logo
Sean Combs' Allies Have Upped Pardon Talks. His Survivors Want to Shut Them Down

Sean Combs' Allies Have Upped Pardon Talks. His Survivors Want to Shut Them Down

Yahoo2 days ago
As Sean Combs' camp ramps up its efforts to secure a presidential pardon for the hip-hop mogul, Rolling Stone has learned there are ongoing talks among survivors to send a personal letter to President Donald Trump urging him against the idea.
'The only reason he's coming to Trump now is because he's desperate,' a source who testified at Combs' eight-week criminal trial tells Rolling Stone.
More from Rolling Stone
Why a 'Confused' Trump Lashed Out at a MAGA Senator
Sean Combs Asks Judge to Ditch His Conviction or Retry Prostitution Counts
Senators Could Vote Imminently to Remove Their Homes, Travel Info From Internet
Rolling Stone has reviewed a draft copy of the letter, which admonishes Combs for attempting to 'reclaim control' and 'rewrite history' following his conviction on prostitution charges. A pardon, the draft adds, 'would not be justice' but a 'devastating message to survivors everywhere: that our lives, our pain, and our truth are still negotiable.'
The letter notes signees would be willing to come to the White House to make their case against a pardon in person to Trump. 'We want to tell you the unfiltered truth — free of legal obstruction, PR spin, or courtroom limitations,' the draft reads. 'These stories deserve to be heard.'
Their concerns were sparked this week by renewed reports that Combs' associates have escalated efforts to gain the president's ear following Combs' acquittal on more serious charges of sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy charges earlier this month. Even before a verdict was reached, Trump publicly mulled flexing his pardon power for Combs, whom he was friendly with in the 1990s through the 2010s.
The mixed verdict means Combs will most likely face more prison time after being found guilty of hiring male escorts to travel across state lines to have sex with his girlfriends as he watched and filmed the drug-fueled encounters. But Combs' high-powered defense team has indicated the one-time billionaire is hellbent on securing his release as soon as possible. (Combs has been detained at the Metropolitan Detention Center since his September arrest.)
According to people in and out of the Trump administration, Combs' team has intensified their behind-the-scenes campaign in recent weeks. 'The pleading has gotten bigger [this month],' a Trump adviser says, referring to a conspicuous uptick in Combs allies' attempts to woo Team Trump.
As Rolling Stone reported in May, longtime Combs associates and friends secretly worked for months — even before Trump's January inauguration — to establish contacts with Trump officials and other MAGAworld luminaries with the president's ear. The idea was simple: strike up enough relationships in that universe, portray Combs as the kind of victim that Trump pretends to be, play up Combs and Trump's past chummy relationship, and lay the groundwork for begging for a pardon or clemency if needed.
It appears that moment has arrived. In the spring, it didn't seem like the rapper had a great chance. Though Trump had spoken glowingly of Combs in the past, there wasn't much evidence to suggest this case was on the president's radar. Some senior administration officials who were aware of Diddy World's outreach campaigns thought it'd be a bad idea for Trump to rescue Combs, given the nature of the criminal charges.
Indeed, there are still a number of Trump advisers who feel it would be a grave unforced error to pardon Combs around the same time that Trump and his administration are embroiled in a scandal over their handling of the investigation into the late Jeffrey Epstein, a convicted sex offender and accused sex trafficker. However, Trump recently refused to rule out pardoning the financier's convicted associate, Ghislaine Maxwell, who is angling to be released from prison.
And the president has seemed somewhat sympathetic to Combs' plight, saying in late May that he 'would certainly look at the facts' of the case when asked about the possibility of a pardon. 'I know people are thinking about it,' he added. 'People have been very close to asking.'
Based on those comments, combined with a jury finding Combs not guilty earlier this month on the most severe charges, multiple Trump advisers saw the rapper's odds at securing clemency increase somewhat, with a growing number of people in the president's orbit at least open to the idea that Combs was 'unfairly' treated by the feds.
It's not clear how likely it is that Trump would ultimately sign on to this. After seeking comment from the White House on this story, an official simply replied: 'The White House will not confirm or deny pardons that may or may not happen.' (A rep for Combs declined to comment.)
Sources familiar with the matter say that ever since the verdict, Combs' associates and confidants appear emboldened by the mogul beating charges that could have sent him to prison for life. And several of the Bad Boy Records founder's allies feel that the chances of a Trump pardon are higher than at any other time.
Because of this, they are working whatever angles they can think of to get the twice-impeached, repeatedly indicted president in Combs' corner.
In the past few weeks, longtime allies of the rap mogul have approached political operatives, lobbyists, and others with close ties to Trumpland and government officials, offering to pay them large sums of money if they agreed to help with a potential Trump pardon, three people familiar with the matter tell Rolling Stone. One of the sources says the offer they were privy to was in the mid-six figures. However, the sources note that at least some of these offers have come with the condition that much, if not most, of the cash wouldn't be paid out until after Combs gets pardoned by Trump.
Buttering up Trump for a pardon is one of several contingency plans Combs currently has in play. On Thursday, his legal team filed a 62-page motion asking the judge to set aside his guilty verdict entirely or retry him.
They made a range of arguments, including that Combs is an amateur porn director who was simply exercising his First Amendment rights to film so-called 'freak-offs' between his girlfriends and oiled male escorts. His attorneys also returned to their original claim that it's unprecedented that Combs was charged with the Mann Act prostitution and trafficking statute, which they blasted as having 'racist origins.'
'To our knowledge, Mr. Combs is the only person ever convicted of violating the statute for conduct anything like this,' his attorneys wrote. 'Even if 'prostitution' includes a defendant who pays to observe two other people have sex with each other, the evidence was insufficient to show that Mr. Combs had any such intent. The proof at trial showed that he typically hired the services of male escorts or dancers advertised openly through lawful businesses, that the men were paid for their time, and that they enjoyed the activities and had friendships with [Cassie and a second ex-girlfriend who testified against him] and were not merely traveling to have sex for money.'
At the very least, the attorneys added, Combs should be granted a new trial on these charges alone. They earlier indicated they'd be seeking an appeal if the judge denies their motion, and on Tuesday filed a new bid to grant Combs bail ahead of his Oct. 3 sentencing date.
If the appeal and pardon routes fail, Combs' lawyers are pushing for a minimum sentence, no more than 27 months with credit for the 11 months that he's already served — although that drastically differs from the minimum of 51 months imprisonment that prosecutors have referred to per sentencing guidelines.
Southern District of New York prosecutors are expected to respond to Combs' bail application by Thursday night, as they previously demanded that he remain in custody and cited concerns Combs would go to extreme lengths to avoid any sentence.
Best of Rolling Stone
Sly and the Family Stone: 20 Essential Songs
The 50 Greatest Eminem Songs
All 274 of Taylor Swift's Songs, Ranked
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The billionaire behind mysterious immigration ads targeting Miami Republicans
The billionaire behind mysterious immigration ads targeting Miami Republicans

