Non-grant of permanent commission to lady officer: SC reproaches Navy action
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
The Supreme Court on Tuesday disapproved of non-grant of permanent commission to a 2007 batch Short Service Commission officer despite its direction.Verbally observing that "enough is enough", a bench headed by Justice Surya Kant asked Naval authorities to shed their egos.The bench asked the authorities to consider the case of 2007 batch Judge Advocate Generals (JAG or legal) branch officer Seema Chaudhary within a week and grant her permanent commission.The bench told counsel appearing for the Centre and Naval authorities: "Enough is enough. Please mend your ways. We will give you one week to take her in for the permanent commission. Does the authority concerned think they can sit over the orders of the court? What kind of disciplined force are you?"The bench, after examining the minutes of the selection board and the annual confidential reports of the officer, asked why Chaudhary was not taken in the permanent commission when the authorities claimed she had attained all benchmarks.The bench verbally remarked: "The authority concerned has to shed its ego. How can you say that she is fit in all aspects but still we cannot take her in permanent commission? There is a clear-cut finding of this court that her case has to be considered on a standalone basis. Then why was she not considered till now?"The counsel for authorities argued that though she checked all parameters, her three annual confidential reports (ACR) contained adverse remarks which couldn't be overlooked for the grant of permanent commission.The bench asked the counsel to furnish the three ACRs and said the remarks made by initiating officers were eventually overruled by the reviewing officer and final authority even accorded her the full 7.6 marks.The counsel said that the Navy did not have a closed mind and "she can be taken" upon a court direction. The counsel, however, sought time to take instructions on the matter. The bench posted the matter for orders after the court's summer break and said the 2024 judgement of the SC, passed in her review plea, had attained finality.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
39 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Denied toilet access, made to kneel overnight: US deportee says he was tortured in El Salvador prison
Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia was supposed to be safe. In 2019, a US immigration judge ruled that the 29-year-old Salvadoran could not be deported to his home country, citing credible fears that local gangs there would persecute him and his family. But in March 2025, the Trump administration deported him anyway. What followed has triggered a political and legal firestorm over the administration's immigration enforcement, reaching all the way to the US Supreme Court. The White House has repeatedly claimed that Abrego Garcia is a member of MS-13, the Salvadoran gang the US government has designated a foreign terrorist organisation. US President Donald Trump, speaking last month, declared that Abrego Garcia 'will never live' in the United States again. Yet multiple judges, including one on the Supreme Court, have ruled that he was deported in error and that the government is obliged to help 'facilitate' his return to Maryland, where he had lived since 2012. That court order came only after Abrego Garcia had already spent nearly three harrowing months inside El Salvador's notorious Terrorism Confinement Center, or CECOT, where he was sent immediately after his wrongful deportation. 'Welcome to CECOT. Whoever enters here doesn't leave,' one official reportedly told him upon arrival, according to court documents filed by his lawyers. Held in an overcrowded, windowless cell with bright lights on 24 hours a day, Abrego Garcia says he was forced to sleep on a metal bunk with no mattress and was denied access to a bathroom, eventually soiling himself. He said he lost 14 kg in two weeks. In his testimony, he lists harrowing details. Upon arrival, he says he was kicked and hit repeatedly, leaving his body bruised and swollen. He and 20 others were made to kneel overnight, with guards striking anyone who collapsed, he claims. At times, he was told he would be transferred to cells with known gang members who would 'tear' him apart. He also said he heard screaming through the night. He saw prisoners assaulting each other in nearby cells. He was told by prison staff that his tattoos would mark him for death—until they later admitted they weren't gang-related at all. According to the new court filings, Salvadoran prison officials determined that Abrego Garcia was not affiliated with any gang. The Trump administration initially brushed aside the deportation as an 'administrative error.' But after weeks of legal pressure, it abruptly flew Abrego Garcia back to the US last month—not to release him, but to indict him. He is now in federal custody in Nashville, Tennessee, facing charges of participating in a conspiracy to smuggle undocumented immigrants, allegedly as a member of MS-13. His lawyers argue the evidence is flimsy and that the government is backpedalling on its previous mistake by doubling down on criminal accusations. Justice Department attorney Jonathan Guynn told a Maryland judge that the US intends to deport Abrego Garcia again, this time to an unnamed third country. There is no set timeline, but his attorneys say the threat is immediate and illegal. 'This was not a mistake,' one of his lawyers told reporters. 'It was a deliberate defiance of a court order.' The Justice Department has not commented publicly on whether it will comply with the Supreme Court's latest ruling or where it intends to send Abrego Garcia next.
