Gunman behind Michigan church rampage ID'd as local who attended services with mother
Brian Anthony Browning, 31, was loaded to the teeth with weapons and ammo when he began shooting outside the CrossPointe Community Church in Wayne shortly after 11 a.m. Sunday, leaving stunned worshippers running for cover, according to footage posted on X by BNO News.
'Everybody to the back!' a woman yelled to panicked parishioners inside the church. 'Please, everybody, come to the back!'
Advertisement
3 Brian Anthony Browning, 31, was fatally shot by security guards after he opened fire outside a Michigan church Sunday.
Wayne Police Department
Browning's mother is a member of the church, and he attended services there a handful of times over the past year, the Detroit News reported.
The motive for the shooting is not clear. Browning was shot dead by church security before he could enter the church. A security guard also was wounded in the firefight.
Advertisement
Browning was armed with an AR-15 style rifle at the time, along with more than a dozen fully loaded magazines, a semiautomatic handgun with an extended magazine and hundreds of rounds of ammunition, the outlet said.
He was spotted driving 'erratically' outside the church before the shooting, the News said.
The suspect was wearing a tactical vest when he exited a vehicle and opened fire with a long gun and handgun, Wayne Police Chief Ryan Strong said during a press conference Sunday.
3 The shooting sent parishioners into a panic.
Getty Images
Advertisement
A churchgoer drove over him with a pickup truck to try to stop him, CrossPointe Community Church Senior Pastor Bobby Kelly Jr. told the outlet.
Then 'the security team locked the front doors and exchanged gunfire with the suspect, who was shot and killed by a member of the security team,' Wayne Police said in a statement.
At least two church security officers fatally wounded Browning before he had a chance to enter the church, cops said.
3 Browning had no previous contacts with police.
WXYZ
Advertisement
Cops arrived and attempted to perform life-saving measures on Browning, but he was pronounced dead at the scene, Strong said.
A security guard was shot in the leg and taken to the hospital in stable condition, according to authorities.
More rifles, semi-automatic handguns and ammunition were found in Browning's home, the outlet reported.
He had no previous contacts with police or a criminal record, cops said.
'We are grateful for the heroic actions of the church's staff members, who undoubtedly saved many lives and prevented a large-scale mass shooting,' Wayne Police Chief Ryan Strong said in a statement.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Teenager arrested after police seize samurai sword from Dudley street
A teenager has been arrested after a samurai sword was seized by police in Dudley. Police were called to reports of a weapon being brandished in Netherton at around 4.35pm yesterday, July 23. A member of the public told officers they had seen a weapon on Wrens Nest Road. READ MORE: Woman fighting for her life after Selly Oak crash as hero locals rush to her aid A samurai sword was later recovered from the scene. Police then arrested a 15-year-old boy on suspicion of possession of a sharp pointed article in a public place. He remains in custody for questioning. A West Midlands Police spokesperson said: "A teenager has been arrested after we received reports of a weapon being brandished in Netherton. "Just after 4.35pm yesterday afternoon (23 Jul) we received a call from a member of the public after they had seen a weapon on Wrens Nest Road, Dudley. "We quickly responded and a 15-year-old boy was arrested on suspicion of possession of a sharp pointed article in a public place. He remains in custody for questioning. "A samurai sword was also recovered. "We take knife crime and carrying a weapon seriously. "If you know someone who is carrying a weapon please call us on 101 to report. "You can also talk to us online or report anonymously to Crimestoppers on 0800 555 111."
19-07-2025
Lawyer argues Call of Duty maker can't be held responsible for actions of Uvalde, Texas, shooter
LOS ANGELES -- A lawyer for the maker of the video game Call of Duty argued Friday that a judge should dismiss a lawsuit brought by families of the victims of the Robb Elementary School attack in Uvalde, Texas, saying the contents of the war game are protected by the First Amendment. The families sued Call of Duty maker Activision and Meta Platforms, which owns Instagram, saying that the companies bear responsibility for promoting products used by the teen gunman. Three sets of parents who lost children in the shooting were in the audience at the Los Angeles hearing. Activision lawyer Bethany Kristovich told Superior Court Judge William Highberger that the 'First Amendment bars their claims, period full stop.' 'The issues of gun violence are incredibly difficult,' Kristovich said. 'The evidence in this case is not.' She argued that the case has little chance of prevailing if it continues, because courts have repeatedly held that 'creators of artistic works, whether they be books, music, movies, TV or video games, cannot be held legally liable for the acts of their audience.' The lawsuit, one of many involving Uvalde families, was filed last year on the second anniversary of one of the deadliest school shootings in U.S. history. The gunman killed 19 students and two teachers. Officers finally confronted and shot him after waiting more than an hour to enter the fourth-grade classroom. Kimberly Rubio, whose 10-year-old daughter Lexi was killed in the shooting, was among the parents who came from Texas to Southern California, where Activision is based, for the hearing. 'We traveled all this way, so we need answers,' Rubio said outside the courthouse. "It's our hope that the case will move forward so we can get those answers." Another attorney for the families argued during the hearing that Call of Duty exceeds its First Amendment protections by moving into marketing. 