Justin Kelly appointed new Garda commissioner
Mr Kelly will replace Drew Harris, who is to retire after seven years as commissioner.
Mr Kelly is currently a deputy commissioner and has been appointed for five years.
Mr O'Callaghan said: 'The role of Garda commissioner is one of the most challenging and impactful leadership positions in Ireland's public service and the appointment process was suitably rigorous.
'I am satisfied that Justin Kelly is both qualified and particularly well suited to the role of commissioner, given his extensive leadership experience over the last 30 years in some of the most challenging issues facing An Garda Siochana, including national security, domestic and sexual violence, and organised crime.
'I know Justin is fully committed to providing a high-visibility, highly trusted policing service to the public.'
The selection process identified 14 candidates and included two interviews and a presentation.
Mr Kelly was selected as the preferred candidate.
Mr Harris will continue to lead the force until September, when he will retire after 41 years of service to policing across the island.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
France to deport Palestinian woman over antisemitic post featuring Hitler, halts Gaza evacuations
France is halting all evacuations of Gazans fleeing the war-torn enclave amid growing outrage over a Palestinian student allegedly reposting antisemitic content on her social media. French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot told France Info radio that the woman "must leave the country" and that she "has no place" in France. "No evacuation of any kind will take place until we have drawn the necessary conclusions from this investigation," Barrot said in the interview. He also vowed there would be a probe into how the Palestinian woman was able to get a student visa. French Interior Minister Bruno Retailleau also expressed outrage over the incident, writing on X, "Hamas propagandists have no place in our country." The now-expelled Sciences Po Lille student, who has not been identified by the French government, is accused of sharing a post with an image of Adolf Hitler that called for killing Jews. According to a screenshot shared by the Jerusalem Post, the caption of the Hitler image—when translated by Grok from Arabic to English — read: "Kill the Jews everywhere. I don't want a Jewish lineage on this earth. You must kill them before they kill you." In a thread on X, Sciences Po Lille said its administration became aware of the student's posts due to a report by Radio Monte-Carlo (RMC). The school condemned the posts, saying the content is in "direct contradiction with the values upheld by Sciences Po Lille." It added that the institution rejects antisemitism, discrimination, and incitement to hatred. "France has no obligation to host international students who glorify terrorism, crimes against humanity, or antisemitism," French Minister of Higher Education Philippe Baptiste wrote. "Whether they come from Gaza or elsewhere, international students who express or relay such views have no place in our country, nor on our soil." Baptiste also vowed that the French government would "do everything necessary to ensure that the case of the Palestinian student admitted to Sciences Po Lille, who shared extremely serious comments on social media, is handled with the utmost firmness." French President Emmanuel Macron, who recently drew the ire of the U.S. and Israel over a plan to recognize a Palestinian state, has yet to comment on the matter regarding the student. According to Macron's plan, Paris will recognize a Palestinian state in September. The country appeared to lay the groundwork for this at the United Nations earlier this week as it co-chaired a conference with Saudi Arabia. During the conference, several nations signed the "New York Declaration," which calls for Hamas to disarm and surrender control of Gaza to the Palestinian Authority. The declaration also demands that Israel evacuate its forces from the Strip. The U.S. objected to the conference before it began, with State Department Spokesperson Tammy Bruce calling it "unproductive and ill-timed." She also dismissed it as a "publicity stunt that comes in the middle of delicate diplomatic efforts to end the conflict." "As Secretary Rubio has made clear, this effort is a slap in the face to the victims of October 7th and a reward for terrorism. It keeps hostages trapped in tunnels," Bruce said. "The United States will not participate in this insult but will continue to lead real-world efforts to end the fighting and deliver a permanent peace. Our focus remains on serious diplomacy: not stage-managed conferences designed to manufacture the appearance of relevance." Israeli U.N. Ambassador Danny Danon also objected to the conference. "Israel has already agreed many times to a ceasefire. No token recognition and no UN resolution will change the basic fact that there are those in the world who fight terrorists and extremist forces and then there are those who turn a blind eye to them or resort to appeasement," Danon said in a statement.
Bloomberg
2 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Ukraine Aims to Get All EU Financial Aid Planned for This Year
Ukraine plans to get its European reform program back on track after missed deadlines prompted the European Union to cut financial aid disbursements, said Economy Minister Oleksii Sobolev. The war-torn country wants to get €12.5 billion ($14.5 billion) from the European Union under the Ukraine facility, the financial support mechanism that aims to help keep the economy afloat amid the full-scale Russian invasion well into its fourth year.
Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
HOW TRUMP'S TARIFFS THREATEN ITALY'S BELOVED WINES
Nobody wanted a trade war, but the price to avoid it is too high anyway. For everybody. The recent agreement reached by European Commission President Ursula van der Leyen and the US President Donald Trump has halved the proposed 30% tariffs on all European products, but it leaves a bitter taste in the mouths of all European manufacturers. For Italy the U.S. remains the single largest export market, accounting for 24% of its total export value in wine. In 2024, the annual turnover of Italian wine exports was approximately $9.15 billion. Once the agreement was announced, reactions were not long in Dissatisfaction Of The Wine Producers And The Minister's Concern According to the secretary general of Unione Italiana Vini Paolo Castelletti, even if a 15% tariff is lower than the proposed 30%, this kind of deal cannot be satisfying for anybody because it's extremely higher than the pre-tariff rate, which was almost zero. For a country like Italy, which prioritizes value for money, this is a devastating blow. The president of Consorzio Tutela Vini Valpolicella Christian Marchesini is of the same opinion. "Any duty or barrier on wine trade causes extremely significant damage to the European and Italian wine industry and to Valpolicella as well – claimed Marchesini - Pending the final negotiations, the 15% duty projected in the medium and long term would have a very serious economic impact. At present, we can say that, according to today's leaks, the uncertainty that will affect us until next autumn is just as serious." The Italian Minister of Agriculture Francesco Lollobrigida has always shown optimism about the deal, but now he admits: 'Wine is what concerns us most.' Meanwhile, the deadline of the 1st of August, when the tariffs should have been effective, has been delayed up to the 7th, although the 15% remains. Tariffs and Dollar Weakness Are A Dangerous Combination Recent studies by Confindustria, the main association representing Italian manufacturing and service companies, show that imposing US 15% tariffs on all Italian goods imported in America could cause Italy to lose €22.6 billion in exports (approximately $24.6 billion). The wine sector only would lose $520 million. The tariffs are not the only obstacle however, the dollar devaluation also complicates things. These two factors combined can make Italian wines less competitive than others in the US markets. Unione Italiana Vini (UIV), the Italian wine companies association, has recently raised the alarm: 15% tariffs penalize at least 80% of the sector. If in January 2025 (pre-tariff) the markup from the winery to the retailer was 123%, with the new tariff regime soars to 186%. As a result, American consumers ultimately pay almost twice the tariff rate in increased prices due to the compounding markup structure throughout the distribution chain. Not All The Wines Are Created Equal The Italian wines most affected by the new tariffs are those with the highest US market exposure: Moscato d'Asti from Piedmont (60% export) and red wines from this region (31%), Pinot Grigio (48%), Chianti Classico (46%) and other Tuscan DOC reds (35%), Prosecco (27%). Overall the new tariff regime will mostly affect the most popular wines, which are affordable to almost every pocket, more than the premium ones. Wines such as Brunello di Montalcino, Barolo, Amarone della Valpolicella, and Super Tuscans are already expensive to begin with, and therefore intended for high-spending consumers. Indeed, in this case, a bottle that was pre-tariffed and cost $25 ex-cellar, $55.75 on the retail shelf, and $150.00 at the restaurant, would now cost $71.50 in the wine shop and $195.00 at the restaurant. If you're a rich person, spending an extra $45 on an excellent Italian wine won't break the bank. Who Wins And Who Loses What has been reported so far are estimates data on behalf Italian wine producers. But what about their overseas trading partners? According to the UIV president Lamberto Frescobaldi, they and their customers could be the ones who will lose the most: 'The tariffs will not only affect consumption, but will also have a severe impact on the US economy, with total damages amounting to $25 billion' he said. This estimate was calculated by the UIV Observatory and is based on the direct, indirect, and induced impact of all wine in the US in the distribution, retail, and transportation phases alone. Wine America quantified this impact at $144.4 billion in its 'United States 2025 Economic Impact Study.' This figure includes not only sales revenues but also the value generated along the distribution chain, the positive effects of wages and the resulting purchasing power, and the increase in demand for goods and services in other related sectors. A significant effect, but one that would lose $25 billion with tariffs on wines at 15%. And things could even get worse: if nothing changes, the revenue loss could reach almost $1.7 billion in the next 12 months. At the time this article was written, there had not been a joint final statement yet, and the details of the deal remain unclear and subject to ratification. In short, the uncertainty keeps on reigning supreme. However, this can mean that perhaps there is still room for further negotiations. Any manufacturer in Europe is crossing their fingers and hoping for the best. With the current deal, it seems that the EU and the US have avoided a trade war, but despite the appearance, the price they could pay is significant for both.
