Holyoke Country Club fined for air pollution control and storage tank violations
HOLYOKE, Mass. (WWLP) – The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) has fined Holyoke Country Club for underground storage tank and air pollution control violations.
ES Golf Corp., doing business as Holyoke Country Club, was fined $19,000 for failure to install a vapor recovery system for its underground storage tank. The system is used to prevent gasoline fumes from escaping into the air during fuel deliveries to service stations and vehicle fueling.
Holyoke-based company fined for asbestos violations at former Eastfield Mall in Springfield
The country club was also in violation for failing to conduct third-party inspections of its underground storage tank and failing to maintain a financial assurance mechanism to fund corrective actions caused by an accidental release. As a result, they ultimately removed the underground storage tank.
'Environmental regulations are in place to protect our air, soil and groundwater from pollution while ensuring swift corrective actions in the event of a release,' said Michael Gorski, Director of MassDEP's Western Regional Office in Springfield. 'Holyoke Country Club's decision to remove their tank and resolve the penalty addresses their violation and underscores the importance of adherence to these protective measures.'
WWLP-22News, an NBC affiliate, began broadcasting in March 1953 to provide local news, network, syndicated, and local programming to western Massachusetts. Watch the 22News Digital Edition weekdays at 4 p.m. on WWLP.com.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
In a blow to Milei, a US judge orders Argentina to turn over its majority stake in state oil company
BUENOS AIRES, Argentina (AP) — The fate of Argentina's state-run oil company was thrown into doubt Monday as a U.S. judge ordered the cash-strapped country to give up its 51% controlling stake in YPF in partial compensation for seizing the shares of former investors during its 2012 nationalization of the energy group. The ruling — a dramatic effort to enforce a $16 billion U.S. court judgement against Argentina — presents a new headache for libertarian President Javier Milei, the ideological foil for left-wing former President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner who oversaw Argentina's contentious takeover of YPF and ensuing legal battles during her tenure (2007-2015). Milei vowed to appeal the ruling. Fernández's abrupt move to seize control of YPF at the time helped bring serial defaulter Argentina further infamy for abandoning its global financial obligations. Milei inherited an economy in shambles after decades of reckless state spending and campaigned on pledges to privatize state companies. In granting the request of former shareholders largely represented by Burford Capital, which finances litigation in return for a share of the winnings, Judge Loretta Preska of the Southern District of New York gave Argentina two weeks to transfer its shares in YPF to Bank of New York Mellon Corp, the major U.S. custody bank, according to the ruling seen by The Associated Press. Because YPF is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, the plaintiffs could file the lawsuit in a U.S. district court. Shares of YPF closed down 5.6%. The judgement stems from a long-running legal case that in 2023 saw Judge Preska find Argentina liable for $16.1 billion in damages and interest. The plaintiffs argue that the government should have launched a tender offer for stakes held by minority shareholders. Milei, whose government has struggled to build up depleted foreign reserves, has vowed to appeal the ruling 'to defend national interests' and blamed the problem on his political rivals. 'More than 10 years have passed, and we Argentines continue to suffer the consequences of the worst government in Argentine history,' he wrote on social media platform X. Marcelo J. García, Director for the Americas at the New York-based Horizon Engage risk consultancy, said the ruling was 'a reminder for the Milei administration that the country's problems will not go away just because he blames the opposition for them.' 'Control of YPF is important for Milei; that's why an appeal is the only option for him,' he added. Paying up and losing the controlling stake in YPF — which has become a pillar of the economy — would cripple Argentina at a crucial moment for Milei's government. YPF has accelerated its drive to develop the country's huge reserves of shale gas in the Vaca Muerta field in Argentine Patagonia. Crude production at Vaca Muerta has steadily climbed, hitting record production in May at 448,000 barrels per day, 22.5% more than the same month in 2024, according to official data. In 2024, YPF notched a net profit of almost $2.4 billion, up from a $1.3 billion loss the year before. Milei has hoped to leverage investments in the Vaca Muerta field to cure the nation's long-standing fiscal weakness and pay its massive deficits. ____ Follow AP's coverage of Latin America and the Caribbean at
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
In a blow to Milei, a US judge orders Argentina to turn over its majority stake in state oil company
