Climate Change Is Helping Fuel an Urban Rat Boom
Milder winters across the Northern Hemisphere are helping rats thrive in ever denser metropolitan areas. Just a handful of warmer weeks a year in a bustling city is enough to boost rodent population growth over time, according to the study.
'That's potentially two to four extra weeks a year that they can be above ground, foraging for food, acquiring those resources that they need to actually reproduce,' said Jonathan Richardson, an assistant professor of biology at the University of Richmond and lead author of the study.
A ballooning rodent population has the potential to create added headaches for public officials already fighting infestations. Rats can damage urban infrastructure and act as a vector for disease. They also take 'a measurable toll' on the mental health of people coexisting with them, according to the study. And there's an economic cost — cities across the globe are already spending $500 million each year to try and keep the rats at bay. In New York, for example, Mayor Eric Adams has declared a ' war on rats,' appointed a rat czar tasked with rodent mitigation efforts and hosted the city's first-ever National Urban Rat Summit.
Urban centers that saw larger increases in temperature over the study periods had larger increases in rat populations, the authors found. Of the 16 cities analyzed, 11 exhibited a growing rat population, including Washington, DC, San Francisco and New York. Population density was another contributing factor to the increase in rodents with denser cities seeing greater growth.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
14 hours ago
- New York Times
454 Hints That a Chatbot Wrote Part of a Biomedical Researcher's Paper
Scientists know it is happening, even if they don't do it themselves. Some of their peers are using chatbots, like ChatGPT, to write all or part of their papers. In a paper published Wednesday in the journal Science Advances, Dmitry Kobak of the University of Tübingen and his colleagues report that they found a way to track how often researchers are using artificial intelligence chatbots to write the abstracts of their papers. The A.I. tools, they say, tend to use certain words — like 'delves,' 'crucial,' 'potential,' 'significant' and 'important' — far more often than human authors do. The group analyzed word use in the abstracts of more than 15 million biomedical abstracts published between 2010 and 2024, enabling them to spot the rising frequency of certain words in abstracts. The findings tap into a debate in the sciences over when it is and is not appropriate to use A.I. helpers for writing papers. When ChatGPT was introduced in November 2022, a collection of words started showing up with unusual frequency. Those words, the investigators report, were not used so often before the release of ChatGPT. They infer that the change in word usage is a telltale sign of A.I. In 2024, there were a total of 454 words used excessively by chatbots, the researchers report. Based on the frequency of the A.I.-favored words, Dr. Kobak and his team calculate that at least 13.5 percent of all biomedical abstracts appeared to have been written with the help of chatbots. And as many as 40 percent of abstracts by authors from some countries writing in a few less selective journals were A.I.-generated. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Bloomberg
4 days ago
- Bloomberg
There's a ‘Double-Edged Sword' in Your Stomach
It's not always obvious which of the multitude of species of bacteria riding around in us should be classified as germs and attacked, and which are essential workers that should be nurtured. One that's particularly hard to classify is H. pylori, which was the subject of the 2005 Nobel Prize for the discovery that it causes peptic ulcers. But more recent studies have connected it with benefits, including lowering the risk of esophageal cancer. In a paper published in Science Advances, researchers in Sweden described how the bacteria can inhibit the formation of amyloid deposits, which are found in the brains of individuals with Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease.
