logo
Punjab government bans stray dog killings, enforces animal birth control policy

Punjab government bans stray dog killings, enforces animal birth control policy

Express Tribune30-05-2025
Listen to article
In a landmark decision, the Lahore High Court has declared the killing of stray dogs through shooting, poisoning, or other inhumane methods as illegal and unconstitutional across Punjab.
The judgment, delivered on May 22, 2025, in the case Eiraj Hassan & Others vs Government of Punjab, prompted the provincial government to formally implement the Animal Birth Control (ABC) Policy 2021.
The policy lays out a comprehensive framework to humanely manage the stray dog population through vaccination, sterilization, tagging, registration, and rehabilitation.
Advocates Eiraj Hassan and Altamush Saeed filed the petition, arguing that the widespread culling of stray dogs was a violation of animal welfare principles and basic human compassion.
The court, in its ruling, emphasized that killing stray animals is in stark contradiction to constitutional rights, ethical standards, and international norms.
Notably, incidents of inhumane dog killings were frequently reported from upscale housing societies and certain municipal jurisdictions, where even government personnel were found complicit.
Despite the ruling, concerns remain over the lack of institutional response mechanisms. There is currently no centralized helpline to report stray dog concerns, and the Police Animal Rescue Centre remains largely inactive.
The Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA) also faces serious challenges due to limited staff and resources.
Advocate Altamush Saeed hailed the court's decision as a major success for animal rights in Pakistan. He pointed out that the Animal Rescue Centre was summoned to court but failed to appear.
Nevertheless, departments including Livestock & Dairy Development and Local Government assured the court of full implementation of the ABC Policy.
Under the new policy, stray dogs will be captured safely and non-violently and taken to animal shelters. Here, they will undergo vaccination and sterilization.
Once deemed healthy, they will be tagged and released back into the same locality. Dogs that are terminally ill or severely injured will be euthanized humanely under veterinary supervision using sodium pentothal, a painless euthanasia drug.
The policy also envisions the establishment of shelter homes in every tehsil, to be operated in collaboration with private welfare organizations or under government oversight. Monitoring committees at the district, tehsil, and provincial levels will ensure strict implementation.
Experts note that while the court's ruling effectively bans cruel culling, on-ground enforcement of sterilization and the construction of shelters remain slow.
Dr. Haider Ali Khan, spokesperson for the Livestock and Dairy Development Department, explained that municipal staff will be tasked with capturing dogs and transporting them to veterinary centers for sterilization, after which the animals will be returned to their localities. Veterinary hospitals across Punjab have been notified and prepared to participate.
Although the policy offers a progressive and humane framework, its success hinges on inter-agency coordination, sustained community involvement, and adequate budgetary support.
The government has committed to allocating dedicated funds for ABC implementation in the upcoming fiscal year.
As Punjab shifts toward a more humane and scientific approach to managing stray dogs, civil society and local governments must now play a vital role in ensuring the policy is more than just ink on paper.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Unjust police certificates stigmatise acquitted citizens: LHC
Unjust police certificates stigmatise acquitted citizens: LHC

