Delhiwale: Last Mughal's wives
Most other graves lie in anonymity, their identities lost to time. Exceptions exist, and a few of such lonesome graves belong to figures with notable status. Like the handful of graves that lie in the forgettable passage separating the all-marble Chausath Khamba monument from poet Ghalib's marble tomb, in central Delhi's Hazrat Nizamuddin Basti. Heritage walking tours step out from the former, and step into the latter, without bothering about the seemingly random graves littering the intervening space.
Almost nobody is aware that these are actually the graves of the last Mughal emperor's wives. Following the failed uprising of 1857, Bahadur Shah Zafar was exiled by the British to distant Rangoon. Only one of his wives, Begum Zeenat Mahal, was permitted to accompany the unfortunate emperor. Like Zafar, she too died in that far-off land. But the emperor's other wives remained in a turbulent Delhi, fated to be buried in Nizamuddin Basti. This detail appears fleetingly in a tiny passage in Maulavi Zafar Hasan's book Memoirs of the Archaeological Survey of India. An ASI official, he had sourced this precious information from Stephen Carr's book Archaeology and Monumental Remains of Delhi.
Today, these graves bear no inscriptions, but per the aforementioned authors, they mark the resting places of Zafar's wives Begum Ashraf Mahal, Begum Akhtar Mahal, and Begum Taj Mahal. Explaining the logic of their burial in this area, Ratish Nanda of Aga Khan Trust for Culture, who authored a two-volume catalogue of more than a thousand Delhi monuments, explains that Chausath Khamba happens to be close to the dargah of mystic Hazrat Nizamuddin Auliya, the shrine venerated by the Mughals all through their rule.
Each of the 18 rulers maintained a connection with this Sufi terrain; either through pilgrimage, architecture or by making the ground their final resting place. (In fact, just before being arrested by the British, Zafar handed over the sacred relics that were in possession of the Mughal emperors to Hazrat Nizamuddin's shrine.)
Consequently, Zafar's wives—plus some of his daughters—found their posthumous homes within these sacrosanct acres (Zafar's younger brother Mirza Jahangir was luckier, being buried inside the premises of the aforementioned shrine).
This evening, a band of friends are huddled inside the Chausath Khamba monument. On becoming aware of the significance of the stones outside, they sombrely stand around the graves, offering their regards to the forgotten women of the Mughal royalty. See photo.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
17 minutes ago
- India Today
‘Traitor' tag for Mir Jafar, Tipu Sultan missing: Controversy erupts over NCERT changes
In the section on the Battle of Plassey of 1757, Mir Jafar, the army general of the Nawab of Bengal, was labelled 'a traitor' in the newly released Class 8 social science textbook, Exploring Society: India and Beyond – Part Battle of Plassey was fought between the Nawab of Bengal and the East India company officials led by Robert Clive, a British official enumerates how the Nawab of Bengal, Siraj-Ud-Daulah, lost to the Company because of Mir Jafar's betrayal. In the section, 'Enter the British' the text reads: 'Clive hatched a conspiracy with Mir Jafar, the Nawab's Military commander, promising to install him as the new Nawab in exchange for his betrayal. The battle took place at Palashi (Plassey as the British Spelt it) some 150 kilometres north of present say Kolkatta. Some French forces assisted the Nawab, but Mir Jafar's forces — constituting the majority of the Nawab's army — stood aside, ensuring a British victory despite their smaller number. Even today, 'Mir Jafar' in India remains a synonym for 'traitor.'!'advertisementThe narrative was vastly different in the earlier version of the book titled 'Our Pasts- III'. In the earlier version the text only mentions under the Battle of Plassey: 'One of the main reasons for the defeat of the Nawab was that the forces led by Mir Jafar, one of Sirajuddaulah's commanders, never fought the battle. Clive had managed to secure his support by promising to make him nawab after crushing Sirajuddaulah.' In the same section under 'The strategy of divide and rule' mentions that 'under the divide and rule policy, the British were equally skilled at exploiting existing divisions within the Indian society, they identified and often encouraged tensions between religious communities.'Although both textbooks continue to teach about the Battle of Plassey, the old textbook explains how trade led to battles through conflicts between the East India Company and the Nawabs after the death of Aurangazeb. The role of nawabs and their resistance has also been reduced as teachings in the new OF RULERS OF MYSORE - TIPU SULTAN AND HAIDER ALIAfter the changes in the history of Mughal rule in India, there is the complete omission of Tipu Sultan, son of Haider Ali, rulers of Mysore and the four Anglo–Mysore Wars—sections that were prominently featured in the previous earlier NCERT social science textbook 'Our Pasts- III , a section explained how the expansion of the East India Company's rule from 1757 to 1857 faced tough resistance from the rulers of Mysore — under Haider Ali and Tipu Sultan, 'the Tiger of Mysore'. Tipu Sultan was portrayed as a significant figure of resistance against British colonial expansion in South India. His