UK has got fat on the free labour of women, says Jess Phillips
She said it was a 'fundamentally sexist' practice that meant Government was less willing to provide the service itself.
She said she 'hated' the title of her role and added that safeguarding against gender-based violence should be 'business as usual in every single Government department'.
Jess Phillips suggested some ministers thought violence against women and girls was solely the remit of the Home Office (Kirsty O'Connor/PA)
The Birmingham Yardley MP suggested there was an issue in Whitehall where Government departments viewed violence against women and girls as solely a Home Office issue.
Ms Phillips said she had to push for the safety of women and girls to be a 'mainstream concern', which she said had not always made her 'popular as a Government minister'.
Asked what pushback she had received from ministers or civil servants, she said: 'People directly say things like, 'That's the Home Office's job'.
'Why is it my job to do healthy relationship education in schools? Why is it my job to provide mental health support for whatever reason it is that you ended up in that [situation]?'.
'Do you know what it is? Free labour of women is where it comes from.
'It comes from a fundamentally sexist place in that women didn't have these services, so a load of women across the country got together and made these services and offered them to other women for free, and they didn't get paid for their labour.
'So they put down a mattress and made a refuge. They set up counselling services and got people who were trained to be therapists and got their voluntary hours and set it up for free.'
Jess Phillips was interviewed at the Iain Dale All Talk Fringe show (Jacob King/PA)
Ms Phillips said people do not recognise how 'heavily' the UK has relied on women providing support that previously did not exist which has suggested an impact on the willingness of Government to provide these services.
She added: 'Nobody offered diabetes medicine for free. Pharmaceutical companies didn't go, 'Wow, this is really important. People will die without this. We'll just give it away for free'.
'That is what the women in our country did in the 1960s and 1970s and 1980s and we got fat on that expectation that that service will be provided for free.
'And we also belittled it as an issue that wasn't absolutely, fundamentally mainstream to the safety and security of our nation.
'Undoing that is really hard and it's going to take a long time.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
2 hours ago
- Metro
Fiona Phillips' husband Martin talks her 'biggest frustration' with Alzheimer's
Martin Frizell has shared his wife Fiona Phillips' biggest uphill battle following her Alzheimer's diagnosis in 2022. The former ITV presenter, 64, and her husband Martin (ex-editor of ITV's This Morning) have been candid about what Phillips' life looks like navigating the early-onset neurodegenerative disease. An experience account of what the couple has been through over the past three years is recorded in the GMTV star's new memoir, Remember When: My Life with Alzheimer's, which includes Frizell's confession that cancer would have been easier to deal with. He also explained that they have secretly hired a carer to support Phillips, who is now struggling with daily tasks including dressing, bathing and cooking. Now, in a new discussion on ITV's daytime talk show Loose Women, co-panelist Jane Moore asked Frizell how Phillips is right now. Frizell started positively, saying that the 'good news' was that her 'mood had improved' and she had a 'better appetite' due to a new antidepressant she is on. It has meant she is in a 'much better place now than she was a few weeks ago' However, he continued: 'Fiona's main problem with her Alzheimer's right now is her frustration. 'She's someone who has worked from the age of 11, at a paper round. Didn't stop working till a couple of years ago when the Alzheimer's made it difficult to do so. Early-onset Alzheimer's is also known as young-onset dementia or younger-onset Alzheimer's. It is the label given to anyone who receives a diagnosis before they turn 65. According to Alzheimer's Research UK, an estimated 70,800 people with dementia in the UK have young onset, and Alzheimer's disease accounts for around one in three cases of young onset dementia. It is thought at least five in every 100 people with Alzheimer's are under 65, however the figure may be higher. According to the NHS, the symptoms of Alzheimer's can begin with usually minor memory problems, but can develop into: confusion, disorientation and getting lost in familiar places difficulty planning or making decisions problems with speech and language problems moving around without assistance or performing self-care tasks personality changes, such as becoming aggressive, demanding and suspicious of others hallucinations (seeing or hearing things that are not there) and delusions (believing things that are untrue) low mood or anxiety 'She'll watch telly and she'll get frustrated that she's not working. She'll get anxious or frightened thinking about it. 'This was a fearless women. She spent decades doing this. Seeing her now in that anxious phase is horrible. The whole of Alzheimer's is horrible, as such.' In a recent Instagram post, shown above, he shared a video of Phillips out for a walk holding a magnum ice cream as she thanked people for reading her book. People shared their well-wishes at the time. 'Sending Fiona so much love. She really looked out for me in my GMTV days, my telly mum and I will never forget how she comforted me when I was going through a tough time in my relationship,' Anna Williamson wrote. 'ending you lots of love, Fiona. You were so kind to me when you came up to my house in Norfolk to do my first interview after I was diagnosed with breast cancer back in 2008. More than just a colleague… A truly kind, talented and beautiful person!' Trisha Goddard echoed. During an interview with the Telegraph, her husband, 66, also recalled the 'gut-wrenching' moment they discovered Phillips' diagnosis. He said: 'We went to [the hospital] to get the results of tests, and the consultant said: 'I'm sorry, but I believe it's Alzheimer's.' And it's like, oh. Gulp. Then he said, 'I'll go and get you a cup of tea, here's some reading for you.' 'He pushed a leaflet across the table and on the front cover was an old couple, with a Zimmer frame, basically saying: 'How to live well with Alzheimer's.' It just doesn't relate to you.' Before adding: 'It shouldn't be happening to someone as young as Fiona. It was utterly gut-wrenching. Sickening. We just looked at each other. S**t! What are we going to do now?' More Trending The couple have been married for 28 years and share two sons, Nat, 26, and Mackenzie, 23, who underwent genetic testing to confirm that the disease wasn't hereditary, with the blood tests 'coming back negative'. Fiona's parents both died after being diagnosed from the disease. In her memoir, Phillips explained how 'agonisingly difficult' she is finding life now. View More » 'Sometimes I get halfway through a sentence and I can't remember where I was heading with it or the word I was looking for. It feels awful,' she said, comparing her condition to 'trying to chase a £5 note that's fallen out of your purse on a gusty day'. Got a story? If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@ calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you.
