Ceremony honors fallen military veterans
'The freedoms that we currently enjoy sometimes are forgotten,' Mayor Rod Roberson said. 'Sometimes they are treated as insignificant, but it isn't.'
Roberson noted the importance of the holiday to honor the service members who have come before. The difference between Veterans Day and Memorial Day is that Veteran's Day celebrates all veterans, Roberson said.
City Councilman Aaron Mishler said the day is significant for him and many Americans. His father, who died in 2016, was a Vietnam War veteran and part of him never left the war, Mishler said. Mishler's middle name comes from his father's best friend who died in Vietnam.
'The sacrifices of our veterans is something that carries on with me for my entire life,' Mishler said. 'Memorial Day is a special and sacred holiday.'
Mishler previously served as a medic in the Indiana Army National Guard and a nurse in the Army reserves.
City Councilman Dwight Fish said he has seen the Memorial Day ceremony now from different perspectives as a council member and as the husband of a 28-year Army veteran.
'She has seen a lot in her career,' Fish said of his wife. 'But a lot of our friends are not around anymore. Our parents, some of her fellow soldiers, are down range, and they are no longer with us because of war and the elements around war, and now we have to honor their memory and the service that they gave us.'
The mayor also noted the absence of former Mayor Dick Moore, who served in the Navy. Moore died just a few weeks ago.
A parade was scheduled to followed the ceremony. The Veterans of Foreign Wars Post 88 also planned a late morning ceremony at Prairie Street Cemetery followed by a luncheon at the post.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
32 minutes ago
- CNN
NTSB holds hearings to determine why passenger plane and Army helicopter collided in January, killing 67 people
The first of the National Transportation Safety Board's three days of investigative hearings is underway to help determine what caused the deadly midair collision on January 29 between an Army helicopter on a training mission and American Airlines flight 5342 landing at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport. The NTSB presented for the first time major 'discrepancies' in the altitude readouts on board the US Army Blackhawk helicopter that led to the crew believing they were flying lower over the Potomac River than they actually were. Investigators said Wednesday that, following the crash, they tested three of the same models of Blackhawk helicopters from the same Army unit involved in the collision flying over the river. 'Notably, the barometric altimeters continued to be 80 to 130 feet lower than the helicopter's determined altitude above sea level when flying at speed over the tidal portion of the Potomac River,' NTSB investigator Marie Moler presented to the hearing. Barometric altimeters use pressure to gauge altitude and can be impacted by a variety of atmospheric and other factors. In its preliminary report, the NTSB said the Blackhawk was consistently higher than maximum published altitudes along the Potomac River, including when it collided with the passenger jet. The heavily technical findings are the most significant in the early moments of Wednesday's 10-hour-long hearing schedule. The Army, PSA Airlines, a regional subsidiary of American Airlines which operated the plane, the Federal Aviation Administration and other parties are represented. 'This is not an adversarial hearing,' NTSB Chair Jennifer Homendy said in her opening remarks. 'This does not mean difficult questions won't be asked. They will be, and they should be. This is an investigation. We are here to improve safety.' At the start of the hearing, an 11-minute animation was shown detailing the minutes leading up to the collision and a video of the accident itself. The board paused briefly to allow any of the family members of the victims of the crash to leave the room or look away before it was played. The air traffic controller working in the control tower that night was responsible for two different positions on two different radio channels, the timeline animation reveled. Five minutes before the collision, flight 5342 was handed over to the controller. Minutes before the crash the controller asked the flight if the pilots could switch their approach to a different runway. Twice, the controller advised the helicopter of other air traffic in the area and both times the helicopter pilots said they could see the plane and were visually ensuring they were staying separate from it. Cockpit voice recorder transcripts from the helicopter show there was some confusion of what to look for and the instructor told the student to sidestep the traffic. The captain of the regional jet had completed 106 flights into the airport and the first officer had completed 51, records reviewed by NTSB showed. However, investigators said interviews with PSA Airline's pilots showed they generally didn't know much about the helicopter routes in the area. Three Reagan National Airport-based captains and one first officer were asked about their knowledge of published helicopter routes and only one PSA captain – who was a former military helicopter pilot in the region – had knowledge of the routes prior to the accident. Sixty-seven people died in the accident over the Potomac River, including 60 passengers and four crew on the plane and three soldiers on the helicopter. The NTSB will meet Wednesday, Thursday and Friday to discuss the facts learned in the investigation. It is expected to conclude with a determination of what caused the crash in January.
