
Senators seek to protect rural broadcasters amid push to claw back public media funds
The White House asked lawmakers to rescind $9.4 billion in spending on June 3, starting the clock on a process that gives Congress 45 days to act. The House approved the rescission package last month, and the Senate now faces a July 18 deadline. But a number of Senate Republicans now say they want to see changes to the package.
Sen. Mike Rounds, a South Dakota Republican who sits on the Appropriations Committee, told reporters Wednesday that he's not comfortable with some of the rescission package's provisions, like cuts to public broadcasting, saying, "That's the reason why we're proposing changes."
Along with $8.3 billion in cuts to international assistance programs, the package includes a proposed $1.1 billion in cuts for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, the private nonprofit that serves as the steward of the funding to NPR and PBS. The White House has targeted the entities, including in a May executive order that instructed the CPB to cease federal funding for PBS and NPR, claiming they have "spread radical, woke propaganda disguised as 'news.'"
PBS CEO Paula Kerger and NPR CEO Katherine Maher defended their organizations' records in an appearance on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan" in May, outlining how local stations will see the immediate impacts of cuts to public broadcasting funding.
"The impact of this could really be devastating, particularly in rural communities," Maher said, noting that there are 246 stations throughout the country, and for some Americans, they provide the sole local source of news. Kerger said for stations in small communities, some of which receive 40 or 50% of their funding from the federal government, "it's existential."
Senate Majority Leader John Thune of South Dakota said Wednesday that there would be an amendment process on the rescissions package, forecasting a vote next week. And Rounds outlined to reporters earlier in the day that Senate Republicans have been considering the best way to handle the opposition to some provisions within the rescissions package, saying they plan to resolve the issue through an amendment or "other means."
"There's a specific group of Native American tribes that have a public radio system set up, and really the vast majority of the funding for it comes from one source, and that's within the rescission package," Rounds told reporters earlier this week. "What we're trying to do is to work with [the Office of Management and Budget] to find a path forward where the funding for those radio stations would be left alone."
Sen. Mike Rounds walks onto the Senate floor at the U.S. Capitol Building on June 30, 2025 in Washington, DC.
Andrew Harnik / Getty Images
Rounds noted that the goal is not to eliminate a number of the provisions within the rescissions package, but "specifically to take care of those that were in some of these rural areas," pointing to stations in South Dakota, North Dakota, Montana and Alaska.
"This is their way of getting emergency messages out to people. It's the way in which they communicate in a very rural area," Rounds said. "So for us, it's a matter of, for those specific ones, it's not a lot of funding involved with it, but it's pretty important in those rural areas."
Sen. Steve Daines, a Montana Republican, told reporters that cuts to local radio stations and the impact it could have on Native American tribes is "something we'll take a look at." And GOP Sen. Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia told CBS News that the impact on rural stations is "one of the considerations" lawmakers are taking into account.
Sen. Lisa Murkowski, an Alaska Republican, defended public broadcasting and its role in her state during a hearing on the rescissions package last month. "I hope you feel the urgency that I'm trying to express on behalf of the people in rural Alaska and I think in many parts of rural America where this is their lifeline," Murkowski told OMB Director Russ Vought.
"This is where they get the updates on [landslides], this is where they get the updates on the wildfires that are coming their way," she said.
GOP Sen. Susan Collins of Maine told reporters Thursday that while she's supportive of "a lot" of what the CPB does, citing the funding for local stations and maintaining the Emergency Alert System, "the problem is NPR, which has a decidedly partisan bent."
Meanwhile, a group of Democrats took to the Senate floor Wednesday to rail against the cuts to public broadcasting within the rescissions package, including Sens. Dick Durbin of Illinois, Ron Wyden of Oregon, Peter Welch of Vermont, Maria Cantwell of Washington, Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin, Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, Ben Ray Lujan of New Mexico, Lisa Blunt Rochester of Delaware and Ed Markey of Massachusetts.
Durbin warned that "once these stations are gone, they're gone."
"In times of crisis, that could mean in the extreme a difference between life and death," Durbin said, citing as examples the ability of Alaska radio stations to share information about weather conditions, or emergency alerts to go out during tornado scares in Alabama. "These are critical services, but President Trump doesn't agree."
Wyden cited the Texas flash floods, saying "we saw the devastating impact of underfunded emergency alert systems with the deadly flash flooding in Texas."
"As more details emerge, there's one area that seems to me to be clear: More could and should have been done to bolster the local emergency alert system to help avoid and limit the horrendous tragedies that we have watched nightly for the last few days," Wyden added. "As extreme deadly weather events like this become more and more common, local, state and federal governments need to be investing — not shrinking — systems like public TV and radio."
Sen. Martin Heinrich, a New Mexico Democrat, told CBS News that he's "very concerned" about the cuts, adding that "in big rural western states," many communities are "completely dependent on those rural radio stations for emergency services." Flash floods killed at least three people in New Mexico earlier this week, officials said.