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
The dragon is tightening its hold: Can India defy it?
Why is China waging a low-intensity war on Indian manufacturing? Live Events You Might Also Like: Foxconn recalls Chinese staff from India, disrupting Apple's iPhone 17 plans Can China hobble India's rise as a manufacturing power? (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel In recent months, geopolitical undercurrents have intensified between Asia's two largest economies, India and China. While the military standoff in Ladakh's Galwan Valley in 2020 marked a turning point in bilateral relations, a quieter but far more consequential confrontation is now unfolding. China is trying to undermine India's manufacturing ascent through strategic export denials, regulatory pressure and skilled labour restrictions. Several steps taken by China in the past few months indicate a well-formed strategy to hobble India's rise as a manufacturing power just when many factors align to help India's dependence on Chinese imports in several sectors, China can seriously hamper India's dream of becoming a rival manufacturing power. But in the long run, its obstructive measures will only help India gain economic strategy appears to be increasingly shaped by the need to maintain its dominance as the world's factory, especially as global manufacturers pursue the 'China Plus One' strategy to diversify supply chains. India, with its vast labour force, growing infrastructure and government-backed industrial policies, is emerging as a prime alternative. This transition poses a direct threat to China's central role in global recent actions suggest it is deploying several tools to delay or derail India's industrial ambitions. Bloomberg reported on Wednesday that over 300 Chinese engineers employed by Foxconn in India have been recalled to China, reportedly due to regulatory pressure from Beijing. These engineers were supposed to be critical to the upskilling of Indian teams at Foxconn's iPhone assembly lines, a process essential to ramp up production of future models like the iPhone China has either halted or significantly delayed exports of key materials to India, including rare earth magnets (vital for manufacturing electric vehicles), specialty fertilisers (essential for Indian agriculture), and even tunnel boring machines (critical for infrastructure projects like metros and smart cities). These are not isolated trade hiccups but part of a broader strategy to weaponize trade and technology transfers. Beijing is keen to prevent a large-scale migration of Chinese technology and manufacturing expertise to India. By restricting technology and skilled labour exports, China aims to create bottlenecks in India's supply chain just as it begins gaining global could be two key motivations behind China's behaviour. India's post-Galwan measures, such as tightened scrutiny of Chinese FDI, banning hundreds of Chinese apps and blocking Huawei and ZTE from 5G trials in 2021, have significantly curtailed China's economic leverage in India. Denied access to one of the world's largest markets, Beijing may be retaliating economically to assert its relevance and influence. Secondly, China wants to strengthen a pre-emptive control of supply chains. As India's PLI schemes begin to yield tangible results -- Apple boosting iPhone production, semiconductor plans taking off and India becoming a major mobile phone exporter -- China wants to prevent a global narrative shift from 'Make in China' to 'Make in India".India's dependence on China for several intermediate goods, especially in electronics, EVs, chemicals and rare earth elements, is substantial. China controls more than 85% of global rare earth processing, and a large portion of Indian imports for electronics manufacturing still originate from China. In the short term, China's restrictions can cause delays, cost overruns and capacity the long-term picture is more nuanced. The exit of Chinese engineers from Foxconn's Indian operations is deemed to have a "negligible" impact, as per Apple analyst Ming-Chi Kuo. He noted that there were not many Chinese employees at the company's India iPhone facilities. Production capabilities at Foxconn's India iPhone facilities were established by the company's Taiwanese employees, like those from FIH's Minsheng plant, not Chinese employees, he said. Even amid US tariff threat over iPhones, Foxconn has not slowed down its ongoing mega expansion in India. This indicates that while Chinese