Miami Herald
38 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
What do Americans think of Benjamin Netanyahu? New poll breaks 28-year record
A record-high share of Americans now have a negative view of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, according to the latest Gallup poll. At the same time, support for Israel's military actions in the Gaza Strip has plummeted to a record low. The survey comes as Netanyahu's government faces growing international condemnation for its handling of the war in Gaza, which began after Hamas' Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel. According to Gaza health officials, the conflict has claimed the lives of over 55,000 Palestinians — the majority being women and children — while most buildings across the territory have been destroyed or damaged. Many of the territory's 2.1 million residents — nearly half of whom are children — also face famine and starvation due in large part to Israeli restrictions on aid coming into the area, according to the United Nations. 'Food is running out. Those seeking it risk being shot. People are dying trying to feed their families,' Tom Fletcher, the U.N. emergency relief coordinator, said in a July statement. President Donald Trump recently acknowledged there is 'real starvation' in Gaza and urged Israeli officials to allow 'every ounce of food' into the enclave, echoing calls from other prominent world leaders. Meanwhile Netanyahu has denied there is severe hunger in Gaza and called the claim that Israel is 'applying a campaign of starvation' a 'bold-faced lie.' He's also blamed Hamas for stealing aid supplies. Here is a breakdown of the results from the Gallup poll. For the first time ever, a majority of Americans, 52%, now express an unfavorable opinion of Netanyahu, marking his highest negative rating seen since Gallup began polling on the leader in 1997 (he has served as prime minister from 1996-1999, 2009-2021 and from 2022 onward). Meanwhile, 29% expressed a favorable view, while 19% had no opinion. These results underscore a recent transformation in American attitudes toward Netanyahu — a member of Israel's right-wing Likud Party. For most of the 2000s and 2010s, his unfavorable rating held steady at around 25%, but it skyrocketed to 47% in 2023, following the outbreak of the war in Gaza. This rating stood at 45% in 2024, the same year the International Criminal Court (ICC) issued an arrest warrant for Netanyahu, accusing him of war crimes — a charge Netanyahu denied and said is rooted in antisemitism. In the latest poll — which surveyed 1,002 U.S. adults July 7-21 — views toward the prime minister varied significantly based on partisan affiliation and age. Record-low shares of Democrats and independents — 9% and 18%, respectively — expressed an favorable opinion of him. In contrast, a record-high 67% of Republicans had a positive view of Netanyahu, who has maintained a close political alliance with Trump. Nearly half of adults 55 and older, 47%, said they had a favorable view of the Israeli premier, while just 6% of 18-34-year-olds said the same. Opposition to the Israeli military's operations in the Gaza Strip has also surged to an unprecedented intensity. For the first time, a majority of Americans, 60%, now disapprove of the country's military actions in the Palestinian territory. This is up 12 points from 48% in September 2024. In contrast, 32% said they approve of the Israeli Defense Force's actions, down from 42% in 2024. Here, again, there were major demographic differences, according to the survey, which has a margin of error of plus or minus 4 percentage points. The vast majority of Republicans, 71%, said they favor the military's conduct in Gaza, marking an increase from 66% last year. However, just 8% of Democrats said the same, down from 24% in 2024. Similarly, 25% of independents approve of the IDF's actions in Gaza, marking a double-digit decrease from 41% in 2024. Additionally, 49% of those 55 and older approved, while just 9% of 18-34-year-olds said the same, underscoring a generational divide that has emerged in U.S. public opinion toward Israel. 'The increasingly skeptical and divided American public poses a challenge for Israeli leadership and U.S. policymakers who are seeking to navigate the conflict,' Gallup concluded.
USA Today
38 minutes ago
- USA Today
GDP soars and Trump's economy roars. Liberals still won't give him credit.
