Views sought on future of Torbay Council
Residents can fill out the survey online until 00:00 on Sunday 10 August and paper copies will be available at all four local libraries from Friday, the council said.
The council said it had already ruled out supporting a single Devon unitary authority, whether it included Plymouth or not.Thomas said it was important the proposal was "right for Torbay" and he encouraged residents to take part in the survey."We want to continue to deliver for our people and our place," he said."We know we have challenges, but we have high aspirations."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
26 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Welfare, winter fuel payments and Trump: key markers of Labour's first year in power
The Labour party's first year in power has seen a determined and relatively successful approach to foreign policy coupled with a number of controversial domestic policies, such as the winter fuel payments and the welfare bill. One year on, we reflect on the moments that have marked the party's first 12 months in power
Telegraph
40 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Labour council bans military hardware from Armed Forces Day
A Labour-run council has banned military equipment from its Armed Forces Day over fears of causing offence. The city of York council said the kit, which could range from weapons to vehicles, would no longer be welcome at the show in light of 'residents' concerns'. Cllr Claire Douglas, the Labour member for Heworth Ward and leader of the council, insisted that the decision 'in no way diminishes how seriously we take Armed Forces Day'. But others claimed the council had caved in under pressure. Cllr Chris Steward, leader of the Conservative group, said the hardware was a 'crucial part' of Armed Forces Day. He told The Telegraph: 'What use is any military without equipment? 'We totally condemn this decision of the Labour councillors. There has been no cross-party involvement. 'It shows how far the Labour Party has fallen from a proud, patriotic party which recognised the courageous and vital job our military do, to one more concerned how their actions may offend their increasingly extreme supporters who seem to want to protest against our long-held values.' City of York council will host the Armed Forces Day celebration on Saturday to honour past, present and future members of the military community for their dedication and sacrifice. Martin Rowley, a Conservative councillor and Lord Mayor of York, told The Telegraph that decisions taken in a multi-cultural city required careful consideration. He said: 'We live in a very diverse city, a city of refuge, a city where we have Ukrainian families who have been deeply scarred by war. 'As a cosmopolitan city we have to be wary of everyone's views. They have to be considered decisions.' Cllr Michael Nicholls, another Conservative, said it was 'disappointing' that the council seemed to think it could 'pick and choose' their support for the military. He said: 'Armed Forces Day is an opportunity for us to say thank you and for the Armed Forces to show the next generation of recruits what they are all about, including the showing of equipment. 'The priority of Labour in York appears to be not to offend those opposed to our values. How sad.' Cllr Douglas said the council was a 'proud signatory of the Armed Forces Covenant' and would continue to support serving personnel, veterans and their families all year around. She said: 'With our military partners, we carefully considered residents' concerns and decided that the day will go ahead as planned, with the only change being no military equipment on show.' It is unclear whether the Sea Cadets will be able to showcase their display boat or if the Queen's Own Yeomanry will have its Jackal military vehicle and replica weapons on show. She added: 'This decision in no way diminishes how seriously we take Armed Forces Day and our deep respect and commitment to those who serve and have served. We look forward to a fantastic day'.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Ban on Palestine Action to take effect after legal challenge fails
Being a member of, or showing support for, Palestine Action will be a criminal offence from Saturday after a last-minute legal challenge to suspend the group's proscription under anti-terrorism laws failed. A ban on Palestine Action, which uses direct action to mainly target Israeli weapons factories in the UK and their supply chain, was voted through by parliament this week but lawyers acting for its co-founder Huda Ammori had sought to prevent it taking effect. After a hearing at the high court on Friday, however, Mr Justice Chamberlain declined to grant her application for interim relief. Ammori said: 'The home secretary is rushing through the implementation of the proscription at midnight tonight despite the fact that our legal challenge is ongoing and that she has been completely unclear about how it will be enforced, leaving the public in the dark about their rights to free speech and expression after midnight tonight when this proscription comes into effect.' Chamberlain said: 'I have concluded that the harm which would ensue if interim relief is refused but the claim later succeeds is insufficient to outweigh the strong public interest in maintaining the order in force.' Ammori sought permission to appeal against Chamberlain's decision in an 8pm hearing that lasted approximately one hour at the court of appeal on Friday night, in an attempt to prevent the ban coming into force. But at about 10.25pm – less than two hours before it was due to take effect – the three judges, led by the lady chief justice, Sue Carr, refused permission. It means Palestine Action will become the first direct action protest group to be banned under the Terrorism Act, placing it in the same category as Islamic State, al-Qaida and the far-right group National Action. Raza Husain KC, representing Ammori, described the proscription decision in the hearing before Chamberlain, as 'an ill-considered, discriminatory and authoritarian abuse of statutory power'. He said it was 'absurd' to label a civil disobedience direct action protest group that does not advocate violence as a terrorist organisation. 'The main target has been stopping Elbit Systems … which markets itself as the backbone of the IDF [Israel Defense Forces],' said Husain. 'As my client says: 'The aim of terrorism is to take lives and hurt people, that's the opposite of what we do.'' He said before making the decision the government had engaged with the Israeli government, Elbit Systems and pro-Israeli lobby groups, while Palestine Action and other pro-Palestine groups were not consulted. Blinne Ní Ghrálaigh KC, also representing Ammori, said what was going on in Gaza was 'an annihilation, it is a genocide' and Palestine Action was 'seeking to disrupt and prevent' UK complicity in it. Ben Watson KC, representing the home secretary, focused on the proscription procedure in his submissions. 'All of these issues, all of that evidence is supposed to go to the secretaries of state… it's only after that process, after the secretary of state has had a chance to consider … then the matter goes before Poac [the Proscribed Organisations Appeal Commission].' He said only then could the case go to the court of appeal and then, potentially, the supreme court. Watson said Palestine Action's activities met the statutory test for proscription and that if the ban took effect but the group subsequently won a judicial review against proscription it would not cause 'irreparable harm' to it. He told the court that if a temporary block was granted, it would be a 'serious disfigurement of the statutory regime'. The protest group Defend Our Juries wrote to the Met police commissioner, Mark Rowley, on Friday to tell him that it 'may be committing offences under the Terrorism Act' in Parliament Square from 1pm on Saturday. It said non-violent protesters would hold signs saying: 'I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action.' The letter said that they 'refuse to be bystanders to what's happening to the people of Palestine, who are bombed, starved and gunned down as they queue for food'. Several hundred protesters gathered, waving Palestinian flags and carrying signs saying 'Free Palestine' and 'We are all Palestine Action' outside the Royal Courts of Justice. UN experts, civil liberties groups, cultural figures and hundreds of lawyers have condemned the ban as draconian and said it sets a dangerous precedent by conflating protest with terrorism. Another hearing is scheduled for 21 July when Palestine Action will apply for permission for a judicial review to quash the order. In the meantime, and unless the judicial review is successful, membership of, or inviting support for, the group will carry a maximum sentence of 14 years in prison.