BUENOS AIRES, Argentina (AP) — The fate of Argentina's state-run oil company was thrown into doubt Monday as a U.S. judge ordered the cash-strapped country to give up its 51% controlling stake in YPF in partial compensation for seizing the shares of former investors during its 2012 nationalization of the energy group. The ruling — a dramatic effort to enforce a $16 billion U.S. court judgement against Argentina — presents a new headache for libertarian President Javier Milei, the ideological foil for left-wing former President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner who oversaw Argentina's contentious takeover of YPF and ensuing legal battles during her tenure (2007-2015). Milei vowed to appeal the ruling. Fernández's abrupt move to seize control of YPF at the time helped bring serial defaulter Argentina further infamy for abandoning its global financial obligations. Milei inherited an economy in shambles after decades of reckless state spending and campaigned on pledges to privatize state companies. In granting the request of former shareholders largely represented by Burford Capital, which finances litigation in return for a share of the winnings, Judge Loretta Preska of the Southern District of New York gave Argentina two weeks to transfer its shares in YPF to Bank of New York Mellon Corp, the major U.S. custody bank, according to the ruling seen by The Associated Press. Because YPF is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, the plaintiffs could file the lawsuit in a U.S. district court. Shares of YPF closed down 5.6%. The judgement stems from a long-running legal case that in 2023 saw Judge Preska find Argentina liable for $16.1 billion in damages and interest. The plaintiffs argue that the government should have launched a tender offer for stakes held by minority shareholders. Milei, whose government has struggled to build up depleted foreign reserves, has vowed to appeal the ruling 'to defend national interests" and blamed the problem on his political rivals. 'More than 10 years have passed, and we Argentines continue to suffer the consequences of the worst government in Argentine history,' he wrote on social media platform X. Marcelo J. García, Director for the Americas at the New York-based Horizon Engage risk consultancy, said the ruling was 'a reminder for the Milei administration that the country's problems will not go away just because he blames the opposition for them.' 'Control of YPF is important for Milei; that's why an appeal is the only option for him,' he added. Paying up and losing the controlling stake in YPF — which has become a pillar of the economy — would cripple Argentina at a crucial moment for Milei's government. YPF has accelerated its drive to develop the country's huge reserves of shale gas in the Vaca Muerta field in Argentine Patagonia. Crude production at Vaca Muerta has steadily climbed, hitting record production in May at 448,000 barrels per day, 22.5% more than the same month in 2024, according to official data. In 2024, YPF notched a net profit of almost $2.4 billion, up from a $1.3 billion loss the year before. ____
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Can't afford an average home in S.F.? Try a mansion in Sacramento instead
A mid-priced home in San Francisco and San Mateo County costs nearly as much as a luxury home in the Sacramento area. It's not just that homes in the San Francisco metro area are far more expensive than they are in the Sacramento region — though they certainly are. The estimated price of a mid-tier home that sold in the San Francisco area from March to May was nearly $1.5 million, according to online real estate brokerage Redfin, almost three times the typical $589,000 price tag in the Sacramento area. But the price gap between a 'normal' home (one in the middle third of values) and a mansion (in the top 5%) is also greater in the Bay Area than it is in the Sacramento region. A top-tier home in the San Francisco metro area, defined in Redfin's data as the city and San Mateo County, cost about $6.2 million, more than four times the price of a mid-tier home. In the Sacramento metro area, a sprawling region that stretches to Lake Tahoe, a luxury home costs less than $1.7 million, less than three times the price of a mid-tier home. The most expensive metro areas don't necessarily have the largest gaps between luxury homes and mid-tier homes. Florida's West Palm Beach and Miami metro areas have relatively moderate prices for mid-tier homes, at just above $500,000. But luxury homes in those metros can cost about eight times as much as a non-luxury home. The Sacramento metro area, on the other hand, has the second-lowest gap, with the Portland, Ore., area having the absolute lowest ratio. Cheryl Dibachi, a Roseville-based luxury home broker associate with Compass who moved from the Bay Area in 2005, said she regularly receives inquiries from Bay Area homebuyers who realize they can get much more space for their money further inland. She herself more than doubled her square footage for roughly the same amount of money once she moved to the Sacramento area, she said. 'If you want a luxury property but can't spend the $20 million-plus, there are great opportunities here, and you still have the proximity to the Bay Area,' Dibachi said. Additionally, the luxury market is relatively new to the Sacramento area, Dibachi said, with higher-end properties mostly being homes rebuilt after 2000, around when the region saw a jump in housing demand. That new demand may have partially stemmed from out-migration of relatively well-off people from the Bay Area, which has a longer history of mansions with eye-popping prices. The difference in the price gap likely reflects the two regions' levels of income inequality. The average income of the top 20% of earners in San Francisco was 28 times what the bottom 20% made, according to U.S. Census Bureau data from 2023. The same ratio was just 14 in Sacramento and Placer counties. But the Sacramento region has its own affordability challenges. Researchers have found that the cost of home insurance is far outpacing homeowner income. And Dibachi also said home prices are also starting to rise as more people flock to the area. 'Over the last three years, I've seen a pretty dramatic jump in what people are willing to pay,' she said. 'And it's really, I think, mainly because they can't get the product anywhere else.'