Scotsman
3 hours ago
- Scotsman
How Scotland regularly fills a 'mass grave' of drug victims who might have lived
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... There are roughly 91 days in every statistical quarter of the year. In the quarter from March 1 to May 31, 2025, there were 312 suspected drug-related deaths. That's more than three a day, every day. Over the 13 weeks, it is 24 every week. It is an increase of 15 per cent over the last 13-week quarter. It is similar (4 per cent lower) than the same period in 2023 but 7 per cent higher than that period in 2024. Whatever year you want to take, it is a harrowing number, especially when you give it some perspective. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Just imagine, every week, for 13 weeks in a row there was a train crash between Glasgow Central and Paisley Gilmour Street, or Haymarket and Dundee, or anywhere in Scotland for that matter – and the result was 24 deaths. Every week. For 13 weeks. And it is getting worse. What do you think the public response would be? Would we not be demanding that the Scottish Government do something to prevent the mounting loss of life? Would any politician be able to look in the mirror and say 'I am doing my best to prevent this daily and weekly roll-call of death' if the numbers just kept being added too? Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad A heroin addict lies sprawled on a mattress (Picture: Chris Young) | Universal Images Group via Getty SNP's perverse policies It's all very well saying that people should not get on the train that might take them to an early death, but few if any of those who make that journey expect early death to be the outcome for them. More often than not, people starting out on this journey think it's always going to happens to someone else. By the time they realise they are watching in slow motion their own but sadly inevitable demise, they are often beyond having the capacity to get off that train. They need help. They need to be helped out of their addiction and they need rehabilitation so they don't think one day they can easily have a day trip without any consequences. Currently, instead of trying to improve our drug rehabilitation, the policy of the Scottish Government is quite the reverse; indeed it's perverse. The Scottish Government is trying to make it easier for those addicted to take their daily journey just that little bit smoother, a little less of a trouble. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad There's a pilot in Glasgow for a 'drug consumption room', where addicts are given a safe place to take their drugs – the provision of such a service consumes scarce resources that could instead be used to provide rehabilitation that can help people making that daily commute to catastrophe. It's like taking away the ticket inspectors, removing the barriers and saying here, try first class instead, it's a more comfortable journey. When the train crashes, it doesn't matter which carriage you are in. You are a fatality, another addition to the statistics – even if the journey was that little bit easier because you could inject the drug of your choice or the addictive substitute of the authorities' choice, you still end up at the destination of death. Bully-state interventions Many of the people advocating an easier journey – essentially in the so-called public health specialism – are also quite sanguine if not openly supportive of making access to drugs easier too. Various narcotics would be declassified and in other ways made easier to come by. Likewise, by making the base cost of alcohol higher through minimum pricing legislation, there is evidence on the street that various drugs are now intentionally made available by suppliers at a cost lower than alcohol so new entrants to drugs become addicted and board that train. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad What is the public health response to an alcohol policy that has failed while persecuting responsible drinkers and lining the pockets of the supermarkets? Why, it is to go into denial – for they themselves are addicted to bully-state interventions of directing the behaviour of the law-abiding majority – and increase the minimum price further. Annemarie Ward, chief executive of the charity Favour UK, which seeks to improve the provision of drug rehabilitation services across the country, has found the Scottish Government to be profoundly difficult to work with, often talking of providing better services only to reduce the number of rehab beds available. Ward notes that the number of suspected drug deaths in the last three quarters is: Q4 2024: 215 deaths; Q1 2025: 272 deaths (+26 per cent); and Q2 2025: 312 deaths (+15 per cent). That's a 45 per cent surge in six months. 'The flames are rising, the bodies are stacking up, and the state has the audacity to rebrand failure as calm,' says Ward. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The campaigner regularly takes the Scottish authorities to task for saying the situation is 'stable' – responding that it is 'an obscenity, like calling a mass grave this year as similar to one last year'. Over 1,200 people needlessly dying last year was a mass grave of great shame to Scotland and will become another such mass grave of shame if, as seems likely, it is repeated this year too. 18 years of failure Scotland having the highest drug-related deaths in Europe is a failing of devolution because, despite having the same laws regarding drug enforcement, the Holyrood parliament has the powers to deal with Scotland's own problems. It is also a failure for the prevailing 'whae's like us' culture in Holyrood, where trying to do things differently from England is given preference – even when their policies work – and comes at the price of needless deaths. Most obviously though, it is a failure of the SNP government, now in power for some 18 years and clearly in control of rehabilitation services that it has failed to develop – while focussing on its own addiction towards holding referendums. What an utterly awful trip Scotland is on, and until the SNP is removed that train will crash every week.