Boston Globe

time5 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

The billionaire behind mysterious immigration ads targeting Miami Republicans

Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'We are seeing a replay of what I saw when I was 12 years old and left Cuba,' said Fernández, 73, who is known as Mike. 'It is beyond troubling. It is scary.' Advertisement Fernández is a former Republican who left the party more than a decade ago to register without party affiliation. The ad campaign, run by a political group called Keep Them Honest, has made Fernández something of an outlier in Florida, which has moved decidedly to the political right. That trend has occurred throughout Miami-Dade County, where several cities have some of the country's highest levels of foreign-born residents, most of them Hispanic. Republicans have defended President Trump's crackdown on illegal immigration as necessary to ensure the rule of law after the number of migrants crossing the southern border surged in recent years. Advertisement Fernández's immediate goal is to help oust in next year's midterm elections at least one of the state's three Cuban American Republican members of Congress: Representatives Mario Diaz-Balart, Carlos A. Gimenez, and Maria Elvira Salazar. The three Republicans, however, have not entirely supported the White House's immigration crackdown. They have pushed back against the administration's move to strip deportation protections from hundreds of thousands of Venezuelans, a rare instance of dissent between congressional Republicans and Trump. Salazar has also noted that she filed legislation to provide some immigrants a path to legal status, though the effort has not gained much traction. When a local Spanish-language television station asked Diaz-Balart recently about the ads, he said that it was a point of 'much pride' for 'the extreme left to criticize me.' 'Congressman — it's not them,' Fernández wrote, referring to the 'extreme left,' in a letter that he plans to publish soon to reveal his campaign involvement. 'It's us.' It was not previously known that Fernández has led the ad campaign, but he has excoriated the three Republicans before. In May, he wrote a letter urging them to stand up to Trump. He also took out full-page ads against them in the Times and The Wall Street Journal decrying their 'complicity and cowardice.' Fernández knows his campaign to unseat any of the three representatives might fail: They are well known, none of their districts are very competitive and, Fernández said, there does not appear to be strong prospective Democratic candidates to challenge them. Advertisement As much as he is pouring his money into the ads, Fernández acknowledged that just spending his fortune may not be enough to reach his goal. 'It cannot just be cash on the table,' he said. By putting his name to the campaign, Fernández said he would like to initiate a 'movement' of like-minded donors, activists, and voters to commit to robustly challenging congressional Republicans in the midterms, who he says have not done enough to challenge the Trump administration's immigration policies. Fernández said he had privately persuaded more than 30 donors, about a third of them Republicans, to contribute since April to Keep Them Honest. As a 'dark money' group, Keep Them Honest can fund issue ads and does not have to disclose its donors. He would like more of them to speak publicly but is not sure if they will for fear of retaliation. Fernández said he had received threats and lost investors, friends, and close contact with some family members as a result of his political involvement. By his estimation, Fernández donated more than $30 million to Republican candidates over the years, including small contributions in the past to Salazar, whom he is now targeting. He also served as finance cochair of the 2014 reelection campaign of former governor Rick Scott, a Republican, and donated millions to Jeb Bush's Republican presidential campaign in 2016. After Trump won that year's primary, Fernández endorsed Hillary Clinton, a Democrat, in the general election. Fernández's family arrived in New York in 1965. He remembered how other immigrants in the city, from Mexico and Ireland, gave him snow boots and a coat. He later served as a paratrooper in the US Army. Advertisement He recently rescinded a $10 million donation to Miami Dade College and a $1 million donation to Florida International University, both public institutions. It was a response to state lawmakers and Governor Ron DeSantis, a Republican, repealing legislation from 2014 that allowed certain immigrants who were brought into the country illegally as children to pay in-state tuition rates. Fernández had forcefully lobbied for the original law, which hangs framed on his office wall. He said he was redirecting some of that money to a nonprofit that provides students lacking permanent legal status with scholarships to private schools. 'I have to leave a mark,' he said, 'an example to my family and my children.' This article originally appeared in

