Game over for helicopters? South Korea just scrapped $2.2 billion US Apache choppers — reason will shock you
South Korea's decision to cancel its $2.2 billion plan to purchase 36 additional AH-64E Apache Guardian helicopters has sparked intense debate about the future of traditional attack helicopters in modern warfare. The canceled order would have doubled the Republic of Korea's current fleet, which already includes 36 Apaches. Now, with changing battlefield dynamics, rising costs, and the growing threat of drones and advanced air defense systems, South Korea is shifting its focus — and its budget — toward unmanned systems and next-generation warfare.
Why did South Korea cancel its $2.2B Apache helicopter order?
The primary reason behind South Korea's decision lies in the dramatic cost increase and budget constraints. According to The Korea Times, the follow-up deal for 36 new AH-64Es faced a 66% rise in cost compared to the first batch purchased a decade ago. This steep hike, coupled with near-zero funding in a supplemental budget approved last Friday, effectively killed the deal.
National Assembly member Yu Yong-weon of the People Power Party pointed out that modern air defense systems, drones, and loitering munitions — seen in real-time warfare like the Russia-Ukraine conflict — have exposed helicopters' growing vulnerabilities. 'Drones and smart systems are redefining modern battlefields,' he told
The Korea Times
. 'Rather than clinging to expensive legacy platforms, we must invest in capabilities that reflect the future of warfare.'
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Shooter Action MMO
Crossout
Play Now
Undo
Did Trump's 25% tariffs cause South Korea to cancel the Apache deal?
Despite speculation, Trump's 25% tariffs were not the reason South Korea scrapped its $2.2 billion deal for 36 U.S.-made Apache AH‑64E helicopters. The real factors were far more immediate and strategic:
Tariffs didn't apply to this deal
Trump's new tariffs mainly target industrial imports like steel, cars, and electronics—not large military purchases. The U.S.–Korea Free Trade Agreement (KORUS) already exempts most traded goods, especially defense equipment, from such duties.
Live Events
So why did South Korea back out?
Skyrocketing costs
: The per-unit price jumped nearly 66%, from around ₩44.1 billion to ₩73.3 billion (~US $52 million each).
Budget slashed
: South Korea's National Assembly cut funding for the Apache program from KR₩100 billion to just ₩300 million.
Warfare lessons from Ukraine
: Apache helicopters were found vulnerable to drones and portable missiles. Lawmakers now favor investing in
unmanned drones, AI systems
, and hybrid tech over traditional manned attack helicopters.
What about Trump's tariffs?
South Korea is currently in urgent trade talks with Washington to avoid the broader impact of the August 1 tariff rollout. But this defense cancellation happened independently, due to cost issues and shifting battlefield strategy, not tariffs.
Are attack helicopters still relevant in modern warfare?
The Apache is not obsolete, but the way it fits into today's battlespace is changing. Attack helicopters like the AH-64 fly low and slow, making them easier targets for MANPADS (man-portable air defense systems), mobile surface-to-air missiles, and anti-aircraft artillery — many of which are becoming increasingly widespread.
In Ukraine, videos have shown multiple Russian helicopters, including the Mi-24/35 and Mi-28, being destroyed by low-cost drones and shoulder-fired missiles. These real-world losses make clear how dangerous modern airspace has become for traditional rotorcraft.
Additionally, cheap loitering munitions, or 'kamikaze drones,' pose a significant threat. These weapons can hover, wait, and strike helicopters mid-flight. On May 22, 2025, footage shared by @Asia_Intel showed a helicopter struck by a First-Person View (FPV) drone — a tactic that's becoming more common.
Can attack helicopters survive in high-threat zones anymore?
Helicopters once relied on terrain masking and radar horizon limitations to stay safe. But with advanced look-down radars, networked sensors, and long-range counter-air missiles, even these survival tactics are losing effectiveness.
New technologies like Air-Launched Effects (ALEs) — which can jam or distract enemy radar — and improved electronic warfare systems help, but they aren't enough to counter all the risks. In many modern combat zones, simply getting close enough to engage the enemy can be a death sentence for helicopters.
The U.S. Army has already begun pivoting in response to these challenges. Instead of expanding traditional helicopter fleets, it's focusing on next-gen aircraft like the V-280 Valor, a tiltrotor aircraft offering greater speed and survivability than traditional helos.
