Hong Kong's Dragnet Widens 5 Years After National Security Law
Jailed pro-democracy activist Joshua Wong shrugged and shook his head after a Hong Kong court this month announced a fresh charge of breaching the city's national security law.
The 28-year-old protest icon has spent more than four years behind bars and hoped to be let out in early 2027.
Now, there is no end in sight.
Monday marks five years since Beijing imposed a national security law after widespread and sometimes violent pro-democracy protests in the finance hub, which Chinese officials saw as a challenge to their rule.
China sees former protest leaders such as Wong as "incorrigible troublemakers", said John Burns, an honorary professor of politics and public administration at the University of Hong Kong.
"We have a daily drumbeat of national security on TV, in the media," Burns told AFP.
The new charge against Wong, who was jailed for subversion and unlawful assembly, underscores how Hong Kong authorities are still widening the dragnet.
The national security law criminalised for the first time secession, subversion, terrorism and foreign collusion, with offenders facing up to life imprisonment.
Since the law was introduced, 165 people have been convicted of various national security crimes, including under follow-up legislation in 2024 and colonial-era sedition laws.
The most severely punished was legal academic Benny Tai, who was sentenced in November to 10 years in prison as part of a sprawling subversion case involving 47 opposition figures.
A lawyer, who requested anonymity in order to discuss sensitive cases, said five years spent defending security law clients had laid bare the limits of his role. Of all those charged with national security crimes, only two have been acquitted.
"Our hands are tied," he told AFP. "Practically the only thing (lawyers) can do is argue for a lighter penalty."
Authorities have also warned against "soft resistance", a vague term introduced in 2021 and recently highlighted by Xia Baolong, China's top official overseeing Hong Kong.
Regina Ip, convenor of the Hong Kong government's cabinet, told AFP: "I don't think the government is being paranoid.
"Because of the increasingly complex and volatile international environment, we all need to be alert," she added.
Beijing security officials in Hong Kong also took part in "interviews" this month with collusion suspects for the first time, authorities said.
Eric Lai, a research fellow at the Georgetown Center for Asian Law, said the city was adapting approaches from mainland China such as "invitation to tea" -- a practice associated with state security agents.
Such informal methods "to regulate and to stabilise society" were favoured because they are "less visible", Lai said.
Another local lawyer with experience in security cases also noted a worsening "information gap" that has kept the public in the dark.
"There are fewer prosecutions now but more arrests, 'interviews' and operations where (people) are not brought to court," said the lawyer, who requested anonymity.
High-profile legal battles have not ended: the case of media tycoon Jimmy Lai continues, while a trial involving organisers of Hong Kong's once-annual vigil marking Beijing's deadly Tiananmen Square crackdown has not yet begun.
Scores of pro-democracy and civil society groups, including trade unions and media outlets, have closed since 2020 and the ouster of opposition lawmakers has had "massive consequences for accountability", said Burns.
Hong Kong's Democratic Party has begun a process that will lead to its dissolution, while local media reported on Wednesday that the League of Social Democrats, the other remaining opposition party, could fold within days.
The security law has prompted a wave of departures.
Hong Kong independence advocate Tony Chung said he felt unsafe after finishing a prison sentence for secession and fled to the United Kingdom in 2023.
Chung is among 19 people Hong Kong authorities deem to be national security fugitives.
The 24-year-old has at times struggled to adapt while he waits in Britain for political asylum but insists on promoting his separatist views.
"Many friends told me that I can start a new life here and leave politics behind," he told AFP.
"I see the sun, good weather, a grassy field... But I force myself to remember why I came here." The national security law criminalised for the first time secession, subversion, terrorism and foreign collusion, with offenders facing up to life imprisonment AFP Since the law was introduced, 165 people have been convicted of national security crimes, including under follow-up legislation in 2024 and colonial-era sedition laws AFP High-profile legal battles have not ended: the case of media tycoon Jimmy Lai (C) continues AFP Scores of pro-democracy and civil society groups, including trade unions and media outlets, have closed since 2020 AFP Infographic showing known prosecutions under Hong Kong's national security laws AFP
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
15 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Florida Republican Ridiculed for 'Islamophobic' Argument That New Yorkers Would Be Scared 'Living With a Muslim Mayor': 'Disgusting'
A Florida Republican is being ridiculed online for suggesting that New York residents would be scared "living with a Muslim mayor" following the results of the Democratic New York City mayoral primary. Angie Wong, a political commentator and Republican committee member from Miami, suggested that people were "concerned about their safety" if Democratic socialist candidate Zohran Mamdani, who won the Democratic primary on Tuesday, were to win the mayoral race later this year. "I'm hearing from various people here in New York and they're concerned about their safety living here with a Muslim mayor," Wong said during a discussion on CNN Thursday night. Wong's declaration was quickly met with pushback from several of the other panelists. "The idea that because he is Muslim, he is a threat to Jewish New Yorkers — is that really what you're saying?" CNN anchor Abby Phillip asked. "No, it's because of his anti-Israel rhetoric he's been putting out," Wong insisted. "But what does that have to do with him being Muslim?" Phillip pushed. "You can go after his policies but what does that have to do with his faith?" "It's not about his faith, it's because he is perpetuating this anti-Israeli rhetoric and New Yorkers are hearing it and they're scared. That's what I'm hearing back from friends," Wong said. Despite Wong's insistence that the assertion was based on what she had heard from locals, her declaration was met with backlash online, with several users accusing her of being "Islamophobic." "If it doesn't matter he's Muslim why'd you bring up his religion you bigots??" one user questioned . Another wrote , "This is Islamophobic. She said the quiet part out loud." "Not all people who are Muslim engage in criminal behavior. Good grief," one user lamented . One added , "People are just flat out disgusting." Mamdani, who is Muslim and Indian, beat former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who was favored to win, in the primary Tuesday. The Democratic socialist's success was met with heavy backlash from Republicans and MAGA supporters. The 33-year-old will go on to face off against Cuomo again in November, who reportedly plans to continue running as an independent, as well as current Mayor Eric Adams, who is also running as an independent, Republican candidate Curtis Sliwa and independent candidate Jim Walden. Originally published on Latin Times
