
New Buy Rating for Accenture (ACN), the Technology Giant
Elevate Your Investing Strategy:
Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence.
Make smarter investment decisions with TipRanks' Smart Investor Picks, delivered to your inbox every week.
According to TipRanks, Grossman is a 4-star analyst with an average return of 8.1% and a 56.94% success rate. Grossman covers the Technology sector, focusing on stocks such as Accenture, Epam Systems, and Infosys.
In addition to Stifel Nicolaus, Accenture also received a Buy from UBS's Kevin Mcveigh in a report issued on July 2. However, on July 7, Jefferies maintained a Hold rating on Accenture (NYSE: ACN).
Based on Accenture's latest earnings release for the quarter ending May 31, the company reported a quarterly revenue of $17.73 billion and a net profit of $2.2 billion. In comparison, last year the company earned a revenue of $16.47 billion and had a net profit of $1.93 billion
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CTV News
24 minutes ago
- CTV News
Trial opens against Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg and other leaders over Facebook privacy violations
Meta Founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg speaks at LlamaCon 2025, an AI developer conference, in Menlo Park, Calif., on April 29, 2025. (Jeff Chiu / AP Photo) WILMINGTON, Del. -- An US$8 billion class action investors' lawsuit against Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg and company leaders -- current and former -- began Wednesday, with claims stemming from the 2018 privacy scandal involving the Cambridge Analytica political consulting firm. Investors allege in their lawsuit that Meta did not fully disclose the risks that Facebook users' personal information would be misused by Cambridge Analytica, a firm that supported Donald Trump's successful Republican presidential campaign in 2016. Shareholders say Facebook officials repeatedly and continually violated a 2012 consent order with the Federal Trade Commission under which Facebook agreed to stop collecting and sharing personal data on platform users and friends without their consent. Facebook later sold user data to commercial partners in direct violation of the consent order and removed disclosures from privacy settings that were required under consent order, the lawsuit alleges. The fallout led to Facebook agreeing to pay a $5.1 billion penalty to settle FTC charges. The social media giant also faced significant fines in Europe and reached a $725 million privacy settlement with users. Now shareholders want Zuckerberg and others to reimburse Meta for the FTC fine and other legal costs, which the plaintiffs estimate total more than $8 billion. The first trial witness, privacy expert Neil Richards, testified Monday morning for the shareholders. 'Facebook's privacy disclosures were misleading,' said Richards, a professor at Washington University Law School. In later testimony, Jeffrey Zients, who served on Facebook's board from 2018 to 2020, testified that consumer privacy and user data were priorities for both management and the board. Nonetheless, he supported settling with the FTC as it investigated potential violations of the 2012 consent order, so the company could move forward. 'It was difficult because this was a lot of money, but I think it was better than the alternative,' Zients said. Asked if the board considered making its founder a party to the settlement, he said Zuckerberg was 'essential' to running the company. And, Zients, who served in both the Obama and Biden administrations, said, 'there was no indication that he had done anything wrong.' The case is expected to run through late next week and include testimony from both Zuckerberg and former chief operating officer Sheryl Sandberg. Other witnesses expected in Delaware Chancery Court, where Facebook parent Meta Platforms Inc. is incorporated, include board member Marc Andreessen and former board member Peter Thiel. The judge is not expected to rule for several months. Meta had hoped the Supreme Court would dismiss the case. Justices heard arguments in November before deciding they should not have taken it up. The high court dismissed the company's appeal, leaving in place an appellate ruling allowing the case to go forward. -- Maryclaire Dale and Barbara Ortutay, The Associated Press Ortutay reported from San Francisco.


CBC
25 minutes ago
- CBC
Several hundred people laid off after open pit mining abruptly stops at N.W.T.'s Ekati diamond mine
Burgundy Diamond Mines says it's laid off several hundred employees and contractors and has temporarily stopped open pit mining at Point Lake — one of its two active operations at the Ekati Diamond Mine. In an emailed statement to CBC News on Wednesday, Ariella Calin, a communications manager for the company, said mining the Point Lake kimberlite pipe had become "sub-economic" because diamond prices have reached record lows. Calin said Burgundy will continue to maintain the open pit so that operations can start again quickly if the economic situation gets better. She also said mining at the Misery underground mine, about two kilometres away from Point Lake, will continue and that its "production rates have significantly improved in recent months" with new mining techniques and equipment. Ekati is one of the N.W.T.'s three diamond mines, which are all approaching closure — raising fears for how the N.W.T.'s economy will pivot once they close, and what it will mean for Indigenous governments, as the mines provide revenue and jobs for many communities. All three mines reported millions of dollars in losses in 2024, with Ekati seeing a $94.7-million loss.


CBC
25 minutes ago
- CBC
Manitoba cabinet minister cleared of insider trading allegation after ethics review
Manitoba's ethics commissioner has ruled Mike Moroz, the minister of innovation and new technology, did not break the province's conflict of interest law. The Opposition Progressive Conservatives had accused Moroz of being in a conflict by answering questions about a 911 service outage while owning shares in Telus. The Tories also accused Moroz of using inside information that criticized the phone company for the outage and selling company stock. In a nine-page report, ethics commissioner Jeffrey Schnoor says there is no evidence that Moroz made any government decisions involving Telus and there is no ban on cabinet ministers owning shares in publicly traded companies. Schnoor also says Moroz did not have insider information and only had access to documents that were publicly available at the time. The 911 disruption in March occurred at a time when a 55-year-old man from Fisher Branch died of a heart attack, and family and friends said they had been unable to get through to the emergency line. "There is no evidence that Minister Moroz made any decision in this matter. At most, he wrote to Telus to express concern and ask for information; this cannot be characterized as a decision," Schnoor wrote in his decision released Wednesday. Phone services are regulated federally by the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, not provincially, Schnoor said, and Moroz did not have inside information. "On the contrary, his information about this matter appears to have come from media reports and publicly available documents on the CRTC's website," Schnoor wrote. Moroz sold his 500 shares in Telus in May and garnered $10,391, incurring a loss of $1,591, the report says.