"There's not a backup, there's not competition, and so that's something we're looking very closely at," Heinrich said.
Still, other senators saw things differently.
"Contrary to what happens here in D.C., there's not a lot of people in central Texas who listen to NPR," Sen. John Cornyn, a Texas Republican, told CBS News. "And there are plenty of other alternatives."
contributed to this report.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
12 minutes ago
- Fox News
Economic expert touts 'solid' economy after Trump's trade deals
Independent Women's Forum's Patrice Onwuka joins 'Fox & Friends First' to weigh in on the impact of economic impact of President Donald Trump's trade deals.


Fox News
13 minutes ago
- Fox News
Washington Post reeling from buyout exodus as bosses hope to turn the page at embattled paper
The latest round of buyouts at The Washington Post is hollowing out the paper of its most high-profile staffers as current management aims for an editorial overhaul and a financial turnaround. Washington Post executive editor Matt Murray announced its Voluntary Separation Program (VSP) in May, hoping that most veteran staffers would be enticed by the exit offer. And it's working. "It kind of shows the crazy incentives at play," one Post staffer told Fox News Digital. "There is a lot of great talent left, and we've been beating everyone on the federal government story, but it's going to be another talent drain." According to a VSP document previously viewed by Fox News Digital, nine months of base pay would be given to staffers employed for 10-15 years, 12 months of base pay for 15-20-year veterans, 15 months of base pay for 20-25-year veterans and 18 months for anyone who has worked at the Post for more than 25 years. All of them would also receive 12 months of pay credit in their Separate Retirement Account (SRA). "It's been a bloodbath on editorial," the Post staffer said. Some of the paper's biggest names in the opinion pages have taken buyouts, including Jonathan Capehart and Catherine Rampell (both notably MSNBC weekend hosts) as well as Perry Bacon Jr. and Philip Bump. The exodus from the editorial pages was also likely fueled by the Post's billionaire owner Jeff Bezos and his initiative to promote "personal liberties and free markets" while vowing not to publish pieces opposing those principles. Washington Post columnist Karen Attiah appeared to swipe the lack of diversity on the paper's editorial team as a result of the buyouts, posting on X "So.. officially, I'm the last Black staff columnist left in the Washington Post's opinion section." The buyouts, however, are having a huge impact throughout the "Democracy Dies in Darkness" paper. Glenn Kessler, The Washington Post's longtime fact checker, announced his exit Monday and its Supreme Court reporter Ann Marimow has joined The New York Times. Even most of the Post's obituary team have reportedly taken buyouts. The Post scrapped its so-called "third newsroom," dubbed WP Ventures, that aimed to capture social media users. Veteran Post editor Krissah Thompson, who was tapped to lead the now-defunct division after its launch last year, also took a buyout and the paper's viral TikTok personality Dave Jorgenson also left the company. Earlier this month, Washington Post CEO Will Lewis sent a memo to staff issuing an ultimatum for those contemplating whether to adapt to the paper's new direction. "The moment demands that we continue to rethink all aspects of our organization and business to maximize our impact," Lewis wrote in the memo obtained by Fox News Digital. "If we want to reconnect with our audience and continue to defend democracy, more changes at The Post will be necessary. And to succeed, we need to be united as a team with a strong belief and passion in where we are heading." "I understand and respect, however, that our chosen path is not for everyone," Lewis continued. "That's exactly why we introduced the voluntary separation program. As we continue in this new direction, I want to ask those who do not feel aligned with the company's plan to reflect on that. The VSP is designed to support you in making this decision, give you the ability to weigh your options thoughtfully and with less concern about financial consequences. And if you think that it's time to move on to a new chapter, the VSP helps you take that next step with more security." The Post staffer seemed skeptical the jarring editorial pivot would bear the fruit that the bosses were hoping for. "So far they don't have much to show for their efforts," the staffer said. "Subscribers fled. Traffic is falling. The third newsroom is dead. Scores of brand-name reporters and editors have left. If there are bright spots, I haven't seen them yet." Others who left the Post had some choice parting words. Longtime columnist Joe Davidson claimed he had a piece spiked because was it was "deemed too opinionated under an unwritten and inconsistently enforced policy" and called out Bezos' "unseemly and well-document[ed] coziness" with President Donald Trump. Editorial board member Eduardo Porter said he was a "bad fit for this ideological turn" and that Bezos and his team "are taking the paper down a path I cannot follow," risking turning The Post "into something more akin to a church, with tight constraints on thought." There have been multiple waves of exits from the Post over the past year, beginning last October when Bezos blocked the paper's endorsement of then-Vice President Kamala Harris just days before the election. Bezos further enraged staff with his editorial directive in February that resulted in the immediate resignation of Post opinion editor David Shipley. Both instances also sparked mass cancellations of reader subscriptions. The Post has since hired Adam O'Neal, formerly of The Economist and The Wall Street Journal, to replace Shipley as opinion editor. In his announcement, O'Neal echoed Bezos' mission of being "stalwart advocates of free markets and personal liberties," adding the opinion pages will be "unapologetically patriotic" and will not be lecturing its readers. Politico has a running list of over 100 Post employees who have left the paper since last fall, many of them joining rival papers like The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal as well as outlets like The Atlantic and CNN. A spokesperson for The Washington Post declined to comment.

