Trial begins for 2024 Moscow concert hall attack suspects
A faction of the Islamic State group claimed responsibility for the March 22, 2024, massacre at the Crocus City Hall concert venue in which four gunmen shot people who were waiting for a show by a popular rock band and then set the building on fire.
President Vladimir Putin and other Russian officials have claimed, without presenting evidence, that Ukraine had a role in the attack. Kyiv has strongly denied any involvement.
2:06
Moscow attack: Russia would be 'cynical' to blame Ukraine, Macron says
The Investigative Committee, Russia's top criminal investigation agency, said in June that it concluded that the attack had been 'planned and carried out in the interests of the current leadership of Ukraine in order to destabilize political situation in our country.' It also noted the four suspected gunmen tried to flee to Ukraine afterward.
Story continues below advertisement
The four, all identified as citizens of Tajikistan, were arrested hours after the attack and later appeared in a Moscow court with signs of being severely beaten.
Get daily National news
Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
The defendants appearing in court on Monday kept their heads bowed as they sat in the defendants' cage.
The committee said earlier this year that six other suspects were charged in absentia and placed on Russia's wanted list for allegedly recruiting and organizing the training of the four. Other defendants in the trial were accused of helping them.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Global News
42 minutes ago
- Global News
Hundreds gather to mark five years since Beirut blast
Hundreds of Lebanese gathered solemnly near Beirut's coast on Monday to commemorate a half-decade since the cataclysmic port blast of 2020, when more than 200 people were killed in one of the largest non-nuclear explosions in history. Carrying Lebanese flags and portraits of some of the victims, many of those standing said they felt deeply disappointed that no one has been held to account for the devastating explosion. 'Can someone tell me why five years on we're still standing here? If everyone stands with this cause, then who's against us?' said William Noun, whose brother Joseph, a firefighter, was killed by the blast. 'This file needs to close. It's been five years and we don't want to have a sixth,' Noun said from a stage set up near the port. The blast destroyed large swathes of Beirut, leaving tens of thousands of people homeless. Story continues below advertisement The names of all those killed were read out as protesters stood facing the wreckage of the Beirut grain silos, which were heavily damaged in the blast and continued to deteriorate and collapse for years after. At 6:07 p.m. – the time of the blast five years ago – the few hundred gathered stood for a moment of silence. 'I'm here because I find it crazy that five years later, we still don't know exactly what happened,' said Catherine Otayek, 30. 'I had hope for answers in 2020. I didn't think we'd still be here.' Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Although she did not lose anyone herself, the Lebanese expatriate living in France said she made it a point to return to Beirut every year for the commemoration as a duty to fellow Lebanese. The port blast came nearly a year into Lebanon's catastrophic economic collapse, and was followed by a political crisis that paralyzed government and a devastating war between Hezbollah and Israel starting in 2023. 1:15 Beirut explosion: Lebanon's prime minister, other ex-officials charged with negligence in deadly blast Investigation Stymied The blast is thought to have been set off by a fire at a warehouse on the evening of August 4, 2020, detonating hundreds of tonnes of ammonium nitrate. Story continues below advertisement Lebanese officials promised at the time that an investigation into the blast's root causes would be completed in five days. But years of political interference stymied the probe, with judicial officials and then-ministers continually raising legal challenges against the investigating judges, effectively paralyzing the investigation. Some Lebanese have drawn hope from pledges by President Joseph Aoun and Prime Minister Nawaf Salam – both of whom came to power at the beginning of this year – to prioritize justice for blast victims. On Monday, Aoun pledged to hold those responsible for the blast accountable, regardless of their position or political affiliation. 'Justice will not die, and accountability will inevitably come,' he said. The president and prime minister did not attend Monday's commemoration. Judge Tarek Bitar resumed his investigation earlier this year and has questioned several officials in recent months – but he has yet to issue a preliminary indictment, which many Lebanese were hoping for ahead of the fifth anniversary. 'We want a preliminary indictment that is complete and comprehensive,' said Paul Naggear, whose three-year-old daughter Alexandra was killed in the blast. 'We want to know who was supposed to evacuate our neighborhoods, so that we could get to the hospital, and so my daughter could have survived.' Naggear and his wife Tracy have been among the most vocal advocates for accountability for the blast. Story continues below advertisement Rights groups have pressed for a full investigation that will establish the full chain of responsibility. 'Justice delayed is justice denied,' said Reina Wehbi, Amnesty International's Lebanon campaigner. 'The families of those killed and injured in the Beirut explosion have waited an intolerable five years. They must not be forced to endure another year of impunity.'