Int'l Business Times
18 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Not Quite A Victory Lap: Rethinking The US–China Trade Agreement
The newly announced trade deal between the United States and China is being described as a breakthrough moment in what has been a rocky and prolonged economic standoff. Both sides are scaling back tariffs and promising a more stable trading relationship. But look a little deeper, and the picture becomes less about resolution—and more about damage control. This agreement isn't the end of a conflict. It's more like a timeout. Tariffs Rolled Back, But Still High One of the headline changes is that U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods are being lowered to 55%, while China has agreed to reduce its own import duties to around 10%. While these are improvements compared to the highs seen during the peak of the trade war, they're still steep by historical standards. As reported by CNBC, the long-term consequences of earlier tariff hikes—including supply chain disruption and sourcing shifts—have already reshaped how U.S. companies operate. Many manufacturers have moved operations to countries like Vietnam, Mexico or India. The latest deal doesn't undo that shift, and many industry analysts argue it likely won't. The Rare-Earth Factor: Strategic Access or Strategic Risk? A central pillar of the agreement is China's pledge to expand exports of rare-earth elements—critical materials used in electric vehicles, wind turbines, and most modern electronics. On the surface, this appears to be a major win for the U.S., which has been grappling with access to these minerals due to export restrictions and a lack of domestic processing capability. But the deal also underscores just how dependent the U.S. remains on China for these resources. According to a report by The Australian, China's decision to allow rare-earth exports comes with no long-term guarantees and no change in control over the global supply chain. In effect, the U.S. is securing short-term access without reducing its strategic vulnerability. No Real Fix for the Structural Divide What this agreement does not include is just as important as what it does: No binding framework on intellectual property protection No enforcement mechanism for subsidy transparency No tariff freeze beyond the next 90 days This lack of structural depth raises questions about the durability of the deal. As reported by Finance Magnates, many economists see the announcement as a political maneuver designed to calm markets ahead of further negotiations, rather than a resolution to long-standing economic tensions. What It Means for Businesses and Consumers For American consumers, this deal might bring a modest reprieve from price hikes on certain imported goods—especially electronics, tools, and industrial inputs. For businesses, the effects are more nuanced. Companies that rely on Chinese components could benefit from reduced tariffs, but the continued volatility and short time horizon (tariffs are up for reassessment in 90 days) mean long-term planning is still risky. Supply chain diversification efforts that began during the height of the trade conflict are unlikely to reverse. Instead, many firms may continue sourcing from alternative markets to hedge against future uncertainty. Final Word: A Deal, Yes—But Not a Resolution This deal represents a cooling-off period, not a cure. It de-escalates tensions and offers temporary relief, but leaves the deeper economic rifts between the U.S. and China unresolved. With additional trade discussions scheduled with India and the EU in July, and tariff reviews just weeks away, this agreement is best seen as a fragile pause—not a permanent peace.
DW
21 hours ago
- DW
India calls for 'permanent solution' in China border dispute – DW – 06/27/2025
The defense ministers of India and China discussed the decades-long territorial dispute between the two countries. The China-India border is the longest disputed frontier in the world. India said on Friday that it seeks a permanent solution to its longstanding border dispute with China. Indian Defense Minister Rajnath Singh made the comments in a meeting with his Chinese counterpart Dong Jun on the sidelines of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) defense ministers' meeting in China's Qingdao. The ministers held in-depth talks on the necessity to maintain peace along the Indo-China frontier, India's Defense Ministry said in a statement published Friday. Singh "acknowledged the work being undertaken by both sides to bring back semblance of normalcy in the bilateral relations. He highlighted the necessity of solving the complex issues through a structured roadmap of permanent engagement and de-escalation," the statement said. "Singh also stressed on border management and to have a permanent solution of border demarcation by rejuvenating the established mechanism on the issue," the statement said, in reference to previous talks between the two powers. "It is incumbent on both the sides to maintain this positive momentum and avoid adding new complexities in the bilateral relationship," Singh said in a post on social media platform X. The border between the two neighbors, called the Line of Actual Control (LAC), separates Chinese and Indian-held territories from Ladakh on the western side to Arunachal Pradesh in the east. The largely undemarcated frontier is the longest disputed land border in the world, sprawling across 3,488 kilometers (2,167 miles). The dispute goes back to claims made by the British Empire when it ruled India, claims that were inherited by India upon independence. Soldiers on both sides have adhered to longstanding protocols to avoid the use of any firearms. In 2020, clashes involving troops from both sides left 20 Indian and four Chinese soldiers dead, putting the relations between the two nuclear-armed countries under strain. Singh on Thursday called for "bridging the trust deficit" that was created after the standoff by "taking action on ground," the Indian Defense Ministry said. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