administrative reforms, and strategic alliances with the French were all integral parts of the narrative on colonial these elements are now conspicuously absent in the new edition, raising concerns about regional representation. While the new textbook retains coverage of other anti-colonial movements such as the Santhal and Kol rebellions and the Anglo–Maratha EXCERPT FROM THE OLD SOCIAL SCIENCE TEXTBOOKThe "Tiger of Mysore"The Company resorted to direct military confrontation when it saw a threat to its political or economic interests. This can be illustrated with the case of the southern Indian state of Mysore. Mysore had grown in strength under the leadership of powerful rulers like Haidar Ali (ruled from 1761 to 1782) and his famous son Tipu Sultan (ruled from 1782 to 1799). Mysore controlled the profitable trade of the Malabar coast where the Company purchased pepper and cardamom. advertisementIn 1785 Tipu Sultan stopped the export of sandalwood, pepper and cardamom through the ports of his kingdom, and disallowed local merchants from trading with the Company. He also established a close relationship with the French in India, and modernised his army with their help. The British were furious. They saw Haidar and Tipu as ambitious, arrogant and dangerous - rulers who had to be controlled and crushed. Four wars were fought with Mysore (1767-69, 1780-84, 1790-92 and 1799).Only in the last - the Battle of Seringapatam - did the Company ultimately win a victory. Tipu Sultan was killed defending his capital Seringapatam, Mysore was placed under the former ruling dynasty of the Wodeyars and a subsidiary alliance was imposed on the excerpt on Tipu Sultan reads:Kings are often surrounded by legend and their powers glorified through is a legend about Tipu Sultan who became the ruler of Mysore in 1782. It is said that once he went hunting in the forest with a French friend. There he came face to face with a tiger. His gun did not work and his dagger fell to the ground. He battled with the tiger unarmed until he managed to reach down and pick up the he was able to kill the tiger in the battle. After this he came to be known as the "Tiger of Mysore" had the image of the tiger on his educationists and students await Part 2, the debate over representation, regional history, and historical accuracy continues to intensify. NCERT officials have clarified that Part 2 of the textbook, which is yet to be released, may include some of the omitted material. However, no official confirmation or release date has been provided.- EndsMust Watch
India Today
3 hours ago
- India Today
The brutal legacy of Akbar's Chittorgarh siege referenced by NCERT
The National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) has released a new Class 8 Social Science textbook that offers a revised take on Indian history from the 13th to 17th centuries. The book, part of the series Exploring Society: India and Beyond, calls Akbar's reign a mix of brutality and tolerance, referring to his massacre of 30,000 people at siege of Chittorgarh is a pivotal event in Indian history. It marks the beginning of Akbar's campaign to subdue the Rana of Mewar. Below is a detailed account based on historical sources, primarily the Akbarnama by Abu'l Fazl, of the causes, events, and aftermath of the Sisodia RajputsThe Rajputs, a warrior caste of northern India, are organised into numerous clans claiming descent from ancient Kshatriya lineages, often linked to solar (Suryavanshi), lunar (Chandravanshi), or fire-born (Agnivanshi) dynasties. The Sisodias, a Suryavanshi Rajput clan, ruled Mewar from Chittorgarh and later Udaipur. Renowned for their fierce independence, they resisted Mughal domination longer than most, notably under Rana Udai Singh II and his son Rana Pratap located in present-day Rajasthan, was a formidable hill fortress and the heart of Mewar. Sprawling over 700 acres atop a 180-meter-high hill, the fortress had a history of resistance, having faced sieges by Alauddin Khalji in 1303 and Bahadur Shah of Gujarat in 1535. Its core structure - walls, gates, and key monuments - dates back to the pre-Mughal era, with contributions from the 7th to 16th Siege of ChittorgarhBy 1567, Akbar had consolidated power over much of northern India, including Malwa and parts of Rajputana. Unlike other Rajput rulers, such as those of Amber and Bikaner, who allied with Akbar through diplomacy and marriage, Rana Udai Singh II refused to recognise Mughal overlordship. His support for rebellious Mughal vassals, like Baz Bahadur of Malwa, further provoked the October 1567, Akbar marched from Agra with 40,000 men with the objective of bringing the Rana to his knees. His large army was equipped with cannons, muskets, and siege equipment. The army set up camp at the base of the Chittorgarh hill, choking off the Chittorgarh fort, a stronghold of Rajput pride, 8,000 warriors led by Jaimal Rathore braced for the storm. Mewar's ruler Rana Udai Singh II had retreated into the Aravalli hills, leaving his trusted commander to hold the Sisodia capital against an unstoppable cannons began to roar, hurling iron at the 30-foot-thick walls of the fort. But the fort's height and defences repelled the Mughal army's efforts. Jaimal's men answered from the ramparts, targeting the Mughals with arrows, musket fire, and stones hurled from catapults. Night after night, the Rajputs struck with quick raids on Mughal by the