Why has electoral reform support reached record high in UK?
This change is backed by a majority of supporters of all parties and by those with low levels of trust and confidence in government.
The figure represents a staggering increase of 33% since 2011, when less than a third of people wanted to change the system.
READ MORE: Here's what we learned from John Curtice's new polling report
A report – compiled by Professor John Curtice, Alex Scholes and Aisha Chabdu and entitled Britain's Democracy: A Health Check – shows how just 36% of people are now happy with the first past the post voting system staying as it is.
The authors concluded voters seemed to feel the choice between Labour and the Tories at the General Election was 'a choice between Tweedledum and Tweedledee'.
For the first time, more than half of people (53%) say they would prefer a coalition running the UK than a one-party government (41%).
It comes after the Labour Party managed to secure a huge majority of MPs in the Commons last July despite winning just over a third of the vote.
Willie Sullivan, senior director of campaigns for the Electoral Reform Society, said the General Election in 2024 was the 'most disproportional ever' and clearly showed people are now voting in a multi-party way.
He said: 'Public support to change the electoral system has hit a record 60%, according to the latest British Social Attitudes survey, showing a clear majority want to ditch Westminster's distorting First Past the Post system.
'This surge in support comes after last year's general election was the most disproportional ever, meaning the current Parliament least represents how the whole country voted of any in history.
'The general election and this year's local elections also showed that people are clearly voting in a multi-party way, and we now need a proportional voting system that accurately represents how they are voting with the MPs they get at Westminster.
'Having a fair and accurate voting system is a crucial step to restoring trust in politics, which the latest BSA results also alarmingly found has slumped to a record low.'
The below graph shows how people's attitudes towards the voting system have changed, with a dramatic shift forming over the past five years.
(Image: British Social Attitudes Survey) Despite Labour clinching this landslide victory, the survey suggests there has only been a slight decline since 2023 in Labour supporters' backing for electoral reform, with 55% still in favour of change.
The survey also showed just 12% trust governments to put the interests of the nation above those of their own party 'just about always or most of the time' – which is a record low.
Only 19% think the system of governing Britain needs little or no improvement.
In its conclusion, the report says the survey has 'left some significant questions hanging over the continued health of Britain's traditional system of democracy' with the authors suggesting many voters felt the choice between Labour and the Tories was like 'a choice between Tweedledum and Tweedledee'.
It said: 'What the election does appear to have done is to provide an opportunity for some voters to express their discontent by voting for parties that posed an unprecedentedly strong challenge to the country's traditional, limited panoply of political parties.
'Those with low levels of trust and confidence were markedly more likely to vote for Reform or the Greens, thereby helping to push the share of the vote won by the Conservatives and Labour combined to a record low.
'For many, the choice between the two parties of government looked too much like a choice between Tweedledum and Tweedledee.'
READ MORE: Corbyn-led party would attract 10 per cent of vote, poll says
The traditional demographic division between middle and working-class voters that had long provided the foundation of support for the Conservatives and Labour respectively showed 'no signs of re-emerging', the report said, with voters age and educational background mattering much more.
The authors warned that while the debate on electoral reform is important, people should not jump to conclusions that changing the voting system would restore faith in government.
'We should be wary of anticipating that changing the electoral system would prove sufficient to restore voters' faith in how they are being governed,' the report said.
'Ultimately, they are looking for more effective government than they feel they have enjoyed in recent years, not least in respect of the economy and public services. The key question ultimately facing Britain's democracy is whether it can deliver.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
14 minutes ago
- The Independent
Labour must stand firm and resist trade union pressure
The government clashed twice with trade unions in the past week and demonstrated its independence from the movement from which the Labour Party arose but to which it must never be beholden. Activists attending the 'policy' conference of Unite, the trade union, voted to suspend Angela Rayner, the deputy prime minister, from membership of the union, because they blame her for failing to settle the Birmingham bins dispute. By seeking to use the leverage of a personal attack, they undermined their comrades' cause. Ms Rayner is a proud trade unionist who owes her start in politics to the success she made of her role as a Unison union representative of care workers. Her Unite membership was a paper one, and she says she had already given it up. She was rightly disdainful of Unite's pettiness and the Birmingham dispute is probably further from resolution as a result. If the case against the workforce changes in Birmingham is as strong as Sharon Graham, the general secretary of Unite, says it is, it should not need the attempted intimidation of government ministers to fight it. Meanwhile, Ms Rayner's cabinet colleague Wes Streeting, the health secretary, is engaged in a different disagreement with another trade union, and one of national significance. He settled the dispute with junior hospital doctors, now called resident doctors, when Labour took office last year. The doctors secured a bigger pay rise than other public sector employees. It was a generous deal, which The Independent criticised because it did not include any commitment on the part of doctors to more efficient ways of working. Doctors could look forward to several years of favourable treatment, by which their pay would continue to catch up after the real-terms decline of the Conservative years. Instead, the British Medical Association has balloted its members on strike action in pursuit of a 'non-negotiable' demand for a 29 per cent pay rise. In that ballot an overwhelming majority of those voting supported strikes, but the strike option still failed to secure the support of a majority of those entitled to vote. As a result, public opinion is opposed to the strikes, in contrast to last year's dispute when the doctors' case was supported. Alan Johnson, the former health secretary and a former union leader himself, tells The Independent: 'This has all the signs of the BMA leading their troops into a battle they can't win – nor should they, given that government has honoured the pay review recommendations in full having settled last year's dispute immediately on taking office.' Mr Johnson is right when he says: 'This is a battle Wes Streeting has to win.' The Independent is not anti-union, despite the circumstances of its birth in the 1980s, which was enabled by the breaking of the power of the print unions in the newspaper industry. We believe that unions have a valuable role in supporting and defending their members. We have our reservations about some of the measures in Ms Rayner's Employment Rights Bill, and think it was right to postpone implementation of some of the most contentious of them until at least 2027. But there is nothing wrong with unions seeking to influence that legislation and calling on the common bonds of history to persuade Labour ministers of their arguments. But in the end, ministers must decide. They can take account of representations made by trade unions, but they should not be bullied, either by personal gestures or by industrial action. Ms Rayner and Mr Streeting must stand firm.