Art activists in legal bid to kill massive gas project
Friends of Australian Rock Art are challenging the Western Australian government's environmental approval to extend the life of Woodside Energy's massive North West Shelf venture.
The Supreme Court action against the WA government and Woodside will argue the state did not consider the impact of climate change that would result from the project, including its effect on Indigenous rock art in the area.
"Woodside's proposed North West Shelf extension is one of the most polluting fossil fuel projects in the world, and will have severe consequences both for the Murujuga rock art and for the environment of Western Australia as a whole," the group's spokeswoman, Judith Hugo, said on Tuesday.
Federal Environment Minister Murray Watt gave provisional approval to push out the life of the project from 2030 to 2070 in May, following WA's approval in December.
Woodside is currently considering the strict federal conditions on cultural heritage and air quality, which Senator Watt said would ensure the 60,000-year-old Murujuga Indigenous rock art was not destroyed.
A final decision has not been made.
The activists say their case in the WA court could impact the Commonwealth approval, which relies on the state assessment in order to satisfy federal laws.
Mardathoonera woman Raelene Cooper previously launched legal action against the Commonwealth in a bid to compel it to consider a heritage application to protect rock art, with the Federal Court to hear the case in mid-July.
Woodside's project is based on the Burrup peninsula in northwest WA, an area known as Murujuga.
It is nominated for UNESCO World Heritage listing as it contains the world's largest collection of Aboriginal rock art.
The company said it was aware of the rock art group's case.
"We have confidence in the robustness of the state government's comprehensive approval process," a spokesman said.
"As the matter is before the court, we have no further comment."
A controversial gas project faces another hurdle, as environmental activists launch an 11th-hour bid to overturn a state government approval.
Friends of Australian Rock Art are challenging the Western Australian government's environmental approval to extend the life of Woodside Energy's massive North West Shelf venture.
The Supreme Court action against the WA government and Woodside will argue the state did not consider the impact of climate change that would result from the project, including its effect on Indigenous rock art in the area.
"Woodside's proposed North West Shelf extension is one of the most polluting fossil fuel projects in the world, and will have severe consequences both for the Murujuga rock art and for the environment of Western Australia as a whole," the group's spokeswoman, Judith Hugo, said on Tuesday.
Federal Environment Minister Murray Watt gave provisional approval to push out the life of the project from 2030 to 2070 in May, following WA's approval in December.
Woodside is currently considering the strict federal conditions on cultural heritage and air quality, which Senator Watt said would ensure the 60,000-year-old Murujuga Indigenous rock art was not destroyed.
A final decision has not been made.
The activists say their case in the WA court could impact the Commonwealth approval, which relies on the state assessment in order to satisfy federal laws.
Mardathoonera woman Raelene Cooper previously launched legal action against the Commonwealth in a bid to compel it to consider a heritage application to protect rock art, with the Federal Court to hear the case in mid-July.
Woodside's project is based on the Burrup peninsula in northwest WA, an area known as Murujuga.
It is nominated for UNESCO World Heritage listing as it contains the world's largest collection of Aboriginal rock art.
The company said it was aware of the rock art group's case.
"We have confidence in the robustness of the state government's comprehensive approval process," a spokesman said.
"As the matter is before the court, we have no further comment."
A controversial gas project faces another hurdle, as environmental activists launch an 11th-hour bid to overturn a state government approval.
Friends of Australian Rock Art are challenging the Western Australian government's environmental approval to extend the life of Woodside Energy's massive North West Shelf venture.
The Supreme Court action against the WA government and Woodside will argue the state did not consider the impact of climate change that would result from the project, including its effect on Indigenous rock art in the area.
"Woodside's proposed North West Shelf extension is one of the most polluting fossil fuel projects in the world, and will have severe consequences both for the Murujuga rock art and for the environment of Western Australia as a whole," the group's spokeswoman, Judith Hugo, said on Tuesday.
Federal Environment Minister Murray Watt gave provisional approval to push out the life of the project from 2030 to 2070 in May, following WA's approval in December.
Woodside is currently considering the strict federal conditions on cultural heritage and air quality, which Senator Watt said would ensure the 60,000-year-old Murujuga Indigenous rock art was not destroyed.
A final decision has not been made.
The activists say their case in the WA court could impact the Commonwealth approval, which relies on the state assessment in order to satisfy federal laws.
Mardathoonera woman Raelene Cooper previously launched legal action against the Commonwealth in a bid to compel it to consider a heritage application to protect rock art, with the Federal Court to hear the case in mid-July.
Woodside's project is based on the Burrup peninsula in northwest WA, an area known as Murujuga.
It is nominated for UNESCO World Heritage listing as it contains the world's largest collection of Aboriginal rock art.
The company said it was aware of the rock art group's case.
"We have confidence in the robustness of the state government's comprehensive approval process," a spokesman said.
"As the matter is before the court, we have no further comment."
A controversial gas project faces another hurdle, as environmental activists launch an 11th-hour bid to overturn a state government approval.
Friends of Australian Rock Art are challenging the Western Australian government's environmental approval to extend the life of Woodside Energy's massive North West Shelf venture.
The Supreme Court action against the WA government and Woodside will argue the state did not consider the impact of climate change that would result from the project, including its effect on Indigenous rock art in the area.
"Woodside's proposed North West Shelf extension is one of the most polluting fossil fuel projects in the world, and will have severe consequences both for the Murujuga rock art and for the environment of Western Australia as a whole," the group's spokeswoman, Judith Hugo, said on Tuesday.
Federal Environment Minister Murray Watt gave provisional approval to push out the life of the project from 2030 to 2070 in May, following WA's approval in December.
Woodside is currently considering the strict federal conditions on cultural heritage and air quality, which Senator Watt said would ensure the 60,000-year-old Murujuga Indigenous rock art was not destroyed.
A final decision has not been made.
The activists say their case in the WA court could impact the Commonwealth approval, which relies on the state assessment in order to satisfy federal laws.
Mardathoonera woman Raelene Cooper previously launched legal action against the Commonwealth in a bid to compel it to consider a heritage application to protect rock art, with the Federal Court to hear the case in mid-July.
Woodside's project is based on the Burrup peninsula in northwest WA, an area known as Murujuga.
It is nominated for UNESCO World Heritage listing as it contains the world's largest collection of Aboriginal rock art.
The company said it was aware of the rock art group's case.
"We have confidence in the robustness of the state government's comprehensive approval process," a spokesman said.
"As the matter is before the court, we have no further comment."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
5 hours ago
- ABC News
Breakfast Wrap: What's in the government's childcare safety legislation
Today the federal government will introduce legislation to crack down on childcare centres that fail to keep children safe. The legislation is yet to be released publicly, but the government has flagged how it could target operators who have serious safety breaches. The Breakfast Wrap will hear from the federal minister for early childhood education. Then, South Australia's toxic algal bloom outbreak continues to deepen and cause division within federal parliament. Environment Minister Murray Watt has pledged $14 million to assist the state, but has stopped short of declaring it a natural disaster, triggering a call from the Greens to examine what criteria is used to declare these events. And the UN says more than a thousand people have been killed by Israel's military while attempting to get food since the U-S and Israel-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation system began in late May. It comes as one veteran Israeli journalist claims there's evidence building that Israel has a clear and deliberate plan to ethnically cleanse Gaza. Recap the morning's news, politics and global affairs with the Breakfast Wrap
Sky News AU
7 hours ago
- Sky News AU
‘Had a gutful': One Nation turns back on Welcome to Country in parliament
One Nation leader Pauline Hanson discusses her senators turning their backs during a Welcome to Country ceremony in parliament. One Nation senators turning their backs sparked discussions about respect and acknowledgment of Indigenous culture. Ms Hanson stated this act of protest has been ongoing, expressing frustrations about the frequency of such ceremonies.
Sydney Morning Herald
9 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Australian energy giant ditches US plant as Trump attacks green power
Woodside, the largest Australian oil and gas company, has abandoned plans to build a lower-carbon fuels plant in the United States as energy users and producers reel from Donald Trump's decision to slash tax breaks for green technologies. The Perth-based energy giant told investors on Wednesday it would take a $US140 million ($214 million) profit hit after deciding to walk away from the H2OK liquid hydrogen project it had been planning in Oklahoma, blaming the rising cost of making cleaner hydrogen and weaker-than-expected customer demand. 'We have made the decision to exit the H2OK project, demonstrating our disciplined approach to portfolio management,' Woodside chief executive Meg O'Neill said on Wednesday. Woodside, a producer of oil and liquefied natural gas (LNG), is pursuing the development of lower-carbon hydrogen as part of its climate transition strategy. Because hydrogen emits only water vapour when burned, it is considered by many to be a promising climate-friendly energy source that could eventually substitute fossil fuels and help clean up heavy-polluting industries, as long as it is made using low- or zero-carbon energy sources. Woodside's H2OK would have used an electrolyser, powered by the electricity grid, to split water into hydrogen and oxygen. However, Woodside announced it was pausing the H2OK project in January, shortly after Donald Trump's return to the White House. It also scrapped a separate plan to build a concentrated solar thermal energy facility in California through a partnership with Heliogen, a company backed by billionaire Bill Gates. While not directly attributing those decisions to Trump's energy agenda, Woodside at the time said it needed to consider the implications of the administration's pledge to dismantle support for US clean energy investments, including halting the disbursement of funds from the $567 billion Inflation Reduction Act, which had been offering generous tax breaks for renewable developers. This month, Trump secured the passage of a giant tax and domestic policy bill through Congress, which will make it cheaper and easier for companies to drill and produce fossil fuels, while cutting funding for electric cars and wind and solar farms. Woodside remains committed to one clean energy investment in the US, the Beaumont lower-carbon ammonia project in Texas. The project was 95 per cent completed as of June 30, the company said.
