Sebi mulls allowing CRAs to rate instruments outside its regulatory purview
ADVERTISEMENT Under the current CRA regulations, credit rating agencies are only allowed to rate securities that are listed or proposed to be listed on a stock exchange recognised by Sebi.
However, the regulations do not stop CRAs from rating products, securities, or issuers if such ratings are done under the guidelines of another financial sector regulator or any authority specified by Sebi.
In its consultation paper, Sebi proposed that CRAs may be permitted to undertake activities that are not regulated by it, subject to certain conditions."CRA may undertake rating of financial instruments, which fall under the purview of any other FSR, provided it shall comply with the regulatory framework, if any, as may be specified by the respective FSR for the matters relating to policy, eligibility criteria, risk management, investor grievance or dispute handling mechanism, inspection, enforcement and claims," Sebi proposed.
The regulator suggested that CRAs may undertake only those rating activities that are fee-based and non-fund-based. Additionally, such activities should be carried out strictly on an arm's length basis through one or more Separate Business Units (SBUs), which should be segregated by a Chinese Wall and ring-fenced from Sebi-regulated functions.
ADVERTISEMENT The regulator further stated that CRAs should ensure the transfer of all non-Sebi-regulated activities to these separate business units within six months from the date of notification of the proposal.These SBUs would also be required to establish distinct grievance redressal mechanisms, including escalation procedures, which are separate from those applicable to Sebi-regulated activities.
ADVERTISEMENT Moreover, CRAs should maintain independent records within the SBU for such non-Sebi-regulated activities, and the personnel engaged in these functions must be distinct from those involved in Sebi-regulated operations.However, crossing the Chinese Wall may be permitted for staff, subject to due procedures approved by the Board of Directors and proper documentation.
ADVERTISEMENT Notably, this restriction does not apply to key managerial personnel.
Sebi also clarified that the minimum net worth requirement of a CRA, as specified under the CRA Regulations, should be protected from any impact arising out of non-Sebi-regulated activities.
ADVERTISEMENT A CRA will be required to disclose on its website the list of activities that are not regulated by Sebi, along with a disclaimer clearly stating that Sebi's investor protection mechanisms will not apply to any grievances or disputes related to such activities. This disclosure should also be prominently displayed in rating reports associated with non-Sebi-regulated activities.Prior to undertaking any such activities, the CRA should provide an upfront written disclosure to all relevant stakeholders, including clients, beneficiaries, and counterparties. This disclosure should be included in all engagement letters, contracts, agreements, and business communications, indicating that the activities do not fall within Sebi's regulatory framework.Also, stakeholders should confirm, at the time of engagement, that they understand the nature of the activities, associated risks, and the non-availability of Sebi's investor protection mechanisms.For existing and ongoing arrangements related to non-Sebi-regulated activities, CRAs should make the necessary disclosures and obtain acknowledgements from stakeholders. A compliance report on this should be submitted to Sebi within six months of the notification.In addition, every CRA undertaking any activity outside the purview of Sebi should submit an undertaking as part of its half-yearly internal audit report, confirming compliance with the specified requirements. This report should be duly reviewed and approved by the CRA's board of directors.Sebi has invited public comments on the proposal until July 30, 2025.
The move comes in response to representations from industry participants and stakeholders, who have requested that CRAs be allowed to rate financial products and instruments under the purview of other FSRs, even where no rating-related guidelines exist.
It was highlighted that such rating activities are closely aligned with CRAs' current business, and allowing them could lead to operational synergies while filling an existing gap in the market.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
State Department Confirms China Barred US Citizen From Leaving
The US State Department confirmed that a US Patent and Trademark Office employee has been barred from leaving China, and said officials were working to resolve the situation. The department said the employee was 'made subject to an exit ban' while traveling in China 'in a personal capacity.' 'We are tracking this case very closely and are engaged with Chinese officials to resolve the situation as quickly as possible,' the department said. The statement confirmed earlier reports in the Washington Post and elsewhere that China had stopped the US citizen from departing for several months. The Post said the ban was put in place over an apparent failure to disclose on a visa application that he worked for the US government. Officials from Beijing and Washington — including in the Commerce Department — are negotiating a trade deal after President Donald Trump hit goods from China with heavy tariffs that he later paused. Trump also wants a meeting with Chinese leader Xi Jinping to sort through their problems, which touch on technology curbs, rare earths and the status of Taiwan. The Commerce Department employee, a veteran of the US Army, was detained when he arrived in the southwestern city of Chengdu in April, the South China Morning Post reported Sunday, citing a person familiar with the situation. He was being prevented from leaving China because his case was 'related to actions Beijing deemed harmful to national security,' the newspaper reported, though the specifics couldn't be confirmed. Since the man arrived in Chengdu, he had also traveled to the Chinese capital with a US official, the newspaper reported. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
NDTV
3 hours ago
- NDTV
Ahead Of New Talks, Iran Blames Europeans For Nuclear Deal Collapse
