logo
Ted Baker 'plans high street return'

Ted Baker 'plans high street return'

Fashion Network2 days ago
could be planning a return to UK physical retail if a report is to be believed, with a newspaper saying that it could be back next year.
The report was in the Sun, which isn't known for it breaking business news stories, but it said that sources close to the matter have told it of plans for a high street come back in early 2026.
That comeback would initially happen in London, we're told, although few details are available at present and it's unclear whether there will be shops outside the UK capital and how many physical locations are planned.
The news comes after the once-high-flying brand closed all of its stores last August.
The brand was founded in 1988 and was hugely successful in the ensuing decades, later listing on the stock exchange and being a popular choice for investors.
As recently as a decade ago it had 550 shops and concessions globally, but the fashion sector downturn of recent years was devastating for the business. After going into administration it was acquired for £210 million in 2022 by US-based Authentic Brands Group, which changed its complete business approach, operating it on a licensing model.
But this hasn't always worked out and in early 20204, Authentic cut ties with UK and Europe stores and webstore operator AARC, which was based in the Netherlands and had run into financial difficulties.
After its store closures, the brand later last year returned to e-commerce and wholesale and a return to operating its own physical stores would see it coming full circle.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US tech firm Zugara accuses Chanel of patent infringement over AR makeup
US tech firm Zugara accuses Chanel of patent infringement over AR makeup

Fashion Network

time10 hours ago

  • Fashion Network

US tech firm Zugara accuses Chanel of patent infringement over AR makeup

Legal disputes over augmented reality (AR) technology are escalating across fashion and beauty. The latest case involves Chanel, which California-based AR company Zugara is suing for allegedly infringing on its patented face-tracking process. Zugara filed the lawsuit on July 22 in Texas, claiming the French luxury house's virtual makeup try-on tool unlawfully replicates a patented system the firm developed for real-time cosmetic simulation. The tech company is known for providing AR tools to major clients such as Nestlé, Pepsi, Toyota, AT&T, and the U.S. Air Force. At the center of the case is a patented method that tracks users' eyes and lips to digitally apply makeup in real time. While there are several ways to achieve this effect, Zugara alleges that Chanel's 'Virtually Try-On' tool copies the specific sequence outlined in its patent. Zugara previously filed a similar complaint against Estée Lauder, which was reportedly settled out of court. Chanel's virtual try-on experience allows users to test makeup looks inspired by its Croisière 2025 runway show. The tool features curated palettes, limited-edition products, and options to customize makeup virtually before purchasing. Unlike virtual reality, which immerses users in a fully digital environment, augmented reality enhances real-world images by overlaying digital elements. In the beauty sector, AR try-on tools have become popular for offering personalized, contact-free shopping experiences. But the rise of AR tools has sparked more than just innovation. Legal challenges involving beauty brands and tech firms are becoming more common—particularly around the collection of biometric data. In the U.S., companies such as Charlotte Tilbury Beauty, e.l.f. Beauty, Mary Kay, and Ulta have previously been sued for allegedly capturing facial data without user consent. As companies like Apple and Meta push forward with AR-enabled devices, experts warn that biometric tracking, facial scanning, and consumer privacy will continue to raise legal and regulatory questions across the retail and tech industries.

US tech firm Zugara accuses Chanel of patent infringement over AR makeup
US tech firm Zugara accuses Chanel of patent infringement over AR makeup

Fashion Network

time12 hours ago

  • Fashion Network

US tech firm Zugara accuses Chanel of patent infringement over AR makeup

Legal disputes over augmented reality (AR) technology are escalating across fashion and beauty. The latest case involves Chanel, which California-based AR company Zugara is suing for allegedly infringing on its patented face-tracking process. Zugara filed the lawsuit on July 22 in Texas, claiming the French luxury house's virtual makeup try-on tool unlawfully replicates a patented system the firm developed for real-time cosmetic simulation. The tech company is known for providing AR tools to major clients such as Nestlé, Pepsi, Toyota, AT&T, and the U.S. Air Force. At the center of the case is a patented method that tracks users' eyes and lips to digitally apply makeup in real time. While there are several ways to achieve this effect, Zugara alleges that Chanel's 'Virtually Try-On' tool copies the specific sequence outlined in its patent. Zugara previously filed a similar complaint against Estée Lauder, which was reportedly settled out of court. Chanel's virtual try-on experience allows users to test makeup looks inspired by its Croisière 2025 runway show. The tool features curated palettes, limited-edition products, and options to customize makeup virtually before purchasing. Unlike virtual reality, which immerses users in a fully digital environment, augmented reality enhances real-world images by overlaying digital elements. In the beauty sector, AR try-on tools have become popular for offering personalized, contact-free shopping experiences. But the rise of AR tools has sparked more than just innovation. Legal challenges involving beauty brands and tech firms are becoming more common—particularly around the collection of biometric data. In the U.S., companies such as Charlotte Tilbury Beauty, e.l.f. Beauty, Mary Kay, and Ulta have previously been sued for allegedly capturing facial data without user consent. As companies like Apple and Meta push forward with AR-enabled devices, experts warn that biometric tracking, facial scanning, and consumer privacy will continue to raise legal and regulatory questions across the retail and tech industries.

US tech firm Zugara accuses Chanel of patent infringement over AR makeup
US tech firm Zugara accuses Chanel of patent infringement over AR makeup

Fashion Network

time12 hours ago

  • Fashion Network

US tech firm Zugara accuses Chanel of patent infringement over AR makeup

Legal disputes over augmented reality (AR) technology are escalating across fashion and beauty. The latest case involves Chanel, which California-based AR company Zugara is suing for allegedly infringing on its patented face-tracking process. Zugara filed the lawsuit on July 22 in Texas, claiming the French luxury house's virtual makeup try-on tool unlawfully replicates a patented system the firm developed for real-time cosmetic simulation. The tech company is known for providing AR tools to major clients such as Nestlé, Pepsi, Toyota, AT&T, and the U.S. Air Force. At the centre of the case is a patented method that tracks users' eyes and lips to digitally apply makeup in real time. While there are several ways to achieve this effect, Zugara alleges that Chanel's 'Virtually Try-On' tool copies the specific sequence outlined in its patent. Zugara previously filed a similar complaint against Estée Lauder, which was reportedly settled out of court. Chanel's virtual try-on experience allows users to test makeup looks inspired by its Croisière 2025 runway show. The tool features curated palettes, limited-edition products, and options to customise makeup virtually before purchasing. Unlike virtual reality, which immerses users in a fully digital environment, augmented reality enhances real-world images by overlaying digital elements. In the beauty sector, AR try-on tools have become popular for offering personalised, contact-free shopping experiences. But the rise of AR tools has sparked more than just innovation. Legal challenges involving beauty brands and tech firms are becoming more common—particularly around the collection of biometric data. In the U.S., companies such as Charlotte Tilbury Beauty, e.l.f. Beauty, Mary Kay, and Ulta have previously been sued for allegedly capturing facial data without user consent. As companies like Apple and Meta push forward with AR-enabled devices, experts warn that biometric tracking, facial scanning, and consumer privacy will continue to raise legal and regulatory questions across the retail and tech industries.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store