Washington Post
13 minutes ago
- Washington Post
IRS warns federal workers about tax debts. Will it cost them their jobs?
The IRS has sent letters to federal workers alleging that they are among 525,000 current and former government staffers who owe back taxes, prompting tax experts to warn that the unpaid bills could be used as a pretext to fire them from their jobs. The letters, mailed last month, begin with the words 'Urgent: You have an outstanding tax issue,' in bold, large type. They started arriving in people's mailboxes shortly after the Office of Personnel Management proposed a rule that would make it easier to dismiss employees who don't meet certain 'suitability criteria,' including 'failure to comply with generally applicable legal obligations, including timely filing of tax returns.' While privacy laws generally prevent the IRS from sharing information about individuals' tax returns with other government agencies, several tax practitioners and employment lawyers who reviewed the letter said agency heads can use unpaid taxes as a basis for firing the workers if the proposed firing guidelines are put into effect. 'I immediately thought: They're trying to find some grounds to use this suitability process,' said Debra D'Agostino, an employment attorney focused on federal employees. 'That's what absolutely immediately jumped in my head.' The letter from the IRS did not specify any consequences that the workers and retirees might face. It acknowledged the recipients' service to the government and reminded them of their responsibility to 'lead by example' by paying their taxes. Jessica Marine, who left her federal job in April and now works as a tax attorney at a Maryland law firm with many federal employees as clients, became concerned when more than 20 of them received the notice. While the clients do owe taxes or have not submitted returns, some are already on payment plans arranged with the IRS, she said. 'This is not to be taken lightly,' she said. She added that if the suitability rule takes effect, 'this is a way the Trump administration could get rid of many federal employees … and it would be 100 percent legal.' The IRS and the Office of Personnel Management did not respond to questions from The Washington Post. Collections letters from the IRS typically include the amount owed or a tax year for which no return was filed. The notices usually include a deadline to pay before penalties increase. But last month's letters, labeled LT36, have none of that personalized information, just a broad warning that the recipient is in some way behind on their taxes. 'The administration came into office saying it wanted to gut the workforce. There were people associated with this administration that said, 'We want it to be psychologically damaging when we do it.' And that's sort of what's happening,' said Suzanne Summerlin, a federal appointee under President Joe Biden who is now a labor attorney focused on the federal workforce. The IRS letters seem to be 'another attack that this administration is making on its own workforce,' she said. The federal government until now has lacked the authority to fire employees over unpaid taxes, although Republican lawmakers years ago unsuccessfully floated legislation that would have allowed it. Receiving a warning from the IRS might make employees apprehensive about staying in government and being 'subjected to this level of scrutiny,' Summerlin said. All Americans are obligated by law to file returns and pay their taxes, but a program called FERDI — the Federal Employee/Retiree Delinquency Initiative — that dates back to 1993 allows the IRS to take extra measures to collect back taxes from federal workers. The Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration noted in a 2023 report that cases of federal workers behind on their taxes have risen, from just under 4 percent of federal workers in 2015 to just under 5 percent in 2021, the most recent year for which estimates were available. (The rate for all taxpayers tends to fall between 8 and 9 percent, so federal workers are doing better.) According to the 2023 report, the largest number of federal workers who failed to submit their tax returns for two or more years worked for the U.S. Postal Service, followed by the Department of Veterans Affairs and the military. More than 3 in 4 non-filers had annual income below $100,000. The IRS generally explains numbered notices like this one on its website, but the agency has not posted online information about LT36. The IRS did send the letters, but after California accountant Logan Allec posted about the letter on YouTube, some people told him they had thought the letter was a scam mimicking a real IRS letter, since it didn't come up on the IRS website, he said. The comments on his video filled up with several people who claimed they got the letter, checked their balance and found they did not actually owe any taxes. 'Notices usually have information about the taxpayer's account: the balance due, the penalties, the interest, a particular due date,' Allec said. He found some of the notices that his clients received frustrating. In one case, the IRS had claimed months ago that Allec's client owed a 10 percent early-withdrawal penalty on all of the money that he took out of a retirement account. Allec thinks the client only owes a penalty on some of the money and has exchanged multiple letters with the IRS trying to resolve the issue. That client received the LT36 letter and is 'kind of freaking out,' Allec said, even though he is in the midst of a good-faith effort to pay what he rightly owes. About two dozen clients of Los Angeles tax adviser Mike Habib's firm received the letter, he said. Habib said taxpayers who get the notice should call the IRS, figure out what they owe, and pay it quickly or set up a payment plan. 'I would expect within five to six months, if you ignore it, then the IRS will move on to possibly levies and things like that,' he said. 'If you work for the government, they expect you to be compliant with the federal tax laws.'