
Photograph: Courtesy Matthew Murphy
First things first: Just in Time is a helluva good time at the theater. It's not just that, but that's the baseline. Staged in a dazzling rush by Alex Timbers, the show summons the spirit of a 1960s concert at the Copacabana by the pop crooner Bobby Darin—as reincarnated by one of Broadway's most winsome leading men, the radiant sweetie Jonathan Groff, who gives the performance his considerable all. You laugh, you smile, your heart breaks a little, you swing along with the brassy band, and you're so well diverted and amused that you may not even notice when the ride you're on takes a few unconventional turns.
Unlike most other jukebox-musical sources, Darin doesn't come with a long catalogue of signature hits. If you know his work, it's probably from four songs he released in 1958 and 1959: the novelty soap bubble 'Splish Splash,' the doo-wop bop 'Dream Lover' and two European cabaret songs translated into English, 'Beyond the Sea' and 'Mack the Knife.' What he does have is a tragically foreshortened life. 'Bobby wanted nothing more than to entertain, wherever he could, however he could, in whatever time he had, which it turns out was very little,' Groff tells us at the top of the show. 'He died at 37.' Darin's bum heart—so weak that doctors thought he wouldn't survive his teens—is the musical's countdown clock; it beats like a ticking time bomb.
Just in Time | Photograph: Courtesy Matthew Murphy
Warren Leight and Isaac Oliver's agile script, suggested by an idea of Ted Chapin's, avoids the maudlin as it takes us from Darin's fatherless childhood in East Harlem through his death in 1973. The story's main figures are given dignity and wit, especially the four women: Michele Pawk as his tenderly acidulous mother; Emily Bergl as his self-abnegating sister; Gracie Lawrence as his first love, the singer Connie Francis; and Erika Henningsen as his first wife, the wholesome-movie actress Sandra Dee. The men are all played by three actors (Lance Roberts, Joe Barbara and Caesar Samayoa) in a jaunty panoply of costumes and wigs. Completing the company are the Sirens (Christine Cornish, Julia Grondin and Valeria Yamin), three leggy showgirls, bedecked in feathers and paillettes by costumer Catherine Zuber, who glitter like jewels amid the handsome Art Décolletage of Derek McLane's set; they are choreographed by Shannon Lewis, who danced 'I Gotcha' in Broadway's Fosse and has a gift for rendering glitz in motion.
Just in Time | Photograph: Courtesy Matthew Murphy
But this is really Groff's show. Just in Time transforms Circle in the Square into a swank New York nightclub—walls of Austrian curtains enfold the audience in a world of retro glamour, and twenty or so spectators sit at cabaret tables just in front of the main stage—but the effect is not so much to take us back to Darin's era as to fashion a space for the star concert we are watching in the present: Groff's. Disarmingly, Groff begins and ends the show as himself, the actor Jonathan Groff, who is starring in a Broadway show and giving you everything you could want from him. He sings! He dances! He plays the piano! He strips down to skimpy blue briefs! And, as always, he shows his work. Never let them see you sweat? Au contraire. The Darin that Just in Time serves us is slathered with Groffsauce, or at minimum liberally spattered with it. ('I'm a wet man,' Groff says upfront. 'I'm just generally extremely very wet when I do this, and I'm sorry in advance.') Some performers get flop sweat. Groff has hit sweat—it's the steam he lets off when he's cooking.
Just in Time | Photograph: Courtesy Matthew Murphy
Paradoxically, Leight and Oliver's metatheatrical framing device may be why the show succeeds so well at capturing the feeling of a Darin concert. Actor and role are telescoped into one, which changes your relationship to the performance: When you applaud the nightclub sequences, you're not just playing your part as an audience member in a recreation of a Bobby Darin concert; you're delighting in and rooting for the real-life Jonathan Groff. And Just in Time does a smart, sneaky thing in the way it approaches being a musical. The songs in the first act are what is known as diegetic; they are delivered as songs, à la Jersey Boys, that the characters perform onstage or in studios or on television. In the second act, however, as Darin romances Dee, songs start to function in the standard musical-theater way: as heightened musical expressions of characters' true thoughts and feelings. But Darin can't live that way for long. By the end, he has returned to the world of diegetic songs, the world of being only a performer.
