logo
SNP quango ‘squandered' £21m of public cash in benefits errors

SNP quango ‘squandered' £21m of public cash in benefits errors

Telegrapha day ago
A benefits quango created by the SNP government has been accused of 'squandering' almost £21 million of public money.
New figures reveal that the cash has been paid out in error to claimants by Social Security Scotland (SSS) since 2019, when it was established.
The quango, which employs 4,000 staff and has a budget of £321 million, was set up to handle additional benefits paid out by the Scottish Government, including the Scottish child payment; best start grants and job start payments.
Stephen Kerr, the Conservative MSP for Central Scotland who obtained the overpayments data, accused the SNP of 'losing control' of state benefits and described SSS as a 'vast, out-of-control bureaucratic monster'.
According to figures released under freedom of information, more than 67,000 overpayments logged by the quango cost taxpayers £18.7 million between 2019-20 and 2024-25.
In the current financial year, almost 4,000 overpayments have cost more than £2.2 million.
The highest number of errors occurred with claimants for best start goods, a benefit designed to help pregnant women and families with young children to purchase healthy meals.
It provides financial support, typically on a prepaid card, to help cover the cost of items such as milk, fruit and vegetables. Since 2019, more than 32,000 overpayments were made.
More than 22,000 overpayments were logged for the Scottish child payment, which helps low-income families with children under 16.
'The SNP have completely lost control of Scotland's benefits bill,' said Mr Kerr. 'They've built an enormous, well-paid bureaucracy that has wasted £21 million since its creation – and the more money they pour in, the worse it seems to get.
'Hardworking Scottish taxpayers deserve far better – and they demand it. It is totally unacceptable for millions of pounds of their money to be squandered through blatant administrative incompetence.
'That money should be funding frontline services – or better yet, staying in taxpayers' pockets – not disappearing because of basic, avoidable errors.
'The SNP promised Social Security Scotland would deliver a fairer, more efficient system. These figures show how absurd that claim truly is. It's time the SNP faced up to the reality of the vast, out-of-control bureaucratic monster they've created. They must get a grip and take real responsibility.'
Growing social security spend
The Scottish Government has said it is committed to using its social security powers to support low-income families, carers and those with disabilities to tackle poverty and provide financial assistance.
However, MSPs on Holyrood's Social Justice and Social Security Committee are seeking views on the positive and negative aspects of growing social security spend in Scotland.
The committee has highlighted that 2025/26, the Scottish Government is spending £1.2 billion more on social security policies than it gets in funding for social security from the UK Government.
According to the Scottish Fiscal Commission, more than £5 billion was spent on social security in 2023/24 with this figure predicted to rise to £8.7 billion by 2030.
A spokesperson for SSS, said: 'As we have introduced more benefits, our client numbers have significantly increased with an expected corresponding increase in payment errors, although the number of errors is small.
'Over 1 million individual clients have been paid more than £6.1 billion directly by Social Security Scotland since 2018. The total amount of money given in overpayments represents 0.35% of our total benefit expenditure since 2018.
'We are committed to minimising errors and improving our abilities to tackle them.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Every Labour U-turn after PM reverses welfare cuts
Every Labour U-turn after PM reverses welfare cuts

The Independent

time27 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Every Labour U-turn after PM reverses welfare cuts

