logo
Parliamentary privilege allows pro-Palestine Action MPs to voice support

Parliamentary privilege allows pro-Palestine Action MPs to voice support

Telegraph8 hours ago
MPs who voice support for Palestine Action in the Commons will be shielded from prosecution under terror laws by parliamentary privilege.
Parliamentary convention dictates that no MP can be prosecuted for anything they say in the Commons chamber, Westminster Hall or formal committee of the House even if they voice support for a proscribed organisation such as Palestine Action. It also protects MPs from being sued for defamation or libel.
It means any MP will be free to support or even encourage backing for Palestine Action, even though saying it outside the Commons would leave them liable for up to 14 years in prison.
Nine Labour MPs were among the 26 members who voted against the Government's move to ban Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation, putting it on a par with Hamas, al-Qaeda and Islamic State.
The group of Labour MPs included Diane Abbott, the veteran Left-winger, Clive Lewis and Richard Burgon, who served in Jeremy Corbyn's shadow cabinet.
Mr Corbyn, who sits as an independent, also voted against proscribing Palestine Action, along with fellow independent John McDonnell, his former shadow chancellor.
The Commons voted by 385 to 26 in favour of proscribing Palestine Action. On Thursday, the Lords backed it without a vote. A so-called regret motion proposed by a Green Party peer criticising the measure was rejected by 144 votes to 16.
It is unclear when the ban, which needs final sign-off by the Home Secretary, will come into force as the group is mounting a court challenge to temporarily block the move with a hearing scheduled on Friday, pending further proceedings.
Two planes were vandalised at RAF Brize Norton on June 20 causing £7 million worth of damage, in an action claimed by Palestine Action. Four people have been charged by counter-terrorism police over the incident and were remanded in custody following a court appearance.
Commons officials confirmed that any MP speaking in support of the group would be exempt from prosecution under parliamentary privilege.
Guidance for MPs states: 'This allows you to speak up on behalf of constituents, express an opinion, or condemn corruption, malpractice or even criminal activity without fear of legal action, as long as you do so in proceedings of the House.
'This protection extends to written proceedings: for example, written and oral questions, motions, early day motions, and amendments tabled to bills and motions.
'Anyone giving evidence to a committee of the House also has this protection, which is a safeguard for witnesses and also ensures that select committees are not obstructed in their inquiries by threats of legal action, or any other kind of threat against witnesses.'
Lord Hanson of Flint, the Home Office minister, said: 'I will always defend the right of British people to engage in legitimate and peaceful protest and to stand up for the causes in which they believe.
'But essential as these rights are, they do not provide a blank cheque for this particular group to seriously damage property or subject members of the public to fear and violence. We would not tolerate this activity from organisations if they were motivated by Islamist or extreme Right-wing ideology, and therefore I cannot tolerate it from Palestine Action.
'By implementing this measure, we will remove Palestine Action's veil of legitimacy, tackle its financial support, degrade its efforts to recruit and radicalise people into committing terrorist activity in its name.'
However, Mr Corbyn warned that the ban would have a 'chilling effect' on protests, adding: 'Surely we should be looking at the issue that Palestine Action are concerned about, and the supply of weapons from this country to Israel, which has made all this possible. If this order goes through it will have a chilling effect on protests.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Votes to decide who will run Guernsey's committees
Votes to decide who will run Guernsey's committees

BBC News

time25 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Votes to decide who will run Guernsey's committees

