From AfD to Reform UK: The far right and European politics – DW – 05/19/2025
At the beginning of May, the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution(BfV), Germany's domestic intelligence agency, classified the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) as a "confirmed right-wing-extremist" party. The AfD is now challenging this decision in court. The BfV has announced that it will not use the extremism label until the court rules on the matter. The classification as right-wing-extremist has reignited debate in Germany about whether the AfD should be banned.
No other country in Europe is considering such a ban to contain the ascendant far right. In some countries, in fact, similar parties are part of the government or, in some cases, even lead it.
DW looks at where far-right parties stand in several European countries.
How much of a neo-Nazi party is the German AfD?
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Freedom Party of Austria
Chancellor Christian Stocker, of the conservative Austrian People's Party (ÖVP) does not consider Herbert Kickl's Freedom Party of Austria (FPÖ) right-wing-extremist. Austria's other political parties have not committed themselves to avoid cooperation with the FPÖ. The ÖVP has formed coalition governments with the FPÖ twice already, the first time back in 2000. This was seen as a scandal in the European Union at the time, and, for a few months, other EU member states kept their relations with the Austrian government to a minimum.
The FPÖ is relatively young in the history of Austria's parliament. The party was founded in 1955 by a former Nazi functionary and later softened its views.
Like the AfD, the FPÖ is critical of immigration, globalization and the European Union. However, the FPÖ appears more willing to compromise and appears less ideological, perhaps due to the number of times it has been part of government, including at the national level.
Last year, it won the parliamentary elections for the first time, garnering 28.8% of the vote. Nevertheless, it was unable to form a coalition government. In the meantime, however, it is even stronger in the polls than it was during the election.
Austria's hard-right party comes first in national election
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
France: The National Rally (NR)
The National Rally has come a long way since it was founded in 1972 by Jean-Marie Le Pen under the name Front National. When his daughter Marine Le Pen took the helm, she renamed the party and moved it — somewhat — towards the center.
Although the party is still critical of immigration and Islam, it is no longer openly antisemitic. This approach helped it attract a new group of voters. Le Pen has run for president three times, most recently losing in the runoff, while still managing to secure more votes each time.
Following a court ruling for misappropriation of public funds, Marine Le Pen was recently barred from running in elections for five years. Current polls show that if either she or the party leader, Jordan Bardella, were to run again, they would have a good chance of at least making it past the first round. In the 2024 parliamentary elections, the RN was the strongest party.
The RN's penchant for protectionism and statism — in other words: the belief that the state can solve major problems — stands in stark contrast to the AfD's viewpoints. In any case, Le Pen has distanced herself from the AfD. The German party is allegedly too radical for her, but this could be a domestic political strategy to appear more respectable.
What does Le Pen's conviction mean for EU politics?
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Brothers of Italy
Giorgia Meloni stands at the helm of the Brothers of Italy party, making her probably Europe's most successful far-right head of state. Many in the Brothers of Italy have a positive view of fascism, the Italian version of National Socialism. Giorgia Meloni once said that she had "an untroubled relationship with fascism" and that the former fascist head of government and Hitler ally Benito Mussolini was "a good politician."
In the 2022 election campaign, which brought her party to power, her slogan was "God, Family and Fatherland."
Meloni and her party campaign against abortions, LGTBQ+ people and, of course against migrants.
In contrast to many similar politicians in Europe, Meloni has taken a clear stance against Russia in the Ukraine war. This is the main reason why she spoke of "irreconcilable differences" with the AfD. At the same time, Meloni has a close relationship with US President Donald Trump and is therefore valued in Brussels as a transatlantic mediator.
Italy: Why do people vote for right-wing populists?
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Sweden Democrats
The roots of the Sweden Democrats lie in the right-wing-extremist movement Bevara Sverige Svenskt (Sweden should remain Swedish). Shortly before the turn of the millennium, the party tried to distance itself from its roots and adopted a more moderate stance.
The current party leader, Jimmie Akesson, is continuing this strategy and was successful in making the Sweden Democrats the second-strongest party in the 2022 parliamentary elections. Since then, the party has backed the minority government of conservative Prime Minister Ulf Hjalmar Kristersson.
As with far-right parties in other countries, the most important issue for the Sweden Democrats is immigration. Widespread gang crime in Sweden's major cities has been instrumental in the Sweden Democrats' electoral success. While unusual for a party on the far right, the party has declared its support for climate protection.
Netherlands: Party for Freedom (PVV)
Since the 2023 parliamentary elections, Geert Wilders' Party for Freedom has been the strongest party in the Netherlands and leads a coalition government together with three other parties. Because Wilders was too radical for the coalition partners, Dick Schoof, who has no party affiliation, became prime minister. The PVV is unique in that Wilders is the only party member; even MPs and ministers are officially only supporters of the party. This means that Wilders can also determine the party program alone and nominate candidates for elections himself.