What does this mean for the future of the U.S. Apache fleet?
The U.S. Army currently operates around 825 AH-64 Apaches, but that number may not hold steady. As warfare evolves, defense priorities are shifting toward drones, autonomous systems, and long-range precision weapons. The Apache fleet may be trimmed and rebalanced with newer tools better suited to contested environments.
South Korea's decision could serve as a test case or even a preview of what's to come for other militaries, including the United States. As budgets tighten and technology advances, the high cost and high risk of traditional helicopters could prompt more countries to downsize their rotary-wing forces.
What alternatives is South Korea turning to instead?
Rather than expanding its Apache fleet, South Korea is redirecting funds toward unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and AI-driven weapons systems. These include one-way attack drones with autonomous targeting capabilities — tools that can strike without a human operator at the controls. South Korea already deploys some of these systems, and more advanced versions are under development.
On the rotary side, South Korea still retains indigenous platforms like the Marine Attack Helicopter (MAH) and Light Attack Helicopter (LAH). Though less capable than the Apache, these can supplement existing fleets at lower cost and potentially lower risk.
Overview of the AH-64 Apache
Full Name
: Boeing AH-64 Apache
Role
: Twin-engine attack helicopter
Global Operators
Country
Fleet Size
Notes
United States
~800+
Largest operator; transitioning to AH-64E
South Korea
36
AH-64E variant
India
22 + 6
AH-64E for Air Force and Army
UK
67
British Army (Apache AH1, upgrading to E)
Japan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Netherlands, Egypt, Israel
Various
Cost and Contracts
Unit Cost (AH-64E)
:
Initial Export: ~$31–35 million (2015–2020)
2025 Estimate (South Korea 2nd batch): ~$52 million per unit
Lifetime Cost (incl. maintenance/training)
:
Can exceed
$100 million per helicopter
Is this the beginning of a broader military transformation?
South Korea's Apache cancellation isn't just about money — it reflects a deeper shift in how modern wars will be fought. Drones, smart munitions, and networked battlefield awareness are rewriting the rules. The Apache still has a role to play, especially in combined arms warfare, but large, expensive fleets of traditional helicopters may be a thing of the past.
FAQs:
Q1: Why did South Korea cancel its Apache helicopter deal?
Due to rising costs and increased risks from drones and modern air defenses.
Q2: What will replace South Korea's canceled Apache order?
South Korea plans to invest in drones, AI systems, and smart one-way attack weapons.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
30 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
One Way to Win Trump Over: Nominate Him for the Nobel Prize
WASHINGTON—President Trump often bristles at questions from the media. But he perked up when a reporter asked a group of African leaders if he should be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. 'I didn't know I'd be treated this nicely, we could do this all day long,' Trump said as the African heads of state—gathered Wednesday at the White House for a summit—opined on whether the Norwegian Nobel Committee should bestow its award on America's polarizing president. Trump has long been fixated on awards and prizes given by elites, but nothing has captured his attention like the Nobel Peace Prize. In meetings and speeches, Trump often mentions the honor, sometimes complaining that he hasn't received it. As world leaders and lawmakers seek to curry favor with the president, they have learned that flattery is often the most effective strategy. In lengthy Oval Office meetings in front of television cameras, they have lavished Trump with praise, hailing him as a peacemaker, a visionary and a transformational leader. Increasingly, they are adding to the list a public declaration that Trump deserves the Nobel Peace Prize. The Nobel Peace Prize was bestowed upon Barack Obama in October 2009 for creating 'a new climate in international politics.' The designation, given just months after he was inaugurated, faced backlash from conservatives and other critics of the then-president. Former secretary to the Norwegian Nobel Committee, Geir Lundestad, told the Associated Press that the decision to give the award 'didn't achieve what [the committee] had hoped for.' The hand-wringing could, among other factors, diminish Trump's chances of winning. Other U.S. presidents who won the award while in office include Theodore Roosevelt for mediating the end of a war between Russia and Japan, and Woodrow Wilson for his role in creating the League of Nations. Jimmy Carter also won the award, more than two decades after he left office, in part for his work to resolve international conflicts and promote human rights. Nominations for this year's prize were due by the end of January, so if the committee was going to give it to Trump this year, the nomination likely would have been submitted months ago. The Norwegian Nobel Institute doesn't comment on nominations for the prize, which will be announced in October. World leaders have been eager to please Trump in this second term. The British rolled out their monarchy, dangling a second state