Power play in Chinese family firms: insiders vs. outsiders
Advertisement
History has shown the instrumental role of family businesses in the economy. A 2025 index from EY shows that 500 global family businesses earn US$17.6 billion annually, with 80 per cent yielding more than US$5 billion. Many of them are headquartered in Asia, including Hong Kong with household names like Jardine Matheson, Sun Hung Kai Properties, Chow Tai Fook and the like.
It is natural to have family members in executive roles to ensure the firms continue their legacy and identity. On the other hand, family firms often hire professionals outside the family at top management levels to sustain growth and remain competitive. The firms' success then depends on how well these family and non-family managers collaborate, combining their unique skills and perspectives to create a competitive edge.
Inevitably, hypothetical dividing lines or faultlines emerge between the two that can impact company performance in various ways. While these divisions can lead to conflicts and impair operations, they can also enhance information sharing and positively affect the firms' earnings, like a double-edged sword. The question is, how far can these lines affect the dynamics of family firms?
'While family and non-family managers collaborate as members of the same team, they differ significantly in terms of family affiliation, personal goals, and the treatment they receive from the controlling family,' says Dora Lau, Associate Professor (Teaching) in the Department of Management at the Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) Business School.
Advertisement
To explore the implications of this division among Chinese family firms, Professor Lau conducted a study titled Top management team faultline size and family firm performance, in collaboration with Li Wenwen of Sun Yat-Sen University, He Ai of South China University of Technology and Li Xiaotong of Qingdao University of Science and Technology. 'The study found that large demographic faultlines between family and non-family managers would benefit firm performance,' Professor Lau says.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
Insta360's Antigravity challenges DJI with 8K 360-degree drone
The consumer drone industry is facing new competition from China, as Antigravity – a new brand from omnidirectional camera specialist Insta360, is set to unveil its first product. Advertisement Scheduled to be unveiled in August, the unmanned aerial vehicle weighs less than 249 grams and features a built-in 360-degree camera with 8K resolution, according to the company. That would make it the industry's first '360 drone': until now, users have resorted to attaching full-degree cameras to their flying machines. According to Antigravity's website, which launched on Monday, the new drone supports real-time data transmission and allows users to adjust shooting parameters during flights. After years of quiet development, the vehicle aims to cater to both experts and beginners, as well as 'everyone in between'. Antigravity, known as Yingling in Chinese, said that the industry had hit a bottleneck, with some users feeling 'tired of drones that looked good on paper but felt lifeless in the air'. A DJI store in Beijing. The company is set to face new competition from Insta360's new drone brand. Photo: EPA-EFE While Antigravity did not disclose its location, the company said it was incubated by Shenzhen-based Insta360 'in collaboration with third parties', and developed by 'a global team of engineers, designers, and creators'.
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
Hong Kong's Law Society swoops down on entire floor of offices at The Center at half price
The Law Society of Hong Kong has bought an entire floor of offices in what was formerly the world's most expensive tower at a 50 per cent discount, the latest among astute investors who are picking up property in the city at bargain prices. Advertisement The Law Society paid HK$345 million (US$44 million), or HK$14,000 per sq ft, for 24,980 sq ft (2,320 square metres) on the 26th floor of The Center from Gale Well Group. The property in the Central district was handed over to the Law Society on July 25, according to the Land Registry. The purchase price was half of the HK$693 million that Gale Well paid in 2021, when its founder and CEO Jacinto Tong Man-leung bought the property from the late Ma Ah-muk. Ma, dubbed Hong Kong's Minibus King, passed away in March last year. The Law Society is still gathering views from its members for the design of the office floor and has not decided on the date for moving in, a member said. An interview with property investment firm Gale Well Group's vice chairman and CEO Jacinto Tong Man-leung on February 25, 2025. Photo: Jonathan Wong The Center, a 73-storey office tower, was sold in 2018 for a record HK$40.2 billion (US$5.2 billion) by the city's wealthiest man, Li Ka-shing, to a group of 10 local tycoons in what was then the world's priciest property deal. Not long after the transaction, Hong Kong's economy was driven into a slump by six months of anti-government protests and three years of the Covid-19 pandemic. Advertisement
South China Morning Post
2 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Hong Kong audit watchdog warns of quality risks amid undercutting and tight deadlines
The head of Hong Kong's auditing watchdog has raised concerns that some auditors are accepting jobs from listed companies at cheaper rates and too close to reporting deadlines, warning that this could affect the quality of their work. The Accounting and Financial Reporting Council (AFRC) said that 17 per cent of the 2,631 Hong Kong-listed companies changed auditors last year. The AFRC also said that it had randomly checked the work of 16 auditing firms that were replaced. The regulator found that of these 16 firms, 13 had received lower fees compared with the previous auditors, while 12 had quality issues and urged them to make improvements. 'Many of these audits were conducted under tight timelines due to late changes in auditor appointments, close to the reporting deadline,' said CEO Janey Lai Chui-pik at a media briefing on the annual audit quality review on Tuesday. 'These practices threaten both the independence of auditors and the quality of audits.' Accounting and Financial Reporting Council chairman David Sun and CEO Janey Lai at the regulator's office at Two Taikoo Place. Photo: Enoch Yiu One of the main reasons listed companies changed auditors was cheaper auditing fees, as existing auditors refused to give discounts. 'After the two sides have lengthy discussions and still cannot reach an agreement on cheaper auditing fees, a listed company usually finds a cheaper auditor just one or two months before the auditing deadline,' she said. 'In one case, a company changed its auditor three times in a year.'