Texas Democrats Leave State to Foil Republican Effort to Redraw State's Congressional Districts
Texas Democrats Leave State to Foil Republican Effort to Redraw State's Congressional Districts

Wall Street Journal

time6 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Texas Democrats Leave State to Foil Republican Effort to Redraw State's Congressional Districts

AUSTIN, Texas— Democrats in the Texas state House fled the state Sunday afternoon, in an attempt to thwart plans by President Trump and Gov. Greg Abbott to redraw the state's congressional districts. Abbott, a Republican, called a 30-day special session of the state legislature after requests by the White House to change the state's congressional maps to add five new Republican seats. That special session started July 21, with the new maps presented last week.

Tulsi Gabbard explains why Russia must have thought Hillary Clinton win was ‘inevitable'
Tulsi Gabbard explains why Russia must have thought Hillary Clinton win was ‘inevitable'

New York Post

time35 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Tulsi Gabbard explains why Russia must have thought Hillary Clinton win was ‘inevitable'

The Russians privately felt it was 'inevitable' that Hillary Clinton would triumph in the 2016 election, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said on Miranda Devine's 'Pod Force One' podcast. Despite widespread narratives that Russia was in President Trump's corner, Moscow's objective was to sow chaos in the American political process and brace itself for a Clinton presidency, Gabbard claimed, citing the trove of intelligence documents her team has released. 'It surprised me that all of these documents still existed, quite frankly,' Gabbard said in an episode set for release Wednesday. 'As we've learned in later documents that we've reviewed throughout that campaign, Russia believed that Hillary Clinton would win the election. Advertisement 'They felt it was inevitable.' Last month, Gabbard's team began disclosing a trove of documents that gave a behind-the-scenes look at the intelligence community's machinations during the 2016 election cycle regarding the probe of Russian interference. 4 Tulsi Gabbard accused the Obama administration of mounting a campaign to subvert President Trump. Ron Sachs – CNP for NY Post Advertisement 4 Hillary Clinton once implied that Tulsi Gabbard is a Russian asset. Getty Images This included a House Intelligence Committee report from 2020 that claimed the Russians may have had intelligence that Clinton was 'placed on a daily regimen of 'heavy tranquilizers' and while afraid of losing.' That was supposedly due to her alleged 'psycho-emotional problems, including uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression, and cheerfulness.' Gabbard pondered why that supposed Russian intelligence wasn't leaked to the public if Moscow's chief objective was to prop up Trump and undermine Clinton. Advertisement 'If Russia aspired to help Trump get elected, which is what the manufactured January 2017 intelligence community assessment says with high confidence, according to Brennan and Clapper, then Putin would have released the most damaging information and emails to help President Trump,' she said. 'It was intentionally withheld and not released because they assumed that Hillary Clinton would win that election, and their plan,' Gabbard added, citing the 2020 House Intelligence Committee report, '[was to] wait until maybe days or weeks before her inauguration to release these documents.' The Russians were widely alleged by US officials to have hacked Democratic National Committee emails during he 2016 campaign. 4 Narratives about Russian interferences in the 2016 election haunted President Trump during his first term. AFP via Getty Images Advertisement The 2020 House Intelligence Committee report had concluded that Russian strongman Vladimir Putin's 'principal motivations in these operations were to undermine faith in the US democratic process' and that he didn't necessarily prioritize propping up one candidate over the other. 'The American people, I think, have been, and our republic, has been most harmed by this,' Gabbard said of the Russia collusion narrative. 'Of course, President Trump went through hell and his family because of this Russia hoax that was manufactured by President Obama and his administration.' Critics such as former CIA Director John Brennan and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper accused Gabbard of peddling 'patently false' accusations about their Russiagate activities. Much of what Gabbard has released centered around rebuffing a 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA), which concluded among other things that 'the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump.' Brennan, Clapper and others have pointed to a 2020 bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee report, which noted the panel 'heard consistently that analysts were under no politically motivated