The PVV's priority is fighting irregular immigration and, above all, Islam. With his aim of banning the Koran and all new mosque buildings, Wilders takes the issue a step further than most. Before the recent election, however, Wilders said that he would put his views on Islam "in the freezer" in order to be able to govern. In addition, he campaigns against climate protection and the EU, which he sees as intrusive.
Where do Europe's far-right parties differ?
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Reform UK Party
Reform UK has undergone several transformations: After breaking away from the UK Independence Party, whose main objective was withdrawing the UK from the EU, it became the Brexit Party. Once Brexit was achieved, the party renamed the Reform UK Party. At each step, the leading figure was Nigel Farage, the spectre of established British politics.
In the meantime, the party has taken up the cause of drastically reducing the number of immigrants — and using this to pressure the ruling Labour Party as well as the Conservatives. Farage has been successful at accusing both parties of inaction.
Just days after Reform UK performed well in regional elections, Labour Prime Minister Keir Starmer promised to drastically reduce both unauthorized migration and migration for work. According to the latest national polls, Reform UK is just ahead of Labor and the Conservatives. Deputy party leader Richard Tice calls the official British goal of climate neutrality "absurd."
This article was originally written in German.
While you're here: Every Tuesday, DW editors round up what is happening in German politics and society. You can sign up here for the weekly email newsletter Berlin Briefing.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
43 minutes ago
- DW
Middle East: Famine 'playing out' in Gaza — monitor – DW – 07/29/2025
Food crisis experts have predicted "widespread death" if action is not taken to alleviate hunger in the Gaza Strip. Israel's foreign minister has rejected international pressure for a Gaza ceasefire. DW has more. Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz is hosting Jordan's King Abdullah II in Berlin on Tuesday for talks not only on bilateral ties but also on regional issues. Their meeting comes as a survey shows that around three-quarters of German residents would like to see the federal government take a tougher stance towards Israel over its conflict against Hamas in Gaza. You can read more over at our Germany blog. The top international authority on food crises issued a new alert on the situation in the Gaza Strip on Tuesday, warning that there could be "widespread death" by starvation if immediate action is not taken. The "worst-case scenario of famine is currently playing out in the Gaza Strip," the Intergrated Food Security Phase Classification, or IPC, said. The alert falls short of being a formal famine declaration but comes amid growing pressure on Israel to take measures to prevent the reported widespread starvation in the Palestinian enclave amidIsrael's offensive against the militant group Hamas. The lack of external access to Gaza stands in the way of a formal famine declaration, which is rare. However, according to the World Food Program, one in three people in Gaza is going without food for days at a time, while hospitals are reporting a surge in hunger-related deaths in children under five. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video from the DW newsroom in Bonn! We will be reporting here on events across the Middle East, with a particular focus on Gaza as international pressure grows on Israel over its offensive in the Palestinian enclave, where hundreds of thousands are at risk of death by starvation. In Germany, Chancellor Friedrich Merz will be meeting with Jordan's King Abdullah II in Berlin on Tuesday to discuss ways of bringing humanitarian aid to Gaza. In this blog, DW will bring you up-to-date reports, correspondents' analyses and explainers on the situation in Gaza and beyond at a time of intense regional turmoil.
DW
2 hours ago
- DW
In Georgia, press freedom and survival are on the line
The ruling party is steadily undermining independent media with restrictive funding. Editor and reporter Lika Zakashvili discusses solidarity and political imprisonment. Thirty years ago, the Republic of Georgia drafted a constitution in a hopeful gesture toward political pluralism. Today, the post-Soviet republic is steadily rolling back that liberalization, and perhaps nowhere is that more clear than in its relations with the country's independent press. In May, the ruling populist political party, Georgian Dream, passed the controversial "Foreign Agents" law , requiring organizations receiving more than 20 percent of their funding from abroad to register as foreign agents. Like Russian laws designed to stifle dissent and media freedom, Georgia's law also hampers the country's independent media, as well as its application toward European integration, which the majority of Georgian citizens support. Since the law's passage, anti-government protests have regularly erupted throughout the country, and journalists and photographers have been imprisoned. Since 2013, Lika Zakashvili has reported for and is now its editor-in-chief. In this interview, she discusses solidarity among independent journalists, how decreased funding has endangered independent media, and why all eyes are on Georgia's courts and judges. DW Akademie: Lika, you yourself have participated in the anti-government protests. You have colleagues who are in jail. You're trying to figure out how to keep afloat. These are all huge challenges. Let's start with funding. What exactly is happening? Lika Zakashvili: Our current government is building a large infrastructure around media, using laws to cancel funding. They know Georgia is a small country, with a small economy, and that various businesses will remain loyal to the government. It's often very difficult here for media outlets with independent editorial policies to find the resources necessary to continue their work. For us, international support, or grants, was the only way for us and others. They know this. They adop ted three different laws with just one goal: to destroy the opportunity to get funding. The law is simple: if you get international monies, you are a target. The requirements are difficult and you have to say, "I'm a foreign agent." It's a way to demonize the media. And if a donor wants to send money to us, first it has to ask the government. They will use this