Just in Time | Photograph: Courtesy Matthew Murphy
And so what if no real lover can match the dream lover of Darin's lyric? Maybe a fantasy love is all he wants, and maybe the fantasy self he presents as a performer is how he wants to be loved. The playboy pop star Bobby Darin, after all, was to some extent a character played by one Walden Robert Cassotto, a sickly kid desperate to get the highest return on his borrowed time. (He took his stage name from the word mandarin, but first he had to cut out the man.) Like Sunset Blvd. and , Just in Time deals with the difference between image and reality. But this show doesn't moralize about that difference. It's finally about the joy of performance, and the escapism it provides not just for an audience but for a performer as well: what it means to be a live show and, for some show people, what it means to be alive.
Just in Time. Circle in the Square (Broadway). Book by Warren Leight and Isaac Oliver. Music and lyrics by various writers. Directed by Alex Timbers. With Jonathan Groff, Gracie Lawrence, Erika Henningsen, Michele Pawk, Emily Bergl, Joe Barbara, Lance Roberts, Caesar Samayoa. Running time: 2hr 20mins. One intermission.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Wales Online
8 hours ago
- Wales Online
Live Euromillions results for Tuesday, July 1: The winning numbers from £43m draw and Thunderball
Below you'll find the winning numbers for tonight's Euromillions draw and Thunderball as they're picked. The Euromillions jackpot for Tuesday, July 1, was a huge £43m. The Euromillions draw takes place every Tuesday and Friday and a ticket costs £2.50. That includes automatic entry into the UK Millionaire Maker draw which creates new UK millionaires every week. The overall jackpot can rise to €190m (approximately £167m). If you entered the Thunderball you stand to win up to £500,000. You can check your numbers below. Good luck! How many numbers do you need to win? If you have got two numbers or one number and two lucky stars or better then you are a winner. Players must match all five main numbers and two lucky star numbers to claim the jackpot. The Thunderball draw was also made tonight and the results will also be displayed below. The Thunderball draw takes place at 8pm and the Euromillions draw takes place at around 8.15pm. In May 2022 Joe and Jess Thwaite, from Gloucester, became the UK's biggest-ever Euromillions winners after netting £184m with a lucky dip ticket. Their record did not last long, though, after another UK winner came forward in July 2022 to claim a jackpot of £195m. However they have not gone public. Prior to Mr and Mrs Thwaite's win the previous record was held by an anonymous winner who scooped £170m in October 2019. On June 4, 2021, a ticketholder in the UK scooped the £111m jackpot in the Friday-night draw, matching all seven numbers to become the country's ninth-biggest lottery winner ever at that stage. In June 2019 a single ticketholder in the UK won £123m in the Tuesday night Euromillions draw. It was the third-biggest Euromillions jackpot in the UK since the draw launched in 2004. It meant they instantly became as rich as Fifty Shades of Grey author EL James (£127m) and Led Zeppelin guitarist Jimmy Page (£125m). Euromillions is played in nine European countries. Get the results:


Scotsman
10 hours ago
- Scotsman
Fringe debut for LA-based playwright turning her prison romance into a one-woman show
American playwright and performer Laurie Magers brings her gripping solo theatre show 'Do You Accept These Charges?' to the Edinburgh Festival Fringe this summer, marking its European premiere at the Pleasance Courtyard Below from the 30th of July to the 24th of August (excluding the 12th and 18th). Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... A powerful and darkly humorous exploration of obsession, coercion, and personal reckoning, the piece pulls back the curtain on an intense real-life relationship between Magers and a man serving time in prison. Written and performed by Magers, the show opens on a prison visitation day in 2014 and spirals into a deeply personal account of a young woman who falls for—and stays with—a man she later discovers is a convicted multi-felon. What begins as a misguided romance unravels into a harrowing narrative of control, trauma, and transformation, told through a mixture of dramatic monologue, reflection, and brutal honesty. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Do You Accept These Charges? is not simply a confessional—it is an unflinching theatrical examination of intimacy under pressure. Through candid storytelling and moments of dark absurdity, Magers brings the audience into the hidden emotional terrain of someone who willingly enters a toxic dynamic and stays long after the damage becomes clear. It's a story of how desire, denial, and addiction to chaos can shape the course of a life. (c) KIM NEWMONEY The production delves into themes of love addiction, physical abuse, female sexuality, and the American prison system with both gravity and unexpected levity. From prison letters and restraining orders to stories of smuggled contraband and misplaced hope, Magers holds nothing back. The result is a raw and confrontational piece of theatre that doesn't seek redemption, but truth. Originally from the San Francisco Bay Area and now based in Los Angeles, Laurie Magers trained at the American Academy of Dramatic Arts and Upright Citizens Brigade. A former competitive poet, she's brought her writing to television through projects with Netflix, Comedy Central, and Disney+, but Do You Accept These Charges? marks her most personal and theatrical work to date. Her writing draws deeply from her upbringing as the daughter of a Filipina political activist and refugee, a background that informs her understanding of power, survival, and rebellion. Magers' stage presence is as fearless as her material, commanding the space with vulnerability and fire. In a festival known for showcasing new theatrical voices, this debut stands out for its unvarnished emotional intelligence and refusal to sanitise the truth. Do You Accept These Charges? Will be at the Pleasance Courtyard Below at 3.10pm for the month of August for tickets go to


Daily Mirror
10 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Inside the playboy princes' Royal love train where Charles had secret tryst
The Royal romance with the railways is over now that the historic train is to be axed, but it was once a favourite for princes with its nine claret-liveried carriages which boasted every luxury from baths to bedrooms KINGS and Queens have enjoyed a royal romance with the railway for almost two centuries, but now the end is signalled. Buckingham Palace accountants yesterday axed the exquisite, practical and historic Royal Train to save money. King Charles bid 'the fondest of farewells.' And so ends a love affair dating back almost to the birth of the passenger railway two hundred years ago. In November 1980, the Sunday Mirror's front page claimed it was a love train. The headline read 'Royal Love Train : Secret meetings in the sidings,' reporting two late-night trysts between Prince Charles and Lady Diana Spencer. The story told how Lady Di, aged 19, had been driven 100 miles from London before being ushered through plain-clothes police lines to meet her prince on a lonely track in the Wiltshire countryside. 'Then followed hours alone together for the couple whose friendship has captured the nation's imagination,' the report continued. A second rendezvous the following night, after Prince Charles had entertained his Duchy of Cornwall tenants in Bath as part of a West Country tour, was, allegedly, 'an open secret in the village.' Conforming with royal policy, the meetings were denied. But there is no secret about the origin of the royal romance with the railway. On 13 June 1842, Queen Victoria became the first reigning monarch to travel by train. She was 'quite charmed' with a half-hour journey on the rail-road from Windsor to London, 'free from dust and crowds and heat.' Her husband Prince Albert, was not quite so impressed with this new-fangled mode of transport, cautioning the Great Western Railway: 'Not quite so fast, next time, Mr Conductor!' But the royal family became a unique part of the railway story, reflecting the nation's highs and lows through decades of war, social unrest and crises like the Covid epidemic. It could be said that the royal train is a timetable of English history. In 1883, when the country was shaken by Irish republican terrorist dynamite outrages, a threat was made to assassinate the Queen en route from Windsor to Ballater. It might have been a hoax, but the government took no chances and 'watchers' scrutinised every inch of the 600-mile journey. Unfazed, Victoria took every opportunity to travel and be seen by her subjects, and was given the first custom-built royal train by the GWR in 1897, fitted with electric lighting and a toilet, though she demanded station stops to use the facilities. Her last journey was also made by rail, when her coffin was transported to Windsor from Paddington for burial in 1901. READ MORE: Top secret WW2 message finally revealed as codebreaker, 101, says 'we were in danger' Her successor Edward VII – the playboy prince 'Bertie' - ordered a brand-new royal saloon within a year, complete with smoking-room and a day compartment in the Colonial style. In grand Edwardian manner, he explored his kingdom at leisure, visiting the landed gentry and provincial racecourses. He was followed on the throne by the altogether more serious naval officer George V, whose reign from 1910 to 1936 took the nation through World War One, the high tide of British imperialism, the