North Wales Live
4 hours ago
- North Wales Live
Police launch investigation after Colwyn Bay man dies from head injury
Police are investigating after a Colwyn Bay man died from a head injury. An inquest was opened today [Monday] into the death of 46-year-old David William Hardman who died in Glan Clwyd Hospital, Bodelwyddan, on July 26. John Gittins, senior coroner for North Wales East and Central, said he had been told by North Wales Police that a disturbance had occurred at Mr Hardman's home in Coed y Glyn, Colwyn Bay. On July 22 Mr Hardman, a telephone engineer, was taken to hospital but later discharged. He then complained of feeling unwell and returned to hospital, but died in the early hours of the following day. Home Office pathologist Dr Brian Rodgers gave the provisional cause of death as a massive subdural hematoma due to a severe blunt force injury. Adjourning the inquest to a date to be fixed, the coroner said that investigations were continuing. Sign up for the North Wales Live newsletter sent twice daily to your inbox Why journalists cover inquests and why it's crucial that we do Reporting on an inquest can be one of the hardest types of stories a journalist can write. More often than not, they are emotionally charged proceedings attended by grief-stricken people who are desperate for answers. Sometimes, inquests can seem quite clinical due to a coroner's need to remain impartial and level-headed so that they can draw a conclusion from desperately sad events. As painful as these proceedings are for those who have lost a loved one, the lessons that can be learned from inquests can go a long way to saving others' lives. Families are often surprised - and sometimes angry - when they see a reporter in attendance. Understandably they worry the nature of their loved one's death will be sensationalised and that a news story will forever tarnish their memory. Responsible and ethically minded journalists will do what they can to report inquests sensitively, while not shying away from the often upsetting facts. It is vital that the public don't forget that inquests are a type of judicial inquiry; they are after all held in a coroner's court. The press has a legal right to attend inquests and has a responsibility to report on them as part of their duty to uphold the principle of 'open justice'. But in doing so journalists must follow the guidance provided by the Independent Press Standards Organisation and set out in Editors' Code of Conduct. It's a journalist's duty to make sure the public understands the reasons why someone has died and to make sure their deaths are not kept secret. An inquest report can also clear up any rumours or suspicion surrounding a person's death. But most importantly of all, an inquest report can draw attention to circumstances which may stop further deaths from happening. Inquests are not criminal courts - there is no prosecution or defence - they are fact-finding tribunals which seek to answer four key questions: Who is the person who died? Where did they die? When did they die? How did they die? They do not apportion blame. Once these questions are answered a coroner will be able to record a conclusion. The wider lessons that can be learned from an inquest can have far-reaching consequences - but if journalists do not attend them how can the public be made aware? The harsh reality is they can't. Coroners often do not publish the results of an inquest. Should journalists shy away from attending inquests then an entire arm of the judicial system - and numerous others who need to answer vital questions - is not held to account. Inquests can often prompt a wider discussion on serious issues, the most recent of these being mental health and suicide. Editors actively ask and encourage reporters to speak to the family and friends of a person who is the subject of an inquest. Their contributions help us create a clearer picture of the person who died and also provides the opportunity to pay tribute to their loved one. Often families do not wish to speak to the press and of course that decision has to be respected. However, as has been seen by many brilliant campaigns run by newspapers and websites up and down the country, the input of a person's family and friends can make all the difference in helping to save others. Without the attendance of the press at inquests questions will remain unanswered, debates unargued and lives lost.