'The basis of our complaint is not the existence of Call of Duty," Katie Mesner-Hage told the judge. "It is using Call of Duty as a platform to market weapons to minors.' The plaintiffs' lawyers showed contracts and correspondence between executives at Activison and gunmakers whose products, they said, are clearly and exactly depicted in the game despite brand names not appearing. Mesner-Hage said the documents show that they actually prefer being unlabeled because 'It helps shield them from the implication that they are marketing guns to minors,' while knowing that players will still identify and seek out the weapons. Kristovich said there is no evidence that the kind of product placement and marketing the plaintiffs are talking about happened in any of the editions of the game the shooter played. The families have also filed a lawsuit against Daniel Defense, which manufactured the AR-style rifle used in the May 24, 2022, shooting. Koskoff argued that a replica of the rifle clearly appears on a splash page for Call of Duty. Koskoff, a Connecticut lawyer, also represented families of nine Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting victims in a lawsuit against gunmaker Remington and got a $73 million lawsuit settlement. He invoked Sandy Hook several times in his arguments, saying the shooters there and in Uvalde shared the same gaming obsession. Koskoff said the Uvalde shooter experienced 'the absorption and the loss of self in Call of Duty.' He said that immersion was so deep that the shooter searched online for how to obtain an armored suit that he didn't know only exists in the game. Koskoff played a clip from Call of Duty Modern Warfare, the game the shooter played, with a first-person shooter gunning down opponents. The shots echoed loudly in the courtroom, and several people in the audience slowly shook their heads. 'Call of Duty is in a class of its own," Koskoff said. Kristovich argued for Activision that the game, despite its vast numbers of players, can be tied to only a few of the many U.S. mass shootings. 'The game is incredibly common. It appears in a scene on 'The Office,'" she said. She added that it is ridiculous to assert that 'this is such a horrible scourge that your honor has to essentially ban it through this lawsuit.' Highberger told the lawyers he was not leaning in either direction before the hearing. He gave no time frame for when he will rule, but a quick decision is not expected. The judge did tell the plaintiffs' lawyers that their description of Activision's actions seemed like deliberate malfeasance, where their lawsuit alleges negligence. He said that was the biggest hurdle they needed to clear. 'Their conduct created a risk of exactly what happened,' Mesner-Hage told him. 'And we represent the people who are exactly the foreseeable victims of that conduct.'
The Hill
18-07-2025
- The Hill
Lawyer argues Call of Duty maker can't be held responsible for actions of Uvalde, Texas, shooter
LOS ANGELES (AP) — A lawyer for the maker of the video game Call of Duty argued Friday that a judge should dismiss a lawsuit brought by families of the victims of the Robb Elementary School attack in Uvalde, Texas, saying the contents of the war game are protected by the First Amendment. The families sued Call of Duty maker Activision and Meta Platforms, which owns Instagram, saying that the companies bear responsibility for products used by the teenage gunman. Three sets of parents who lost children in the shooting were in the audience at the Los Angeles hearing. Activision lawyer Bethany Kristovich told Superior Court Judge William Highberger that the 'First Amendment bars their claims, period full stop.' 'The issues of gun violence are incredibly difficult,' Kristovich said. 'The evidence in this case is not.' She argued that the case has little chance of prevailing if it continues, because courts have repeatedly held that 'creators of artistic works, whether they be books, music, movies, TV or video games, cannot be held legally liable for the acts of their audience.' The lawsuit, one of many involving Uvalde families, was filed last year on the second anniversary of one of the deadliest school shootings in U.S. history. The gunman killed 19 students and two teachers. Officers finally confronted and shot him after waiting more than an hour to enter the fourth-grade classroom. At the hearing, the families' attorney, Josh Koskoff, argued that the game goes beyond artistic representation into marketing weapons to teenagers. He showed contracts and correspondence between executives at Activison and gun makers whose products, he said, are clearly and exactly depicted in the game despite brand names not appearing. 'Likenesses of brands,' Koskoff said, 'whether they are labeled or not, is of great value to Call of Duty.' The families have also filed a lawsuit against Daniel Defense, which manufactured the AR-style rifle used in the May 24, 2022, shooting. Koskoff said the shooter experienced 'the absorption and the loss of self in Call of Duty.' He said that immersion was so deep that the shooter searched online for how to obtain an armored suit that he didn't know only exists in the game. Koskoff played a Call of Duty clip, with a first-person shooter gunning down opponents. The shots echoed loudly in the courtroom, and several people in the audience slowly shook their heads. 'Call of Duty is in a class of its own,' Koskoff said. Family lawyers are expected to argue the First Amendment issues of the Activision case later Friday. The motion for Activision to be dismissed as a defendant is based on California's anti-SLAPP law, or 'strategic lawsuits against public participation.' It is meant to block lawsuits filed to intimidate or silence critics. Highberger asked Kristovich whether it was appropriate for a major company to invoke a statute meant to protect 'the little guy' against a powerful opponent. 'The statute is clear, it does not depend on the court's characterization of big guy, little guy or medium guy,' Kristovich said. 'The First Amendment applies regardless of the size of your pocketbook.' Highberger told the lawyers he wasn't leaning in either direction before the hearing, and it is unlikely he will issue a ruling immediately. The judge did tell the plaintiffs' lawyers that their description of Activision's actions seemed like deliberate malfeasance, where their lawsuit alleges negligence. He said that was the biggest hurdle they needed to clear.