army's failure and the Rajput resistance, Akbar asked his men to creep toward the fort in covered trenches (sabat). The Mughals burrowed beneath the fort, packing gunpowder to rip the foundations apart. But the Rajputs were watching. They dug counter-mines and fought of ChittorgarhWeeks turned into months, but the defenders stood firm. Akbar, sleepless, prowled his camp, watching the army lose patience and hope. But in February 1568, Jaimal Rathore was killed, possibly by a Mughal marksman or during a sortie (though Mughal chronicles say he was shot by Akbar himself). His death was a turning point, as it demoralised the defenders and signaled the fort's imminent defeat inevitable, the Rajput women inside the fort performed jauhar on or around February 23, 1568, to avoid capture. The men donned saffron robes and launched a final sortie against the Mughal February 23-24, 1568, after nearly four months of siege, the Mughals breached the fort's defences through a collapsed wall section. Mughal sources claim that the defenders were almost entirely killed, with estimates of 8,000-10,000 Rajput deaths. Akbar, enraged by the prolonged resistance, ordered a general massacre of the fort's non-combatant population, with estimates of civilian deaths ranging from 20,000 to 30,000. The fort, scarred and silent, stood as a hollow AftermathThe fall of Chittorgarh marked a significant victory for Akbar, weakening Mewar's resistance and sending a message to other Rajput states. The fortress was briefly occupied by Mughal forces but was not permanently garrisoned due to its remote location and the high cost of maintenance. Akbar appointed a governor to oversee the region, but Mewar's resistance continued under Rana Udai Singh's son, Pratap Singh, who later waged a guerrilla campaign against the the Rajputs, the siege became a symbol of sacrifice and defiance. The jauhar and Rajput bravery at Chittorgarh were immortalised in Rajput ballads and chronicles, celebrating the heroism of Jaimal, Patta Sisodia (another commander), and the women who performed jauhar. Rana Pratap's refusal to submit to Akbar further cemented Mewar's reputation as a bastion of Rajput fort still exists and retains significant elements of its pre-1568 structure, such as its gates, towers, and major palaces, reminding visitors of the siege, the massacre, and the unyielding spirit of the Ranas of Mewar.- EndsMust Watch
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
She was Queen Victoria's goddaughter. At 16, forgot her language. Meet the Indian princess adopted by British royalty but never accepted
At the age of 11, she went to England and became the goddaughter of Queen Victoria. However, Princess Gouramma 's story was far from being a fairy tale. Today, it remains a cautionary tale about the limits of cultural assimilation and how immigration can often demand a huge price for racial minorities. A Royal Childhood Shattered By Colonial Conquest Princess Gouramma was born into Indian royalty, the cherished daughter of Chikka Virarajendra, the last sovereign ruler of the Kodagu kingdom, more commonly known as Coorg. However, her privileged beginnings were soon interrupted by a pivotal historical conflict. On April 24, 1834 CE, the Coorg War ended in defeat for her father, resulting in his dethronement by the British East India Company. Acting under the directives of Army officer James Stuart Fraser, the British forces formally annexed Coorg into their growing dominion, incorporating the territory into British India. The defeated monarch was relocated as a political detainee to Benaras, where he spent approximately 14 years in enforced exile. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Select a Course Category Voyage to an Alien World In 1852, the deposed king embarked on a voyage that would drastically alter his daughter's fate. With eleven-year-old Gouramma by his side, he journeyed to London. The objective was twofold: to petition the British authorities for the restitution of his seized assets and to ensure that his daughter was afforded security and protection under the Christian faith. It was during this trip that both father and daughter became the first documented Indians to set foot in Britain. The king, guided by his close confidante Dr. William Jeafersson, prioritized the discussion of Gouramma's upbringing and welfare in the British court before pursuing claims to his property. A Queen's Patronage, A Princess's Rebirth Upon arrival, Princess Gouramma caught the attention of Queen Victoria. The British monarch formally adopted her as a goddaughter, bestowing upon her the name Victoria Gouramma of Coorg. This symbolic christening marked her official entry into British aristocracy. Though it seemed like a dream opportunity, it instead laid the foundation for a complex and ultimately tragic life. Cultural Erosion and the Loss of Identity According to Chandrica Barua in her scholarly article 'Poor Little Princess': Queen Victoria's Court as a Site of Imperial Conquest,' Gouramma's life in Victorian Britain was not one of warmth and welcome, but of calculated display and cultural estrangement. Barua described how the young princess, forcibly detached from her homeland and roots in the 1850s, underwent a sweeping transformation. She was converted to Christianity, forced into English customs, trained in Western etiquette, and paraded as a symbol of imperial success—a