pressure to reach specific conclusions.' Clapper and Brennan recenty penned an op-ed insisting that the intelligence community report never referenced 'collusion' between Trump and the Russian government, and stood by their claims that the Kremlin prefered him in the 2016 election. Tulsi Gabbard's Russiagate claims Tulsi Gabbard's claims of election interference focus on the controversial 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment, which President Barack Obama ordered his intel chiefs to compile. The report fueled the Russiagate investigations against President Trump. Gabbard alleges it amounted to a political hit job, claiming Obama officials knowingly used shaky intel and then lied about it. Gabbard's new claims are based on a 2020 House Intelligence Committee report, which she has publicly released. Its findings differ in some key ways from both the Obama report and a previously released Senate Intelligence Committee report. Democrats, however, point to the Senate report, which was backed by then-Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) — now Trump's secretary of state. That supports some of the findings of the Obama report. Here are the biggest points — and what the dueling intel reports say: The Steele dossier The House report contradicts the claims of Obama officials that they never relied on the discredited Steele dossier — which was compiled by Hillary Clinton's campaign — as part of the Russiagate investigation. In a 2017 House hearing, Obama CIA Director John Brennan denied that his agency used the Steele dossier for intelligence assessments. However, the full Steele dossier was still included as an attachment to the Obama intel report, the newly public House report found. Additionally, according to the House report, Brennan, FBI Director James Comey and Deputy Director Andrew McCabe pushed to use the Steele dossier for the Obama intel report. Senior intel officials also confronted Brennan about the legitimacy of the Steele dossier, the House report said, but he shrugged it off. Brennan's response was reportedly, 'Yes, but doesn't it ring true?' The Senate investigation found that the Steele dossier was not used as part of the Obama intel report. Obama's involvement Gabbard claimed Wednesday that Obama ordered the creation of the 2017 intel report and suggested it 'was subject to unusual directives directly from the president and senior political appointees.' She added: 'Obama directed an intelligence community assessment to be created, to further this contrived false narrative that ultimately led to a year-long coup to try to undermine President Trump's presidency.' The 2020 Senate intel report confirmed that Obama ordered the report to be drafted, but did not comment on the political motivations. Obama said that 'the bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction.' Did Putin want Trump to win? The Obama report said that 'Russia's goals were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability' and that Putin had a 'clear preference for President-elect Trump.' But the House report contradicted this, saying that Putin's 'principal motivations in these operations were to undermine faith in the US democratic process.' The Russian strongman also seemed to expect Clinton to win, and held back on 'some compromising material for post-election use against the expected Clinton administration.' The Senate report said lawmakers were given 'specific intelligence reporting to support the assessment that Putin and the Russian Government demonstrated a preference for candidate Trump.' Did Russia alter the 2016 election? To buttress her claims that the Obama intel report was political interference, she highlighted the findings of multiple intelligence agencies that Russia 'had neither the intent nor capability to impact the outcome of the US election.' On this, all three reports are in agreement. Gabbard pointed to how Obama ordered the 2017 ICA of Russian interference in the 2016 election and his administration's machinations detailed in the document dump to accuse the 44th president of subversion. Advertisement 'What we now know came from President Obama was a covert mission, essentially, to subvert the will of the American people, create this lie that would challenge the legitimacy of President Trump's election and the four years of his administration, resulting and affecting in what was truly a years' long coup,' Gabbard said. Reps from Obama have refuted those characterizations, saying that the 'bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction.' 'Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes,' Obama spokesperson Patrick Rodenbush said in a statement last month. 4 Tulsi Gabbard has drawn President Trump's attention with the document dump on Russiagate. REUTERS Advertisement Gabbard made referrals to the Justice Department based on her findings, and the DOJ has since formed a 'strike force' to comb through the claims.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store