Sir Keir Starmer has announced his latest U-turn: a £5bn change of course over his flagship welfare bill. With just minutes to go before MPs were set to vote on an already watered down welfare bill, he confirmed plans abandon a key plank of the reforms in order to get them through parliament and avoid a mass rebellion from his own MPs. The U-turn left the prime minister's authority battered and left the chancellor with a gaping hole in the public finances. As Sir Keir marks one year in office, The Independent looks at all the times he has U-turned on his promises or let voters down. Sir Keir suffered the biggest blow to his leadership since coming into power a year ago after he was forced to abandon a key plank of his controversial benefit cuts in order to get them through parliament. Just 90 minutes before voting began, ministers announced that plans to restrict eligibility for personal independence payments (PIP) – which had been the central pillar of the government's reforms – were being dropped. Sir Keir had already been forced into a U-turn the week before when more than 130 Labour MPs signed an amendment that would have effectively killed the bill off. Among the concessions announced then was a plan to impose tougher eligibility rules only on future PIP claimants, leaving existing recipients unaffected. Winter fuel payments In July, the chancellor announced that pensioners not in receipt of pension credits or other means-tested benefits would no longer receive winter fuel payments - a £300 payment to help with energy costs in the colder months. After spending months ruling out a U-turn, the prime minister in May told MPs he now wants to ensure more pensioners are eligible for the payment – something he claimed has come as a result of an improving economic picture. After weeks of speculation over what the changes would look like, it has now been confirmed that 9 million pensioners will be eligible for the payment - a huge uplift from the 1.5 million pensioners who received the payment in winter 2024-25. Grooming gangs Sir Keir spent months brushing off calls for a national inquiry with statutory powers into grooming gangs as unnecessary. As Elon Musk launched himself headlong into the debate, calling for a fresh probe into the scandal, Labour's refusal looked increasingly unlikely to hold. But Sir Keir stood firm, and even accused those calling for an inquiry, including Tory leader Kemi Badenoch, of ' jumping on the bandwagon of the far-Right '. But in yet another screeching U-turn, after months of holding out, Sir Keir in June accepted the recommendation of Baroness Casey to hold an inquiry. In a 2022 interview, Sir Keir said: 'All your working life you've got in mind the date on which you can retire and get your pension, and just as you get towards it, the goalposts are moved and you don't get it, and it's a real injustice. 'We need to do something about it. That wasn't the basis on which you paid in or the basis on which you were working.' But, in a familiar change of tune since becoming prime minister, Sir Keir last year sent his work and pensions secretary out to tell Women Against State Pension Inequality, Waspi women, they would not be getting any compensation. National insurance Labour's pre-election manifesto promised not to increase national insurance. It stated: 'Labour will not increase taxes on working people, which is why we will not increase National Insurance, the basic, higher, or additional rates of Income Tax, or VAT.' But, Sir Keir and Chancellor Ms Reeves used the ambiguity around whether they meant employer or employee national insurance contributions to steamroll the pledge at Labour's first Budget in power. The pair argue that they only promised to keep employee contributions frozen and instead landed firms with a 2 per cent increase to employer national insurance contributions. Tractor tax Farmers have also said they feel betrayed by the PM, after a 2023 National Farmers Union (NFU) speech in which he promised to have 'a new relationship with the countryside and farmers'. Sir Keir claimed to be concerned that 'each day brings a new existential risk to British farming. He added: 'Losing a farm is not like losing any other business, it can't come back.' Going even further, then shadow environment secretary Steve Reed said it was 'desperate nonsense' to suggest he would scrap tax breaks for farmers, just weeks before the July 4 poll. But, in another hugely unpopular Budget bombshell, Sir Keir slashed agricultural property relief, meaning previously exempt farms will be his with a 20 per cent levy on farming assets worth more than £1m. Critics have said it will see family farmers forced to sell up, ripping the heart out of countryside communities. And other times the PM has rowed back on his words... Two-child benefit cap Promising in 2020 to create a social security system fit for the 21st century, Sir Keir said: 'We must scrap the inhuman Work Capability Assessments and private provision of disability assessments... scrap punitive sanctions, two-child limit and benefits cap.' But before the election, Sir Keir said Labour was 'not changing' the Tory policy if Labour were to win power. He has stuck to his guns, even suspending seven Labour MPs for rebelling against his King's Speech in a bid to have the policy scrapped. And now, it looks like the prime minister is gearing up to row back on the position. While nothing has been announced, the prime minister is privately said to be in favour of lifting the cap. He has refused to commit to anything until the child poverty strategy is published in the autumn but has insisted he is 'absolutely determined' to 'drive down' child poverty and has repeatedly sidestepped questions on the issue when pressed on it. £28bn green investment pledge As shadow chancellor, Rachel Reeves announced the party's plans for an extra £28bn a year in green investment at Labour's conference in September 2021. But before the election, Sir Keir ditched the £28bn a year target and said instead that he would spend a far smaller sum on Great British Energy, a national wealth fund for clean investment and pledges on energy efficiency. Bankers' bonuses Strict regulations on bonuses, which limit annual payouts to twice a banker's salary, were introduced by the EU in 2014 in a bid to avoid excessive risk-taking after the 2008 financial crisis. Former prime minister Liz Truss and chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng scrapped the cap in 2022, in a bid to encourage more investment in the UK. Sir Keir had previously vowed to reinstate the cap, saying in 2022 that lifting it 'shows the Tories are absolutely tone deaf to what so many people are going through'. But in another major U-turn, Ms Reeves announced before the election that the party 'does not have any intention of bringing that back'.

Tourist trade offered reassurance on tourist tax
Tourist trade offered reassurance on tourist tax