visit. The Dutch put him up overnight in a palace. The Finns leveraged the golfing prowess of their president, Alexander Stubb, dispatching him to Florida for some time on the links. Now world leaders have caught on to Trump's desire to win the award. And unlike other Trumpian wishes—such as increasing military spending of North Atlantic Treaty Organization countries or securing a new presidential airplane—this one if granted would come with no monetary cost. World leaders, lawmakers and previous Nobel winners are among the select group who can nominate potential winners. Last month, Pakistan issued a statement saying that Trump should receive the award, citing his role in resolving recent clashes between India and Pakistan, two nuclear-armed countries. Nominating Trump for the peace prize was in Pakistan's self interest, said a senior former minister belonging to the country's ruling political party, Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz. Trump's role resolving the recent tensions, the former official pointed out, prompted Islamabad to tie itself more closely with the U.S. Earlier this week, during a dinner at the White House, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu presented Trump with a copy of the letter that he said he had sent to the Nobel committee nominating Trump for the award. 'Coming from you in particular, this is very meaningful. Thank you very much, Bibi,' Trump said as he examined the letter. On Wednesday, the African leaders were quick to endorse the idea. 'Of course we are supportive,' said Umaro Sissoco Embaló, the president of Guinea-Bissau. Added Gabon's president, Brice Oligui Nguema: 'A Nobel Peace Prize, I don't see any problem with that.' Mauritanian President Mohamed Ould Ghazouani pleaded ignorance about the nomination process, but said his country wouldn't get in the way. 'Our world needs more peace,' he said. The prize isn't really a matter of voting by countries, said Senegalese President, Bassirou Diomaye Faye, though he added that he thought Trump would be a worthy recipient. 'When the time comes, I think everyone will see that it is a deserved prize,' he said. It isn't just world leaders who have attached Trump's name to the big prize. Rep. Darrell Issa (R., Calif.) wrote a letter to the Nobel committee nominating Trump for the honor in March. Other lawmakers pushing for the president to get the award include Sen. Bernie Moreno (R., Ohio) and Rep. Buddy Carter (R., Ga.). Trump's supporters say his efforts to negotiate a cease-fire between Iran and Israel after his decision to launch U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities should qualify him for the award. They they have praised the president for his efforts to secure the release of American hostages from Gaza. Trump hasn't achieved lasting peace in Gaza and Ukraine, despite saying he would end the wars upon taking office. The president's critics have said that his mass-deportation campaign and efforts to target his political opponents should disqualify him from receiving the award. During Trump's first term, a member of the Norwegian Parliament nominated him for the 2021 Peace Prize for helping to broker peace between two Middle Eastern countries. Instead it went to Maria Ressa and Dmitry Andreyevich Muratov, journalists from the Philippines and Russia. Trump has also weighed in on the recipients of the Pulitzer Prize. He sued Pulitzer board members over 2018 prizes they awarded to the Washington Post and the New York Times for coverage of Trump's alleged ties to Russia during the 2016 campaign. Trump's lawyers are in discovery in that case. Write to Annie Linskey at
Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
Malawi's largest refugee camp in crisis
AI generated image In June, the UN refugee agency (UNHCR) said a funding shortfall has compelled it to scale down its operations worldwide. The measure includes some 3,500 staff cuts. In Malawi, where the UNHCR has been active since 1994, refugee camp supervisors and security personnel have since been laid off and the agency is selling off its vehicles, equipment and other assets. The situation is dire at the country's largest camp for refugees and asylum seekers, Dzaleka. According to the UNHCR, several other NGOs involved in the overcrowded camp are also scaling down operations and halting community-based training and sensitization programs. A bleak outlook for refugees in Malawi Dzaleka houses mostly people from Africa's Great Lakes region and the Horn of Africa. Civil society groups and activists are concerned for their welfare of those at Dzaleka and asking how the women and children among them especially will access the basic services. "I think it is very disturbing, especially where women are particularly disadvantaged and you look at the services that are supposed to be provided which fulfill human rights and issues of gender. You look at health care services for example, and the fact that there are job cuts," said Jessie Chingoma, a gender and labor activist. "It means now that the basic public services are not adequate, they have already been inadequate but now the situation becomes much worse. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Transform Your Child's Confidence with Our Public Speaking Program Planet Spark Book Now Undo " Where will the refugees go? "It was reported that the government has started communication with countries where refugees in Dzaleka are from to talk about possible repatriation," Innocent Magambi, a Lilongwe-based refugee rights advocate who was himself once housed at the camp, told DW. "The refugees are worried, because most of them fear they will lose the little security they have." The closure of Dzaleka without a sustainable alternative would be "a very big disaster," Undule Mwakasungula, a human rights activist, told DW. It "could expose refugees to severe human rights violations which might include some refugees being forced to return to their countries," Mwakasungula added. As of March 31, UNHCR said, it had received only 12per cent of the $26 million (€22 million) required to adequately support refugees and asylum-seekers in Malawi this year, which hampers its operations. Inside the Dzaleka camp Dzaleka was built to accommodate 10,000 to 12,000 people. By the end of 2024, it housed 56,779 refugees from the democratic republic of congo (DRC), Rwanda, Somalia, Burundi and Ethiopia. Conflicts and political unrest around Africa have driven many to Dzaleka since 1994. In February 2025 alone,thousands of Mozambicans sought refuge in Malawi. UNHCR data shows a monthly intake of nearly 300 people, with women and children making up 93per cent of the camp's population. "Dzaleka refugee camp remains highly congested resulting in poor living conditions and poor infrastructure being constructed due to limited space and resources," a 2024 UNHCR factsheet on Malawi said. Calls for broader support NGOs like the Malawi Network Against Trafficking are calling on civil society and the private sector can help address the situaion. "I think several players will have to come in, we have already seen or heard the government efforts, but the UN also should not abandon the whole situation," Chingoma told DW. It is also being suggested that the UNHCR and the Malawi government works closely on the voluntary repatriation program that was started in 2023. So far, 310 refugees from Burundi and Somalia primarily have returned home under the initiative. But not everyone agrees with voluntary repatriation. "When you say there is a funding gap and then you say the solution is to close the refugee camp or to seek for repatriation, that is not the context of repatriation," Magambi told DW. "Repatriation should be something that people voluntarily assess the situation back home and they decide to go. It should not be caused by any other external situation like in this case, lack of funding and inability of government to care for refugees." Human rights advocates are meanwhile warning the government to avoid forced repatriations. DW reached out to the government through the office of Homeland security but received no response. What do refugees think? DW asked Innocent Magambi what he, as someone who was sheltered at Dzaleka, thinks is needed in the face of the UNHCR funding shortfall. "Planning for the future is to plan on how we reduce the burden of donor dependency among refugees who have been there for 31 years, some of them," Magambi said. "We need to meet the donors, I believe that the fact that refugees in Dzaleka have been treated as emergency for over 30 years, does not give confidence to donors to continually give money that does not have an end plan."
Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
Microsoft on how AI saved the company more than $500 million in 2024
Microsoft has reportedly saved more than $500 million in 2024, largely due to the widespread adoption of artificial intelligence (AI). During a recent internal presentation, Chief Commercial Officer Judson Althoff highlighted how AI tools are increasing productivity across several key departments, including sales, customer service, and software engineering. Citing a source familiar with the matter, Bloomberg reported that Althoff highlighted the substantial cost reductions in call centers as a prime example of AI's impact, noting that the technology has also led to increased satisfaction for both employees and customers. Microsoft generating 'tens of millions of dollars in revenue' Further expanding its AI integration, Microsoft is now beginning to utilise AI to manage interactions with its smaller customers. While this initiative is still in its early stages, Althoff reported that it is already generating tens of millions of dollars in revenue. Althoff said that at Microsoft, AI generated about 35% of the code for new products, accelerating launch times. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Đây có thể là thời điểm tốt nhất để giao dịch vàng trong 5 năm qua IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo According to the executive, AI can make Microsoft employees more effective as sellers. He said that through the use of Microsoft's Copilot AI assistant, each salesperson is finding more leads, closing deals quicker and generating 9% more revenue. The news of these AI-driven efficiencies arrives soon after workforce reductions at the company. Microsoft has laid off approximately 15,000 employees so far this year. Microsoft executives have, however, reportedly downplayed a direct correlation between the layoffs and the adoption of AI. Microsoft President Brad Smith recently said that productivity gains from AI were 'not a predominant factor' in the job reductions of recent months.