colonial trophy. Despite being presented as a civilizational triumph of the Empire, she never truly found a place in the restrictive and racially charged environment of Queen Victoria's court. Placed under the guardianship of Major and Mrs. Drummond, a British military couple, Princess Gouramma was systematically distanced from her heritage. Educated in the ways of the West, she embraced the external trappings of Victorian high society. Contemporary accounts described her as graceful, vivacious, and adept in social settings, but these traits masked the silent dislocation she experienced. Language Lost, Roots Severed Barua highlighted Queen Victoria's frequent references to her in her diaries, often using the phrase 'poor little princess.' This phrase, though affectionate on the surface, reflected the condescension and racialized pity directed toward Gouramma. The British elite viewed her father with suspicion and disdain, often describing him as a "hoary reprobate," a relic of Asiatic despotism, morally questionable and a bad influence. Barua cited recollections from Gouramma's imperial guardians that confirmed a disturbing cultural erasure. The princess, over time, lost all connection to her mother tongue, Kannada, and became incapable of speaking with her father. By her teenage years, any curiosity or concern for her homeland had been deliberately subdued, and she showed indifference to Coorg's political or cultural affairs. Romantic Misfortunes and a Crumbling Facade In Victoria Gouramma: The Lost Princess of Coorg, author C. P. Belliappa detailed the emotional void in Gouramma's personal life. She sought love in forbidden places—initially with a stablehand and later with a butler named George Christmas while living with Colonel Vernon Harcourt and his wife, Lady Catherine Harcourt. These relationships, although brief, underscore her longing for companionship. Queen Victoria had aspirations of orchestrating a royal union between Princess Gouramma and Maharaja Duleep Singh, another royal orphan absorbed into the British establishment. However, the relationship between the two godchildren never blossomed romantically. Instead, they developed a close, sibling-like friendship. Duleep Singh, recognizing the limits of British acceptance, eventually arranged her marriage to Colonel John Campbell—a military officer five decades her senior. Prejudice Cloaked In Politeness Despite her formal inclusion in British high society, Gouramma faced subtle but entrenched racial biases. Chandrica Barua cited Lady Login's journal entries, which described Gouramma's desperate attempts to be embraced by her husband's family. "'It was pathetic, the eagerness with which poor Gouramma identified herself with her husband's family,'" Login wrote in her notes. Lady Login's tone appeared mocking, reflecting the underlying sentiment that no amount of Westernization could make an Indian woman truly acceptable within elite British circles. Even though she had been baptised, educated, and Anglicised, Gouramma remained an outsider in the eyes of many—suitable only for symbolic unions with other colonized elites, not as an equal within the British gentry. Sickness, Solitude, And Betrayal Outwardly maintaining appearances, Gouramma's inner world was deteriorating. Chronic illness gnawed at her body — she frequently suffered from bouts of coughing and weakness. Her emotional pain deepened when she realized the true nature of her marriage. Colonel Campbell, it turned out, was less interested in her as a partner and more concerned with the wealth she had brought into the relationship. The dream of stability and love faded into a harsh reality of neglect and exploitation. Historian Dr. Priya Atwal revealed in a The Quin t report that Queen Victoria had prohibited Gouramma from seeing her father, fearing he would "corrupt" her with his 'heathen' and native influences. This further cemented her emotional isolation. In 1861, Gouramma gave birth to her daughter, Edith. However, rather than basking in motherhood, she was forced into the role of a solitary parent, for Campbell had no interest in fatherhood. Two years later, at the tender age of 22, Gouramma lost her life to tuberculosis. She died in obscurity, having endured a lifetime of alienation, exploitation, and cultural loss. Legacy And Rediscovery For decades, it was assumed that Princess Gouramma's bloodline ended with her. However, C. P. Belliappa later discovered that her legacy lived on. As reported in The Deccan Herald, Belliappa was contacted by Anne Phillips, a descendant of Campbell and his first wife, Margaret Mathew. Phillips shared rare, previously unseen photographs of Gouramma and her daughter Edith from her family's private collection. Further tracing revealed that one of Gouramma's great-great-grandsons, Robert Yardley, resides in Australia. Despite this continuation of her bloodline, the memory of the princess remains obscure in popular discourse. Her grave lies neglected in Brompton Cemetery, London—a solemn monument to a life that began in royalty and ended in loneliness. Gouramma's story, filled with displacement, unreciprocated love, and quiet resilience, stands as a powerful reminder of the often-overlooked personal costs of colonialism. Her journey, while paved with imperial promises, ultimately revealed the harsh limitations of cultural assimilation and the enduring scars of racial marginalization.