Boston Globe
5 days ago
- Boston Globe
Honey, We Shrunk the Cod
But a new study suggests that intense fishing was driving the evolution of the fish. Small, slow-growing cod gained a significant survival advantage, shifting the population toward fish that were genetically predisposed to remaining small. Today's cod are small not because the big individuals are fished out but because the fish no longer grow big. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The data, which were published Wednesday in the journal Science Advances, add to a growing body of evidence that human activities like hunting and fishing are driving the evolution of wild animals -- sometimes at lightning speed. Advertisement 'Human harvesting elicits the strongest selection pressures in nature,' said Thorsten Reusch, a marine ecologist at the GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel in Germany and an author of the new paper. 'It can be really fast that you see evolutionary change.' The imprint that humans are leaving on other species is not always quite so visible. In a second study published this week, researchers at the Field Museum of Natural History, in Chicago, reported that over the past century, increasing human development may have driven changes in the skulls of local rodents. But some of these changes were subtle, and they were not the same across species. Advertisement 'We are comparing two species in the same area that were supposedly exposed to the same pressure,' said Anderson Feijó, the assistant curator of mammals at the Field Museum and an author of the rodent study, which was published in the journal Integrative and Comparative Biology on Thursday. 'But the way they dealt is totally different, because their biology is different.' Go Fish In the new cod study, researchers studied a set of unusual biological specimens: a collection of otoliths, the tiny, bonelike structures located in the inner ear of most fish. Otoliths grow in size over the course of a fish's life, adding rings much as a tree trunk does. By examining these rings, scientists can estimate the age and growth rate of individual fish. The researchers used a newly developed chemical technique to analyze otoliths collected from Eastern Baltic cod harvested between 1996 and 2019, when the collapse of the population prompted a fishing ban. They found that fish harvested in more recent years were significantly smaller, with slower growth rates, than those from the beginning of the period. From 1996 and 2019, the average length of the cod declined by 48%. Then, the researchers sequenced and analyzed the DNA of each individual fish. For the older specimens, this was a tricky task, requiring the researchers to recover degraded DNA from otoliths that had been stored in paper bags, at room temperature, for decades. 'We had to work with a little dirt, a little slime, some blood traces that were sticking to the otoliths,' Reusch said. Advertisement Ultimately, the team identified a variety of genomic regions and variants associated with growth rate. A statistical analysis revealed that over time, these variants were changing in correlated, nonrandom ways -- suggesting that there was some external selective force acting on the genome and the population. That is a 'signal of selection,' said Kwi Young Han, a postdoctoral researcher at GEOMAR and an author of the paper. The results didn't prove that fishing is what drove this selection; warming temperatures would also be expected to favor smaller cod. But the size changes that the scientists documented far exceed what would be expected from temperature alone. The genetic changes could have long-term consequences for the population and help explain why it hasn't bounced back since the 2019 fishing ban. 'It's 2025 right now, and we don't see any big fish still,' Han said. Rodent Roundup In the second study, researchers examined hundreds of rodent specimens contained in the collection of the Field Museum of Natural History. The specimens had originally been collected from around the Chicago metropolitan area between 1898 and 2023. The scientists focused on the skulls of two species: eastern chipmunks and eastern meadow voles. Each skull was analyzed for specific characteristics, including its particular collection site and how highly developed the area was. The researchers found that over time, as Chicago grew more urban, the chipmunks' skulls became larger -- but their rows of teeth grew shorter. These seemingly opposing trends may have been driven by a change in diet, the scientists said. Urbanization, with its abundance of human food and trash, could have made it easier for chipmunks to pack on weight year round, leading to larger body sizes. At the same time, the robust teeth that helped chipmunks extract calories from nuts and seeds may have become less essential. Advertisement Voles, in contrast, did not show significant changes in skull size over time, perhaps because their more restrictive diets -- mostly grasses and other plants -- and reclusive natures made them less likely to dine on human food, Stephanie Smith, a research scientist at the Field Museum and an author of the study, said. 'Voles are kind of much more secretive,' she said. 'They're not as out-and-about and stealing people's french fries.' But their skulls showed signs of other changes. Vole skulls collected from more urban areas were flatter than those found at less developed sites. The bony structure that houses parts of the middle and inner ear -- known as the auditory bulla -- also tended to be smaller in vole skulls from urbanized areas. There is some evidence from other species that larger auditory bullae may be associated with enhanced hearing. Perhaps urban voles evolved smaller auditory bullae to help dampen the urban din, Smith said. Voles live 'down in the ground, near all of the train noises, all of the vibrations from people walking around, cars, buses, everything,' Smith said. 'So our thought here is that, potentially, this change in the auditory bulla could be related to filtering out excess sound.' It's just a hypothesis, Smith stressed, and one that requires much more study. But the findings help illustrate the enormous diversity of ways in which humans are inadvertently reshaping other species, whether out in the open ocean or in our backyards. Advertisement 'There is evolution happening everywhere, all the time,' Smith said. 'You just have to know where to look for it.' This article originally appeared in