Tehran: Tehran blamed European powers on Monday for the failure of a landmark 2015 nuclear deal, accusing them of breaking commitments ahead of renewed talks in Istanbul with Britain, France and Germany. The 2015 agreement -- reached between Iran and UN Security Council permanent members Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States, plus Germany -- imposed curbs on Iran's nuclear programme in exchange for sanctions relief. However, it unravelled in 2018 when the United States, during Donald Trump's first term as president, unilaterally withdrew and reimposed sweeping sanctions. Though Europe pledged continued support, a mechanism intended to offset US sanctions never effectively materialised, forcing many Western firms to exit Iran and deepening its economic crisis. "Iran holds the European parties responsible for negligence in implementing the agreement," said foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei ahead of Friday's talks in Istanbul with Britain, France and Germany on the deal's future. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and his Turkish counterpart Hakan Fidan spoke by phone Monday to discuss the talks, Fidan's office said, confirming the date had been set for Friday. Iran will also host a trilateral meeting today with Chinese and Russian representatives to discuss the nuclear issue and potential sanctions. The Chinese foreign ministry said Beijing would "continue to play a constructive role in pushing relevant sides to restart dialogue and negotiations, and reach a solution that takes in account the legitimate concerns of all parties". In recent weeks, the three European powers have threatened to reimpose international sanctions on Tehran, accusing it of breaching its nuclear commitments. Germany said the Istanbul talks would be at the expert level, with the European trio, or E3, working "flat out" to find a sustainable and verifiable diplomatic solution. "If no solution is reached by the end of August... the snapback also remains an option for the E3," said its foreign ministry spokesman, Martin Giese. A clause in the 2015 agreement allows for UN sanctions on Iran to be reimposed through a "snapback" mechanism in the event of non-compliance. However, the agreement expires in October, leaving a tight deadline. - 'No intention of speaking with America' - The International Atomic Energy Agency says Iran is the only non-nuclear-armed country currently enriching uranium to 60 percent -- far beyond the 3.67 percent cap set by the 2015 accord. That is a short step from the 90 percent enrichment required for a nuclear weapon. Using the snapback clause was "meaningless, unjustifiable and immoral", Baqaei told a news conference, arguing that Iran only began distancing itself from the agreement in response to Western non-compliance. "Iran's reduction of its commitments was carried out in accordance with the provisions outlined in the agreement," he said. Western powers -- led by the United States and backed by Israel -- have long accused Tehran of secretly seeking nuclear weapons. Iran has repeatedly denied this, insisting its nuclear programme is solely for civilian purposes such as energy production. Tehran and Washington had held five rounds of nuclear talks starting in April, but a planned meeting on June 15 was cancelled after Israel launched strikes on Iran, triggering a 12-day conflict. "At this stage, we have no intention of speaking with America," Baqaei said Monday. Israel launched a wave of surprise strikes on its regional nemesis on June 13, targeting key military and nuclear facilities. The United States launched its own strikes against Iran's nuclear programme on June 22, hitting the uranium enrichment facility at Fordo, in Qom province south of Tehran, as well as nuclear sites in Isfahan and Natanz.
Indian Express
4 hours ago
- Indian Express
Trump, Xi aides discussed autumn US-China leaders' meeting, sources say
Aides to Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping have discussed a potential meeting between the leaders during a trip by the US president to Asia later this year, according to two people familiar with the plans. While plans for a meeting have not been finalized, discussions on both sides of the Pacific have included a possible Trump stopover around the time of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in South Korea or talks on the sidelines of the October 30-November 1 event, the people said. Trump has sought to lower tensions with Beijing in recent weeks after pausing a tit-for-tat tariff war that has upended global trade and supply chains. China has also sought the attendance of international guests, including some from the United States, for a September 3 Beijing ceremony commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of World War Two, said a spokesperson for China's embassy in Washington in a briefing last week for reporters. The Kremlin said on Monday it did not rule out the possibility of Russian President Vladimir Putin and Trump meeting in Beijing in September if Trump decides to attend that ceremony. Putin has confirmed his attendance. 'Diplomacy between heads of state plays an irreplaceable strategic leading role in Sino-US relations,' said Chinese Foreign Affairs Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun on Monday, declining to comment on a possible Trump-Xi meeting. The White House declined to comment. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Monday there would be 'talks in the very near future' between the countries. 'Trade is in a good place, and I think now we can start talking about other things. The Chinese, unfortunately … are very large purchasers of sanctioned Iranian oil, sanctioned Russian oil,' he told CNBC. He added: 'We could also discuss the elephant in the room, which is this great rebalancing that the Chinese need to do.' Trump has sought to impose tariffs on virtually all foreign goods, which he says will stimulate domestic manufacturing and which critics say will make many consumer goods more expensive for Americans. He has called for a universal base tariff rate of 10% on goods imported from all countries, with higher rates for imports from some, including China. Imports from China have the highest tariff rate of 55%. Trump has set a deadline of August 12 for the US and China to reach a durable tariff agreement. Other points of friction between the countries include China's support for Russia, trade in fentanyl-related chemicals, regional security worries, and exit bans on some American residents. The most recent high-level US-China meeting was on July 11, when US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi had what both described as a productive and positive meeting in Malaysia about how trade negotiations should proceed. Rubio said then that Trump had been invited to China to meet with Xi, and said that both leaders 'want it to happen.' On Friday, China Commerce Minister Wang Wentao said China wants to bring its trade ties with the U.S. back to a stable footing and that recent talks in Europe showed there was no need for a tariff war.
