Kubayi calls for law firms to withdraw their challenge against the Legal Sector Code
Image: Jairus Mmutle / GCIS
Justice and Constitutional Development Minister Mmamoloko Kubayi has urged major law firms to reconsider their legal challenge against the Legal Sector Code aimed at transforming the legal profession.
Responding to oral questions in the National Council of Provinces, Kubayi expressed her disappointment over the ongoing court challenge by Norton Rose Fulbright, AfriForum, and others.
'I raise the issue that if the companies that have taken us to court, such as Norton Rose Fulbright and others, could pull out of court because, to be honest with you, what we have here is an embarrassment 30 years down the line we are still talking about making sure that we can be able to bring those who were previously disadvantaged to the fore to participate,' she said.
Kubayi commented when she was asked whether any government-wide capacity and systems exist to monitor briefing patterns of attorneys or advocates by the state organs on litigations against the State.
In her response, she said her department does not have the government-wide capacity and systems to monitor the briefing and outsourcing of legal work patterns.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
'The department monitors the outsourcing and briefing patterns of cases outsourced to private practitioners through the Office of the State Attorneys (OSA) on behalf of the national and provincial spheres of government.'
Kubayi stated that municipalities and state-owned enterprises have their own systems of outsourcing legal work.
'The State Attorney Act, as amended, is silent on whether municipalities and state-owned enterprises are supposed to consume legal services from OSA or not.'
Kubayi explained that former Justice and Constitutional Development minister Ronald Lamola and the Legal Practice Council initiated in 2020 the process for the development of a transformation sector code.
The process was guided by the Broad-based Black Economic Empowerment Act, and it culminated in the adoption of the proposed Legal Sector Code in February 2021.
The Legal Sector Code is aimed at transforming the briefing patterns in favour of the previously disadvantaged legal practitioners, and was gazetted on September 20, 2024.
Kubayi said the Legal Sector Code was currently being legally challenged through the courts by the big law firms led by Norton Rose Fulbright.
She further said the Legal Sector Code provided for the establishment of the Legal Sector Code Charter Council (LSCCC) by the Ministry to monitor outsourcing targets for private and public institutions to improve participation of historically disadvantaged practitioners and law firms in the legal sector.
'The briefing patterns for the public and private sectors will be monitored by the LSCCC with the assistance of the Solicitor General's office.'
Kubayi also said it was important to be transparent in the manner they did the briefing patterns but also be accountable because some of the issues touched on corruption where people would want to charge more for services but did not deliver.
'When I met with the law Society of South African and black professionals in the sector, the issue was raised that we have got to be able to hold each other accountable.'
She noted that she got lashed out by ministers complaining that OSA allocated a particular advocate who could not argue their case, and as a result, lost the court case.
'I will do a preparatory meeting or engagement with my colleagues in national government, but another issue is to do a roadshow to provincial executives, sit with them and make them understand why sometimes we have a lot of money that we are spending on litigation when we are not supposed to. That is one of the areas that we need to be working on, and we'll continue to improve on it.'
Kubayi also said one of her tasks was to ensure that black advocates were not only briefed by the state, but were paid on time.
'I still get a lot of people saying, I've done work, 30 days have passed, 60 days have passed, I've not been paid. That's one of the critical areas that is important, because if we do not pay them on time, they will not be able to sustain themselves.'
mayibongwe.maqhina@inl.co.za
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mail & Guardian
7 days ago
- Mail & Guardian
Making the register of sex offenders public vital for tackling GBVF rates
There needs to be a balance between protecting privacy and saving lives as South Africa debates publicising its sex offender registry It seems this collective plea did not fall on deaf ears as, at the beginning of 2025, Justice and Constitutional Development Minister Mmamoloko Kubayi stated that the The laws in question include the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act 32 of 2007, specifically, section 52, which emphasises confidentiality regarding the information on the registry, as well as stating that disclosing that information would be an illegal act subject to a conviction. To get around this, At the core of this hesitance to publicise the register is the issue of privacy. Making it public would violate offenders' right to privacy as the public would be able to access their information. Because of this, the register is, and has always been private, with the exception of employers making applications to vet potential or current employees, especially those working with children. Along with this hesitation is the quest to find the balance between upholding the offenders' right to privacy and protecting vulnerable people, which is the aim of the register. While the right to life is absolute, the other can be waived under certain circumstances, and An example of prioritisation of lives would be While South Africans have been assured that publicising the registry will happen — it is just a matter of getting around the legal matters — citizens are growing weary, hoping this is not another instance of denied justice as the number of lives claimed by GBVF keeps growing. One thing South Africans have proved to have, transmitted across generations, is the tenacity to fight. Led by the NGO Women for Change, on 11 April 2025, a protest was held at the Union Buildings in Pretoria to deliver a petition with more than 150 000 signatures to Deputy Minister in the Presidency For Women, Youth and Persons with Disabilities Mmapaseka Steve Letsike. This petition, along with a memorandum, called for In their attempt to find the balance between protecting offenders' right to privacy and the right to life, Kubayi and her department must also work on the accuracy of the register, with the minister stating in March 2025 that it contained 32 557 There have been questions regarding whether these figures are accurate, bearing in mind that South Africa has one of the highest rates of GBVF in the world. As Build One South Africa deputy leader Livhuwani Malelelo is a freelance writer.