Business Recorder

time3 days ago

  • Business Recorder

Unjust police certificates stigmatise acquitted citizens: LHC

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court (LHC) has recently observed that issuing a police character (PS) certificate reflecting a criminal history of an accused despite his acquittal by a court of law in an FIR violates the individual's constitutionally protected right. The court said such a practice not only violates the individual's protected right to human dignity but also imposes a lasting and unjust stigma upon a citizen who has been exonerated through due judicial process. The court said, once an accused has been acquitted by a competent court of law, he is to be considered, treated and regarded as innocent person under the law. Despite a conclusive acquittal of an accused any continuous reference or inclusion of the relevant FIR in official documents like police character certificate is unwarranted, the court observed. The court passed this order in a petition of Abdur Rehman Faryad challenging issuance of a PC certificate mentioning his name in the FIR despite his acquittal by a competent court of law. The court said the petitioner is entitled to a PC certificate that reflects his acquittal and the absence of any subsisting criminal liability. The court said the allegations levelled against the petitioner do not involve moral turpitude, nor do they relate to any offence against the State. The court said it would be legally unjustified to draw any adverse inference or attach any stigma to the petitioner merely based on the registration of an FIR. The court; therefore, directed the Home Secretary Punjab to ensure the issuance of a PC certificate in favour of the petitioner, which accurately reflects his present legal status. The said certificate shall exclude and omit any reference whatsoever to FIR registered at Police Station Nawan Kot, Lahore, in the light of the petitioner's lawful acquittal and the absence of any existing criminal liability, the court added. The court noted that law enforcement agencies have the administrative authority to maintain internal records of reported incidents, including FIRs, for various legitimate purposes. The court said the retention of such data, so long as it is confined to lawful administrative use and is not disclosed or misused in a manner prejudicial to the rights of the individual and cannot be construed as a violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution. The court; therefore, directed the office to transmit copy of the court order to the Inspector General of Police Punjab and the Chief Secretary Punjab, to ensure its strict implementation in light of the court's directions and observations. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

PTI to submit CCTV footage of police raids
PTI to submit CCTV footage of police raids

Express Tribune

time4 days ago

  • Express Tribune

PTI to submit CCTV footage of police raids

Listen to article The Lahore High Court (LHC) on Wednesday allowed Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) to submit CCTV footage of alleged police raids as part of the official court record. The decision was made by Justice Khalid Ishaq while hearing a petition filed by senior PTI member Akmal Khan, who sought judicial intervention against what he termed illegal police actions targeting party supporters. In his petition, Khan requested the court to restrain police officials from conducting raids and harassing PTI workers and supporters involved in mobilizing for the party's August 5 protest. The petitioner named the Inspector General of Police Punjab, the CCPO Lahore, DIG Operations, and the Station House Officers (SHOs) of Shahdara and Ferozwala (District Sheikhupura) as respondents. He argued that the alleged police actions were in violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution. Read More: APC calls for abolishing SIFC, 26th Amendment, creating new 'Charter of Democracy' Citing constitutional protections, Khan submitted that every citizen has the right to move freely within Pakistan, reside in any part of the country, and assemble peacefully — subject to reasonable legal restrictions in the public interest. He further argued that citizens also have the right to form or join political parties unless such activities are declared prejudicial to national sovereignty or integrity by the federal government and later upheld by the Supreme Court. Justice Ishaq, while accepting PTI's request to include CCTV footage as evidence, noted that any material relevant to the alleged harassment and unlawful actions by police may assist the court in assessing the facts of the case. The court will continue proceedings after examining the submitted footage and hearing responses from the concerned police officials.

LHC sets aside FIR order against Suleman Shehbaz
LHC sets aside FIR order against Suleman Shehbaz

Express Tribune

time5 days ago

  • Express Tribune

LHC sets aside FIR order against Suleman Shehbaz

Chief Justice Aalia Neelum of the Lahore High Court (LHC) has set aside a district court's order directing the registration of a First Information Report (FIR) against Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif's son, Suleman Shehbaz, in a cheque dishonour case. The high court held that the lower court failed to properly examine the facts of the matter. Suleman Shehbaz had challenged the July 10 order issued by the district judge, which instructed police to register an FIR against him on charges of issuing a bounced cheque. During the LHC proceedings, Suleman's counsel contended that the district court's decision was not only contrary to law but also passed without a proper review of the factual background. The respondent's counsel alleged that Suleman's company had purchased 17 laptops and issued a cheque for Rs 600,000 in payment, which was later dishonoured. However, Suleman's counsel countered that no laptops were ever delivered to the company's office. He further argued that the cheques in question were stolen by company employees and wrongfully handed over to the respondent. An FIR had already been registered against those individuals, he added. 'The company has no connection with these cheques,' the counsel asserted. Chief justice also questioned the respondent's legal team for failing to specify the date of the alleged laptop purchase. She noted that no purchase receipts bore any official stamp either. After hearing arguments from both sides, chief justice ruled in favour of the petitioner and annulled the district court's order.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store