Politicians will elect the presidents of the States of Guernsey's committees in a secret ballot of members later. First up the States will choose who should lead the seven principal committees. Following that, the presidents of the Scrutiny Management Committee, Development and Planning Authority and States Assembly and Constitution Committee will be elected. The final significant election will be for the President of the States Trading Supervisory Board. Health and Social Care In 2020 there were no willing candidates for the position at the head of the States' highest spending committee, before Deputy Al Brouard was eventually elected to the role. This time around, it looks set to be a coronation, with Deputy George Oswald, a retired doctor and founding partner of the Medical Specialist Group, set to run for the role. He has also served as a non-States member on HSC for the past five years Deputy Marc Leadbeater had said he would stand, but after conversations with the new Policy and Resources Committee, he said he was set to run for the presidency of Home Affairs. The committee has a wide mandate including everything from the running of the Princess Elizabeth Hospital to overseeing the food hygiene ratings dished out by environmental health. Environment and Infrastructure Bringing together a lot of the mandates of the old Environment and Public Services Department, Environment and Infrastructure covers a huge amount of work in the States. It looks after the quality of local roads, the island's policy on climate change and popular spots such as Sausmarez committee vice-president Adrian Gabriel has said he would run for the States members deputies Andrew Niles and Sally Rochester have both said they were interested in a seat on the board. Home Affairs The Committee for Home Affairs has a broad mandate, including the police, border force, the island's immigration regime and trading standards. Simon Vermeulen, the committee's former vice-president, said he would be interested in the presidency, while Deputy Marc Leadbeater who resigned from the committee in the last term has said he will run. New deputy Jayne Ozanne has also said she would like to run the committee. Economic Development Despite having the smallest budget of all the principal committees, there has been a lot of interest in the presidency. Deputies Sasha Kazantseva-Miller and Marc Lainé have both said they would be interested in the role after Deputy Steve Falla who said he wanted the job was elected to Policy and Resources, which means he can't be on any other committees. While Deputy Chris Blin also said he wanted the job, but now says he will most likely stand for a position on the board. Newcomer Deputy Hayley Camp has said she would be keen to serve on the board, while Alderney representative Edward Hill has also said he will stand in an election on term it was one of the key committees which secured the island's new ferry contract with Brittany Ferries. Education, Sport and Culture Education, Sport and Culture has been seen by many within the States as a poisoned chalice, with every leader of the committee losing their seat at an election in the last two decades. The committee oversees the running of the island's primary and secondary schools alongside cultural events like Liberation Day. Deputies Sarah Hansmann-Rouxel and Aidan Matthews have both said they would like to run the committee, while new and former teacher Deputy Paul Montague has said he may also be interested, after initially having said he would not want to run a committee in his first term. Employment and Social Security The Committee for Employment and Social Security admisters benefits, including pensions, alongside looking after health and safety in the workplace. In the last term it was responsible for the introduction of secondary pensions and the island's first anti-discrimination legislation. Deputy Tina Bury sat on the committee in the last term and has said she would like to lead it in the new assembly. Returning politician Deputy Garry Collins has said he would like to serve on the board, alongside new politician Deputy David Dorrity. Housing A successful proposal from Deputy Sasha Kazantseva-Miller led to the creation of this new committee. Former Guernsey Housing Association CEO Steve Williams has said he wanted to lead this new board, while Deputy Marc Lainé also said he would be interested. It will have responsibility for the island's social housing stock and will take over general housing policy from Environment & Infrastructure. The new housing committee is the last of the principal committees so there is a chance some of the candidates who fail to get a place at the top of other boards may run for this role. States Trading Supervisory Board The board is not like the other big committees in the States, partly because it has fewer deputies on it and in the way it operates. It has political oversight of Guernsey Electricity, Waste, Water and the Channel Island Lottery amongst other things. Deputy Mark Helyar is set to run for the role, while Deputy Neil Inder had said he would contest the position, but has now decided not to. Scrutiny Father of the house Deputy John Gollop, the longest-serving politician in the States, has said he would like to run this committee, which looks at whether committees within the States of Guernsey are delivering their services effectively and has also run a series of public hearings where politicians and officials are quizzed on their work. He will face competition from former States economist Deputy Andy Sloan. Development and Planning Authority Former environment department minister Deputy Yvonne Burford could stand as the president of the authority. Before the changes to the machinery of government in 2016, environment had responsibility for of the first jobs for the new committee will be to finish the review of the Island Development Plan which was started, paused and restarted in the last term. States Assembly and Constitution Committee With a lot of talk before the election about the shape and size of government, alongside talk at election time about the electoral system, it seems likely both of these areas will be looked at by whoever takes up the presidency of the States Assembly and Constitution Aidrian Gabriel, Andy Cameron, John Gollop and Tom Rylatt have all said they would like to stand for roles on the committee, while Deputy Burford has also said she would be keen to run the committee alongside the Department and Planning Authority, if elected.

Cheshire farmer backs change to policing rural dog attacks
Cheshire farmer backs change to policing rural dog attacks

BBC News

time25 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Cheshire farmer backs change to policing rural dog attacks