Global News
2 hours ago
- Global News
Elon Musk to get US$29B in Tesla shares. Here's why
Tesla is awarding CEO Elon Musk 96 million shares of restricted stock valued at approximately US$29 billion, just six months after a judge ordered the company to revoke his massive pay package. The electric vehicle maker said in a regulatory filing on Monday that Musk must first pay Tesla US$23.34 per share of restricted stock that vests, which is equal to the exercise price per share of the 2018 pay package that was awarded to the company's CEO. In December Delaware Chancellor Kathaleen St. Jude McCormick reaffirmed her earlier ruling that Tesla must revoke Musk's multibillion-dollar pay package. She found that Musk engineered the landmark pay package in sham negotiations with directors who were not independent. At the time McCormick also rejected an equally unprecedented and massive fee request by plaintiff attorneys, who argued that they were entitled to legal fees in the form of Tesla stock valued at more than US$5 billion. The judge said the attorneys were entitled to a fee award of US$345 million. Story continues below advertisement The rulings came in a lawsuit filed by a Tesla stockholder who challenged Musk's 2018 compensation package. 0:22 Trump says it's 'ridiculous' for Musk to start a third political party That pay package carried a potential maximum value of about US$56 billion, but that sum has fluctuated over the years based on Tesla's stock price. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Musk appealed the order in March. A month later Tesla said in a regulatory filing that it was creating a special committee to look at Musk's compensation as CEO. In a letter to shareholders, Tesla's board said that Musk hasn't received 'meaningful compensation' for eight years, citing the 2012 CEO Performance Award that was last earned in 2017. The board argued that Musk deserves compensation because he's delivered 'transformative and unprecedented growth' that's 'translated into immense value generated for Tesla and all our shareholders.' Musk has been one of the richest people in the world for several years. Story continues below advertisement Wedbush analyst Dan Ives feels Musk's stock award may alleviate some Tesla shareholder concerns. 'We believe this grant will now keep Musk as CEO of Tesla at least until 2030 and removes an overhang on the stock,' Ives wrote in a client note. 'Musk remains Tesla's big asset and this comp issue has been a constant concern of shareholders once the Delaware soap opera began.' Tesla shares have plunged 25 per cent this year, largely due to blowback over Musk's affiliation with President Donald Trump. But Tesla also faces intensifying competition from both the big Detroit automakers, and from China. In its most recent quarter, Tesla reported that quarterly profits plunged from US$1.39 billion to US$409 million. Revenue also fell and the company fell short of even the lowered expectations on Wall Street. Under pressure from shareholders last month, Tesla scheduled an annual shareholders meeting for November to comply with Texas state law. A group of more than 20 Tesla shareholders, which have watched Tesla shares plummet, said in a letter to the company that it needed to at least provide public notice of the annual meeting. Investors have grown increasingly worried about the trajection of the company after Musk had spent so much time in Washington this year, becoming one of the most prominent officials in the Trump administration in its bid to slash the size of the U.S. government. Story continues below advertisement Tesla's stock rose more than 2 per cent in morning trading. Shares are down about 23 per cent in the year to date.
Global News
2 hours ago
- Global News
Trump says India to face higher tariff for its purchase of Russian oil
U.S. President Donald Trump said on Monday he willsubstantially raise tariffs on India over its purchases of Russian oil. 'India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian Oil, they are then, for much of the Oil purchased, selling it on the Open Market for big profits. They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine,' Trump said in a post on Truth Social. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy 'Because of this, I will be substantially raising the Tariff paid by India to the USA.' He did not elaborate on what the tariff would be. Trump last week said he would impose a 25 per cent tariff on goods imported from India and added that the world's fifth-largest economy would also face an unspecified penalty but gave no details. Over the weekend, two Indian government sources told Reuters that India will keep purchasing oil from Russia despite U.S. Trump's threats. The sources did not wish to be identified due to the sensitivity of the matter. Story continues below advertisement —Reporting by Doina Chiacu; Writing by Caitlin Webber; Editing by Doina Chiacu and Franklin Paul