know-how may have played a critical role in the initial ramp-up, Indian talent and local engineering capabilities are set to mature global firms are increasingly bullish on India. Apple's contract manufacturers, including Foxconn, Pegatron and Wistron (now owned by Tata), continue to expand their Indian footprints. With supply chain diversification being a geopolitical imperative for Western companies, India remains a central part of this new global manufacturing has recognized the vulnerabilities arising from over-reliance on China and has responded with a mix of policy, investment and diplomatic initiatives. India is offering financial incentives across 14 sectors -- including semiconductors, electronics, EVs and pharmaceuticals -- to attract investment and scale up manufacturing. The PLI scheme has already contributed to India becoming the second-largest mobile phone producer in the in a direct response to China's rare earth squeeze, India is preparing a Rs 3,500–5,000 crore PLI scheme to boost the local manufacturing of rare earth magnets. Under this scheme, Sona Comstar, a major importer of these magnets, has announced plans to produce them domestically, signaling industry alignment with national goals. India is actively exploring alternate sources for specialty fertilisers and critical minerals, including deals with countries like Australia, Vietnam, and African nations. This aims to insulate agriculture and green energy sectors from Chinese pressure. India is investing heavily in upskilling its labour force and creating engineering talent pipelines to reduce dependency on Chinese programmes and partnerships with industry are part of this push. India is negotiating trade agreements with the US and EU while it has already signed an FTA with the UK. These deals will open up new export markets and attract investment, helping India position itself as a global manufacturing hub outside China's manufacturing ecosystem is still young, but it is evolving rapidly, powered by a combination of global realignment, domestic ambition and geopolitical support from the West. China's export denials and covert trade obstructionism are signs of concern but they also reflect a realization that India is no longer just a large market -- it is a serious manufacturing contender .Ultimately, China's restrictions may serve as an accelerator rather than an obstacle. They are pushing India to build domestic capabilities, diversify partnerships, and focus on resilience. If India continues on its current trajectory - with strategic clarity, global cooperation, and internal reforms - it has the potential not just to withstand China's pressure, but to emerge stronger from it.
News18
3 hours ago
- News18
Armoured Vehicles To Missiles: Indian Armed Forces To Get Indigenous Weapons Worth Rs 1.05 Lakh Cr
Last Updated: The approved acquisitions are aimed at enhancing the mobility, combat preparedness, and overall operational efficiency of the Indian Armed Forces In a major boost to India's defence capabilities and indigenous manufacturing, the Defence Acquisition Council (DAC) on Thursday accorded Acceptance of Necessity (AoN) for 10 capital acquisition proposals amounting to approximately Rs 1.05 lakh crore. The proposals are set to be procured through indigenous sources. The decisions were taken under the chairmanship of Defence Minister Rajnath Singh. The approved acquisitions are aimed at enhancing the mobility, combat preparedness, and overall operational efficiency of the Indian Armed Forces. Key proposals include the procurement of Armoured Recovery Vehicles, Electronic Warfare Systems, an Integrated Common Inventory Management System for the Tri-Services, and Surface-to-Air Missiles. These systems are expected to significantly bolster air defence capabilities, streamline supply chain management, and improve the mobility of armed units. In addition, AoNs were approved for the procurement of Moored Mines, Mine Counter Measure Vessels, Super Rapid Gun Mounts, and Submersible Autonomous Vessels. These assets will help mitigate threats to Naval and Merchant vessels, enhancing maritime security. To further promote the government's vision of self-reliance in defence production, the approvals were granted under the Buy (Indian–Indigenously Designed, Developed and Manufactured) category. The DAC's move marks another significant step towards strengthening indigenous defence production and reducing reliance on foreign suppliers. First Published: July 03, 2025, 19:39 IST