rise of socialism and fascism – and the heyday of the railway. The Midland Railway built him a new royal saloon at its Derby works. But with the onset of World War Two, a secret new design took shape. In 1941, the LMS built his successor, George VI, three armour-plated saloons with document safes, in which the reluctant but deeply-admired monarch toured bomb-damaged towns and cities across the country. Post-war austerity Britain, with the railway nationalised by Labour in 1948, was no time for regal railway extravagance, and the new Queen had to wait a quarter of a century before she was presented with her first – and the nation's last – royal train in 1977. This unique set of nine claret-liveried carriages, boasting every luxury from baths to bedrooms and a dining car seating 12, is the last word in British craftsmanship. Built at Wolverton works for her Silver Jubilee, it has lasted well, with at least one refit, for almost fifty years. In future, His Majesty will usually travel around his kingdom by helicopter or car, though few would be surprised if he joins a regular service train. He is known for enjoying a visit to the 'cab', especially if it's steam-hauled, as in 2018, behind 35028 Bulleid Pacific Clan Line, built in 1948, the year of his birth. Today's train, of seven of British Rail Mark 3 design and two built for the HST prototype, has had security significantly upgraded. But it was used only twice in the past year, at a cost of almost £78,000. Axing will save an estimated £1 million a year in upkeep and maintenance. James Chalmers, Keeper of the Privy Purse, said : 'The royal train has, of course, been a part of national life for many decades, loved and cared for by all those involved, but we must not be bound by the past.' Decommissioning begins next year, concluding in March 2027, when some particularly historic elements might go on public display. Carriages of previous royal trains, including from Queen Victoria's reign, have been on display at the National Railway Museum in York for many years, visited by well over half a million people a year. There is a powerful argument for preserving the entire train on site, as the Royal Yacht Britannia was retained for the nation in Leith harbour. Save Our Royal Train! The current set includes 'her and her lounges' - initially for the Queen and Prince Philip and now for the King and Queen Camilla, a dining car with place settings for 12, a kitchen car, bedrooms, and bathrooms with staff carriages also equipped with sleeping quarters. One 75ft carriage is for the monarch's sole use, with a 3ft wide bed topped by a tartan coverlet. The room has a bedside cabinet with a wireless permanently tuned to BBC Radio 4. Several framed landscapes by Scottish artist Roy Penny hang on the walls. The loss of the royal train will disappoint not only train-lovers but train drivers, for whom driving the Royals is a special honour. There has never been any shortage of volunteers – including, on one memorable occasion, Mick Whelan, general secretary of the train drivers' union, Aslef, called urgently to the colours, when the royal driver went sick. It has to be said that the day did not go quite as intended. Arriving at its Wolverton base from Euston, the royal train was inadvertently delayed. 'Yes, well,' Mick admitted to his union's journal. 'Some of the carriages went one way, and some another.' READ MORE: There have been other incidents, some potentially more serious. In October 2015, a member of the Royalty Protection Branch accidentally discharged his automatic pistol during an ovenight stop in South Wales. Both the Queen and Prince Philip were on board, but heard nothing and were undisturbed. Had Queen Victoria still been with us, her reaction would surely have been: 'We are not amused!' This truly has been the age of the Royal Train. Six incredible facts about the Royal Train • The Dowager Queen Adelaide, widow of King William IV, was the first royal to travel by train, from Nottingham to Leeds in July 1840 • King George VI had an armour-plated train for visits to towns and cities, targeted by the Luftwaffe in WW2 • Two special locomotives in claret livery, 67005, Queen's Messenger and 67006, Royal Sovereign, share train-haul duties • They are owned by DB Cargo – the German state railway - and operate normal goods services when not on royal duty • Royal train drivers are chosen for their experience, route knowledge, unflappability and skill – including being able to pull up the train within six inches of a designated stop • Royal author Penny Junor says the train is 'very dear to them. It's somewhere completely private, with everything they need on board.' • Paul Routledge's Mirror Book, For The Love of Trains, celebrating 200 years of travel after the first passenger train on 25 September 1825 on the Stockton and Darlington railway, is out later this year.