Labour's VAT policy. Many of these children earned their place not through wealth but academic ability. We forget that many independent schools are selective, and for some they have been a ladder of opportunity rather than a preserve of privilege. With closures underway, many children will be forced into entering overstretched state schools. This will disrupt hard-won educational progress. While it is no doubt motivated by a desire for fairness – a redistribution from rich to poor – in practice it undermines families who have taken noble and sacrificial steps to invest in their children's education. Far from narrowing inequality, the policy risks widening it. Wealthier families will absorb the extra cost or seek alternatives abroad. It is the middle-and lower-income aspirants, often from black and Asian backgrounds, who are being squeezed out. But perhaps most damaging of all is that this policy undermines one of Britain's great success stories: the integration of aspirational minority families into the fabric of national life. In its rush to appear fair, Labour is betraying those who have believed most in this country; who have trusted the system to reward effort and sacrifice. Multi-ethnic Britain deserves better.