Edinburgh Reporter

time33 minutes ago

  • Edinburgh Reporter

Tourist trade offered reassurance on tourist tax

Tourist venues and holiday businesses in West Lothian will be asked for their views on a visitor levy which could bring in £1m a year. Council officers promised the cash generated by any 'tourist tax' has to be ploughed back into the industry, and a trade-led forum will have oversight. It comes as the county is growing as a visitor venue with a 16% increase in overnight stays last year. Some councillors last week urged a swift introduction of a levy, describing it as a 'no brainer' and easy earner. There are concerns about the impact on local businesses however and council officers remain keen to pursue a softly-softly approach. Jim Henderson the council's Business Development Manager said discussions were at an early stage and promised to return to councillors with initial results. The depute leader of the council said it was important 'for the views of the business community' to be heard before decisions are made. Last year In West Lothian there were 506,600 overnight visitors, with 298,400 staying in fee-paying accommodation and 208,200 staying with friends or relatives. This was a 16% increase on 2023 levels. The local country parks continue to be a popular attraction, with the total estimated 2023/24 visitor numbers of 1,553,950 at three of them; Almondell & Calderwood, Beecraigs, and Polkemmet, showing an increase of 15% compared to 2022/23. The Visitor Levy (Scotland) Bill enables councils to apply a levy on overnight stays. A report to West Lothian's Executive outlined potential income based on the fee-paying visitors who stayed in the county last year. The most expensive accommodation, with an average spend of £100 per person per night would generate £1,342, 800 at a 5% levy. The lowest proposed levy of 2% would generate more than £500,000 in the most expensive accommodation. The legislation states that net proceeds generated will be ring-fenced and must be spent on facilities and services for or used by visitors for leisure or business purposes. How tight that ring-fencing is could likely be challenged by councils, but any future debate will probably depend on whether councils consider tourist numbers a benefit or blight. In a report to the last meeting of the Council Executive before the summer recess, Stewart Ness, the Tourism and Town Centre Manager said: 'Whilst Visitor Levy is historically considered in areas of 'over-tourism', such as Edinburgh, it may be inappropriate to argue that this applies across West Lothian where some areas might benefit from an increase in visitors. 'There could be a risk that West Lothian is 'left behind' by neighbouring local authority areas that do use the ring-fenced funds raised through the introduction of a Visitor Levy to invest in tourism in their areas.' Mr Ness added: 'Local authorities are encouraged to conduct early engagement before entering the consultation phase. 'Although not statutory, this engagement phase is considered by the guidance to be best practice. Learning from other local authorities' areas who have undergone the process is available and this could be used to guide the process in West Lothian. 'By engaging with the tourism businesses in this collaborative fashion, it will increase understanding for the scheme amongst those who will be responsible for collecting the levy.' A council spokesperson stressed this week: 'It is important to clarify that no decision has been made on the introduction of a levy in West Lothian. 'The purpose of the consultation phase is to gather the opinions of stakeholders, including local businesses and tourism providers. 'The outcome of that consultation will be brought back to Council Executive for further consideration.' Councillor Susan Manion, the depute leader of the council who is Executive councillor for Economy Community Empowerment and Wealth Building said: 'I think it is very important that the views of the local business community and other stakeholders are heard and that councillors are able to take an informed decision based on feedback. 'Other areas in Scotland will have a visitor levy in the not-too-distant future and given the income that will be generated in these areas, I think it is sensible to explore how a visitor levy could impact, and benefit West Lothian and local residents.' Another requirement for any council setting up a levy is to establish a forum of representatives from local businesses and the community which will discuss and advise the council on matters related to the levy. The types of accommodation included within scope of the legislation are hotels, guest houses, bed and breakfast accommodation, camping sites and caravan parks. Visit Scotland has created guidance for councils and an indicative timeline for the development of a levy is thought to be two to two and a half years. The City of Edinburgh Council last month agreed to implement a 5% levy for Summer 2026. Other local authorities are considering a rate of between 2% and 4%. Highland, Glasgow, Argyll and Bute, and Aberdeen are all now in the formal consultation stage. Other councils such as East Lothian, Stirling, Dumfries & Galloway, and others have been given approval for 'early engagement' work. By Stuart Sommerville, Local Democracy Reporter Like this: Like Related

Councillor call for wider debate on Stirling school mobile phone policies
Councillor call for wider debate on Stirling school mobile phone policies

Daily Record

time40 minutes ago

  • Daily Record

Councillor call for wider debate on Stirling school mobile phone policies

The current situation allows for individual schools across the region to prepare their own policies on mobile phone usage in classrooms. Mobile phone use in schools could be debated by councillors. Individual schools across the area have their own approach to pupils' phones in their buildings and classrooms. ‌ But a rural Stirling councillor has asked when the topic could be brought before elected members for wider discussion. ‌ Last year the Scottish Government published guidance that enabled headteachers to limit or ban the use of mobile phones at their schools. But at a recent full meeting of Stirling Council, Forth and Endrick ward Conservative councillor Paul Henke asked just what such bans or limitations existing at each of the area's secondary schools. Children and young people committee convener, Labour councillor Danny Gibson, said: 'The Scottish Government published Mobiles Phones-Guidance for Schools (August 2024). 'The vision of the paper is 'to enable all schools and local authorities to develop an ethos of citizenship that leads to respectful and responsible use of mobile technology. This will encourage schools to positively embrance mobile technology to enhance learning now and in the future, whilst helping them protect staff, children and young people from the possible disruptive and harmful consequences of misuse'. 'All of Stirling Council secondary schools have reviewed their mobile phone policies in line with the national guidance. ‌ 'Each school has established a clear and consistent policy on acceptable use of mobile phones, developed in consultation with parents, carers, pupils and staff. 'While each school has tailored their policy to suit the individual context, there are several common themes across all schools.' The themes include: classroom expectations - pupils must deposit their phones in secure storage boxes upon entering the classroom or keep them on silent and stored in their school bags during lessons; use during the school day - mobile devices, including headphones earphones, must not be used during the school day, except before school starts, at break time, and at lunchtime; and responsible use - all mobile devices must be used responsibily and in accordance with the school's policy. Cllr Henke thanked the convener for the response, but further asked him to advise when a council policy covering this could be brought forward to committee for debate. Cllr Gibson said: 'I'll check with officers what the intention is in that regard and I'll advise the councillors directly.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store