IOL News
30-06-2025
- IOL News
DA slams R100k taxpayer-funded legal bill for magistrate's protection
The Minister of Justice has continued to evade the real question as to why a legally trained person is assisted to the tune of R100 143.68 to obtain a protection order against journalists, says the writer. The Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development continues to defend a shocking display of state overreach and misuse of public funds as revealed by a DA parliamentary question. The Department spent over R100k of public money on a personal protection order for a magistrate, when the magistrate herself could have attended to this administrative task. The DA will be writing to the minister, demanding that the magistrate pay back this wasted money. Last year, Magistrate Ezra Morrison sought a protection order against journalists who reported on the magistrate's failure to refer a child, now accused of the murder of Deveney Nel, to the Children's Court when he was a minor. He was accused of raping an 11 year old girl when he was 13 and was found by psychiatrists to be a danger to society and at high risk of reoffending. Despite this warning, nothing was done. In reply to a question posed by the DA, the Minister of Justice has continued to evade the real question as to why a legally trained person is assisted to the tune of R100 143.68 to obtain a protection order against journalists. The minister attempted to justify this gross abuse of funds by claiming that the matter was 'intrinsically linked' to the magistrate's professional duties. What is worse is that costs are for consultations, drafting, formal appearances and settlement. Not only are these prices seriously inflated, but these are all things the magistrate could have done herself for a personal matter. Seeking a protection order is something thousands of vulnerable South Africans are forced to navigate alone every day in terms of the Protection from Harassment Act and the Domestic Violence Act. The two Acts are intended to prevent domestic abuse and harassment, provide safety and security to complainants and their dependents and are specifically designed to be accessible and victim-centred. Magistrate Morrison's application to obtain such an order against journalists is a private matter and not a state function, whichever way you look at it. The DA finds it deeply disturbing that R100 143.68 was spent on an advocate's fees when the Magistrate could have simply attended at the Clerk of the Court and completed the requisite forms. Yet, the minister failed to address this question in her response and only provided vague answers with no proof that this warranted a protection order or an explanation as to why the matter was not referred to the Press Ombud. While the most vulnerable in our society – women, children and the poor – sit in long queues waiting for overwhelmed clerks and backlogged courts, the minister affords preferential treatment for the legal elite. The DA will be pursuing further accountability through parliamentary channels, including demanding that the Magistrate pay the money back to the state. Nicholas Gotsell MP DA NCOP Member on Security & Justice
IOL News
24-06-2025
- IOL News
Repossessed homes sold for R100— South Africa's big banks will front the courts in R60bn lawsuit
Some of the largest banks in the country are finally set to face legal action in February 2026 when a R60 billion class action lawsuit against them goes to court. Image: Independent Media / Ron AI Some of the largest banks in the country are finally set to face legal action in February 2026 when a R60 billion class action lawsuit against them goes to court. Hundreds of former homeowners allege their properties were unlawfully repossessed and sold below market value. The case, filed in 2017, is set to go to court in February 2026. Some homeowners reportedly had their homes auctioned for as little as 10% of their market value, resulting in homelessness and destitution. The case names the four largest banks in the country Absa, Nedbank, Standard Bank, and FirstRand, as well as the National Credit Regulator, the Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development Mmamoloko Kubayi, and the South African Human Rights Commission. Before the case can proceed, the court must determine whether the group of plaintiffs qualifies for class action status, which would allow them to sue collectively. IOL previously reported that once the class action is certified, it is hoped that things will run much faster and that the banks will then pay the hundreds of claimants who are now in dire financial need after losing their homes. 'No one thinks what they have been doing - in some cases selling homes for as little as R100 - is okay. They should pay these people back,' Advocate Douglas Shaw at told IOL earlier this year. Last year the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) led by Julius Malema also endorsed the 'long overdue' class action lawsuit against banks for their 'predatory and exploitative practices' which the party says has left hundreds of poor, primarily black South Africans homeless and destitute 'The class members argue that the bank's sales in execution were not only unnecessary in many cases but also represented a grave violation of their rights, as these properties were their primary residences and were sold at far below market value, destroying their savings and security," the party said. IOL also previously reported that the banks are challenging the case and say they have done nothing wrong. [email protected] IOL Business Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel
