EXCLUSIVE Welcome to the PIP capital of the UK where one in THREE people claim the benefit
With its bootcamp fitness classes, basketball court, football pitches and well-used running track, Victoria Park in Plymouth is an unlikely home to Britain's highest level of disability benefits claimants.
But shocking new analysis has found one in three of the area's working-age residents receives Personal Independence Payments, designed to support those with long term health conditions or disabilities.
MailOnline has scrutinised data from the Department of Work and Pensions that shows almost 33 per cent (1,336) of its 3,940 residents in this bracket are on the handout.
The park itself is a popular area for young families with well-maintained and recently refurbished Victorian terraced homes, neighbourhood watch signs and thriving independent cafes and restaurants nearby.
But just a few streets away MailOnline found addicts and alcoholics - and residents who say they are sick of seeing their taxes abused.
The council 'ward' known as St. Peter and the Waterfront is the most deprived area of the Devon coastal city and is ranked in the top 1% of most disadvantaged districts in England.
According to the city's Labour-run council, residents have a life expectancy of 77 years, roughly 7.5 years less than the city's least deprived area.
It also has high rates of smoking, childhood obesity and emergency hospital admissions.
Local resident Mary Leigh, 56, who started receiving PIP earlier this year after a heart attack stopped her working as a taxi driver said she sees high levels of benefits abuse in the area.
She said: 'It doesn't surprise me at all that this is the highest area in the country for claimants - I am sure a lot of people around here are claiming but don't need it.
'There are a lot of drug and alcohol problems in this area and you see all the users sitting about all day spending their benefits.
'They are proud of not having to work - like the rest of us are suckers.
'Unfortunately some of the people that really need benefits are going to suffer.
'I have just started receiving PIP myself having paid taxes all my life, after my heart attack I used all my savings in a year trying to get back to health and I'm hoping to one day go back to work.
'I think particularly young people need to be given more incentive to work, there's enough jobs that need doing, look at the state of the parks or the street. I'd like to see them get out and pick litter to earn their doll money.'
Antique dealer Simon Platt, 37, who has run a shop near Victoria Park for four years, said: 'I hate to say it but I think a lot of the problem is wokeism.
'Older people might've had a lot of mental health issues but they just got on with it.
'People are very quick to sign on and it seems to be quite easy. I used to be pro-Labour but they're not for the working people any more.
'Instead of giving people money they should bring in some form of support to help people into work. I'd like to see the money spent from the cuts on more apprenticeships and more jobs.'
Cafe worker Ollie Mason, 30, said: 'You walk around the streets in the morning and people are walking like zombies because they are on something.
'There are a lot of drugs in the area and a lot of businesses around here are getting robbed constantly.
'There are always people getting mugged in the park.'
As well as Plymouth being the capital for PIP payments, neighbourhoods within Newcastle-upon-Tyne and Stockton-on-Tees have similarly high rates.
Critics of Labour 's ballooning £143billion welfare bill said the figures should act as a 'wake up call' for the Government.
The analysis comes after Keir Starmer completed a humiliating backtrack on his flagship welfare reforms package at the eleventh hour, following sustained pressure from over 120 MPs.
The initial package of reforms was mooted to save around £5billion by the end of the Parliament and included a restriction on the eligibility for PIP.
Existing claimants were to be given a 13-week phase-out period of financial support in an earlier move that was seen as a bid to head off opposition by aiming to soften the impact of the changes.
It's understood now that around 370,000 existing PIP claimants will be able to keep their payments.
But the change on PIP is estimated to wipe up to £2billion off the £5billion savings by the end of the Parliament, and Universal Credit tweaks another £1billion.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves is odds-on to hike taxes to pay for the financial shortfall, experts have said.
If the legislation clears its first hurdle on Tuesday, it will then face a few hours' examination by all MPs the following week – rather than days or weeks in front of a committee tasked with looking at the Bill.
PIP can be paid even to people who are working, have savings or are getting most other benefits.
It is not means tested, tax-free and currently doled out to around 3.6million people across England, Wales and Northern Ireland.
The Labour Government is working on a plan to tighten eligibility for the payments.
Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall confirmed earlier this month that the government will overhaul the points system so a claimant must score 4 points in a single activity such as washing or dressing rather than eight points in total.
People with less severe conditions will also need to be re-assessed more often.
The proposals could see 800,000 people losing access to PIP.
But there is strong resistance from MPs are trying to block the bill as well as mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, who claims it would 'destroy the financial safety net' for millions of people.
Local resident James Walker, 52, told MailOnline he hasn't been able to work since he was 18 and currently receives £733 per month higher rate PIP due to his epilepsy, depression, anxiety, agoraphobia and COPD in addition to his £366 universal credit.
He said: 'I think the cuts are outrageous, that would really affect me in a lot of ways.
'I struggle to get by even on the higher rate of PIP so my quality of life would take a massive fall if they took that away.
'It's not enough money to live on once I have paid my £63 rent, electric, gas, council tax and water
'Labour is supposed to look after vulnerable people but Starmer is just a Conservative in a red tie.
'I know there are a lot of people exploiting PIP and I would like them to make it tougher for those people but not people who genuinely need it.'
Unemployed former florist Julie Glanville, 52, said she doesn't claim PIP but believes there are numerous fraudulent claims made.
He said: 'They need to weed out the ones taking advantage who don't want to work.
'It makes it harder for the people who genuinely need help.
'There are a lot of people in this area struggling and that need help but don't get it and a lot that don't need it.
'The whole system seems back to front sometimes.'
According to Plymouth City Council figures over 57,000 residents in the city meet the Equality Act definition of having a disability.
With about 12% of residents having their day-to-day activities limited a little, and 9% have them limited a lot.
According to the ONS the total number of benefit claimants rose to 5,985 in March 2024, up from 5,500 in March 2023.
Minicab driver Chris Kawka said: 'It's definitely not the best area to live in and there are always a lot of people hanging out in the park during the day.
'I don't know whether they really deserve that money or need it.
'People speak about this in my taxi all the time that you can get given more for not working than for working.
'I would like to see the government spend that money on programmes to get people back on their feet and back into work.'
Meanwhile Byker East in Newcastle-upon-Tyne, a universal credit hotspot, has the second highest rate of PIP claimants - 1,453 out of 4,278, almost 32 per cent.
The Central Stockton & Portrack region of Stockton-on-Tees came in third at 30.5 per cent, or 1,323 out of 4,340.
These are the only three areas where the PIP rate among working-aged people is over 30 per cent.
However in 58 areas across England, the rate is more than one in five.
Fifty four of these are across the North East, West and Yorkshire and the Humber, and four - Weston Bournville in Somerset, Augusta Park in Test Valley, Hartcliffe in Bristol and number one-ranked Victoria Park - spread across the South.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
2 hours ago
- Times
Times letters: Tying hospital funds to patient satisfaction
Write to letters@ Sir, There is a big difference between motivation and financial incentives ('Hospitals' funds tied to patient satisfaction', news, Jun 28). Most health and other professionals are primarily motivated by wanting to make a difference in the world and have an impact in their chosen field. They are not indifferent to money, but are far more likely to be demotivated by lack of money than motivated by financial rewards. Improved technology and better systems are vital, but the NHS is essentially a people-based service. The new NHS plan will only succeed if the people who have to implement it are personally committed to doing so — providing the extra discretionary effort and passion that money can't buy. The NHS plan of 2000 was similarly far-reaching: it enjoyed enormous support from many NHS professionals and organisations and kickstarted the major improvements of the following CrispChief executive of NHS England and permanent secretary of the Department of Health 2000-06 Sir, It's hard to see how cutting the income of a poorly performing NHS trust will result in its treating its unfortunate patients better: the reverse is far more likely. A fairer and more intelligent policy would be to replace the managers of badly run trusts with others who have a track record of serving the public ParlourLincoln Sir, Too often elaborate and expensive plans are made without any patient involvement. If the ten-year NHS plan is to be successful then patient representation on every single 'change' project should be encouraged. The patients' voice needs to be clear and loud, so as to have a real impact on future Mabs ChowdhuryConsultant dermatologist, Cardiff Sir, To achieve success during the 20-plus years that I was a clinical director in an NHS commissioning group, I spent my life explaining to the non-clinical managers why their initial ideas might not work for clinicians. Labour's suggestion will only work if the managers are willing clinicians who know the system; to think otherwise is folly. One need only look at what happened when the pandemic struck, and managers abandoned ship to the doctors and nurses, to realise Shelley HaylesOxford Sir, You report that patients will decide how much hospitals are paid by rating their treatment and that an improved NHS app will give patients more choice over who treats them and where. On the first issue there has never been a problem with staff motivation but there has been a perennial one with facilities provided (namely, operating theatres, beds and equipment) — which is hardly the responsibility of those providing the care. On the second issue there have been many studies to show that patients prefer local treatment, where any complications can be dealt with promptly by the same team and overall travel kept to a minimum. These proposals will be ineffective and wasteful. Instead we need to eliminate inefficiency and provide adequate facilities for a professional workforce that should be trusted and not treated like difficult ThomasRet'd consultant orthopaedic surgeon, Itchen Stoke, Hants Sir, I enjoyed Ben Macintyre's account of Anglo-Iranian relations ('Iranian distrust of the British runs deep', Jun 28) but I fear he is too accepting of some of the propagandist claims regularly made by the Islamic Republic. He omits to mention British support for the Constitutional Revolution between 1905 and 1909, particularly the role played by the extraordinary Philo-Persian Cambridge scholar and activist Edward Browne. He might also have recalled Lord Curzon's intense interest in the country. He cites British support for Reza Khan in 1921, but after the chaos of the previous ten years many Iranians welcomed the stability he brought. Macintyre claims that Mohammad Mosaddegh was 'left-leaning'. He was certainly reformist and nationalist, but he came from an old Qajar family and had been a high functionary in the last days of the dynasty, suggesting paternalism rather than socialism. We and the Americans were certainly involved in his overthrow. But that would not have happened if substantial elements in the army, the religious establishment and the population at large had not supported the Shah. Finally, the present regime is well aware of the decline in our international influence. They shout loudly about us not because they believe we are really capable of damaging them but because it is helpful to them in rallying nationalist John JenkinsFormer British ambassador to Syria, Iraq and Saudi Arabia; Matfield, Kent Sir, Ben Macintyre's article brought back memories from the late 1960s, when an Iranian student friend told me that in Iran, should someone trip over a stone, you could be sure that an Englishman had put it AlbrightRottingdean, Brighton & Hove Sir, As a teacher I found that gaining the trust and support of parents whose children who were a threat to good order in school was enough to resolve the problem. Jenni Russell's comment piece ('Fear of knives is destroying the social order' Jun 28) reminds us that the more young men carry knives, the more others feel forced to do so. When teenagers appear in court charged with knife crimes their parents are not obliged to attend. These are the people who have brought these young people into the world and have engaged with the responsibility of bringing them up. Owners of dangerous dogs can appear in court; why not the parents of dangerous teenagers? Then courts could demand their co-operation and InsonEast Mersea, Essex Sir, I was much impressed by Jenni Russell's views on the disturbance of social order by petty crimes. Perhaps two days in supervised stocks might provide an effective solution; why waste money on incarceration when the low-cost public shame and indignity of this suffered by offenders might well make them mend their ways within a very short time?Peter HardymentCobham, Surrey Parliament's lingo Sir, The proposed 'inclusive' makeover to parliament's 'outdated' language must be resisted ('Division bell rings for 'confusing' parliamentary terms', news, Jun 28). Such an unnecessary change is likely to be irreversible, and is yet another damning example of the Labour government's contempt for tradition and also its utmost uninterest in maintaining high standards of literacy for the future. The perverse logic underpinning this decision will no doubt have deleterious ripple effects in the education sector further down the line. The literary canon will not be taught in schools on the grounds that the 'confusing' language in these texts 'alienates' students; resultant successive generations of university students will be less willing and able to read; and the longer-term ability for students and academics to engage critically with literature — let alone write about it elegantly — will decline and fall. Edward Gibbon will be turning in his Edward HowellOxford Two-tier justice Sir, Lord Hermer, the attorney-general, describes the claim that there exists a two-tier justice system in this country as 'offensive' (Jun 28). But there is indeed a two-tier system, as justice is available only to those eligible for legal aid and those to whom the cost of it all is immaterial. The great majority of the population comes into neither category. Lawyers are fond of repeating that justice delayed is justice denied: it is also the case that justice too-expensive-to-be-afforded is also justice Davies-HumphreysChester Sir, Tim Davie's advice to employees to avoid conflict with friends and family over Gaza is no doubt well intentioned ('BBC staff told not to fight with family and friends over Gaza coverage', Jun 26). Given the BBC's Glastonbury coverage of Bobby Vylan's chant of 'death to the IDF', why should employees feel unable to defend their employer? If they are uncomfortable doing so, should they not seek to change the organisation from within — or alternatively consider whether they should change their employer?Andrew LeslauHenley-on-Thames, Oxon Sir, If, as reported (Jun 27), disability benefit changes will now apply only to new claimants, it is questionable whether the same criteria should not have been applied to the imposition of VAT on school fees, thereby preventing the enforced displacement of thousands of WellingsHalesowen, W Midlands Sir, Further to your report ('Give 65-year-olds MoT 'to keep them living at home' '), as a 67-year-old who plays hockey and cricket at club and international age group level, erects the marquees for the village fête, cleans the local church using an extendable ladder and goes mountain biking on Salisbury Plain, am I allowed to question the age criteria of the proposed care home assessment?Mark BanhamBeechingstoke, Wilts Sir, Regarding people dining alone being given a bad table (Notebook), the trick is, when entering, to ask for a table for two and order a glass of wine right away, 'While I wait for my friend'. When it comes, smile apologetically, pick up your phone and say you've just learnt that your friend can't make it and you'll be eating alone. You'll never be asked to JohnstoneLondon NW1 Sir, Dafydd Thomas's letter (Jun 28) reminded me of a dinner party in Nashville at which I was the only one of the 12 guests who did not carry a gun. The hostess said that she advised her children when returning home late to shout up 'It's only me, Mother'. Otherwise, she said, 'I'll shoot 'em'.Averil MansfieldLondon W2 Sir, Your editorial (Jun 28) accuses the M&S Red Diamond Strawberry and Creme sandwich of 'desecrating' the legacy of the 4th Earl of Sandwich, thus perpetuating the legend that the Earl created the delicacy. The Romans, among others, might contest that claim. The first Earl of Sandwich, however, whose scorched remains, recognisable only by his clothing and medals, were washed ashore after his ship was set on fire at the Battle of Solebay in 1672, could lay claim to the dubious honour of being history's first example of a 'toasted' CooteErith, Kent Write to letters@
BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
Covid inquiry begins examination of impact on social care sector
The Covid inquiry will start examining the impact of the pandemic on care services for elderly and disabled people on Monday. Bereaved families say they have been waiting for this moment for years, describing the way Covid swept through care homes as one of the clearest and most devastating failures of the pandemic. Nearly 46,000 care home residents died with Covid in England and Wales between March 2020 and January 2022, many of them in the early weeks of the pandemic. The government says it supports the inquiry and is committed to learning lessons from it. There are key questions families and care staff want answering, including why the decision was made in March 2020 to rapidly discharge some hospital patients into care blame this, in part, for seeding the virus into care homes in the early stages of the are also questions about blanket "do not resuscitate" notices being placed on some care home residents by medical services, and about visiting policies which prevented families seeing their loved ones for months."It was an awful, awful time," says Maureen Lewis, manager of St Ives Lodge care home in northeast home cares for up to 35 people, many of whom have dementia. When we visited earlier this month, some of the residents were sitting round a table in the dining area, making brightly coloured collages of flower baskets. Staff and residents sat cheek by jowl chatting to each other. This was a huge contrast to our first visit on 15 April 2020. Then, staff were dressed head to toe in protective suits, their faces covered by masks. It was three weeks after the UK locked down to try to stop Covid spreading. Despite this, St Ives Lodge had just lost six residents in a week."That was the hardest. And that was right at the very beginning of Covid," Maureen remembers. The ones they couldn't saveWhat guidance did care homes get? On 17 April 2020 the number of deaths in care homes reached its peak, with 540 people dying in England and Wales in one Ives Lodge had locked down in mid March, but a resident who had returned from hospital developed Covid symptoms. Those who sat at the same dining table as him quickly showed the same signs. They died within seven days of each other. The home later lost another resident to the the time, Maureen described how doctors and district nurses refused to come in, how care homes struggled to get protective equipment (PPE) and there was no helpful guidance from government."We were like a mini hospital," she told BBC News, "dealing with end-of-life care... Googling what to do". It was an experience described by many other care home managers who felt abandoned by the government and NHS in the early months of the pandemic. Looking back, Maureen says: "There were no protocols, no testing and [the NHS] was basically getting rid of any residents back to care homes. They were discharged as normal, but we were in a pandemic."She wants the inquiry to find out why such decisions were made, and she wants those in positions of responsibility held to remains angry with the former Health and Social Care Secretary, Matt Hancock, for his statement on 15 May 2020, that the government had "thrown a protective ring around care homes". "There was no ring of protection for care homes at all," she says. "He needs to take accountability for the decisions he made." Mr Hancock is due to give evidence within the next few days. It will be his seventh, and likely final Jean Adamson, the evidence which will be heard at the inquiry over the coming weeks will be the most important father, Aldrick, died with Covid on 15 April 2020. The last time she saw him was when, whilst she stood outside, she glimpsed him through the window of his care home a few days before he passed away. She was devastated she could not be at his side."We weren't allowed to say goodbye to him, to hold his hand," she says. "It's an experience that will stay with me forever. There is no grief like it."She too has questions about the policy of discharging patients to care homes. On 17 March 2020 the NHS sent a letter to all hospitals telling them to free up beds. Over the next four weeks, an estimated 25,000 patients were discharged into care homes many were not tested for Covid. On 2 April 2020, the government advised "negative [Covid] tests are not required" before patients were discharged into care was changed on 15 April 2020, the day Aldrick Adamson died. New government guidance said anyone discharged from hospital to a care setting would be tested first. Jean Adamson believes patients who arrived at her father's care home from hospital could have seeded the virus there. Other factors such as staff moving between care homes and the spread of the virus in the general community will have played a part but, she says, the rapid discharge of patients to care homes without them being tested or isolated was a choice. "It was a reckless decision," she says. "The way that my father and tens of thousands of other care home residents were sacrificed. It really gets me because I think it smacks of ageism and disability discrimination."In the five years since her father's death she has become an active member of the campaign group, Covid-19 Bereaved Families for Justice says the group wants the inquiry to look at the ban on care home visits that kept families apart for also want answers to why some people were "routinely placed on do not attempt resuscitation orders [DNARs]", without discussion with relatives or an assessment."There was an abuse of the do not attempt resuscitation policy. We need to understand how that came about," she inquiry will also examine the difficulties faced by care workers who supported people in their own phase is expected to last five weeks, with the report not due until next both Maureen Lewis and Jean Adamson the memories of the pandemic remain traumatic and both say what they want now is the truth."We need to understand so that we can learn lessons going forward for when we have the next pandemic and what happened here should never happen again," says would like more recognition of how care services survived without much help. In future, she says: "There needs to be more investment" and better planning for emergencies.
The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
Patients with common eye condition face sight loss due to care delays
Get the free Morning Headlines email for news from our reporters across the world Sign up to our free Morning Headlines email Sign up to our free Morning Headlines email Email * SIGN UP I would like to be emailed about offers, events and updates from The Independent. Read our Privacy notice Patients with a common eye condition risk losing their sight permanently due to delays in care, experts have warned. The Association of Optometrists (AOP) said the current approach to glaucoma in England is 'failing the public'. It comes as a survey by the organisation found more than half of high street optometrists have witnessed patients going blind from the condition because of late detection or delays in treatment. Glaucoma affects about 700,000 people in the UK. It is caused by fluid building up in the front part of the eye, leading to the optic nerve, which connects the eye to the brain, becoming damaged. The condition does not usually cause any symptoms to begin with and can develop slowly over many years. A report by the Royal College of Ophthalmologists suggests cases could rise by 22% by 2035. AOP chief executive Adam Sampson said: 'The current approach to glaucoma in England is failing the public. 'Each year, people are faced with the reality of permanent sight loss as a direct result of delays to care and inconsistencies in eye care provision. 'But glaucoma services led by optometrists show that it does not need to be this way.' According to the AOP, reforms in Wales in 2022 mean optometrists can offer glaucoma services on the high street, with schemes also running in Scotland and in some areas of England. It is now calling for the Government to commit to a national glaucoma pathway for England, working with high street opticians to ensure patients have equal access to treatment. An AOP survey of 915 optometrists found 54% had witnessed a patient with glaucoma permanently losing their sight in the last year. The poll also found more than six in 10 optometrists believe most of their patients are unaware of the condition or its risk factors, which include age, ethnicity and some medical conditions like diabetes. Mr Sampson added: 'The research we have conducted reveals a national glaucoma pathway in England could free up 300,000 hospital eye appointments and save the NHS over £12m every year. 'We are calling on the Government to act now to overhaul health in England. 'We must ensure high street optometrists can protect the public by detecting, monitoring and treating glaucoma, and ease the burden on hospital eye services.' Matt Weale was diagnosed with glaucoma after a routine eye test in 2021 revealed dangerously high pressure in his left eye. The 54-year-old said: 'By the time I was finally offered a follow-up appointment, my vision had already started to deteriorate. 'I felt like I was falling through the cracks, and it was terrifying – not knowing if I was going to lose my sight because the system was too stretched to see me. 'If I hadn't been able to pay for private care, I truly believe I would have gone blind in my left eye. I lost confidence, I had to give up my job, the things I loved – like playing football and performing.'