to block funding, both for the media and the civic sector. And what has been the media's response? When the Georgian Dream party enacted the foreign agents law, independent media organizations in Georgia declared that they would not register as agents. These organizations maintain that they are independent, have their own editorial policies, and have never operated under external influence. The Georgian Dream's intention appears to be to tarnish their reputation. These media outlets reject the new rules. As independent organizations, they are prepared to use all available legal means to urge Georgian Dream to suspend and ultimately repeal these laws. It is a very challenging situation. We can't plan long-term. If we get public financial support and we can continue working, this will really matter to us. What we do know is that we are not going to collaborate with the government. We are not agents, we will never be agents. And h ow is the government responding? Independent media are unable to access information from state agencies. There is a strong suspicion that the Georgian Dream has created a media outlet blacklist that it refuses to provide information to. Additionally, numerous studies indicate that the transparency and accountability of public agencies to the public have significantly declined in recent years. And they've restricted our coverage of the courts, which are the most important government bodies today. We can't get video, audio or photographs. We can't cover the trials of political prisoners, which is of much public interest. Georgians want to know what is happening there. There's a lot of empathy among Georgians for these people who have been arrested. Before the restrictions, we were showing readers the lack of evidence in these – well, let's call them what they are: political arrests. There are no juries, just judges. Are you scared for your safety? Yes. During the anti-government demonstrations, my colleagues were beaten by police. A photographer colleague was working. [He] was very visible. He was wearing a mask and also a press identification. Police intentionally beat him, and he ended up needing facial surgery. This was seven months ago at a big demonstration, and it wasn't until afterward that we recognized that we were in fact being targeted. Since then, when we go to protests, we leave all of our ID behind, and we've started reporting with our phones. Miza Amaghlobeli, the founder of two news websites in Georgia, is in failing health and relatives fear for her life. She remains in pre-trial detention. Image: You've mentioned your friend Mzia Amaghlobeli. She's been in jail since January. Mzia's pre-trial detention is disproportionate to the offense she is accused of committing, as outlined in the indictment. If the court finds her guilty, she could face a prison sentence of up to seven years. According to Georgia's Supreme Court, slapping a police officer is not regarded as an attack, especially when there is minimal physical harm involved. Therefore, we assert that Mzia's case is politically motivated. She is being punished for her professional activities. And we simply see this for what it is – intimidation – which they hope leads to a chilling effect. But it won't. Not for us. DW Akademie receives funding from both the German Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) and the European Union to work wi th journalists from Georgian media organizations on projects related to fact-checking and recognizing propaganda and disinformation.
DW
4 hours ago
- DW
EU and US reach trade deal, avoiding tariff escalation – DW – 07/27/2025
EU chief Ursula von der Leyen has managed to negotiate a 15% US tariff. She calls the transatlantic agreement "the biggest deal ever." The United States and the European Union on Sunday reached a trade deal, ending a months-long standoff. "We have reached a deal. It's a good deal for everybody," US President Donald Trump told reporters after talks with the European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen in Scotland. "We have a trade deal between the two largest economies in the world. And it's a big deal. It's a huge deal," said von der Leyen, who was seeking to finalize an agreement with Washington before the August 1 deadline. "It will bring stability, it will bring predictability. That's very important for businesses on both sides of the Atlantic," she added. Ahead of the crunch talks, Trump gave "a good 50-50 chance" on Friday for a deal to be reached with the European Union. "We are agreeing that the tariff straight across, for automobiles and everything else, will be a straight across tariff of 15%," according to Trump. Currently, most EU goods face a 10% tariff, with levies of 25% on cars and car parts. But the rate would not apply to steel and aluminum, which are being taxed at 50%. Trump also said the bloc had agreed to purchase "$750 billion (€638 billion) worth of energy" from the US, as well as $600 billion more in additional investments. "Purchases of US energy products will diversify our sources of supply and contribute to Europe's energy security. We will replace Russian gas and oil by significant purchases of US LNG, oil and nuclear fuels," von der Leyen told reporters. She added that the baseline tariff rate of 15% on imported EU goods would apply to cars, semiconductors and pharmaceutical goods. At the start of the meeting, Trump said that "fairness" was the main remaining sticking point. "Europe is very closed. We don't sell cars into Europe. We don't sell essentially agriculture of any great degree," he said. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The trade pact means the bloc would avoid the 30% tariffs that Trump had threatened on all goods from the EU on July 12. The 15% rate is the same as the one announced with Japan earlier this week. But it marks a significant compromise, especially given that von der Leyen offered a "zero-for-zero tariffs for industrial goods" when talks began. Still, the EU chief said they agreed "zero-for-zero tariffs on a number of strategic products" including aircraft and aircraft parts, some chemicals, and certain agricultural products. She added that the framework trade deal did not contain any decision regarding the spirits sector. The trade pact will need to be approved by all 27 member states. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz welcomed the trade deal following the announcement. "We managed to avert a trade conflict that would have hit the export-oriented German economy hard," Merz posted on X.
