logo
Journalist Sneha Barve gets fresh death threats, CPJ urges CM Devendra Fadnavis to act against accused

Journalist Sneha Barve gets fresh death threats, CPJ urges CM Devendra Fadnavis to act against accused

Mint11 hours ago
Three weeks after the brutal assault while reporting on illegal construction near Pune, journalist Sneha Barve has received fresh death threats.
The threats were reportedly issued on July 24.
Now, the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) has urged Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis to take immediate action to protect the journalist.
'It is outrageous that journalist Sneha Barve, who was nearly killed for exposing wrongdoing, has been threatened once again, while the main suspect in her assault walks free,' said Kunāl Majumder, CPJ's India representative, reported CPJ.org.
'Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis must urgently guarantee Sneha Barve's safety to send a clear message that attacks on the press will not be tolerated and ensure those responsible are swiftly prosecuted,' Majumder also said.
According to CPJ report, Prashant Pandurang Morde – an accused in the assault case, accosted Barve outside her office in Manchar, Pune district and threatened her, saying: 'This time, we should finish the matter for good.'
On July 18, Prashant Morde - son of key accused Pandurang Sakharam Morde, went to the office of Barve's father and threatened to harm the entire family, the journalist told CPJ.
Barve is the founder of YouTube-based news channel 'Samarth Bharat Pariwar'.
On July 4, she was attacked by a group of men while she was reporting on alleged illegal construction on disputed land in Manchar.
The incident was caught on camera. Its viral video sparked outrage among the people.
The National Commission for Women (NCW) had taken suo motu cognisance of the shocking incident.
NCW Chairperson Vijay Rahatkar strongly condemned the attack and directed the concerned police officials to conduct a fair and time-bound investigation into the matter.
She had also instructed authorities to ensure that the main accused is arrested and that the survivor is provided with appropriate medical and psychological assistance.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

2 caught with heroin in Tarn Taran
2 caught with heroin in Tarn Taran

Hindustan Times

time44 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

2 caught with heroin in Tarn Taran

Security personnel apprehended two 'drug smugglers' and seized 610-gm heroin near Kalsian village in Tarn Taran, the Border Security Force (BSF) stated on Sunday. Taking to X, BSF's Punjab Frontier informed that the alert troops took action after they spotted a drone in the area. Drone-dropped heroin seized by BSGF. In Ferozepur, a DJI Mavic 3 Classic drone was seized near Barreke. The BSF further stated that in another operation in coordination with the Punjab Police, 755-gm heroin was seized from a plastic container near Noorwala, Tarn Taran. 'These recoveries reflect BSF's vigilance, precise intelligence and seamless coordination with Punjab Police in thwarting cross-border narco-smuggling attempts,' the BSF added. Recoveries of drone, drugs, firearms and other items from areas alongside Pakistan border have been a regular feature. Such items are dropped via drones by Pakistan-based smugglers for their aides in the Indian side.

Punjab: Muktsar hospital, doctor, insurer to pay student ₹22 lakh over medical negligence
Punjab: Muktsar hospital, doctor, insurer to pay student ₹22 lakh over medical negligence

Hindustan Times

time44 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Punjab: Muktsar hospital, doctor, insurer to pay student ₹22 lakh over medical negligence

The district consumer disputes redressal commission (DCDRC) in Faridkot has directed a Muktsar-based doctor, hospital and an insurance firm to pay ₹22 lakh compensation to a youth for medical negligence that led to loss of his bright career opportunities abroad. The doctor and the hospital have rubbished the allegations levelled by the complainant, terming his plea an ulterior motive to extract money from them. According to commission president Rakesh Kumar Singla and member Param Pal Kaur's July 23 verdict, Dr Sandeep Singh Sandhu, Sandhu Hospital and Oriental Insurance Company Limited have to comply within 45 days of receipt of a copy of the order. As per rules, the accused can challenge the ruling before the state panel. Gurpreet Singh of Shaheed Balwinder Singh Nagar in Faridkot town had filed a complaint on February 10, 2021, against the three, seeking a compensation of ₹40 lakh. He stated that he was studying in New Zealand to pursue a diploma in 'Business Level 5' after paying a fee of NZ$16,100 for one year starting November 26, 2018. His petition stated that he flew to India on January 1, 2019, to meet his parents when he complained of abdominal pain and was taken to Dr Sandeep, who advised an ultrasound test that reportedly showed a suspicion calculus measuring 5-6 mm in his gallbladder's fundus. He was suggested for laser surgery. After another ultrasound test, the doctor allegedly recommended cholecystectomy, surgical intervention to remove the gallbladder. In their replies before the commission, the doctor and the hospital stated that during an intraoperative procedure, a rare complication was identified and another surgery was done following which Gurpreet complained of swelling in the abdomen and he was taken to a private hospital in Ludhiana. They also rubbished the allegations levelled by the complainant, terming his plea an ulterior motive to extract money from them. After hearing both parties, the commission found the charges of medical negligence true. The order stated that 'no discharge summary has been brought on record by the treating doctor to verify the fact that what procedure was adopted by the doctor and the hospital in treating the patient. There is nothing on record what kind of advice or instructions were given to the complainant regarding his medication and for follow-up. They have not placed on record a consent form showing the signatures of the complainant or his parents, which was mandatory before doing any surgery.' The order also mentioned that there is no record of the review ultrasound that confirms the diagnosis of gallstones and the surgery for suspicious gallstones is not justified. When Gurpreet was referred to a medical institute, no record of medical care or any relevant investigations conducted on him on that day was provided.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store