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Britain does not need an Islamophobia law, existing rules work
As the founder and former director of Tell MAMA, I have experience of working with the Crown Prosecution Service on the prosecution of cases of anti-Muslim hatred, including working with the CPS on a six-year harassment campaign that I endured and which finally led to a prosecution. I am speaking as someone who has many years of practical experience of combatting anti-Muslim hate. This is something that cannot be said of all the members of the Labour-appointed Working Group on Islamophobia. How the group defines anti-Muslim hate will have profound ramifications. Its recommendations risk strengthening bad actors within Muslim communities who want to create a chilling effect on free speech. I know full well that existing laws are robust enough to prosecute genuine Islamophobes. They are used effectively by police forces up and down this country. What is needed is better enforcement of existing laws, not new speech codes. The Working Group on Islamophobia will have you believe that its work is similar to that of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of anti-Semitism produced by academics, legal scholars and representatives of Jewish organisations. But it is not. The IHRA definition was not handed down by a government, but was a grassroots initiative developed by non-governmental organisations. The reason for the current Islamophobia drive is simple. Labour is trying to provide a symbolic sop to British Muslim communities after suffering significant electoral losses in some strongly Muslim seats at the last election. Members of the Working Group have suggested that anti-Muslim hate is racialised. This is only part of the picture. Tell MAMA data, covering the last 13 years, demonstrate that this is not true in the majority of cases, although it certainly is in some. I know that campaigning groups have been calling for Islamophobia to be recognised and recorded as being both racially and religiously aggravated, thereby melding the two separate aggravating factors. But the law is clear – Sikhs and Jews can be regarded as both a racial and religious group. This is simply not the case with Muslims since they do not constitute a single racial group and come from across the world. When we drill down into the laws on incitement to racial hatred, it is clear that racially aggravated offences are deemed different from religiously aggravated ones. The CPS guidance is unambiguous on this. If there are no racially aggravating comments, materials or actions, then the case should not be classed as such. Whatever definition Dominic Grieve and his group come up with will be caveated in a long report that will more than likely make the argument that many cases of Islamophobia or anti-Muslim hate have a racial hatred component to them. But since Muslims are not a race this, by definition, cannot be the case. With a sleight of the hand, they will seek to confuse and project the view that race and religion both automatically play a part in the targeting of Muslims. We must call them out on this, and the CPS must push back on the claim with some vigour. If we, as the public, do not wake up, we may be looking at more people being cancelled or even criminalised in the future. We cannot allow that to happen.
Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Voters have clocked something about Farage - but Welsh Labour chief is 'worried'
Wales' First Minister Eluned Morgan says Labour risks being taken for granted after being in power so long - but there's still something about Nigel Farage that voters don't like Reform UK pose a serious threat to Labour but voters are clocking Nigel Farage 's patronising view of Wales, the First Minister said. Eluned Morgan admitted she was 'seriously worried' by the surge in support for the right-wing party ahead of next year's crunch Senedd elections. She said Labour risks being taken for granted after being in power for so long but warned that things like free prescriptions, hospital car parking, and free bus travel for over 65s weren't guaranteed. She said: "There's lots of things like that that we have that people just assume are going to continue. "We're trying - in the light of the fact we have got elections next year - to remind people that these things could be lost. 'These are political choices." On Reform, she said: "I'm seriously worried about the threat that they pose and it's not just about their ability to run a country. "We've been here before in Wales, so Nigel Farage's party were elected to the Senedd before, they had seven members elected as Ukip. "By the end of the parliament, six of them had left the party to join three different parties. "We've seen them close up before, and it's not pretty. When the rubber hits the road, when it comes to Reform, it all falls apart." She said Reform's plans for Elon Musk-style efficiency savings in local councils would mean cutting public sector jobs. And she accused the party of wanting to introduce health insurance after Mr Farage repeatedly suggested he wanted to re-examine the NHS funding model. She said: "People need to understand what's at stake if they vote for Reform." Reform recently said it was committed to keeping the NHS free at the point of delivery and free prescriptions. Mr Farage doesn't know the first thing about Wales, she said, pointing to his recent call to reopen domestic coal mines. She said: "I would be very surprised if you could find anyone who worked in the coal mines in the past who wanted their grandchildren to go down the pits. "That is somebody who doesn't understand and who hasn't watched somebody struggling to breathe as a result of emphysema, who hasn't had to live next door to an open cast coal area where they are breathing in particles. "Then to suggest he's going to come in and reopen the blast furnace is absolutely illiterate in terms of understanding how the steel sector works - and that's starting to be clocked by people in Wales. "To come in and patronise us with this very old fashioned view of Wales is something that I hope people will start to realise is not appropriate for our country."