Will Democrats put politics aside and applaud as the American economy shows a strength and resilience that so many of them doubted? Probably not. Thanks to President Donald Trump's bold policies, it appears that the United States will avoid a recession this year − one that so many liberals were predicting only months ago. Will Democrats put politics aside and applaud as the American economy shows a strength and resilience that so many of them doubted? Probably not. The Bureau of Economic Analysis on July 30 released more good news about our nation's vibrant economy. Gross domestic product grew a healthy annual rate of 3% in the second quarter after recording a less than 1% decline in the first three months of this year. Fears of a recession should now dissipate like morning haze after the sunrise. Nearly all markers of a strong economy are in top form. Unemployment is low, hovering at 4.1%. The past three months have seen steady job growth. Average hourly earnings for U.S. workers grew 3.7% over the 12 months ending in June. Consumer spending is expected to rise, and there's been a modest uptick in consumer confidence. The Consumer Price Index, which measures inflation, increased 2.7% over the 12 months ending in June, far below the 40-year high recorded in President Joe Biden's term. Even the average price of eggs has dropped dramatically, to $3.31 per dozen, down from a spike to $8 in February and back to roughly the same price level as a year ago. Stock indexes continue to grow at a strong pace, recovering from the sell-off this spring driven by concerns over Trump's tariffs. The Nasdaq and S&P 500 have set multiple record highs in July, a boon to millions of Americans with retirement accounts and other investors. On the tariff front, Trump's new trade deal with the European Union should be a catalyst for further economic growth, particularly in the energy and construction sectors. If this is what a recession looks like, let's keep it coming. Critics said Trump was destroying the economy Despite such healthy economic markers, I doubt I'll see many kudos offered to the Trump administration for powering past a recession, which the left predicted in doomsday terms. Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman wrote in May that Trump and "MAGAnomics" were "destroying the economy and waging war on the middle class and the poor." The headline thundered that Trump was "making America backward again." Opinion: Trump's EU trade deal ushers in a golden age for blue-collar workers Interestingly, Krugman claimed that the U.S. economy was in good overall shape when Biden left office in January. He charged Trump with wrecking the economy in a mere three months. Now, that the data clearly shows otherwise, will Krugman admit his errors? I doubt it. Krugman, to be fair, wasn't the only so-called expert spouting off about our supposedly crumbling economy. CNN published an analysis in April with a headline that claimed "Trump took the US economy to the brink of a crisis in just 100 days." That same month, the Center for American Progress bemoaned that "President Donald Trump's decision to unilaterally launch a global trade war could be one of the worst economic statecraft blunders in American history." I read these articles in the mainstream news media and wonder if we share the same universe. Do progressives not see the same healthy economic markers that millions of other Americans and I see? The answer, of course, is that they do see − but they are too blinded by partisanship to admit it. Good economic news should be nonpartisan I don't have a problem with liberals criticizing Trump. Sometimes he deserves it. But when it comes to obvious wins like a blossoming economy, the constant derision is tiresome and pedestrian. A robust economy under any president is good news for Americans, regardless of their party affiliation. Right? I didn't care for Biden's leftist policies. But I didn't cheer when the economy struggled. It was bad news not just for Biden but, far more important, also for our nation and its citizens. More than a year after Biden entered the White House, annual inflation spiked to 9% in June 2022, the highest rate in four decades. Americans were hit with sudden increases in food, housing and transportation costs. Opinion: Nvidia CEO says Trump gives America an advantage. Hear that, progressives? Compounding the pain, the Federal Reserve acted to cool inflation by raising interest rates, which pushed up consumers' payments for auto, housing and credit card loans. Democrats tried to blame decisions made in Trump's first term, including federal spending used to fight consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic. But Biden spent more even as the pandemic began to wane. In 2024, more than half of American voters said the economy was the issue that mattered to them the most. It's why Trump won more than 77 million votes and returned to the White House. Now, he is delivering on his promises to rebuild our nation's economy. But not everyone is happy about it. It's too bad liberals can't separate economic success from Trump's party affiliation. I can't help but wonder if they wanted a recession so they could blame Trump even more. Nicole Russell is a columnist at USA TODAY and a mother of four who lives in Texas. Contact her at nrussell@ and follow her on X, formerly Twitter: @russell_nm. Sign up for her weekly newsletter, The Right Track, here.