A farmer whose animals have been attacked by dogs twice said he hoped a change in the law would help bring more offenders to justice. Phil Latham, from Cheshire, said he collected DNA and video footage after one attack but was told by the police it could not be South and Eddisbury MP Aphra Brandreth's bill would give police more powers to use such evidence and extend the offence of livestock worrying to cover animals such as Latham said the impact of dog attacks was "not just the money, but the heartache". Brandreth told BBC Politics North West the bill was about "responsible dog ownership", and it had been prompted by her meeting Mr Latham last Conservative MP's bill, the Dogs (Protection of Livestock) (Amendment) Bill, will reach the next stage of the process in Parliament on will add to police powers around the seizure of dogs and collection of evidence from both dogs and livestock, and increase the maximum penalty from £1,000 to an unlimited NFU said UK farm animals worth £1.8m were severely injured or killed in dog attacks last year. Mr Latham said the first attack at his farm in Chornley, near Nantwich, 18 out of 20 calves in a pen were severely injured. He said the second attack had two vets and three members of staff working for five hours to treat the animals."The first thing you want to do is look after your animals. It's what we try to do."We're trying to optimise the calf welfare because if they're happy they grow better, and we're happy."So when you find that they've been severely bitten, bits of skin hanging off or muscles detached, that is really distressing."He said he was "incredibly frustrated" to learn the evidence he had gathered after the second attack could not be used in a prosecution."Those tests are good enough to put people away for life, but they're not good enough - or weren't - to allow to determine whether a dog had attacked a calf or not."It's quite simply ridiculous," he said. Brandreth said: "Phil showed me photos of a horrific dog attack. It was really awful to see the damage that they had caused."I realised it was an opportunity for me to try and make a difference for farmers like Phil and also animal welfare because it's so vitally important."Ms Brandreth said the bill had been worked on with MPs across different parties and also Welsh MPs. Read more stories from Cheshire on the BBC and follow BBC North West on X. For more local politics coverage, BBC Politics North West is on BBC One on Sunday at 10:00am and on BBC iPlayer.

‘Police said I violated the Human Rights Act for cycling no-handed'
‘Police said I violated the Human Rights Act for cycling no-handed'

Telegraph

time28 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

‘Police said I violated the Human Rights Act for cycling no-handed'

A cyclist has claimed police ticketed him under the Human Rights Act for taking both hands off of his handlebars. Paul Powlesland, a barrister and environmental campaigner, filmed the encounter with the City of London police in which he was told he could fall and injure someone. In the video posted to X, a police officer can be heard saying: 'Cycling with no hands on the handlebars places other road users at risk, contravenes article 2 of the Human Rights Act '. The barrister, laughing, responds: 'Cycling no-handed violates Article 2 of the Human Rights Act? That's the Right to Life, isn't it?' Article 2 of the Human Rights Act 1998 states that 'everyone's right to life shall be protected by law' and 'no one shall be deprived of his life intentionally save in the execution of a court following his conviction of a crime'. I recently got stopped & ticketed by the City of London Police for, & I kid you not, "cycling no handed". Even though it's clearly not an offence, the officer said they were ticketing me under the Human Rights Act as I was infringing other people's Article 2 'Right to Life', in… — Paul Powlesland (@paulpowlesland) July 3, 2025 There is no specific law that makes cycling no-handed a crime in the UK, though police do have the power to fine riders deemed to be cycling dangerously and not in control of their bikes. Mr Powlesland is heard probing the officer over whether she intended to ticket everyone cycling no handed during rush hour, to which she responded: 'if I see them, yes.' He added: 'You're letting phone snatchers and bike thieves go to ticket law-abiding citizens cycling no handed – do you honestly think that's a good use of City of London police time?' While Mr Powlesland was not ticketed on 2 April, when the video was shot, he had been penalised by the officer on 5 March for careless and inconsiderate cycling under section 29 of the Road Traffic Act 1988. The barrister, who is the founder of Lawyers for Nature, an organisation which seeks to represent natural work in the courts, later described the ticketing as 'utterly bonkers stuff'. In a caption on X after the event, he argued that police time would be better spent tackling the scourge of thieves in London. He wrote: 'With bicycle theft basically legalised in the City due to the complete failure of the police to bother investigating such thefts and people being regularly terrorised in London by e-bike phone muggers, it's good to see the City of London Police concentrating the resources on what really matters.' In the first four months of the year, 213 phones were reported stolen in the City of London. In the West End, 37 people report their phone stolen on average every day. Home Office data released in May revealed that more than 365,000 bike thefts reported to the police have gone unsolved since 2019, which equates to 89 per cent of all cases. And just three per cent of reported bike thefts in the past five years have led to a charge or summons. Mr Powlesland had posted his encounter in response to the City of London Police's announcement of their summer campaign on 2 July, which they have dubbed 'Safer City Streets'. The force said the campaign 'focuses on offences that matter to communities, like cyclists going through red lights'. It added that nearly 300 cyclists had received fixed penalty notices for running red lights so far this year. A City of London Police spokesman told MailOnline: 'We're aware of a social media post that shows a small clip from a longer interaction between a cyclist and a City of London Police officer on April 2 2025. 'The cyclist approached the officer and during their three-minute chat, the Human Rights Act was mentioned. The cyclist was not ticketed on this day, but he had approached the officer because she had issued him a ticket on March 5 2025 in the City of London. 'On March 5 2025, the officer observed the cyclist riding with his arms stretched out wide and off the handlebars during rush hour. 'The officer stopped the cyclist and issued him with a ticket for careless and inconsiderate cycling under s29 of the Road Traffic Act 1988. 'A ticket was processed on May 19 2025. Should the cyclist contest the ticket, officers will attend court and present any relevant evidence that we have obtained.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store